quote:

ORIGINAL: housebitch777

Force rules the world. It works every time its tried, whether it be military, economic or what have you. It worked for Germany, it worked for napoleon, and it worked for fdr and Reagan.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: housebitch777

Force rules the world. It works every time its tried, whether it be military, economic or what have you. It worked for Germany, it worked for napoleon, and it worked for fdr and Reagan.

It worked for Napoleon ? Are you smoking anything ?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: housebitch777
bush and blair didn't do what I have suggested and In fact have lead the isis as you have said. Their would no rebuilding iran, their would be no aid to iran after the fact, their would be nothing left of iran.
My suggestion says nothing in iran is so sacred we wont destroy it to find and kill the enemy. Nothing suggest the bushes and blairs of the world have or had the stomach for. done the way I have suggested,
the whole thing would be over in a month. The refugees fleeing into other would have would really piss off those countries.....But they would understand the consequences of being iran or nuisance to the US.

Nothing is so sacred.......... what like innocent civillians, women and children etc ? [8|]
Do you understand how the weather works, the notion of how the winds blow around the world, spreading the nuclear fallout across the Middle East and beyond ?
Yeah, bomb everyone to bits, as long as the tax payer doesnt have to pick up the bill. I just hope your simplistic bliss isnt catching, because you just dont get it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

Sanity that is honestly the most accurate thing you've ever said [:D]

Whenever I see a brainless little punk kid like you thinking he is really one to judge me, I have to laugh

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: housebitch777
bush and blair didn't do what I have suggested and In fact have lead the isis as you have said. Their would no rebuilding iran, their would be no aid to iran after the fact, their would be nothing left of iran.
My suggestion says nothing in iran is so sacred we wont destroy it to find and kill the enemy. Nothing suggest the bushes and blairs of the world have or had the stomach for. done the way I have suggested,
the whole thing would be over in a month. The refugees fleeing into other would have would really piss off those countries.....But they would understand the consequences of being iran or nuisance to the US.

Nothing is so sacred.......... what like innocent civillians, women and children etc ? [8|]
Do you understand how the weather works, the notion of how the winds blow around the world, spreading the nuclear fallout across the Middle East and beyond ?
Yeah, bomb everyone to bits, as long as the tax payer doesnt have to pick up the bill. I just hope your simplistic bliss isnt catching, because you just dont get it.

We do have non-nuclear bombs in the US, PS. Just an FYI. There doesn't have to be any "nuclear fallout."

But, I think we agree that bombing Iran isn't the right course of action.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: housebitch777
bush and blair didn't do what I have suggested and In fact have lead the isis as you have said. Their would no rebuilding iran, their would be no aid to iran after the fact, their would be nothing left of iran.
My suggestion says nothing in iran is so sacred we wont destroy it to find and kill the enemy. Nothing suggest the bushes and blairs of the world have or had the stomach for. done the way I have suggested,
the whole thing would be over in a month. The refugees fleeing into other would have would really piss off those countries.....But they would understand the consequences of being iran or nuisance to the US.

Nothing is so sacred.......... what like innocent civillians, women and children etc ? [8|]
Do you understand how the weather works, the notion of how the winds blow around the world, spreading the nuclear fallout across the Middle East and beyond ?
Yeah, bomb everyone to bits, as long as the tax payer doesnt have to pick up the bill. I just hope your simplistic bliss isnt catching, because you just dont get it.

We do have non-nuclear bombs in the US, PS. Just an FYI. There doesn't have to be any "nuclear fallout."

But, I think we agree that bombing Iran isn't the right course of action.

But you cant bomb people into oblivion with non nuclear bombs. At the end of the day non nukes only work in conjunction with troops on the ground.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: housebitch777
bush and blair didn't do what I have suggested and In fact have lead the isis as you have said. Their would no rebuilding iran, their would be no aid to iran after the fact, their would be nothing left of iran.
My suggestion says nothing in iran is so sacred we wont destroy it to find and kill the enemy. Nothing suggest the bushes and blairs of the world have or had the stomach for. done the way I have suggested,
the whole thing would be over in a month. The refugees fleeing into other would have would really piss off those countries.....But they would understand the consequences of being iran or nuisance to the US.

Nothing is so sacred.......... what like innocent civillians, women and children etc ? [8|]
Do you understand how the weather works, the notion of how the winds blow around the world, spreading the nuclear fallout across the Middle East and beyond ?
Yeah, bomb everyone to bits, as long as the tax payer doesnt have to pick up the bill. I just hope your simplistic bliss isnt catching, because you just dont get it.

We do have non-nuclear bombs in the US, PS. Just an FYI. There doesn't have to be any "nuclear fallout."
But, I think we agree that bombing Iran isn't the right course of action.

But you cant bomb people into oblivion with non nuclear bombs. At the end of the day non nukes only work in conjunction with troops on the ground.

quote:

ORIGINAL: housebitch777
I want nothing to do with another bombing campaign.....if we are that concerned with loss of life, then we should just surrender.....because our defeat all but a done deal.

quote:

ORIGINAL: housebitch777
The president gets it from congress and we go alone. and because we can.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: housebitch777
The president gets it from congress and we go alone. and because we can.

Where does Congress get the authority to invade another sovereign country?

"Because we can?!?!?"

Sorry, we have a Constitution that was written to limit the powers of the US Government so it doesn't do whatever it wants, "because [it] can." In case you've forgotten, or never learned it, one of the things we didn't care for with King George and England, was that they did stuff we didn't like "because [they could]."

quote:

ORIGINAL: housebitch777
we have invade several in the last 30 yrs....I am not talking about staying. If you think asking the UN For permission is the answer? stick it in your ear.