RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes

RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

joether -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/22/2015 2:40:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Oh FFS, read the words that YOU wrote and I bolded a few posts back. They are clear enough for all to see. Actually, that was quote. Reading skills, yanno? Stop being immature and childish. Politesub clearly understands things. You can try your typical tactics again and again; but many of us have learn from them. That out flanking your positions has become to easy of late. You typically evade direct questions, while demanding others answer yours. THAT, is being a hypocrite. You typically attack the individual when they make good points and back it up with air-tight arguments. In this exchange, Politesub "fucking PWNED your ass" to use a gamer expression! Be a gentleman and admit defeat. You can do that, right?

Gauge -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/22/2015 2:48:42 PM)
You all know the National Report is a satire site... right?

Politesub53 -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/24/2015 4:12:29 PM)
And you still dont get the what a fucking bonus is.

Lucylastic -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/24/2015 4:32:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Gauge You all know the National Report is a satire site... right? OOps I stated that wrong:) by bad, apologies Crazyml. It was a play off another "source" given in another thread. like the onion, blackcurrant, etcetc

JVoV -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/24/2015 4:35:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Gauge You all know the National Report is a satire site... right? Slow news week. We're just making shit up to fight about now. Pretty sure it's your turn.

Sanity -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/30/2015 10:42:46 AM)
FR Theyre already cheating quote: Exclusive: Britain told U.N. monitors of active Iran nuclear procurement - panel (Reuters) - Britain has informed a United Nations sanctions panel of an active Iranian nuclear procurement network linked to two blacklisted firms, according to a confidential report by the panel seen by Reuters. The existence of such a network could add to Western concerns over whether Tehran can be trusted to adhere to a nuclear deal due by June 30 in which it would agree to restrict sensitive nuclear work in exchange for sanctions relief. Talks between six major powers and Tehran are approaching the final stages after they hammered out a preliminary agreement on April 2, with Iran committing to reduce the number of centrifuges it operates and other long-term nuclear limitations. "The UK government informed the Panel on 20 April 2015 that it 'is aware of an active Iranian nuclear procurement network which has been associated with Iran's Centrifuge Technology Company (TESA) and Kalay Electric Company (KEC)'," the Panel of Experts said in its annual report. The panel monitors Iran's compliance with the U.N. sanctions regime. KEC is under U.N. Security Council sanctions while TESA is under U.S. and European Union sanctions due to their suspected links to banned Iranian nuclear activities. Iran, which is has been under sanctions for years, has a long history of illicit nuclear procurement using front companies and other methods of skirting sanctions. That has enabled it to develop a substantial atomic program in spite of aggressive international efforts to curtail it, U.N. diplomats say. But analysts and Western intelligence officials say sanctions have slowed the development of Tehran’s nuclear program. The United States and the International Atomic Energy Agency have repeatedly said that Tehran has so far complied with the terms of a limited agreement struck in November 2013 between Iran and the six powers involving some reductions in its nuclear activities, including enrichment... [img]http://media.cagle.com/62/2013/12/12/141665_600.jpg[/img]

mnottertail -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/30/2015 10:50:14 AM)
They are not cheating, nothing has been signed.

Sanity -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/30/2015 11:13:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail They are not cheating, nothing has been signed. Theyre not negotiating in good faith, or put another way their actions run contrary to their words [img]http://media.cagle.com/29/2015/04/06/162271_600.jpg[/img]

mnottertail -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/30/2015 11:18:08 AM)
What do you mean they are not negotiating in good faith? Your heros the quislings of america have already told them that we are not negotiating in good faith, and when you come to power (never) you will void it.

Sanity -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/30/2015 11:26:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail What do you mean they are not negotiating in good faith? Your heros the quislings of america have already told them that we are not negotiating in good faith, and when you come to power (never) you will void it. What do I mean... They are not negotiating in good faith My apologies, but I do not have the patience to break it down any further for you As for Congress, whose constitutional duty includes the ratification of any treaty, they simply advised Iran that John Kerry is an utter moron who out if his vast ignorance of how the United States is governed, was not negotiating in good faith Perhaps well intentioned, but an idiot (just like the president). Hardly the same thing. Not even remotely a good point

mnottertail -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/30/2015 11:39:16 AM)
But mine is true, yours as always is lying untutored slobbering. Not even close to a point. The United States and the International Atomic Energy Agency have repeatedly said that Tehran has so far complied with the terms of a limited agreement struck in November 2013 between Iran and the six powers involving some reductions in its nuclear activities, including enrichment

Politesub53 -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/30/2015 4:42:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail They are not cheating, nothing has been signed. Theyre not negotiating in good faith, or put another way their actions run contrary to their words [img]http://media.cagle.com/29/2015/04/06/162271_600.jpg[/img] The event sanity speaks of is from a year ago, he should really check his facts. That hardly comes under current negotiations.

