Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/15/2015 11:43:47 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
And even if Carter only handed Iran over to the mullahs on a silver platter due to sheer stupidity and incompetence, it is still he who installed the religious fanatics there into power


You misspelled "Reagan."

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/15/2015 11:45:24 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Remember, it was St Wrinklemeat that gave WMD to Iran, not Obama.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/15/2015 11:50:59 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
http://www.ijreview.com/2015/07/368173-bill-clintons-boast-after-striking-nuke-deal-with-north-koreans-now-seems-eerily-familiar/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=Owned&utm_term=conservativedaily&utm_campaign=Politics

Now I understand why MS Clinton like the deal

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/15/2015 12:09:20 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Uh, you see any nukes in North Korea?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/15/2015 3:23:24 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Obama and Kerrys fantastic deal -

quote:

What we get:

- Iran reduces by about half the number of centrifuges actively enriching uranium

- Iran reduces its stockpile of enriched uranium from about five tons to 300 kilograms

- Iran repurposes its heavy water reactor in Arak so it does not produce plutonium

- An unspecified increase in inspections by the IAEA

What Iran gets:

Sanctions relief:

- Almost every type of U.S., EU, and UN sanctions lifted

- Repeal of six UN Security Council resolutions declaring the Iranian nuclear program illegal

- Top IRGC and Quds Force terrorists removed from the sanctions list, including Qassem Suleimani, leader of Iran’s campaign against U.S. soldiers in Iraq, and Ahmad Vahidi, mastermind of the 1994 Jewish community center bombing in Argentina that killed 85 people

- The removal from the sanctions list of approximately 800 people and legal entities, including 23 out of 24 Iranian banks

- $100 to $150 billion to be unfrozen and given to Iran with no restrictions on its use to purchase arms and fund terrorism, including funding for Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Assad regime in Syria

Nuclear program:

- Iran keeps every one of its nuclear centrifuges

- Iran keeps its entire physical nuclear infrastructure, including the enrichment facilities at Fordow and Natanz and the nuclear reactor at Bushehr

- Iran permitted to continue research and development on all of its advanced centrifuge designs, reducing nuclear breakout time at the end of the deal to weeks

- Iran permitted to transition its allowed enrichment of uranium from older centrifuge designs to advanced designs

- No “anywhere, anytime” inspections. Iran can delay inspection of any site for at least 24 days

- No requirement that Iran fully disclose past nuclear weapons research and development (known as the PMD issue)

- The P5+1 western powers pledge to collaborate with Iran on nuclear technology

- Restrictions on enrichment – part of the “sunset” of the deal – are lifted after eight years

- If Iran is thought to have violated the deal, in order to “snap back” sanctions a dispute resolution process must be undertaken that can last two and a half months, after which the matter can be referred to the UN Security Council. At the UNSC, the re-imposition of sanctions can be vetoed by Russia, which stands to earn billions of dollars from arms sales to a non-sanctioned Iran.

Concessions unrelated to nuclear program:

- Ballistic missile embargo lifted after eight years


- Conventional arms embargo lifted after five years

- Iran keeps U.S. hostages


With leaders like this who needs enemies

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/15/2015 3:56:48 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Obama and Kerrys fantastic deal -

quote:

What we get:

- Iran reduces by about half the number of centrifuges actively enriching uranium

- Iran reduces its stockpile of enriched uranium from about five tons to 300 kilograms

- Iran repurposes its heavy water reactor in Arak so it does not produce plutonium

- An unspecified increase in inspections by the IAEA

What Iran gets:

Sanctions relief:

- Almost every type of U.S., EU, and UN sanctions lifted

- Repeal of six UN Security Council resolutions declaring the Iranian nuclear program illegal

- Top IRGC and Quds Force terrorists removed from the sanctions list, including Qassem Suleimani, leader of Iran’s campaign against U.S. soldiers in Iraq, and Ahmad Vahidi, mastermind of the 1994 Jewish community center bombing in Argentina that killed 85 people

- The removal from the sanctions list of approximately 800 people and legal entities, including 23 out of 24 Iranian banks

- $100 to $150 billion to be unfrozen and given to Iran with no restrictions on its use to purchase arms and fund terrorism, including funding for Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Assad regime in Syria

Nuclear program:

- Iran keeps every one of its nuclear centrifuges

- Iran keeps its entire physical nuclear infrastructure, including the enrichment facilities at Fordow and Natanz and the nuclear reactor at Bushehr

- Iran permitted to continue research and development on all of its advanced centrifuge designs, reducing nuclear breakout time at the end of the deal to weeks

- Iran permitted to transition its allowed enrichment of uranium from older centrifuge designs to advanced designs

- No “anywhere, anytime” inspections. Iran can delay inspection of any site for at least 24 days

- No requirement that Iran fully disclose past nuclear weapons research and development (known as the PMD issue)

- The P5+1 western powers pledge to collaborate with Iran on nuclear technology

- Restrictions on enrichment – part of the “sunset” of the deal – are lifted after eight years

- If Iran is thought to have violated the deal, in order to “snap back” sanctions a dispute resolution process must be undertaken that can last two and a half months, after which the matter can be referred to the UN Security Council. At the UNSC, the re-imposition of sanctions can be vetoed by Russia, which stands to earn billions of dollars from arms sales to a non-sanctioned Iran.

