RE: Netanyahoo labels BDS a "strategic threat"

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Netanyahoo labels BDS a "strategic threat"

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Netanyahoo labels BDS a "strategic threat"

Page: << < prev 7 8 9 10 [11]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Netanyahoo labels BDS a "strategic threat" - 6/18/2015 10:02:43 AM

HunterCA

Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

CreativeDominant
I want you to use something other than direct-from-BDS sources. You've yet to do so.

Dear oh dear! You can't even keep to the standard that you insist I adhere to.

You insist that I use non-partisan sources yet here you are posting from CAMERA, a well known pro-Zionist group and part of the 'Israel lobby' in the USA. Here's some of what the notoriously pro_Israel wiki has to say about CAMERA:
"The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, or CAMERA, is an American non-profit pro-Israel[2] media-monitoring, research and membership organization. According to its website, CAMERA is "devoted to promoting accurate and balanced coverage of Israel and the Middle East."[3] The group says it was founded in 1982 "to respond to the Washington Post‍ 's coverage of Israel's Lebanon incursion", and to respond to what it considers the media's "general anti-Israel bias".[4]
CAMERA is known for its pro-Israel media monitoring and advocacy."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_Accuracy_in_Middle_East_Reporting_in_America

By the standard you have unilaterally imposed on me this is a partisan pro-Zionist site. You can't even keep to your own standards. I wonder if this is best described as hypocritical or just plain dumb?

I hope you aren't expecting me to respond to some material from a Zionist propaganda site. If you can find something from a genuinely independent source, please post it.

There you go, exactly what I said. Read and immediately reject because it doesn't fit your dogma. Very poor thinking skills.

(in reply to tweakabelle)

Profile

Post #: 201

RE: Netanyahoo labels BDS a "strategic threat" - 6/18/2015 10:03:32 AM

tweakabelle

Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
Every post I've...and others have...made refuting her sources with other sources has been ignored.

In recent pages, you have twice presented 'arguments' (which basically consist of copy and paste efforts from either Zionist or pro-Zionist sources) arguing that BDS is anti-Semitic. That accusation has been dealt and refuted with at length above.

You mean Jews...right?

No I don't. By "Zionist", I was referring specifically to the zeek website cited by CD. By "pro-Zionist" I was referring specifically to the notoriously pro-Zionist wiki article on BDS also cited by CD.

Now that you know the truth in detail, I trust you will not make this offensive slur again. I have no expectation that you will actually do the right thing but go on, prove me wrong for once.

But when you are a racist, I'd expect anything that you read that wasn't gospel according to your slant to be considered not worth reading. So, why should I consider anything you post to be something other than racist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0kWAqZxJVE

The "anti-Semite" slur/trick reached its use-by date long ago you racist moron. So stick it where the monkey stuck his nuts. No doubt you are intimately familiar with that space.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 6/18/2015 10:12:41 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to HunterCA)

Profile

Post #: 202

RE: Netanyahoo labels BDS a "strategic threat" - 6/18/2015 10:16:05 AM

HunterCA

Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: HunterCA

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
Every post I've...and others have...made refuting her sources with other sources has been ignored.

In recent pages, you have twice presented 'arguments' (which basically consist of copy and paste efforts from either Zionist or pro-Zionist sources) arguing that BDS is anti-Semitic. That accusation has been dealt and refuted with at length above.

You mean Jews...right?

No I don't. By "Zionist", I was referring specifically to the zeek website cited by CD. By "pro-Zionist" I was referring specifically to the notoriously pro-Zionist wiki article on BDS also cited by CD.

Now that you know the truth in detail, I trust you will not make this offensive slur again. I have no expectation that you will actually do the right thing but go on, prove me wrong for once.

But when you are a racist, I'd expect anything that you read that wasn't gospel according to your slant to be considered not worth reading. So, why should I consider anything you post to be something other than racist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0kWAqZxJVE

The "anti-Semite" slur/trick reached its use-by date long ago you racist moron. So stick it where the monkey stuck his nuts. No doubt you are intimately familiar with that space.

There you go. I actually enjoy when you loose control, start the drama and the hate so others can see exactly what you are. Keep it up troll. Your hate is showing and it displays your racist base in this discussion.

BTW, more lies. Why are you so fixated on me?

(in reply to tweakabelle)

Profile

Post #: 203

RE: Netanyahoo labels BDS a "strategic threat" - 6/18/2015 10:39:52 AM

CreativeDominant

Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

CreativeDominant
I want you to use something other than direct-from-BDS sources. You've yet to do so.

Dear oh dear! You can't even keep to the standard that you insist I adhere to. How pathetic is that?

