RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Dvr22999874 -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 5:05:47 PM)

We had the opposite experience to you CD. We have a gay friend who told his mother about it. she was a Jehovahs Witness and she went to her local witch-doctor and asked what she should do. He frothed and foamed and sputtered and said that her son was an abomination and she should cut him off from the family and never see or speak to him again. She had a better idea though. She is no longer a JW; she prays in private to whoever and is on excellent terms with her son and his long-time partner. She told us it was a great wrench to give up her religion but it would have been even harder to give up her son.




CreativeDominant -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 5:43:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


Because I'm not a hypocrite because you say I am?

I've noticed one thing with you P.S....everyone whose views differ from yours is, in your eyes, a hypocrite. That means that no matter WHAT I say...unless it lines up with your way of thinking...I'm going to be wrong. Sorry, I'd rather argue with Lucy or peon or even mike who at least come back with questions or statements from their POV without name-calling every time they do.



Did I hit a nerve........ my bad [8|]

If you wish to ignore my posts because I point out your hypocrisy, thats your choice. However, if I wish to point out your hypocrisy, thats my choice.

And...like in most cases...you'll be wrong.




lovmuffin -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 6:02:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


Because I'm not a hypocrite because you say I am?

I've noticed one thing with you P.S....everyone whose views differ from yours is, in your eyes, a hypocrite. That means that no matter WHAT I say...unless it lines up with your way of thinking...I'm going to be wrong. Sorry, I'd rather argue with Lucy or peon or even mike who at least come back with questions or statements from their POV without name-calling every time they do.



Did I hit a nerve........ my bad [8|]

If you wish to ignore my posts because I point out your hypocrisy, thats your choice. However, if I wish to point out your hypocrisy, thats my choice.

And...like in most cases...you'll be wrong.



Don't forget yer also a bigot, sexist, homophobe, Islamaphobe[8D]




Lucylastic -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 6:29:17 PM)

Nm. To early...]




thishereboi -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 6:52:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

How about "forced by their own beliefs and the beliefs of the shop owner" to go elsewhere?


How about you stop being a fucking hypocrite and just admit it is discrimination. The difference being a gay person wouldnt refuse to serve someone for being straight.

Frankly I would refuse to serve you for being an arsehole.

One point that stands out to me on this thread, is all of you tossers claiming to support "religious freedom" show very fucking little of it in your posts regards Islam.



Actually that's total bullshit. I have been in many bars that didn't allow straight men in. Just because you have never heard of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.


I bet you havent........ Although many gay bars wont let groups of drunken straight men in, for obvious reasons.

Hell, most bars where I live wont let groups of drunk straight men in, for the very same reason.



then you would lose the bet. But just for shits and giggles, tell me how many gay bars have you been to in the states?




thishereboi -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 6:53:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

If you have a problem with gays, just say so. Don't hide behind juvenile cocksucking jokes. But to answer your second question, it's pretty much a no brainer when the two guys who came in are checking out the chicks and not each other. They rarely made it to the bar before being shown the door.


If you are suggesting these two guys, imaginary as they are, were thrown out for nothing more than eyeing up the girls, I am dubious of your claims.



I wasn't suggesting it, I was stating it as fact. Now I realize you won't believe me but that's ok because I honestly don't give a shit.




Dvr22999874 -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 6:58:29 PM)

I visited a few and I have to agree with you thishereboi..................same in London, Hamburg, Koln, Buenos Aires, Sydney and a number of other places. And before you call me a liar, a hypocrite or stupid PS, yep, you could be right. Í have been called worse names in more languages and by more intelligent people than you, so it really doesn't bother me.




