RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty

RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Politesub53 -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 4:40:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA Double post, sorry. Tried to correct spelling of cose to Code. But would like to point out that Isreal building new apartment buildings for citizens is not claiming large swaths of land from palistinians territory. Every time Isreal does build new apartments it's all the screed about occupying more land. Ridicules. I'd like to here People who hurl "Zionist" hate mongeing address this issue. You really are blinkered about whose land the new apartments are being built on. I have called the settlement movement akin to ethnic cleansing and I stand by that. Noted. You are on record. Lmfao....... of course I am on record for criticising Israeli policies, a simple search would show you that.

HunterCA -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 4:50:02 PM)
Good, then we agree.

Politesub53 -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 4:55:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee If nothing is launched from it, then it will not be targeted. Unless you are suggesting that they SHOULD use such a thing to store and launch munitions. Utter bullshit, as proven by the shelling of UN compounds in Palestine last year. Let's see: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4549474,00.html IDF asks UN to evacuate for three days, it doesn't. Hamas starts to lob bombs at the IDF from around the UN compound. As they are often want to do from homes, schools, and mosques. IDF lob shells back at Hamas and hits UN compound. And that proves Aylee is wrong in saying if Hamas doesn't hide/shoot from the church it won't be a target how? It is quite clear the IDF did target UN compounds not being used by Hamas. Even the IDF have launched a criminal investigation. More on the IDF tactics. http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.654823

Politesub53 -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 4:56:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA Good, then we agree. No we dont agree, because you are not critical of the settler movement.

Politesub53 -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 4:59:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity The sources you choose seem to know an awful lot about propaganda. Your stupidity is showing...... The report is by ex IDF soldiers.

Sanity -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:09:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity The sources you choose seem to know an awful lot about propaganda. Your stupidity is showing...... The report is by ex IDF soldiers. Thats the claim, at least. Why do you call yourself polite btw

HunterCA -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:17:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee If nothing is launched from it, then it will not be targeted. Unless you are suggesting that they SHOULD use such a thing to store and launch munitions. Utter bullshit, as proven by the shelling of UN compounds in Palestine last year. Let's see: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4549474,00.html IDF asks UN to evacuate for three days, it doesn't. Hamas starts to lob bombs at the IDF from around the UN compound. As they are often want to do from homes, schools, and mosques. IDF lob shells back at Hamas and hits UN compound. And that proves Aylee is wrong in saying if Hamas doesn't hide/shoot from the church it won't be a target how? It is quite clear the IDF did target UN compounds not being used by Hamas. Even the IDF have launched a criminal investigation. More on the IDF tactics. http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.654823 No, we agree you're on record.

Politesub53 -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:19:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity The sources you choose seem to know an awful lot about propaganda. Your stupidity is showing...... The report is by ex IDF soldiers. Thats the claim, at least. Why do you call yourself polite btw Because I am polite. I pointed out your stupidity, since you made a stupid post about Lucys link. You best write to Hareetz and Ynetnews and inform them both you consider them to be propoganda. Why do you use the name sanity btw ?

HunterCA -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:19:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity The sources you choose seem to know an awful lot about propaganda. Your stupidity is showing...... The report is by ex IDF soldiers. Yes, and John Kerry is an ex swift boat soldier with three purple hearts.

HunterCA -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:23:10 PM)
PS, doesnt Britsin call what we call a Purple Heart a wound strip or something like that?

Politesub53 -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:25:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA No, we agree you're on record. Of course I am on fucking record, although you are starting to sound like a broken one. I have already told you that my posts on the issue can be found using the search finger. Let me be clear about this. The moderators have stated it is okay to be critical of Israeli policies. I have used my right of free speech to do just that. Not only that but you best get used to it, because I am not about to stop becuse you dont like it. Instead of trying to make some cryptic assertions about me being on record, grow a pair and state what you mean.

BamaD -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:31:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee If nothing is launched from it, then it will not be targeted. Unless you are suggesting that they SHOULD use such a thing to store and launch munitions. Utter bullshit, as proven by the shelling of UN compounds in Palestine last year. Let's see: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4549474,00.html IDF asks UN to evacuate for three days, it doesn't. Hamas starts to lob bombs at the IDF from around the UN compound. As they are often want to do from homes, schools, and mosques. IDF lob shells back at Hamas and hits UN compound. And that proves Aylee is wrong in saying if Hamas doesn't hide/shoot from the church it won't be a target how? It is quite clear the IDF did target UN compounds not being used by Hamas. Even the IDF have launched a criminal investigation. More on the IDF tactics. http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.654823 No, we agree you're on record. For a moment let us assume that PS isn't talking via his posterior. If the IDF is conducting an investigation that would imply that if INDIVIDUALS did this they did so in VIOLATION of IDF policy, otherwise a criminal investigation would make no sense.

