RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Marc2b -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 8:16:52 AM)

quote:

What if you don't offer cakes celebrating gay marriage to anyone?


The question is nonsensical. Either you sell cakes or you don't sell cakes. If you sell cakes then you sell cakes to gay people as well as straight people. If you don't want to sell cakes to gay people then . . . DON'T SELL CAKES!




tweakabelle -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 8:25:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01



Just treat everyone equally and fairly. If you are not open on Sunday, due to your religious beliefs, fine. Just don't open for some people and not others. It really isn't that hard.

If you are offended by doing business with some parts of your community, then you have NO buusiness doing business in that community. That is true, whether you are gay, straight, Christtian, Musllim, or anything else.

And when, as in Oregon they drive a quarter of the way across the state to find a baker who, while they have no problem serving gays have a problem doing a gay wedding. Or are you saying that they should only be allowed to run a business if they deny there beliefs? Not putting words in your mouth, asking, because that is what it looks like.

What's the problem BamaD? It's simple - if you supply goods or services to the public you treat everyone the same. It really couln't be any simpler than that could it?

Anyways all the 'difficulties' you are raising come under existing anti-Discrimination law, not marriage law so their relevance to the SCOTUS decision and this thread is questionable.




BamaD -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 8:41:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b
No one can force you to perform a service that you don't offer. But if you do offer a service then you must offer it to everyone equally. It is about the people, not the cakes and steaks.


What if you don't offer cakes celebrating gay marriage to anyone?


If you don't have a topper that is two grooms or one that is two brides you can't offer that service, can you?




Marc2b -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 8:57:05 AM)

quote:

If you don't have a topper that is two grooms or one that is two brides you can't offer that service, can you?


THEN BUY ONE!!!!!!

(for fuck's sake)





Zonie63 -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 9:01:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b
No one can force you to perform a service that you don't offer. But if you do offer a service then you must offer it to everyone equally. It is about the people, not the cakes and steaks.


What if you don't offer cakes celebrating gay marriage to anyone?



That would mean not doing wedding cakes at all. Which is certainly an option, too.




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 9:03:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

CreativeDominant
We are all equal under the law now. But what does that entail? Can I go into a Muslim or Jewish restaurant and demand pork...their beliefs be damned? Can I demand that a vegan caterer serve filet mignon at my wedding and have the weight of the law on my side?


What is it about "We are all equal under the law now" that causes you so much difficulty? Are you against everyone being equal under the law?

It's a really simple concept - just treat everyone the same. What could possibly be wrong with that? Why are you manufacturing difficulties?
Great...then I want to see gay couples going into a Muslim bakery and asking for a gay wedding cake...I want to see carnivorous couples going to a vegan caterer and asking them to serve filet mignon at a group meeting.

That's equality, right? Everyone treated equally, no matter their beliefs? I seriously doubt that the vegan caterer's beliefs are any deeper than the Christian couple forced to pay $ 135,000.00 for acting upon their beliefs. Or that the Muslim's beliefs are any deeper than the Christians.


First of all, gay couples should absolutely be able to go into a Muslim bakery and ask for a cake for theiir wedding.

Secondly, a caterer (vegan or not) who doesn't cater any meat dishes is under NO obligation to cater meat dishes for anyone (carniverous or not), as long as he/she does nott pick and choose for whom he/she will cater meat dishes.

Just treat everyone equally and fairly. If you are not open on Sunday, due to your religious beliefs, fine. Just don't open for some people and not others. It really isn't that hard.

If you are offended by doing business with some parts of your community, then you have NO buusiness doing business in that community. That is true, whether you are gay, straight, Christtian, Musllim, or anything else.

And when, as in Oregon they drive a quarter of the way across the state to find a baker who, while they have no problem serving gays have a problem doing a gay wedding. Or are you saying that they should only be allowed to run a business if they deny there beliefs? Not putting words in your mouth, asking, because that is what it looks like.


Back to the denying beliefs thing again.

In general, (and this is codified in law in a plethora of communities, (a point which I had to teach Hunter), if you are open for business to the public, you can't discriminate, even for your own religious beliefs. Should there be some exceptions? Yes. (e.g. HOSTING events, private clubs, and truly religious organizations (which are in effect, private clubs).