PeonForHer -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 8:20:34 PM)




quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Seems to me that one hand, you recognize that both sides have beliefs and freedoms and yet, on the other hand, it's still o.k. to disregard others'...as long as they're Christians...beliefs. Because "they'll get over it".


quote:

PeonForHer

It isn't OK to disregard others' freedoms and beliefs, CD. It would not be a fine and noble thing to do to send a picture of your wedding cake, with two male figurines on top, but which was made by god-fearing cake makers who thought that the cake would be for a heterosexual couple. That wouldn't be as bad a thing to do as, for instance, bullshitting yourself that you actually think gays are great but, tragically, your religion prevents you from making a cake for them ... but it would still not be a fine and noble thing to do.


quote:

CreativeDominant
Who said the Christian bakers think the gays are great? Or that they consider it a tragedy to not be able to serve them? Or...maybe they do. Sometimes, standing up for your beliefs can be tragic.


I did. As a hypothetical. And also because, of all the things that the Bible sees as undesirable, homosexuality is the one that is the focus of the cake makers' censure, along with that of a large section of the Christian Right in the USA, from what I can see. Not all, note, but a large section. Therefore the suspicion is too strong, amongst too many people, that the Bible has just been used to vindicate a preconceived dislike of homosexuals. Not gluttons, nor rich men who could never get through the 'eye of the needle' - they're fine, it seems. Just homosexuals. Until the defence against that charge of using the Bible just to vindicate a prejudice develops something more the utter feebleness that it's got now, I can't see how gay people and their supporters in cases like this are going to stop getting angry about it.

On the other hand ....

quote:

CreativeDominant:

How many gay people do you suppose have some tragedy in their lives because of their beliefs? That doesn't stop them from believing what they believe, it just makes part of their life sad. I have a cousin who's gay. His sister hasn't spoken to him since he came out 5 years ago because she believes his union with another man is wrong "in God's eyes.". She was raised in the same church I was, 30 years later when the denominations beliefs had become a lot more accepting. Yet, that's her belief. I just spent time with him and his partpartner at my nephews' wedding. I'm Christian, just as she is. But my BELIEFS disagree with hers. So...she won't see him. I will. How tragic that his own sister won't see him...but it doesn't stop him from living his belief. Or stop her from living hers. He's not wrong but neither is she.And if you don't think a man can be a Christian, disagree with other Christians beliefs but allow them to have them and live their lives accordingly, and still have gay friends, you might want to look for a certain animal on the forums. He carries something in his tagline that should indicate to you that he considers me his friend.


I'm can't understand what you think I might want to argue with, here. I know both enough gays and enough Christians to know that they have (had) their struggles, in their different ways. And just for the record, 'Christians as good people who can vary in their beliefs' is not an alien concept to me.




kdsub -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 9:01:10 PM)

Damn 26 pages…too many to read so I will just give an opinion even if already stated.

I believe a baker or florist has a right to deny service to gays according to his religion… I believe a bar or restaurant has a right to deny service to a black because of his race…I believe a mechanic has the right refuse to work on a Muslim’s car because of their religion… I believe a pharmacist can refuse to fill birth control orders or insulin just because they don‘t like the cut of their clothes… I could go on but you get my idea. It goes beyond religion I think I have the right to deny my services to anyone for any reason I please.

BUT

Only if my services are NOT open and available to the general public. Privately everyone has the right to the above but If I make a profit from the general public then I have no right to discriminate for any reason other than public health and safety. If I can’t bring myself to do it because of my religion then I should not have got into business.

If I have a private by invitation only group of friends I provide services to they can be who I choose and only who I choose…as long as I make no profit from them…. Otherwise it is discrimination and should be unlawful.

Butch




BamaD -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 9:11:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Damn 26 pages…too many to read so I will just give an opinion even if already stated.

I believe a baker or florist has a right to deny service to gays according to his religion… I believe a bar or restaurant has a right to deny service to a black because of his race…I believe a mechanic has the right refuse to work on a Muslim’s car because of their religion… I believe a pharmacist can refuse to fill birth control orders or insulin just because they don‘t like the cut of their clothes… I could go on but you get my idea. It goes beyond religion I think I have the right to deny my services to anyone for any reason I please.

