RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BoscoX -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/5/2017 5:46:57 AM)


The very best "debate" leftist trash ever has to offer [;)]




BoscoX -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/5/2017 5:52:28 AM)


The topic:

FBI turns over new Clinton investigation documents to Congress

House GOP leaders open probe into FBI's handling of Clinton investigation

The FBI has begun turning over to Senate investigators hundreds of pages of memos regarding the bureau's probe into Hillary Clinton's private email server, sources told The Hill.

The sources said the Justice Department notified the Senate Judiciary Committee late Friday and the FBI began transmitting memos soon after to assist Congress in its review of former Director James Comey's handling of the Clinton email case.


The memos detail how and when the bureau's leadership declined to pursue criminal charges against Clinton for transmitting classified information on her private email server as secretary of State, an investigation that has remained controversial since the 2016 presidential campaigns.

FBI officials declined to comment. "We don't have any information for you," spokeswoman Carol Cratty told The Hill.

The Senate committee has been seeking the memos for some time as it investigates whether Comey chose to absolve Clinton of criminal liability before the election-year probe was complete and before she was even interviewed. Comey ultimately concluded that while Clinton's handling of classified emails was careless, there was not enough evidence of intent to warrant criminal charges.

Comey had announced in July 2016 that the FBI was declining to pursue charges against Clinton for what it called the careless transmission of classified documents on her private email server. The FBI then re-opened the email case in late October 2016, shocking the political world because it was so close to Election Day, after a new trove of emails was found on an associate's computer.

Comey then announced a second time he did not plan to pursue criminal charges, a move that came just two days before Clinton lost to Trump in the election. The FBI's handling was roundly criticized by both Clinton and Trump, and was one of the reasons cited when Trump fired Comey as director earlier this year. Clinton has also blamed Comey in part for her loss in the election.

The new documents being transmitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee are expected to shed light on how the FBI made those decisions, who was involved and whether the decision to clear Clinton was made before she was even interviewed by FBI agents in spring 2016.

The release of the new documents comes as new FBI Director Christopher Wray attempts to build his own relationship with Congress amid multiple oversight investigations.

The release also comes hours after new documents came to light in a federal lawsuit showing exactly when FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe recused himself from the Clinton email investigation, which was codenamed "Mid Year." McCabe was forced to step aside due to questions about a possible conflict of interest involving hundreds of thousands of dollars of money that flowed to his wife's political campaign from a Clinton ally.

Those documents (below), released under a FOIA lawsuit to the conservative group Judicial Watch, show McCabe did not recuse himself from the long-running investigation until Nov. 1, 2016, just six days before the probe was officially ended and eight days before Donald Trump was elected president over Clinton.

"As of today I am voluntarily recusing myself from the ongoing Mid Year investigation," McCabe wrote. "I will continue to respond to congressional requests for historical information as needed."

By the time McCabe recused himself, he had supervised the case for months after becoming deputy director of the bureau in February 2016. The decision followed newspaper articles that specifically questioned whether he had a conflict of interest because his wife Jill McCabe's 2015 Virginia state Senate campaign had accepted nearly $700,000 from Clinton ally and Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe.

MORE




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/5/2017 6:51:27 AM)

I notice that even though the Senate has been asking for the documents for some time, they were released via a FOIA lawsuit. What does the FBI think it's doing?




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/5/2017 7:20:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

your ignoring it doesnt make it go away...
have you been keeping up this week?
Carter page, Sam Clovis, jeff session AND trump all knew about the russian connection coffee boy wanted. sessions has lied continuously to the senate committee about his knowledge and his own contacts.
There may not be collusion(as its not a criminal term) but its only because he has "plausible deniability"

NOBODY, and NOBODY knew about the investigation into pappad until monday.
Seems the "leaks" are coming directly from the nuthouse, (whitehouse)
And the whitehouse didnt even "know" sam CLovis had testified until this week.
all you can do is whinge but hillary.
111 pages and you are still whinging.




OMFG

"Someone wanted a meeting, and people knew"

Hilarious

See why I call them "howlers"

All you do is deflect from the questions, you simply cant respond with a trace of honesty or facts
its ok I will start a new thread, I expect you will offer up any number of deflections. or ignore it.
ITs factual information, not wishful thinking, unlike the last 110 pages which was.
And it's only been a week
this is going to take a toll, I relish it.




BoscoX -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/5/2017 7:22:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

I notice that even though the Senate has been asking for the documents for some time, they were released via a FOIA lawsuit. What does the FBI think it's doing?