Sanity -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/30/2015 5:12:10 PM)
Exclusive - Britain told UN monitors of active Iran nuclear procurement: panel Reuters‎ - 22 mins ago http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0NL09220150430 The article is dated today (How does it feel, to be wrong about everything that you post?)

Sanity -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/30/2015 5:57:30 PM)
Something else thats NEWS: Even more evidence that Iran cannot be trusted quote: First on CNN: Navy to escort U.S. commercial ships near Iran Washington (CNN)CNN has learned that U.S. Navy warships will now accompany U.S.-flagged commercial vessels that pass through the Strait of Hormuz due to concerns that ships from Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps navy could try to seize a U.S. cargo ship. Pentagon officials provided clarification Thursday afternoon that not every ship will necessarily be accompanied by the Navy. But this is still a significant change in the U.S. military posture in the Strait. The classified plan was approved by the Pentagon earlier Thursday, according to a senior defense official. While the Navy maintains a routine ship presence in the Persian Gulf and the North Arabian Sea, this new effort specifically requires an armed warship to be in the narrow channel between Iran and Oman when a U.S. commercial vessel passes through. The decision to go ahead with this plan comes as Iran Revolutionary Guard ships harassed a U.S.-flagged vessel, the Maersk Kensington, on Friday and then later seized another cargo ship, the Maersk Tigris, flagged in the Marshall Islands... http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/30/politics/us-navy-escort-cargo-ships-iran-strait-of-hormuz/index.html I wonder who is in worse denial. John Kerry and the rest of the Obama administration? or our resident Islamist apologists...

MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (4/30/2015 7:14:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Next Obama will be sending them lingerie. [8D] Nah, he'll let them pick out the lingerie they like. The State Department on Monday would not rule out giving Iran up to $50 billion as a so-called "signing bonus" for agreeing to a nuclear deal later this year, according to comments made to journalists following reports that the Obama administration had formulated a plan to release tens of billions of frozen Iranian funds. Experts have said this multi-billion dollar "signing bonus" option, which was first reported by the Wall Street Journal, could be the largest cash infusion to a terror-backing regime in recent memory. ~Source K. Actually the biggest cash infusion to a terror-backing regime in recent memory, was (and is) the invasion of Iraq, which saved this same terror-backing regime approximately $4Billion/yr (we are on year 12 and counting) in defense spending in it's conflict with Iraq, which was diverted into their nuclear program. (Not to mention the development of this same terror-backing regime's Pars gas field, earning (I don't know how much)). Oh and BTW: The same American company who developed this gas field FOR this terror-backing regime, DIRECTLY sold this same regime technology for uranium enrichment. Just sayin'

Politesub53 -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (5/1/2015 4:29:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Exclusive - Britain told UN monitors of active Iran nuclear procurement: panel Reuters‎ - 22 mins ago http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0NL09220150430 The article is dated today (How does it feel, to be wrong about everything that you post?) Get a fucking grip and do some research. the report may be new but the incident was from a year ago. Only one of us is happy to post outdated bullshit and claim it as being right. (And it aint me bruv)

Aylee -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (5/1/2015 6:24:38 PM)
"The UK government informed the Panel on 20 April 2015 that it 'is aware of an active Iranian nuclear procurement network which has been associated with Iran's Centrifuge Technology Company (TESA) and Kalay Electric Company (KEC)'," the Panel of Experts said in its annual report. The panel monitors Iran's compliance with the U.N. sanctions regime. And The panel also said that a U.N.-sanctioned subsidiary of the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), the Irano Hind Shipping Company (IHSC), has remained active without its assets being frozen as required under U.N. sanctions rules. The report said IHSC continues to operate two oil tankers, Amin 2 and Tour 2, which have been transporting crude oil to Syria, as recently as after September 2014. ``````` Neither of those look like a year ago.

Politesub53 -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (5/1/2015 6:42:16 PM)
quote: Britain has informed the United Nations Iranian of attempts a year ago to buy uranium enrichment technology on the black market, it was reported on Thursday. source http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/30/uk-tells-un-of-iranian-attempts-to-buy-nuclear-technology-report Like I said..... a year ago.

Lucylastic -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (5/1/2015 7:22:10 PM)
doesnt get much clearer than that

Sanity -> RE: Obama signs deal to give Iran Nukes (5/1/2015 7:25:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee "The UK government informed the Panel on 20 April 2015 that it 'is aware of an active Iranian nuclear procurement network which has been associated with Iran's Centrifuge Technology Company (TESA) and Kalay Electric Company (KEC)'," the Panel of Experts said in its annual report. The panel monitors Iran's compliance with the U.N. sanctions regime. And The panel also said that a U.N.-sanctioned subsidiary of the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), the Irano Hind Shipping Company (IHSC), has remained active without its assets being frozen as required under U.N. sanctions rules. The report said IHSC continues to operate two oil tankers, Amin 2 and Tour 2, which have been transporting crude oil to Syria, as recently as after September 2014. ``````` Neither of those look like a year ago. September was a year ago? New math? Newspeak? Nah... Just new gibberish... [;)]

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625