RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Lucylastic -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 6:18:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

For a moment let us assume that PS isn't talking via his posterior. If the IDF is conducting an investigation that would imply that if INDIVIDUALS did this they did so in VIOLATION of IDF policy, otherwise a criminal investigation would make no sense.



This is what I meant by this tosser using the backs of other peoples posts to throw insults about.

Read the fucking link Bama..... It is from an Israeli paper, as is Lucys.

Hey hon...the paper I believe was Tweaks, not mine. just setting it straight before they jump all over you*wink*




Politesub53 -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 6:20:04 PM)

Thanks........ I just cant get your cute bum out of my mind.




Lucylastic -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 6:22:17 PM)

Focus man, focus:)




Politesub53 -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 6:25:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Focus man, focus:)



Oh I was, trust me....... LOL




HunterCA -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 6:33:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Focus man, focus:)



Oh I was, trust me....... LOL




PS, she admitted to Kirata some days ago that it's not her bum.




HunterCA -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 6:40:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

PS, doesnt Britsin call what we call a Purple Heart a wound strip or something like that?


Yes but it was only awarded during WW1 and WW2. There was clamour for one to be introduced in recent times but afaik nothing has been decided yet.



See! Clamour with a "u". PS, my spell check won't allow a "u" in clamour. Does yours allow it? Or does yours actually correct to it?


Some of us tend not to rely on spellcheck. How on earth did it come up with Britsin ? [;)]




Look, PS, I already admitted my spelling sucks the high fast one. (Sorry baseball reference. I am seriously trying to learn Cricket. I've even built a Cricket pitch for the local Indian community.) Why you would expect me to know how my computer spelled Britsin, instead of Britain, is beyond me. I just assume that on a quick thread discussion forum people sorta read around the typos.




Sanity -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 6:47:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

For a moment let us assume that PS isn't talking via his posterior. If the IDF is conducting an investigation that would imply that if INDIVIDUALS did this they did so in VIOLATION of IDF policy, otherwise a criminal investigation would make no sense.


They cant keep their propaganda straight

Its not Lucy who posted the propaganda hit piece, it was tweaka. And its not an Israeli newspaper, its a hack job website

Could you imagine Hamas or Hezbollah investigating their own due to civilian casualties

(Since they purposely target civilians)

Fucking jokers




Lucylastic -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 6:52:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Thanks........ I just cant get your cute bum out of my mind.

see what I mean:) tsk tsk




BamaD -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/16/2015 7:12:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

For a moment let us assume that PS isn't talking via his posterior. If the IDF is conducting an investigation that would imply that if INDIVIDUALS did this they did so in VIOLATION of IDF policy, otherwise a criminal investigation would make no sense.


They cant keep their propaganda straight

Its not Lucy who posted the propaganda hit piece, it was tweaka. And its not an Israeli newspaper, its a hack job website

Could you imagine Hamas or Hezbollah investigating their own due to civilian casualties

(Since they purposely target civilians)

Fucking jokers

Not a prayer. Sorry I attributed the hit piece to the wrong person.




tweakabelle -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/17/2015 1:09:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

For a moment let us assume that PS isn't talking via his posterior. If the IDF is conducting an investigation that would imply that if INDIVIDUALS did this they did so in VIOLATION of IDF policy, otherwise a criminal investigation would make no sense.

Its not Lucy who posted the propaganda hit piece, it was tweaka. And its not an Israeli newspaper, its a hack job website

:
"The excerpt that I posted came from the Breaking The Silence group, a group of ex-IDF veterans whose mission statement opens with:
" Breaking the Silence is an organization of veteran combatants who have served in the Israeli military since the start of the Second Intifada and have taken it upon themselves to expose the Israeli public to the reality of everyday life in the Occupied Territories. We endeavor to stimulate public debate about the price paid for a reality in which young soldiers face a civilian population on a daily basis, and are engaged in the control of that population’s everyday life.
[....] Founded in March 2004 by a group of soldiers who served in Hebron, Breaking the Silence has since acquired a special standing in the eyes of the Israeli public and in the media, as it is unique in giving voice to the experience of soldiers. To date, the organization has collected testimonies from over a 1,000 soldiers who represent all strata of Israeli society and cover nearly all units that operate in the Territories. All the testimonies we publish are meticulously researched, and all facts are cross-checked with additional eye-witnesses and/or the archives of other human rights organizations also active in the field. Every soldier who gives a testimony to Breaking the Silence knows the aims of the organization and the interview. Most soldiers choose to remain anonymous, due to various pressures from official military persons and society at large. Our first priority is to the soldiers who choose to testify to the public about their service.

http://www.breakingthesilence.org.il/about/organization

The activists and soldiers who speak out run considerable personal risks in doing so, especially when one considers the level of militarisation of Israeli society and the esteem in which the IDF is held (rightly or wrongly) by large sections of that society.