Covering for their Dem overlords

Hillary was not supposed to lose




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/5/2017 7:27:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

I notice that even though the Senate has been asking for the documents for some time, they were released via a FOIA lawsuit. What does the FBI think it's doing?

From september first.
The FBI is under attack on two different fronts.

Three days after the FBI denied an attorney’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents related to the Hillary Clinton email investigation, a federal judge is telling the agency to make them public.

The Washington Times reports that U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg overruled objections by the Trump administration, which insisted that making the information public would violate grand jury secrecy rules.

“After reviewing the document in camera, the court concludes that it largely rehashes information already made public, thus obviating any need for secrecy,” Boasberg said.

The attorney, Ty Clevenger of Texas—who helped remove two federal judges appointed to lifetime appointments and trigger the indictment of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, according to The Dallas Morning News—originally filed a FOIA request in March of 2016 to see the documents. The head of the FBI’s Records Management Division, David M. Hardy, sent a letter (originally obtained by Fox News) to Clevenger this week telling him that the bureau had “determined you have not sufficiently demonstrated that the public’s interest in disclosure outweighs personal privacy interests of the subject.”

Meanwhile, former FBI director James Comey is under fire for allegedly planning to exonerate Hillary Clinton before the agency had completed its investigation. The 2016 presidential candidate was accused of conducting official business on a private email server.

The Washington Post reports that Senators Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) sent a letter Thursday to FBI director Christopher Wray, “asking for documents to flesh out what to them seems a suspicious timeline: that Comey was apparently drafting statements to close the Clinton email probe at least two months before he publicly announced in July 2016 that the FBI was shuttering its investigation.”

President Donald Trump responded to the report in a tweet Friday morning:

Donald J. Trump ✔@realDonaldTrump
Wow, looks like James Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton long before the investigation was over...and so much more. A rigged system!
6:56 AM - Sep 1, 2017
45,815 45,815 Replies 42,883 42,883 Retweets 136,124 136,124 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
The Senators gave the FBI a deadline of Sept. 13 to respond to their request.
http://fortune.com/2017/09/01/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-comey/









BoscoX -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/5/2017 7:29:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

your ignoring it doesnt make it go away...
have you been keeping up this week?
Carter page, Sam Clovis, jeff session AND trump all knew about the russian connection coffee boy wanted. sessions has lied continuously to the senate committee about his knowledge and his own contacts.
There may not be collusion(as its not a criminal term) but its only because he has "plausible deniability"

NOBODY, and NOBODY knew about the investigation into pappad until monday.
Seems the "leaks" are coming directly from the nuthouse, (whitehouse)
And the whitehouse didnt even "know" sam CLovis had testified until this week.
all you can do is whinge but hillary.
111 pages and you are still whinging.




OMFG

"Someone wanted a meeting, and people knew"

Hilarious

See why I call them "howlers"

All you do is deflect from the questions, you simply cant respond with a trace of honesty or facts
its ok I will start a new thread, I expect you will offer up any number of deflections. or ignore it.
ITs factual information, not wishful thinking, unlike the last 110 pages which was.
And it's only been a week
this is going to take a toll, I relish it.


You are going to start yet another thread accusing president Trump of doing things that he never did, that Hillary actually did do?

Oh that is so scary

I am so scared

What will this be, the ten thousandth one




WhoreMods -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/5/2017 8:30:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

your ignoring it doesnt make it go away...
have you been keeping up this week?
Carter page, Sam Clovis, jeff session AND trump all knew about the russian connection coffee boy wanted. sessions has lied continuously to the senate committee about his knowledge and his own contacts.
There may not be collusion(as its not a criminal term) but its only because he has "plausible deniability"

NOBODY, and NOBODY knew about the investigation into pappad until monday.
Seems the "leaks" are coming directly from the nuthouse, (whitehouse)
And the whitehouse didnt even "know" sam CLovis had testified until this week.
all you can do is whinge but hillary.
111 pages and you are still whinging.




OMFG

"Someone wanted a meeting, and people knew"

Hilarious

See why I call them "howlers"

All you do is deflect from the questions, you simply cant respond with a trace of honesty or facts
its ok I will start a new thread, I expect you will offer up any number of deflections. or ignore it.
ITs factual information, not wishful thinking, unlike the last 110 pages which was.
And it's only been a week
this is going to take a toll, I relish it.


You are going to start yet another thread accusing president Trump of doing things that he never did, that Hillary actually did do?