BUT

Only if my services are NOT open and available to the general public. Privately everyone has the right to the above but If I make a profit from the general public than I have no right to discriminate for any reason other than public health and safety. If I can’t bring myself to do it because of my religion then I should not have got into business.

If I have a private by invitation only group of friends I provide services too they can be who I choose and only who I choose…as long as I make no profit from them…. Otherwise it is discrimination and should be unlawful.

Butch

You do realize that this means that Christians can only have a business if they deny their beliefs. Don't take this to mean that I favor discrimination because I don't. Over the years I have been discriminated against because of my religion, for being from to small a town, for being from too far north, for being white, and because of my age. But I believe in a persons right to not have to do that which violates their beliefs.




Dvr22999874 -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 9:18:43 PM)

But private clubs cater to a select few and won't let outsiders over the threshold.......I believe there are plenty in the U.S. and I KNOW there are plenty in the U.K. and Australia and I believe they make nice, fat profits too.




BamaD -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 9:20:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

But private clubs cater to a select few and won't let outsiders over the threshold.......I believe there are plenty in the U.S. and I KNOW there are plenty in the U.K. and Australia and I believe they make nice, fat profits too.

Are you suggesting it would be a good idea to run a bakery as a private club?




kdsub -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 9:24:56 PM)

quote:

You do realize that this means that Christians can only have a business if they deny their beliefs.


Yes if they make a profit from the general public... THEY have the obligation to find a business that does not deny their beliefs... the general public should not have to find a business that does not deny them of a service because of their religion, sexual orientation, or skin color... This is the very real definition of discrimination.

Butch




Dvr22999874 -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 9:25:35 PM)

Not at all.........but you said that it was okay to cater just to a select few friends as long as no profit was made. I was just wondering how that applied to private clubs that DO make a profit. I personally believe that yes, they ARE discriminating but they keep on operating somehow.




BamaD -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 9:26:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Not at all.........but you said that it was okay to cater just to a select few friends as long as no profit was made. I was just wondering how that applied to private clubs that DO make a profit. I personally believe that yes, they ARE discriminating but they keep on operating somehow.


That wasn't me.




Dvr22999874 -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 9:28:29 PM)

I apologise Bama............That was kd sub. My mistake .




BamaD -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 9:30:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

You do realize that this means that Christians can only have a business if they deny their beliefs.


Yes if they make a profit from the general public... THEY have the obligation to find a business that does not deny their beliefs... the general public should not have to find a business that does not deny them of a service because of their religion, sexual orientation, or skin color... This is the very real definition of discrimination.

Butch

So they can be discriminated against for there beliefs limiting the kind of work they can do. You know that is what the Soviets did to Christians, you can have your religion but we are going to limit your ability to make a living if they do.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 9:32:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Are you suggesting it would be a good idea to run a bakery as a private club?



This is an interesting idea and the way some bars and restaurants have circumnavigated the anti-smoking laws. They charge a small "membership fee" ($10 per year or some such) and since only members are allowed ...

I think this bears some looking into, actually and have for quite some time. I think it'll be a good idea until the PPLs manage to get the right of association removed from the constitution.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Not at all.........but you said that it was okay to cater just to a select few friends as long as no profit was made. I was just wondering how that applied to private clubs that DO make a profit. I personally believe that yes, they ARE discriminating but they keep on operating somehow.



This has to do with my previous reference of our right to free association which is enshrined in our constitution. The right to peacably assemble is absolute (until the media, Hollywood and a bunch of Pablum© pukers decide they don't like it).



Michael




kdsub -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 9:37:57 PM)

Bama as an example... Where does it say in the Bible baking bread for a gay is against the Christian Religion?... Same with a florist. But if you are against abortion because of religious reasons than DO NOT become a Pharmacists... find another business where you do not have to directly break your religious beliefs by filling birth control prescriptions.. These are individual choices that can be made without discriminating.

Butch




BamaD -> RE: Indiania can now discriminant against anyone (4/2/2015 9:42:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

I apologise Bama............That was kd sub. My mistake .

np




Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625