If you are devout in your religion, and certain customers, offend you, (NOT because they are disruptive, or abuusive, or intoxicated), but solely because of their characteristics (age, gender, race, sexual orientation), then you need to get out of serving the public, or not get in.

Will gay people drive across the state to try and bait people? Maybe. (I throw them on the pile of a-holes of society). The law, in many places, (and IMO American values dictate) says that you need to treat people equally and fairly.

It's NOT just a question of free market. (We had that argument in '65 over the civil rights act) "You can go across the street to someone else."

Even if you could "go across the street (or nearby) to another business. The Civil Rights Argument (which won) said that you shouldn't have to. That there was a MINIMUM standard of interaction with all customers.

Public Accomodations Laws simply add "Sexual Orientation" to thhe list of criteria in the Civil Riights Act.


What if you lived in a small town, and I had the best gourmet sandwiches in the county, and everyone liked to go to my store. (Basically the whole town). You come into my store for lunch with your co-workers, and I say "I am sorry, I can't serve you. My deeply held religious beliefs prevent me from serving anyone who has been affiliated with a German Shepherd. You will have to leave. But you can go to the McDonald's in the next town (5 mins away). They will serve German Shepherd lovers like you."?

If you complain, I can say "It's a free market. There are other places to eat."


The Bottom line is this: The Federal Government (supported largely by Republicans (against Dixiecrats) has said (they left out sexual orientation in the CRA), and huundreds of local goovernments have said, (and I agree), that a business owner serving the public has a fiduciary duty to the public to treat everyone fairly. If your religious beliefs are so hateful and discriminatory, that you can't even make someone a sandwich, just because you don't appprove of his/her characteristcs, then you should remain a private citizen and not serve the publc (OR, as you put it, deny your beliefs)

Again, there are, and should be some exceptions. (Maybe there should be more exceptions. As long as they are reasonable, and the rules are clear)




Zonie63 -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 9:07:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

If you don't have a topper that is two grooms or one that is two brides you can't offer that service, can you?


THEN BUY ONE!!!!!!

(for fuck's sake)


I like this one:

[image]http://images.weddingcollectibles.com/T/Romance-Gay-Lesbian-Wedding-Cake-Topper-CLONE.jpg[/image]




Aylee -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 10:26:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

CreativeDominant
We are all equal under the law now. But what does that entail? Can I go into a Muslim or Jewish restaurant and demand pork...their beliefs be damned? Can I demand that a vegan caterer serve filet mignon at my wedding and have the weight of the law on my side?


What is it about "We are all equal under the law now" that causes you so much difficulty? Are you against everyone being equal under the law?

It's a really simple concept - just treat everyone the same. What could possibly be wrong with that? Why are you manufacturing difficulties?
Great...then I want to see gay couples going into a Muslim bakery and asking for a gay wedding cake...I want to see carnivorous couples going to a vegan caterer and asking them to serve filet mignon at a group meeting.

That's equality, right? Everyone treated equally, no matter their beliefs? I seriously doubt that the vegan caterer's beliefs are any deeper than the Christian couple forced to pay $ 135,000.00 for acting upon their beliefs. Or that the Muslim's beliefs are any deeper than the Christians.


First of all, gay couples should absolutely be able to go into a Muslim bakery and ask for a cake for theiir wedding.

Secondly, a caterer (vegan or not) who doesn't cater any meat dishes is under NO obligation to cater meat dishes for anyone (carniverous or not), as long as he/she does nott pick and choose for whom he/she will cater meat dishes.

Just treat everyone equally and fairly. If you are not open on Sunday, due to your religious beliefs, fine. Just don't open for some people and not others. It really isn't that hard.

If you are offended by doing business with some parts of your community, then you have NO buusiness doing business in that community. That is true, whether you are gay, straight, Christtian, Musllim, or anything else.

And when, as in Oregon they drive a quarter of the way across the state to find a baker who, while they have no problem serving gays have a problem doing a gay wedding. Or are you saying that they should only be allowed to run a business if they deny there beliefs? Not putting words in your mouth, asking, because that is what it looks like.


Back to the denying beliefs thing again.

In general, (and this is codified in law in a plethora of communities, (a point which I had to teach Hunter), if you are open for business to the public, you can't discriminate, even for your own religious beliefs. Should there be some exceptions? Yes. (e.g. HOSTING events, private clubs, and truly religious organizations (which are in effect, private clubs).