Concessions unrelated to nuclear program:

- Ballistic missile embargo lifted after eight years


- Conventional arms embargo lifted after five years

- Iran keeps U.S. hostages


With leaders like this who needs enemies


Sanity, without this deal, everything could have headed towards war. Do you want that? Would you put yourself forward to fight in it? I mean, I know you ultra-righties are all muscular types who are gung-ho for some gung-ho physical action and stuff, whereas us lefties are all bit namby-pamby and limp-wristed ... but would you *really* be up for some blood-and-guts fighting out in the ME? Or if not you, your kids, or the kids of your friends and relatives?

What is your alternative to this deal? Please do say - the rest of us are dying to hear. Spell out how, in your view, it *should have gone*. Mmmh?

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/15/2015 4:40:15 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Uh, you see any nukes in North Korea?

Yep, so did the Iranians and want some of those.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/15/2015 4:47:38 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: epiphiny43

Given their history with the US from our installation of the Shah's almost US puppet regime (Anyone here actually pay attention to history?) their antagonism is fully comprehend able, and maybe mild given the past. The US also supplied the military equipment and trained the Shah's security and interrogation services, reputedly one of the most violent in a violent region. Who the CIA was under cover when they could have effective camouflage?? One of many black parts of the Cold War. As Churchill noted, the worst evil of dictatorships is that democracies feel forced to imitate them to survive.

With all that, peace requires peoples and governments to engage, not snarl at each other and do the utmost to demonize each other domestically and internationally. I'm seeing the mass of Iranians looking hopefully to a period of peace and growth after a far more turbulent and violent period than any sane person could wish for their children and family. Hopefully this counterbalances the crazies willing to see cultural and mass obliteration as a price worth paying to oppose Israel.
Those on the Right who are upset by Any negotiations of substance (Meaning the Iranians get anything besides humiliation.) have to remember peace is only arranged by the brave. Anger and hostility are the primary outward signs of fear. Be the change you want to see in the world. We have had enough centuries of fear determining the course of nations and peoples. Way past time to let the intramural disputes among humans have a rest while we try to save the only planet worth living on.


Weird how leftists keep going back to the Shah. "But the Shah! The Shah!" The Shah was a cream puff compared to the un-elected monsters who Carter installed, and who leftists seem to worship. Would you like to be interrogated by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard?

Iranian women under the Shah:



They could work, go to school, have a life.

Iranian women now:

quote:

...women lack the ability to choose their husbands, have no independent right to education after marriage, no right to divorce, no right to child custody, have no protection from violent treatment in public spaces, are restricted by quotas for women's admission at universities, and are arrested, beaten, and imprisoned for peacefully seeking change of such laws.



Iran - Women are number one enemies of mullahs

The Revolutionary Guard represents "liberal" ideals in so many ways...

Gay Iranians Forced to Surgically Change Gender

And the Mullahs are openly laughing about how they won.



The terms of this deal are terrible

The American citizens who are being held in Iran arent mentioned, the centrifuges keep spinning, there are no clear terms about unannounced inspections... The list goes on and on.


The Shah was a murderous, brutal despot installed by Eisenhower. (not elected) The geopolitics of the world (including the US) couldn't care less about elections even when some nasty people come to power via a revolution in which Carter had no role.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/15/2015 7:58:31 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2347
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline
I'll say this about the deal.

1) It's a bad deal (Why? Because it frees up billions of dollars for Iran to aid Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations)
2) It's the best option out of some very crappy options

Thanks to the DISASTROUS foreign policy of the past administration (basically freeing up funding for Iran's nuclear program), AND the former VP selling nuclear technology to Iran. (Yes, in this case, most definitely, we are where we are, thanks to the last administration), we now have 3 choices.

1) Negotiate this deal, keeping Iran from building a bomb for a decade, and allowing inspections beyond that
2) Keep applying sanctions (albeit unilaterally moving forward (as the Russians and Europeans are pulling out), and therefore, largely ineffective), while Iran continues to enrich uranium to a larger and larger degree, and become a nuclear power in 5 years
3) All out invasion of Iran

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/16/2015 7:03:09 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

CNN's Dana Bash and Don Lemon criticized CBS News' Major Garrett Wednesday for asking President Obama how the White House could hail its nuclear deal with Tehran even as four Americans are being held prisoner by Iran.

"I've been a White House reporter," Bash said after the White House press briefing Wednesday. "You know what it's like to stand up and ask the president a question — and you do want to be tough."

