irishbynature -> RE: How important is your dom's sexual arousal? (7/16/2006 6:21:11 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AAkasha When I dominate, it is apparent to my "victim" that I am very into what I am doing to him. He can tell because I'm totally into it (not reluctant, not confused, very direct), and depending on the "type" of domme mood I am in, sometimes even smiling and teasing him (The "awww, poor baby" syndrome). Obviously, this kind of attitude is probably enjoyed by a sub, versus a sort of reluctant, "Am I doing this right?" or "I really am not into this" mood. But then there is the other type of arousal in a scene - sexual arousal - and often I communicate that to a sub as well. It's always there anyway (In other threads about "is bdsm sexual" I know I commented that for me, sexual arousal *definitely happens*, but I am not after the almighty orgasm, I'm too wrapped up in the power rush), so often I will *show* my sub how much he is getting me wet. It's also a sinister little act in itself - there is something so wonderfully devious about the suffering of a man who cares about me resulting in a pair of very wet panties. I would assume that this kind of arousal is much more of a turn on to a sub, and also more motivating for him to "take more" for his Mistress. But is the other type pretty satisfying as well? In other words, do a lot of subs really need/want to know that their Mistress is getting "turned on" sexually by their submission, or is it rewarding enough that the Mistress is simply *really enjoying herself*? Akasha Submissively, yes to the last part. There's an intrinsic part that asks, "If he's not being pleased, then what am I not doing to please him correctly?" That can get in the way of pleasure because your mind can be replaying this question over and over ---- When a Dom communicates what pleases Him and reacts as such, then commands you to let go...it's incredible.[image]http://www.collarchat.com/image/s4.gif[/image]
|
|
|
|