If you are devout in your religion, and certain customers, offend you, (NOT because they are disruptive, or abuusive, or intoxicated), but solely because of their characteristics (age, gender, race, sexual orientation), then you need to get out of serving the public, or not get in.

Will gay people drive across the state to try and bait people? Maybe. (I throw them on the pile of a-holes of society). The law, in many places, (and IMO American values dictate) says that you need to treat people equally and fairly.

It's NOT just a question of free market. (We had that argument in '65 over the civil rights act) "You can go across the street to someone else."

Even if you could "go across the street (or nearby) to another business. The Civil Rights Argument (which won) said that you shouldn't have to. That there was a MINIMUM standard of interaction with all customers.

Public Accomodations Laws simply add "Sexual Orientation" to thhe list of criteria in the Civil Riights Act.


What if you lived in a small town, and I had the best gourmet sandwiches in the county, and everyone liked to go to my store. (Basically the whole town). You come into my store for lunch with your co-workers, and I say "I am sorry, I can't serve you. My deeply held religious beliefs prevent me from serving anyone who has been affiliated with a German Shepherd. You will have to leave. But you can go to the McDonald's in the next town (5 mins away). They will serve German Shepherd lovers like you."?

If you complain, I can say "It's a free market. There are other places to eat."


The Bottom line is this: The Federal Government (supported largely by Republicans (against Dixiecrats) has said (they left out sexual orientation in the CRA), and huundreds of local goovernments have said, (and I agree), that a business owner serving the public has a fiduciary duty to the public to treat everyone fairly. If your religious beliefs are so hateful and discriminatory, that you can't even make someone a sandwich, just because you don't appprove of his/her characteristcs, then you should remain a private citizen and not serve the publc (OR, as you put it, deny your beliefs)

Again, there are, and should be some exceptions. (Maybe there should be more exceptions. As long as they are reasonable, and the rules are clear)



Except that making a sandwich does not require artistic ability and design. Wedding cake making and photography does. "We're from the government and we are here to tell you what your artistic expression will be."




MasterJaguar01 -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 10:35:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Except that making a sandwich does not require artistic ability and design. Wedding cake making and photography does. "We're from the government and we are here to tell you what your artistic expression will be."


I would disagree. My hypothetical sandwich shop requires the utmost artistic ability and culinary design.

And as for your hypothetical quote:

"We're from the government and we are here to tell you what your artistic expression will be."

It should be: "We're from the government, and you are free to express yourself artistically, in any way you see fit." But if you are in a business, SELLING your art, you have to treat everyone equally. More specifically, if you are taking contracts to make NEW art, as a service, you have to treat everyone equally."

I ccould support an exemption directly supporting weddings, as long as the rules were clearly defined.




Lucylastic -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 10:42:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
IF You go to a vegan caterer, and demand steak
more idiot you.
Dietary restrictions may well be allied with religious issues, veganism is a strongly held belief, and handling meat is a religious dietary restriction as old as the hills and religion. BUT baking a cake is not a dietary restriction in ANY religion...as far as I know.






Except at times when leavening agents are forbidden.

Very true, and noted, but on the other hand .....when leavening agents restrict all baking, it restricts all customers....[:)]




Real0ne -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 11:09:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

Back to the denying beliefs thing again.

In general, (and this is codified in law in a plethora of communities, (a point which I had to teach Hunter), if you are open for business to the public, you can't discriminate, even for your own religious beliefs. Should there be some exceptions? Yes. (e.g. HOSTING events, private clubs, and truly religious organizations (which are in effect, private clubs).

If you are devout in your religion, and certain customers, offend you, (NOT because they are disruptive, or abuusive, or intoxicated), but solely because of their characteristics (age, gender, race, sexual orientation), then you need to get out of serving the public, or not get in.

Will gay people drive across the state to try and bait people? Maybe. (I throw them on the pile of a-holes of society). The law, in many places, (and IMO American values dictate) says that you need to treat people equally and fairly.

It's NOT just a question of free market. (We had that argument in '65 over the civil rights act) "You can go across the street to someone else."

Even if you could "go across the street (or nearby) to another business. The Civil Rights Argument (which won) said that you shouldn't have to. That there was a MINIMUM standard of interaction with all customers.

Public Accomodations Laws simply add "Sexual Orientation" to thhe list of criteria in the Civil Riights Act.