So a " a hack job website" as you chose to put it, it most certainly isn't. "A propaganda hit piece" it most certainly isn't. Honest, credible first hand eyewtness accounts of IDF behaviour by serving IDF members and veterans it is. Groups such as Breaking the Silence ( http://www.breakingthesilence.org.il ) and Ex-combatants for Peace ( http://www.cfpeace.net/ a group I support financially) speak about the situation in Occupied Palestine and the behaviour of the IDF with authority and honesty. Their voices are far more authoritative than yours, mine or any one else posting here will ever be. They deserve to be listened to with respect.




Aylee -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/17/2015 2:47:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

PS, doesnt Britsin call what we call a Purple Heart a wound strip or something like that?


Yes but it was only awarded during WW1 and WW2. There was clamour for one to be introduced in recent times but afaik nothing has been decided yet.



Oh they do have one. The EMB.






Enemy Marksmanship Badge. [:D]




Sanity -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/17/2015 7:06:16 AM)


Thats the claim, anyway.




Sanity -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/17/2015 8:20:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Thats the claim, anyway.


(If its on the Internet its got to be true, right?) [:D]




Politesub53 -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/17/2015 4:54:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Focus man, focus:)



Oh I was, trust me....... LOL




PS, she admitted to Kirata some days ago that it's not her bum.


As long as it isn`t yours or Kiratas, I will continue to admire it, as long as thats okay ? [;)]




Politesub53 -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/17/2015 4:55:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

For a moment let us assume that PS isn't talking via his posterior. If the IDF is conducting an investigation that would imply that if INDIVIDUALS did this they did so in VIOLATION of IDF policy, otherwise a criminal investigation would make no sense.


They cant keep their propaganda straight

Its not Lucy who posted the propaganda hit piece, it was tweaka. And its not an Israeli newspaper, its a hack job website

Could you imagine Hamas or Hezbollah investigating their own due to civilian casualties

(Since they purposely target civilians)

Fucking jokers



Hack job website..... ?? Really ?




HunterCA -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/17/2015 4:56:31 PM)

Admire away ol chum.




tweakabelle -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/19/2015 9:02:43 AM)

"Israel's decision to use indiscriminate fire in heavily populated residential neighbourhoods caused the deaths of hundreds of innocent civilians in last year's Gaza war, a months-long investigation has found.

Soldiers who served in the Gaza Strip say they received orders to shoot to kill every person they saw in what the army classified a "combat sector", while being led to believe - wrongly - that the area had been cleared of civilians. In reality, the armed forces entered areas in which "innocent civilians, and sometimes even entire families, remained", the veterans' group Breaking the Silence found.

Casting "grave doubts" on the ethics of the Israel Defence Forces, the soldiers' testimonies indicate that in some cases, the military's open-fire policy was not "directly related to the combat itself or to defending the troops in the field, but rather served political and diplomatic interests", the report found.
"

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/world/israeli-soldiers-say-shoot-to-kill-orders-put-civilians-in-firing-line-20150504-1mza1r.html

The full article is well worth reading, especially if you still subscribe to the myth that the IDF carefully targets only military targets.




HunterCA -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/19/2015 9:13:07 AM)

You shoot rockets for months at people that own tanks and fighter jets, shit happens.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden_in_World_War_II

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Tokyo

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Berlin_in_World_War_II





tweakabelle -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/20/2015 1:39:27 AM)

Is appears that Zionists and their pathetic ever dwindling bunch of apologists are reduced to arguing that one massacre justifies another, that one war crime justifies another, that the mass bombing that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians in WWII justifies the mass bombing of Gaza that killed hundreds of civilians. No massacre of civilians justifies another massacre of civilians. One could be forgiven for thinking that this is IS talking, not supporters of a State that claims to be civilised

What a state of total moral bankruptcy those supporters occupy. Though it's hardly surprising that apologists for a racist State that practices ethnic cleansing and apartheid are reduced to moral bankruptcy. What morality could justify ethnic cleansing, apartheid and the slaughter of civilians?




BamaD -> RE: Vatican to Recognize Palestinian State in New Treaty (5/20/2015 4:17:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Is appears that Zionists and their pathetic ever dwindling bunch of apologists are reduced to arguing that one massacre justifies another, that one war crime justifies another, that the mass bombing that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians in WWII justifies the mass bombing of Gaza that killed hundreds of civilians. No massacre of civilians justifies another massacre of civilians. One could be forgiven for thinking that this is IS talking, not supporters of a State that claims to be civilised

What a state of total moral bankruptcy those supporters occupy. Though it's hardly surprising that apologists for a racist State that practices ethnic cleansing and apartheid are reduced to moral bankruptcy. What morality could justify ethnic cleansing, apartheid and the slaughter of civilians?

Read post 72. Though it turned out you were responsible and not ps.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625