NookieNotes -> RE: Masters asking for gifts (4/6/2015 12:50:59 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dreamlady I wasn't thinking of this in terms of D/s dynamics, but interpersonal relationships in general. It does make for a stretching of one's mind to reverse roles, and more so with thinking like your polar opposite, but it can be done if necessary, depending on personal ethos. - If I am the type of person who would never borrow money and not repay it promptly, would I lend money to a friend who is fiscally irresponsible and risk losing our friendship as a result? Why would I lose my friendship? If I know they are fiscally irresponsible and I loan them money, I'm ready to lose that money, and therefore not lose the friendship. THIS is what I mean when I say do what you're willing to do, and make sure you can afford it. quote:
ORIGINAL: dreamlady - If I were the owner of an establishment, and I would not ask one of my employees to miss his or her child's pre-planned birthday party celebration (which I had given advance notice about my unavailability that weekend day), is it reasonable of my boss to put me in that position of playing catch-up when another employee is available, capable and willing of performing these last-minute duties? Yes. Because it's your job. You are making my point. There is no way two people can think alike. I am responsible for making my own decisions, not using what I grok of someone else's behavior to determine what to do. quote:
ORIGINAL: dreamlady - If my wife had just given birth, would a considerate husband still expect her to clean house, cook meals, keep up with the laundry unassisted, and attend to my needs as she had customarily done in the past? Depends. What's your definition of a considerate husband. I know MANY cultures do not miss a beat after having birth. If I chose to marry a pan and have a child with him, then that consideration would have been discussed ahead of time. If I had an "inconsiderate husband," and still chose to have a baby (perhaps hoping to change him), I kinda deserve what I get. quote:
ORIGINAL: dreamlady - [Insert your own example here.] Even with D/s, when there is no ownership commitment, is what your Dominant-under-consideration asking of you the submissive a reasonable request under the circumstances? Man to woman, woman to man, person to person. Obviously, affordability is not the issue, because if it were, nobody would be considering giving NSA gifts to cyber Doms or overextending themselves financially in the first place. [&o] DreamLady There are plenty of things that D/s and non-D/s relationships do that are unreasonable (naked and waiting at the front door, anyone?). Each individual needs to decide what they are willing to do. And affordability does come into it. Because if my Dom has a smoking fetish, and I have asthma, I cannot afford to take up smoking... If my sub enjoys high-end clothing and expects to be taken care of, no matter how much I want to do that, I cannot afford it and will not put myself in debt for it, to compound the situation.
|
|
|
|