What if you lived in a small town, and I had the best gourmet sandwiches in the county, and everyone liked to go to my store. (Basically the whole town). You come into my store for lunch with your co-workers, and I say "I am sorry, I can't serve you. My deeply held religious beliefs prevent me from serving anyone who has been affiliated with a German Shepherd. You will have to leave. But you can go to the McDonald's in the next town (5 mins away). They will serve German Shepherd lovers like you."?

If you complain, I can say "It's a free market. There are other places to eat."


The Bottom line is this: The Federal Government (supported largely by Republicans (against Dixiecrats) has said (they left out sexual orientation in the CRA), and huundreds of local goovernments have said, (and I agree), that a business owner serving the public has a fiduciary duty to the public to treat everyone fairly. If your religious beliefs are so hateful and discriminatory, that you can't even make someone a sandwich, just because you don't appprove of his/her characteristcs, then you should remain a private citizen and not serve the publc (OR, as you put it, deny your beliefs)

Again, there are, and should be some exceptions. (Maybe there should be more exceptions. As long as they are reasonable, and the rules are clear)



the government is the public 'serving' the people.

Private parties are self serving and in business to make money to put food on the table.

Issuing a permit or license to supply commercial goods and services does not include doing business with anyone for any reason, caveat unless for instance you are the water or electric company (monopoly).

gun dealers selling rocket launchers and DU tipped rounds to anyone who demands them state side comes to mind.

Unless there is an 'bonafide' PRE-agreement between the issuing state and the proprietor while it may be somewhere within the governments jurisdiction (had people even voted it in) it would be a violation of rights to demand what and to whom someone sells.

Reserved rights in substance trump state issued privileges.

What we see is the continual destruction of the 'individuals' religion and forced acceptance of the 'state' religion as a result of court rulings in violation of rights.

Private parties have the full right to sell or not sell anything to someone based on their right to EXERCIZE their religious. That is what exercize means. 'Acting' upon. Putting your religions beliefs into action.

Now on the other hand, where you have things like the news media and even for instance discussion forums that advertise a quasi-public legal standing providing a platform for 'free-speech' for instance, and they make the legal determination that something is in violation of hate or free speech law, or news organizations where people depend on accurate information, or likewise fully public government agencies now we have a different story since they clearly provide a public or quasi-public function.


That fiduciary duty is fulfilled when the business owner equally rejects serving everyone who violates their religious beliefs.

OR are you saying that the government has the right to dictate internal policy or private proprietors without a legitimate agreement or jurisdiction outside government based religion?











Real0ne -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 11:28:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

What if you don't offer cakes celebrating gay marriage to anyone?


The question is nonsensical. Either you sell cakes or you don't sell cakes. If you sell cakes then you sell cakes to gay people as well as straight people. If you don't want to sell cakes to gay people then . . . DON'T SELL CAKES!



That is the government forcing someones political and religions beliefs upon another, an in addition disrupting your right to intercourse (commercial-see the articles of confederation)

The only thing legalizing gay marriage has done is to force "government" the 3rd party interloper to acknowledge the contract.

Remember this country was created out of english law based on pure hereditary property rights complete with dowery's and the whole ball of wax only a short 100 years ago which required intimate government intervention to enforce.

Meantime there were government agreements under social security etc and other entitlements that would not transfer in a gay marriage because again they were not recognized.

Its all about money, entitlements and property from the gubmint side.

Other than the gubmint feet dragging gays had no problem creating a marriage nest no different from anyone else.

I read the thread and as usual virtually all the posts seem to miss the core arguments.




MercTech -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 12:10:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

What if you don't offer cakes celebrating gay marriage to anyone?


The question is nonsensical. Either you sell cakes or you don't sell cakes. If you sell cakes then you sell cakes to gay people as well as straight people. If you don't want to sell cakes to gay people then . . . DON'T SELL CAKES!


Actually, other than by equal housing laws, is there a law that requires a business owner to contract business with someone they don't want to do business with?
There is a right of refusal when it comes to commerce.

A business owner has a right to be a bigoted SOB.




JVoV -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 12:39:17 PM)

I'm not sure how the Supreme Court would rule on the issue of gay wedding cakes.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurley_v._Irish-American_Gay,_Lesbian,_and_Bisexual_Group_of_Boston

quote:

"One important manifestation of the principle of free speech is that one who chooses to speak may also decide what not to say".
...
Souter wrote that the Council could not statutorily be prohibited from excluding the messages of groups it did not agree with, nor could it be forced to endorse a message against its will.




