quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that there is any public unease about these matters. I do know that there are a lot of unsubstantiated accusations floating around, emanating from Republican minds that are anything but at ease, but that's quite a different thing.

In the absence of any proof, my guess is that the public will pay the usual amount of attention it pays to such party political jockeying and mudslinging ie it will offer a great big yawn and insist on moving onto more substantial issues. If you wish to gain the public's attention produce the proof. It would be prudent to hold your silence until such time as you can produce proof of your suspicions and allegations.

quote:

The New York Times has a report about the State Department’s decision to approve the sale of Uranium mines to a Russian company that donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Global Initiative, and that a Russian investment bank promoting the deal paid Bill $500,000 for a speech in Moscow.

quote:

ORIGINAL: electorate

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

FR

Regardless of what the report says, or when it's released, Benghazi and the email situation is going to be an election issue.

Hillary can't win without serious answers that will set the public's minds at ease. I don't think we saw that in the Congressional hearings.

I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that there is any public unease about these matters. I do know that there are a lot of unsubstantiated accusations floating around, emanating from Republican minds that are anything but at ease, but that's quite a different thing.

In the absence of any proof, my guess is that the public will pay the usual amount of attention it pays to such party political jockeying and mudslinging ie it will offer a great big yawn and insist on moving onto more substantial issues. If you wish to gain the public's attention produce the proof. It would be prudent to hold your silence until such time as you can produce proof of your suspicions and allegations.

quote:

ORIGINAL: hot4bondage

quote:

ORIGINAL: electorate

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

FR

Regardless of what the report says, or when it's released, Benghazi and the email situation is going to be an election issue.

Hillary can't win without serious answers that will set the public's minds at ease. I don't think we saw that in the Congressional hearings.

I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that there is any public unease about these matters. I do know that there are a lot of unsubstantiated accusations floating around, emanating from Republican minds that are anything but at ease, but that's quite a different thing.

In the absence of any proof, my guess is that the public will pay the usual amount of attention it pays to such party political jockeying and mudslinging ie it will offer a great big yawn and insist on moving onto more substantial issues. If you wish to gain the public's attention produce the proof. It would be prudent to hold your silence until such time as you can produce proof of your suspicions and allegations.

She lied about being shot at during her last presidential campaign. Former NBC news anchor Brian Williams may have permanently wrecked his career by telling similar tales. She wants to be leader of the free world and he wants to be seen reading from a teleprompter. Why was he held to a higher standard?

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
Regardless of what the report says, or when it's released, Benghazi and the email situation is going to be an election issue.

Hillary can't win without serious answers that will set the public's minds at ease. I don't think we saw that in the Congressional hearings.

I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that there is any public unease about these matters. I do know that there are a lot of unsubstantiated accusations floating around, emanating from Republican minds that are anything but at ease, but that's quite a different thing.

In the absence of any proof, my guess is that the public will pay the usual amount of attention it pays to such party political jockeying and mudslinging ie it will offer a great big yawn and insist on moving onto more substantial issues. If you wish to gain the public's attention produce the proof. It would be prudent to hold your silence until such time as you can produce proof of your suspicions and allegations.

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
Regardless of what the report says, or when it's released, Benghazi and the email situation is going to be an election issue.

Hillary can't win without serious answers that will set the public's minds at ease. I don't think we saw that in the Congressional hearings.

I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that there is any public unease about these matters. I do know that there are a lot of unsubstantiated accusations floating around, emanating from Republican minds that are anything but at ease, but that's quite a different thing.

In the absence of any proof, my guess is that the public will pay the usual amount of attention it pays to such party political jockeying and mudslinging ie it will offer a great big yawn and insist on moving onto more substantial issues. If you wish to gain the public's attention produce the proof. It would be prudent to hold your silence until such time as you can produce proof of your suspicions and allegations.

Every decent poll shows Clinton with a ten to fifteen point lead among the top GOP picks. Against everyone else, its anywhere from 20-50 points (yeah Santorium doesnt have a prayer). Most people like Clinton for many different reasons. If it comes down to the pick between two evils, the population will still side with Clinton. Better her than some religious nutcase, gun fucknut, or someone that wants to undermine the nation financially.

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
Regardless of what the report says, or when it's released, Benghazi and the email situation is going to be an election issue.

Hillary can't win without serious answers that will set the public's minds at ease. I don't think we saw that in the Congressional hearings.

I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that there is any public unease about these matters. I do know that there are a lot of unsubstantiated accusations floating around, emanating from Republican minds that are anything but at ease, but that's quite a different thing.

In the absence of any proof, my guess is that the public will pay the usual amount of attention it pays to such party political jockeying and mudslinging ie it will offer a great big yawn and insist on moving onto more substantial issues. If you wish to gain the public's attention produce the proof. It would be prudent to hold your silence until such time as you can produce proof of your suspicions and allegations.

Every decent poll shows Clinton with a ten to fifteen point lead among the top GOP picks. Against everyone else, its anywhere from 20-50 points (yeah Santorium doesnt have a prayer). Most people like Clinton for many different reasons. If it comes down to the pick between two evils, the population will still side with Clinton. Better her than some religious nutcase, gun fucknut, or someone that wants to undermine the nation financially.

Ah, Jees joether, your facts are really sucking here as well.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/

Maybe a week ago you were correct. Today it's 2 to 5 points while having unfavorables over 50 percent.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


You blew him completely out of the water. Beautiful. Total obliteration.

Youve appointed yourself "the decider" now

Pretty funny...

Come now sanity,the result was fairly obvious .