"But there's a fine line, especially standing in the East Room — a fine line between asking a tough question and maybe crossing that line a little bit, and maybe being disrespectful. So I think that that happened there," she added.


http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/cnn-reporters-journalist-was-out-of-line-asking-obama-about-american-hostages/article/2568357

Don't ask Obama questions

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/16/2015 4:18:10 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
More a case of telling the reporter dont be a prick and asked barbed questions. To insinuate Obama is okay with Americans being held hostage is laughable. It is also worth remembering it wasnt just the US and Iran in the talks and it was vital a solution was found.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/16/2015 4:36:04 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
Ken - That is because it is racist to ask those tough questions.

How they came to this conclusion, I really have no idea.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/16/2015 5:27:04 PM   
epiphiny43


Posts: 688
Joined: 10/20/2006
Status: offline
It was a cheap shot to get TV exposure and ignored the reality on the ground in Iran where there are many groups not under the control of the negotiators, including the Quds Guards. Nations don't rest the survival of whole populations and nations on a few still living prisoners, or everyone would be paralyzed, captive to every group with weapons and foreigners to kidnap. US air crew and Special Forces loses in just initial reconnaissance before any realistic planning for action could easily far outnumber the current Living prisoners. And most likely already has. How fortunate the US is that policy people think more deeply than many forum posters.
Russia's contrasting response pattern hasn't been any more effective, usually charging in guns blazing and killing most of the captives and all the armed opponents. Not effective against 'martyrs'? All their rebellious Muslim regions are still active if not increasingly militant, besides the exhausted Chechens.
Russia also is obviously benefiting from observing the shit the US stepped in, by Not obviously chasing Islamic groups supporting militant activities in their country across sovereign borders of other countries. What they do under effective cover may be quite different. However, it isn't working particularly well, from reports all over the Islamic post-USSR region.

< Message edited by epiphiny43 -- 7/16/2015 5:29:07 PM >

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/16/2015 7:30:53 PM   
Marini


Posts: 3629
Joined: 2/14/2010
Status: offline
I am not going to pretend, that I fully understand the agreement reached on the Iran nuclear program.

I do not feel good about, the parts of the "deal" that I do understand.

I wonder, what is the rush?
Why can't we have several "deals" on the table?

I mean, we are talking about IRAN here.

Here is a great article from NPR.
From NPR-- "From the Middle East, IRAN Deal called big MISTAKE"

If this turns out to be a "big mistake" many countries/including US might be royally screwed.

< Message edited by Marini -- 7/16/2015 7:48:16 PM >


_____________________________

As always, To EACH their Own.
"And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. "
Nelson Mandela
Life-long Democrat, not happy at all with Democratic Party.
NOT a Republican/Moderate and free agent

(in reply to epiphiny43)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/16/2015 11:47:33 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/16/top-obama-official-admits-that-iran-will-likely-use-sanctions-money-to-fund-terror-video/

When we unfreeze the money to Iran (assuming it is done) then according to questions from CNN Wolf Blitzer the white house admits it could go to fund terrorists. Watch the video.

(in reply to Marini)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/17/2015 1:23:47 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

I wonder, what is the rush?


I think the urgency - from the western side - was about getting inspectors in there. From what I'm hearing, this is the most rigorous and thoroughgoing inspection regime ever put in place.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Marini)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/17/2015 6:37:01 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

quote:

CNN's Dana Bash and Don Lemon criticized CBS News' Major Garrett Wednesday for asking President Obama how the White House could hail its nuclear deal with Tehran even as four Americans are being held prisoner by Iran.

"I've been a White House reporter," Bash said after the White House press briefing Wednesday. "You know what it's like to stand up and ask the president a question — and you do want to be tough."

"But there's a fine line, especially standing in the East Room — a fine line between asking a tough question and maybe crossing that line a little bit, and maybe being disrespectful. So I think that that happened there," she added.


http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/cnn-reporters-journalist-was-out-of-line-asking-obama-about-american-hostages/article/2568357

Don't ask Obama questions


I'd prefer that reporters ask presidents (and others in power) tough questions, but not irrelevant questions with ridiculous implications. If the reporter's concern was genuine, then he should have asked why we haven't broken off relations with every country where Americans are held in prison. But since he did not ask that or phrase it in that way, then the premise of his question was faulty to begin with. I don't agree that it was disrespectful, and I'm also of the belief that there's no such thing as a stupid question - but this question comes pretty close.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/17/2015 7:42:41 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

I'm also of the belief that there's no such thing as a stupid question


Hell, you could regret saying that one day. ;-)

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/17/2015 2:07:40 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
quote:

I'm also of the belief that there's no such thing as a stupid question

Hell, you could regret saying that one day. ;-)


I have heard or received many submissions that would qualify as a "stupid question."


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program - 7/17/2015 2:47:27 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
FR

Anyone for a thread in 'polls and random' entitled 'Ask Zonie the stupidest question you can think of!'

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Agreement reached on Iran nuclear program Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109