Marc2b -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 12:42:52 PM)

quote:

Actually, other than by equal housing laws, is there a law that requires a business owner to contract business with someone they don't want to do business with?
There is a right of refusal when it comes to commerce.

A business owner has a right to be a bigoted SOB.


No actually, they don't.

Here is an interesting article that summarizes things nicely.

It is interesting to note that, while Friday's ruling is a major leap forward for gay rights, it is still actually legal to discriminate against gays in parts of the United States. Something we might forget in our jubilation.

Clearly much work needs to be done.

ETA: Actually, to clarify, business owners have the right to be bigoted, they just don't have the right to act bigoted.

Most of the time.

The fight continues.





WinsomeDefiance -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 12:57:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
IF You go to a vegan caterer, and demand steak
more idiot you.
Dietary restrictions may well be allied with religious issues, veganism is a strongly held belief, and handling meat is a religious dietary restriction as old as the hills and religion. BUT baking a cake is not a dietary restriction in ANY religion...as far as I know.






Except at times when leavening agents are forbidden.

Very true, and noted, but on the other hand .....when leavening agents restrict all baking, it restricts all customers....[:)]


It would seem unreasonable to deny all lovers of cake the pleasure of eating cake because leavening agents are forbidden.
I guess it would be unleavened crackers for all.




Zonie63 -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 12:57:47 PM)

FR

I must say that I find it absurdly amusing that bakeries have become some kind of moral battleground these days. All this hullabaloo over a fucking cake. I've never worked in a bakery, but I now have this picture in my mind of a place full of religious fanatics on some kind of crusade against sin (where those who eat Pop Tarts and Twinkies would be considered "heretics"). They seem to believe it a mortal sin if they bake a cake for a gay wedding.

Does their "No cake for you" philosophy apply to other sins as well?

If a guy goes into a bakery and says that he covets thy neighbor's wife, would they then have a moral obligation to not sell him any cake?




JVoV -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 12:57:54 PM)

Water cannons... Probably not as much fun as it sounds, even as hot as it is today.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/turkish-police-water-cannons-clear-gay-pride-rally-32085459

ISTANBUL — Turkish police used water cannons and tear gas against gay pride marchers trying to rally in Istanbul's central square on Sunday, forcing the thousands of demonstrators to gather several blocks away.

Between 100 and 200 protesters were chased away from Taksim Square as they began gathering in the late afternoon. Police hemmed the demonstrators into a small corner of the square and then fired several jets of water to force them down a side street. The Dogan News Agency says rubber pellets were also used.

Within minutes, the noisy but otherwise peaceful rally restarted a few blocks away and grew to several thousand people as the day wore on. An Associated Press reporter at the scene occasionally smelled tear gas, but there didn't appear any further attempt by police to interfere with the protest.

It's not clear why police prevented the rally from gathering at Taksim, a traditional focal point for protests. Turkey is one of only a few Muslim countries not to ban homosexuality, although homophobia remains widespread.




DesideriScuri -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 2:08:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b
quote:

What if you don't offer cakes celebrating gay marriage to anyone?

The question is nonsensical. Either you sell cakes or you don't sell cakes. If you sell cakes then you sell cakes to gay people as well as straight people. If you don't want to sell cakes to gay people then . . . DON'T SELL CAKES!


You didn't answer the question, Marc. If a bakery doesn't make wedding cakes celebrating gay weddings for anyone, they shouldn't be forced to sell one to anyone. It's not just about some cake, but about a wedding cake. If a bakery refuses to sell chocolate cake as a wedding cake, but will sell chocolate cakes otherwise, should they be forced to sell chocolate cakes as wedding cakes?




DesideriScuri -> RE: SCOTUS rules gay marriage legal in all states! (6/28/2015 2:10:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b
No one can force you to perform a service that you don't offer. But if you do offer a service then you must offer it to everyone equally. It is about the people, not the cakes and steaks.

What if you don't offer cakes celebrating gay marriage to anyone?

That would mean not doing wedding cakes at all. Which is certainly an option, too.


While it is an option, not decorating a cake to celebrate a gay wedding does not mean you can't decorate a cake for a heterosexual wedding.




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625