Certainly you see that ?


Any old cretin could

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
Regardless of what the report says, or when it's released, Benghazi and the email situation is going to be an election issue.

Hillary can't win without serious answers that will set the public's minds at ease. I don't think we saw that in the Congressional hearings.

I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that there is any public unease about these matters. I do know that there are a lot of unsubstantiated accusations floating around, emanating from Republican minds that are anything but at ease, but that's quite a different thing.

In the absence of any proof, my guess is that the public will pay the usual amount of attention it pays to such party political jockeying and mudslinging ie it will offer a great big yawn and insist on moving onto more substantial issues. If you wish to gain the public's attention produce the proof. It would be prudent to hold your silence until such time as you can produce proof of your suspicions and allegations.

Every decent poll shows Clinton with a ten to fifteen point lead among the top GOP picks. Against everyone else, its anywhere from 20-50 points (yeah Santorium doesnt have a prayer). Most people like Clinton for many different reasons. If it comes down to the pick between two evils, the population will still side with Clinton. Better her than some religious nutcase, gun fucknut, or someone that wants to undermine the nation financially.

Ah, Jees joether, your facts are really sucking here as well.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/

Maybe a week ago you were correct. Today it's 2 to 5 points while having unfavorables over 50 percent.

Yes, we can find favorable/unfavorable rating for a US Citizen that is not even in elected office right now. But can't find a steady poll for Congress. How fucked up is that?

Likewise, Clinton seems focus on figuring out what are the issues and dialogue of US Citizens. Yet those seeking the GOP nomination seem to be a one trick pony "attack Clinton". We can look at President Obama an he is handling a number of issues at once; but that Republican controlled Congress can't seem to get anything useful out the door.

We we are going to have a 'favorable/unfavorable' chart for Mrs. Clinton, we do it for all the other conservatives running for the GOP nomination. That would be fair, right? Wonder how many of those candidates are seen by the general public as 'having a clue they are on planet Earth'?

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
Regardless of what the report says, or when it's released, Benghazi and the email situation is going to be an election issue.

Hillary can't win without serious answers that will set the public's minds at ease. I don't think we saw that in the Congressional hearings.

I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that there is any public unease about these matters. I do know that there are a lot of unsubstantiated accusations floating around, emanating from Republican minds that are anything but at ease, but that's quite a different thing.

In the absence of any proof, my guess is that the public will pay the usual amount of attention it pays to such party political jockeying and mudslinging ie it will offer a great big yawn and insist on moving onto more substantial issues. If you wish to gain the public's attention produce the proof. It would be prudent to hold your silence until such time as you can produce proof of your suspicions and allegations.

Every decent poll shows Clinton with a ten to fifteen point lead among the top GOP picks. Against everyone else, its anywhere from 20-50 points (yeah Santorium doesnt have a prayer). Most people like Clinton for many different reasons. If it comes down to the pick between two evils, the population will still side with Clinton. Better her than some religious nutcase, gun fucknut, or someone that wants to undermine the nation financially.

Ah, Jees joether, your facts are really sucking here as well.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/

Maybe a week ago you were correct. Today it's 2 to 5 points while having unfavorables over 50 percent.

Yes, we can find favorable/unfavorable rating for a US Citizen that is not even in elected office right now. But can't find a steady poll for Congress. How fucked up is that?

Likewise, Clinton seems focus on figuring out what are the issues and dialogue of US Citizens. Yet those seeking the GOP nomination seem to be a one trick pony "attack Clinton". We can look at President Obama an he is handling a number of issues at once; but that Republican controlled Congress can't seem to get anything useful out the door.

We we are going to have a 'favorable/unfavorable' chart for Mrs. Clinton, we do it for all the other conservatives running for the GOP nomination. That would be fair, right? Wonder how many of those candidates are seen by the general public as 'having a clue they are on planet Earth'?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

FR

Regardless of what the report says, or when it's released, Benghazi and the email situation is going to be an election issue.

Hillary can't win without serious answers that will set the public's minds at ease. I don't think we saw that in the Congressional hearings.

Except after the dozen or so 'Benghazi' incidents under Bush makes the whole issue hyperbole and hypocrisy at its worse.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well, 'conservatives' have had over thirty years to figure out how to legislate a living minimum wage (#EPICFAIL) Nationalized healthcare for 60 (#EPICFAIL) and campaign finance reform and immigration law (#EPICFAILS) and a host of other things.(#EPICHOSTFAIL)

But you have been out here hooting for how long? What do the people of Minnesota want? Her politics has been either mechanical-wonky or New York, not national policy stuff.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

FR

Regardless of what the report says, or when it's released, Benghazi and the email situation is going to be an election issue.

Hillary can't win without serious answers that will set the public's minds at ease. I don't think we saw that in the Congressional hearings.

I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that there is any public unease about these matters. I do know that there are a lot of unsubstantiated accusations floating around, emanating from Republican minds that are anything but at ease, but that's quite a different thing.

In the absence of any proof, my guess is that the public will pay the usual amount of attention it pays to such party political jockeying and mudslinging ie it will offer a great big yawn and insist on moving onto more substantial issues. If you wish to gain the public's attention produce the proof. It would be prudent to hold your silence until such time as you can produce proof of your suspicions and allegations.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Links to polls are like flies to shit, essentially meaningless, certainly not factual.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

No, I have an excellent understanding. Who will be the President if not Hillary? You may only choose democrats, none of the clowns in the bus will be given a license to drive for years to come.

Your ignorance of reality has been demonstrated continuously and repeatedly out here.