tweakabelle
Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007 From: Sydney Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata ~ FR ~ I have no fundamental objection to shooting a person who poses a threat, regardless of whether or not he's armed. But speaking as someone who respects firearms and skill in their use, I find myself disgusted when cops, sometimes multiple officers at once, blast away like maniacs at center of mass, killing an individual who could have been taken off his feet with a leg shot. Firing at center of mass is only recommended because the torso presents a large target, i.e., because you're less likely to miss, not because it is effective. A perpetrator, particularly one who is cranked up on drugs, can take multiple center of mass hits and keep on coming, partly because the effects of internal organ damage and bleeding are not instantaneous, and partly because you haven't impaired his mobility. Where to shoot depends on circumstances and distance, but most of these incidents occur at ranges where a competent shooter has choices. Keystone Cops are funny in the movies, but not so much otherwise. K. This. It might be a surprise that we finally find some common ground on a gun-related issue, but I have to say that I agree with all the sentiments expressed above. It seems pretty clear that more training of police in the areas you've identified can only lead to positive outcomes. Chapeau!
< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 6/5/2015 5:33:14 AM >
_____________________________
|