HunterCA
Posts: 2343
Joined: 6/21/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote:
ORIGINAL: JVoV quote:
ORIGINAL: HunterCA quote:
ORIGINAL: JVoV While I believe in Israel's right to defend itself, I do not believe it had any rights to expand outside of the borders established by the UN upon its creation, and should not continue to make settlements outside of its current borders for further expansion. I really don't see this much differently than Saddam's invasion of Kuwait. Except the expansions came from territory taken when they were attacked. That's fair. It's how we got California. No. I think we should give California back too. Except most of the expansion occurred during the 1967 war, which Israel started. And it's not fair. It's a blatant contravention of international law to acquire territory by military means. It doesn't matter who does it or why. It's a war crime. Equally the 'settlements'/colonies are another blatant contravention of international law. Another war crime and recognised as such by just about every Govt in the world. BS tweak. That's all BS. I was alive then and at the time the Golan Heigths were being used by the Arabs to fire artillery into Isreal just as the Hamas rockets are being fired from Gaza now. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1961-1968/arab-israeli-war-1967 quote:
The Prewar Crisis On May 13, 1967, Soviet officials informed the Syrian and Egyptian Governments that Israel had massed troops on Syria’s border. Though the report was false, Nasser sent large numbers of Egyptian soldiers into the Sinai anyway. On May 16, Egypt demanded that the United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF), which had been deployed in the Sinai Peninsula and the Gaza Strip since 1957, withdraw from Israel’s border. Secretary-General U Thant replied that he would have to withdraw UNEF from all its positions, including Sharm al-Shaykh, which would put political pressure on Nasser to close the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping. Nasser remained adamant, and on May 22, after UNEF withdrew, he announced that he would close the Straits. In 1957, President Dwight D. Eisenhower had promised that the United States would treat the closure of the Straits as an act of war. Johnson now had three unwelcome options: to renege on Eisenhower’s promise, acquiesce in an Israeli attack on Egypt, or order U.S. forces to reopen the waterway. Instead, the President played for time. He sought international and Congressional support for Operation Red Sea Regatta, which called for a coalition of maritime nations to send a “probing force” through the Straits if Egypt refused to grant all nations free passage through them. Simultaneously, Johnson implored the Soviets to intercede with Nasser and urged Israeli restraint. “Israel,” Johnson told Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban on May 26, “will not be alone unless it decides to go it alone.” Yet over the following week, the administration failed to gain domestic or foreign backing for “Regatta.” Meanwhile, Jordan joined the Arab coalition, heightening the pressure for an Israeli strike. Though Johnson continued to caution Israel against preemption, a number of the President’s advisors had concluded that U.S. interests would be best served by Israel “going it alone” by the time the Israelis actually did so. The War and its Aftermath Between June 5 and June 10, Israel defeated Egypt, Jordan, and Syria and occupied the Sinai Peninsula, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights. From the beginning, the United States sought a ceasefire in order to prevent an Arab defeat bad enough to force the Soviet Union to intervene. U.S. officials were also concerned about alienating pro-Western Arab regimes, especially after Egypt and several other Arab states accused the United States of helping Israel and broke diplomatic relations. Yet after June 5, the administration did not also demand an immediate Israeli pullback from the territories it had occupied. U.S. officials believed that in light of the tenuous nature of the prewar armistice regime, they should not force Israel to withdraw unless peace settlements were put into place. You have three Arab armies sitting on your border and you believe that Isreal should have waited to be attacked at the Arabs convenience. BS tweak, you're predjudice, racist and uninformed with biased drivel. And BS on your international law as well. Prior to WWI there was no such thing as Jordan, Saudi Arabia, or Syria. Everything was the Ottoman Empire. The winners of WWI made the Arab states. North Vietnam took south vietnam, Taiwan took its island from China. China swears it will get it back. China says Tibet is historically China. You're contintion that international law doesn't allow Isreal to take and keep land they won in a war and took because their neighbors were using it as a high point to lob artillery rounds into their populated area is pure BS.
|