HunterCA -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:32:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA No, we agree you're on record. Of course I am on fucking record, although you are starting to sound like a broken one. I have already told you that my posts on the issue can be found using the search finger. Let me be clear about this. The moderators have stated it is okay to be critical of Israeli policies. I have used my right of free speech to do just that. Not only that but you best get used to it, because I am not about to stop becuse you dont like it. Instead of trying to make some cryptic assertions about me being on record, grow a pair and state what you mean. PS, I'd have to go back and look, but I think you said "I'm on the record for that." And I sais okay you're on the record for that. I said it with absolutely no malice and just total harmony between us that you and I don't often get to share. And now you are really screwing up my harmonic convergence with you by being all paranoid about it. Just stop it and join me in harmonic convergence.

PeonForHer -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:32:44 PM)
quote: Thats the claim, at least. Why do you call yourself polite btw Come on. The phrase 'people living in glass houses shouldn't throw stones' mean absolutely nothing to you? Why on this god's green earth do you call yourself 'Sanity'? Is it because it's something you aspire towards - like the Knights of Legend used to aspire to finding the Holy Grail?

Politesub53 -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:34:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA PS, doesnt Britsin call what we call a Purple Heart a wound strip or something like that? Yes but it was only awarded during WW1 and WW2. There was clamour for one to be introduced in recent times but afaik nothing has been decided yet.

Politesub53 -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:37:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD For a moment let us assume that PS isn't talking via his posterior. If the IDF is conducting an investigation that would imply that if INDIVIDUALS did this they did so in VIOLATION of IDF policy, otherwise a criminal investigation would make no sense. This is what I meant by this tosser using the backs of other peoples posts to throw insults about. Read the fucking link Bama..... It is from an Israeli paper, as is Lucys.

HunterCA -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:53:54 PM)
For me personally, I learned during the Tet holiday in 1968, via news mind you, that being a civilian in a war zone often sucks. Here's and example of that: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden_in_World_War_II I personally would be butt hurt being collateral damage in a war zone. Yet, one of the big boy/girl decisions a leader must make before going into war is this worth the collateral damage to civilians. Apparently, Hamas thinks so. They actually hand out pamphlets on how to capitalize in the news with regard to civilian damage. So, frankly, I'm really not concerned when Hamas' intended practices cause their people pain. If they didn't want it, it's simple, don't shoot rockets and mortars at a country with jet military aircraft and tanks. Again, going back to big boy/girl decisions about going to war, I really don't hold anything against the IDF for trying not to, but still inflicting collateral damage. That fact that they make a pretense at all to avoid it is, to me, tactically stupid. The purpose of war is to break things and kill people. Frankly, I'm incensed that here, because of loony lefties our troops have to go into war with stupid rules. If you don't go to war with the only concern being the last fucking guy standing, don't go.

HunterCA -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:56:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA PS, doesnt Britsin call what we call a Purple Heart a wound strip or something like that? Yes but it was only awarded during WW1 and WW2. There was clamour for one to be introduced in recent times but afaik nothing has been decided yet. See! Clamour with a "u". PS, my spell check won't allow a "u" in clamour. Does yours allow it? Or does yours actually correct to it?

BamaD -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 5:58:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA For me personally, I learned during the Tet holiday in 1968, via news mind you, that being a civilian in a war zone often sucks. Here's and example of that: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden_in_World_War_II I personally would be butt hurt being collateral damage in a war zone. Yet, one of the big boy/girl decisions a leader must make before going into war is this worth the collateral damage to civilians. Apparently, Hamas thinks so. They actually hand out pamphlets on how to capitalize in the news with regard to civilian damage. So, frankly, I'm really not concerned when Hamas' intended practices cause their people pain. If they didn't want it, it's simple, don't shoot rockets and mortars at a country with jet military aircraft and tanks. Again, going back to big boy/girl decisions about going to war, I really don't hold anything against the IDF for trying not to, but still inflicting collateral damage. That fact that they make a pretense at all to avoid it is, to me, tactically stupid. The purpose of war is to break things and kill people. Frankly, I'm incensed that here, because of loony lefties our troops have to go into war with stupid rules. If you don't go to war with the only concern being the last fucking guy standing, don't go. Amen

Politesub53 -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 6:05:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: HunterCA PS, doesnt Britsin call what we call a Purple Heart a wound strip or something like that? Yes but it was only awarded during WW1 and WW2. There was clamour for one to be introduced in recent times but afaik nothing has been decided yet. See! Clamour with a "u". PS, my spell check won't allow a "u" in clamour. Does yours allow it? Or does yours actually correct to it? Some of us tend not to rely on spellcheck. How on earth did it come up with Britsin ? [;)]

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875