quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Bullshit....you now have the wisdom,absent any post ,of divining my affections.
You must be all powerful as well as all full of shit

Nope, just got you confused with somebody else. My bad. Apologies. Here ya go:

>the minute you find any post of mine where I assert a need to ban and or confiscate guns,one little post...and you will have my word that I won't post on any future gun bans.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

We need serious gun control,we need to close the gun show loophole,we need an assault weapon ban,we need to outlaw large magazines,we need to micro stamp ammunition,we need to take a serious look at bio-metric technology for weapons yet to be manufactured .

K.

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Are you suggesting I can mount a working artillery piece on my lawn ?
Can that be of whatever size I can afford ?

Not if it is crew-served, I think.

But I do believe that you can still own black powder cannon. I am not sure at what size it becomes a crew served weapon, of course. But since we are talking about what you can afford. . . I would not worry about it being too big for you.

Now. . . I am not sure what you local laws regarding stuff on lawns are. [:)]

You can have more than just black powder cannons. Up to and including modern pieces. However, there are a slew of laws that have to be complied with, including permitting requirements. Both the weapon and ammunition is usually cost prohibitive. Then there is the problem of finding a range to make it go boom for you.

Crew Served usually means that it is recommended for more than one person to operate the weapon. a 2 man crew served weapon usually means one to carry ammo and some components and the other to carry less ammo and larger components (by weight). One person can usually (dependent on the weight of the ammo and components) operate most crew served weapons. Most civil war cannons were considered crew served. realigning it after fireing was hard work.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Again where is confiscation or banning guns mentioned....surely you can do better than this.
This doesn't come close to the bar I set. That's not a coincidence either,since I don't advocate either position there is little chance of you finding any post wherein I say that.
Now if what you are looking for are posts where I suggested things you don't like...well there you go .
You found it,of course it's a big swing and miss,but hey at least you are trying [:D]



p.s Hint,banning any one class,or group ,is not equal to banning guns...and is miles away from confiscation.Which is an integral part of the position that thb postulated was mine

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Bullshit....you now have the wisdom,absent any post ,of divining my affections.
You must be all powerful as well as all full of shit

Nope, just got you confused with somebody else. My bad. Apologies. Here ya go:

>the minute you find any post of mine where I assert a need to ban and or confiscate guns,one little post...and you will have my word that I won't post on any future gun bans.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

We need serious gun control,we need to close the gun show loophole,we need an assault weapon ban,we need to outlaw large magazines,we need to micro stamp ammunition,we need to take a serious look at bio-metric technology for weapons yet to be manufactured .

K.

Check and mate.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Again where is confiscation or banning guns mentioned....surely you can do better than this.
This doesn't come close to the bar I set. That's not a coincidence either,since I don't advocate either position there is little chance of you finding any post wherein I say that.
Now if what you are looking for are posts where I suggested things you don't like...well there you go .
You found it,of course it's a big swing and miss,but hey at least you are trying [:D]



p.s Hint,banning any one class,or group ,is not equal to banning guns...and is miles away from confiscation.Which is an integral part of the position that thb postulated was mine

Hint once you can ban one class of guns you just keep redefining other guns as being of that class. Not one weapon banned by the original assault weapons ban was an assault weapon but some looked like an assault weapon, close enough.
You ban armor piercing ammunition then start claiming other ammunition as armor piercing even though it does not fit the definition.
They now want to ban all 5.56 ammo because some pistol has been chambered for it, ever hear of the buffalo bison, looks like a piece maker but chambered in 45-70 government. Dwarfs the 5.56 and neither handgun has ever been used against a police officer. However if we pretend hard enough we can say it is not banning all ammo just one type of very dangerous ammo, then keep redefining other ammo as fitting in that class. Not miles from confiscation, just inches.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


Nevermind... LOL

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Are you suggesting I can mount a working artillery piece on my lawn ?
Can that be of whatever size I can afford ?