You insist that I use non-partisan sources yet here you are posting from CAMERA, a well known pro-Zionist group and part of the 'Israel lobby' in the USA. Here's some of what the notoriously pro_Israel wiki has to say about CAMERA:
"The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, or CAMERA, is an American non-profit pro-Israel[2] media-monitoring, research and membership organization. According to its website, CAMERA is "devoted to promoting accurate and balanced coverage of Israel and the Middle East."[3] The group says it was founded in 1982 "to respond to the Washington Post‍ 's coverage of Israel's Lebanon incursion", and to respond to what it considers the media's "general anti-Israel bias".[4]
CAMERA is known for its pro-Israel media monitoring and advocacy."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_Accuracy_in_Middle_East_Reporting_in_America

By the standard you have unilaterally imposed on me this is a partisan pro-Zionist site. You can't even keep to your own standards. I wonder if this is best described as hypocritical or just plain dumb?

I hope you aren't expecting me to respond to some material from a Zionist propaganda site. If you can find something from a genuinely independent source, please post it.

You illiterate wench.

You just prove mine...And others' point. Despite footnotes leading you to UN sources (are they pro-Israel?), documented historical sources and even some Arab sources, the fact that the piece comes from a pro-Israel site is all it takes for you to dismiss it.

Yet...you expect us to swallow every non-documented source from BDS simply because you think they're right?

This is why I and others...not all...can debate with those from the left who come with legitimate sources. You don't.

(in reply to tweakabelle)

Profile

Post #: 204

RE: Netanyahoo labels BDS a "strategic threat" - 6/18/2015 10:46:09 AM

HunterCA

Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

CreativeDominant
I want you to use something other than direct-from-BDS sources. You've yet to do so.

Dear oh dear! You can't even keep to the standard that you insist I adhere to. How pathetic is that?

You insist that I use non-partisan sources yet here you are posting from CAMERA, a well known pro-Zionist group and part of the 'Israel lobby' in the USA. Here's some of what the notoriously pro_Israel wiki has to say about CAMERA:
"The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, or CAMERA, is an American non-profit pro-Israel[2] media-monitoring, research and membership organization. According to its website, CAMERA is "devoted to promoting accurate and balanced coverage of Israel and the Middle East."[3] The group says it was founded in 1982 "to respond to the Washington Post‍ 's coverage of Israel's Lebanon incursion", and to respond to what it considers the media's "general anti-Israel bias".[4]
CAMERA is known for its pro-Israel media monitoring and advocacy."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_Accuracy_in_Middle_East_Reporting_in_America

By the standard you have unilaterally imposed on me this is a partisan pro-Zionist site. You can't even keep to your own standards. I wonder if this is best described as hypocritical or just plain dumb?

I hope you aren't expecting me to respond to some material from a Zionist propaganda site. If you can find something from a genuinely independent source, please post it.

You illiterate wench.

You just prove mine...And others' point. Despite footnotes leading you to UN sources (are they pro-Israel?), documented historical sources and even some Arab sources, the fact that the piece comes from a pro-Israel site is all it takes for you to dismiss it.

Yet...you expect us to swallow every non-documented source from BDS simply because you think they're right?

This is why I and others...not all...can debate with those from the left who come with legitimate sources. You don't.

I don't criticise for no reason. Had she ever have been reasonable I'd have treated her with respect. She doesn't deserve respect is why she gets none from me.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)

Profile

Post #: 205

RE: Netanyahoo labels BDS a "strategic threat" - 7/6/2015 7:42:04 AM

tweakabelle

Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

Another US Church votes to support the BDS movement.
The nearly 1 million-member United Church of Christ voted overwhelmingly Tuesday (June 30) to divest from companies that profit from the Israeli occupation and to boycott products of Israeli companies based in the West Bank, a move that follows a divestment vote taken by the Presbyterian Church (USA) last spring"
http://www.religionnews.com/2015/06/30/united-church-christ-votes-divest-companies-israeli-occupied-territories/

Proof that BDS is starting to change Israeli intransigence - and in doing so achieving what the UN, successive US Presidents and the condemnation of the world failed to achieve - as some of Israel's Rightwingers begin to advocate for a partial settlement freeze as a means of thwarting BDS.
"One sign that BDS, the international boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign, is working is the fact that several hard-core opponents of BDS have begun to put pressure on the Israeli government to declare a freeze on settlements outside the Israeli barrier inside the West Bank. They are talking about just a partial freeze on a 48-year project of colonization, but the pressure shows that even diehard supporters who ascribe BDS to anti-Semitism acknowledge that the Israeli occupation is aiding the international campaign to isolate the country".
http://mondoweiss.net/2015/06/supporters-partial-settlement?utm_source=Mondoweiss+List&utm_campaign=0c1218217f-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b86bace129-0c1218217f-387294778#sthash.9DbZWX8h.dpuf

It is nice to see that Isreal's Rightwingers are at last talking about settlement freezes. The Right has always been Israel's most intransignent and belligerent sector. It has taken non-violent BDS to force them to face reality. The best way to stop BDS completely is for Israel to start observing international law and change its ghastly treatment of Palestinians. That would remove BDS's raison d'etre. Until that happens, it's all onwards and upwards for BDS.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 7/6/2015 8:24:14 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to HunterCA)

Profile

Post #: 206