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Of course the number one threat to an American life,violence wise ,is another armed American....but why split hairs,eh ?
Unless your a child.... I've been told it's pools [:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Again where is confiscation or banning guns mentioned....surely you can do better than this.
This doesn't come close to the bar I set. That's not a coincidence either,since I don't advocate either position there is little chance of you finding any post wherein I say that.
Now if what you are looking for are posts where I suggested things you don't like...well there you go .
You found it,of course it's a big swing and miss,but hey at least you are trying [:D]



p.s Hint,banning any one class,or group ,is not equal to banning guns...and is miles away from confiscation.Which is an integral part of the position that thb postulated was mine

quote:


ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

While we are asking for links....please supply me with the link wherein I said no one in the country needs a gun.
You do that,and I will search for studies supporting my assertions.
We could make this interesting....the minute you find any post of mine where I assert a need to ban and or confiscate guns,one little post...and you will have my word that I won't post on any future gun bans.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Bullshit....you now have the wisdom,absent any post ,of divining my affections.
You must be all powerful as well as all full of shit

Nope, just got you confused with somebody else. My bad. Apologies. Here ya go:

>the minute you find any post of mine where I assert a need to ban and or confiscate guns,one little post...and you will have my word that I won't post on any future gun bans.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

We need serious gun control,we need to close the gun show loophole,we need an assault weapon ban,we need to outlaw large magazines,we need to micro stamp ammunition,we need to take a serious look at bio-metric technology for weapons yet to be manufactured .

K.

Check and mate.

Not even close....do you know how the game is played ?

quote:

can you please explain to the rest of us who are probably as dumbfounded as I am as to how kirata didn't provide evidence of your saying what it is he asserted you said. it looks pretty cut and dry to me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Of course the number one threat to an American life,violence wise ,is another armed American....but why split hairs,eh ?
Unless your a child.... I've been told it's pools [:D]

actually NO its automobiles..

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Of course the number one threat to an American life,violence wise ,is another armed American....but why split hairs,eh ?
Unless your a child.... I've been told it's pools [:D]

actually NO its automobiles..

You missed the 'violence wise' bit. Unless you're talking about automobiles deliberately used as lethal weapons.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

can you please explain to the rest of us who are probably as dumbfounded as I am as to how kirata didn't provide evidence of your saying what it is he asserted you said. it looks pretty cut and dry to me.

It seemed to me that he was calling for a ban on certain types of guns. That's pretty common, even amongst gun fans, isn't it? Or are there lots of gun fans in the USA who think that machine guns - gawd, even field guns - should be up for purchase by Joe Citizen?

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Of course the number one threat to an American life,violence wise ,is another armed American....but why split hairs,eh ?
Unless your a child.... I've been told it's pools [:D]

And I am sure you will be back with links to back that up right? Because you wouldn't spew random bullshit without some studies proving your point, right?

What a shame this guy didn't have a gun, things might have ended differently but I know that kind of thing doesn't matter. If you don't think anyone in the country needs a gun then I guess they don't.

http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2014/10/03/man-mauled-dogs-detroit/16635281/

Tell you what,rather than wasting your considerably important time finding a dog bites man story...why don't you use that time to debunk my bullshit.'
Seeing as you chose the dog bites man piece of shit story I'm guessing you can't
Another impartial post brought to us by CS's resident expert on impartiality and assorted piles of dung

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Of course the number one threat to an American life,violence wise ,is another armed American....but why split hairs,eh ?
Unless your a child.... I've been told it's pools [:D]

actually NO its automobiles..

You missed the 'violence wise' bit. Unless you're talking about automobiles deliberately used as lethal weapons.

if you don't think an auto crash is violent you've never been in one!

tell ya what, let me slam you into something solid at even just 30 MPH, forget 40, 50, 60, or higher and you tell me how VIOLENT that was!

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitYakin

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Of course the number one threat to an American life,violence wise ,is another armed American....but why split hairs,eh ?
Unless your a child.... I've been told it's pools [:D]

actually NO its automobiles..

You missed the 'violence wise' bit. Unless you're talking about automobiles deliberately used as lethal weapons.