Oh that is so scary

I am so scared

What will this be, the ten thousandth one

Do you honestly not understand how utterly fucking pathetic that sounds tacked onto the end of a hundred plus page thread that keeps getting bumped whenever allegations are made against your boy?
Are you genuinely this stupid and oblivious, or is this some sort of act you're putting on for comic effect?




Musicmystery -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/5/2017 8:47:46 AM)

...and from the clown who keeps pretending I have ever supported Hilary for president. If someone doesn’t fit the narrative, he’s got no response, so he has to pretend, and then pretend everyone else is pretending.

That’s how ridiculous things have become in the desperation to find a way Trump might possibly make sense. That will never happen, so they seek out new things to blame.

Sad.




Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/5/2017 8:56:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

your ignoring it doesnt make it go away...
have you been keeping up this week?
Carter page, Sam Clovis, jeff session AND trump all knew about the russian connection coffee boy wanted. sessions has lied continuously to the senate committee about his knowledge and his own contacts.
There may not be collusion(as its not a criminal term) but its only because he has "plausible deniability"

NOBODY, and NOBODY knew about the investigation into pappad until monday.
Seems the "leaks" are coming directly from the nuthouse, (whitehouse)
And the whitehouse didnt even "know" sam CLovis had testified until this week.
all you can do is whinge but hillary.
111 pages and you are still whinging.




OMFG

"Someone wanted a meeting, and people knew"

Hilarious

See why I call them "howlers"

All you do is deflect from the questions, you simply cant respond with a trace of honesty or facts
its ok I will start a new thread, I expect you will offer up any number of deflections. or ignore it.
ITs factual information, not wishful thinking, unlike the last 110 pages which was.
And it's only been a week
this is going to take a toll, I relish it.


You are going to start yet another thread accusing president Trump of doing things that he never did, that Hillary actually did do?

Oh that is so scary

I am so scared

What will this be, the ten thousandth one

you still wouldnt respond with truth, just like the above post.
you cant do it without hillary obama or bill.
You are proving it with every post you have made today
not one scintilla of discussion on the subject in my post.
Deflect deflect defect




MasterDrakk -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/5/2017 12:29:06 PM)

9 Federal Departments gave a thumbs up to this action.
The Treasury department chairs the committee.
The Clinton foundation received monies from board members of Uranium One when Clinton was not secretary of state.
Clinton did not strong arm any agencies to do the deal, and didnt pay the department secretaries a dime.
Not one picogram of uranium this company produces domestically can leave the United States.
The President, and only the President approved the deal.

DoubleSpeak from the RWNJ and their demented howling goons and thugs. They have always been at war with East Arkansas, like its 1984 all over again.





bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/6/2017 1:57:33 PM)

mnottertroll! is that you?




MasterDrakk -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/6/2017 2:22:26 PM)

If he is the type of fellow who points out the facts to the factless, then we are all mnottertroll to you.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/6/2017 2:53:14 PM)

right, very clever.

wanna answer me though? mnottertroll or not?




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/6/2017 5:34:39 PM)

"Grassley: Early Drafts of Comey's Exoneration Statement Acknowledged Hillary Clinton Violated Federal Law"

quote:

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray late Monday afternoon demanding to know why early versions of former FBI Director James Comey's statement exonerating Hillary Clinton strongly indicated she had violated federal law by hosting and sharing top secret information on a personal email server. In Comey's final statement, which he delivered in July 2016, that language was changed.

“Although Director Comey’s original version of his statement acknowledged that Secretary Clinton had violated the statute prohibiting gross negligence in the handling of classified information, he nonetheless exonerated her in that early, May 2nd draft statement anyway, arguing that this part of the statute should not be enforced,” Grassley said.

From the letter, which details how the statement changed:

quote:

On November 3, 2017, the FBI provided documents in response to the Committee’s August 30, 2017, letter requesting records relating to then-Director Comey’s statement exonerating Secretary Clinton from criminal wrongdoing. Among those documents, the FBI provided what appears to be a May 2, 2016, draft of the exoneration statement, two months before Director Comey’s July 5, 2016 press conference. In that draft, the original language is shown to have included the following sentence:

There is evidence to support a conclusion that Secretary Clinton, and others, used the private email server in a manner that was grossly negligent with respect to the handling of classified material.[1]

That same draft also included the following sentence:

Similarly, the sheer volume of information that was properly classified as Secret at the time it was discussed on email (that is, excluding the “up classified” emails) supports an inference that the participants were grossly negligent in their handling of that information.[2]

As you are aware, 18 U.S.C. § 793(f) makes the mishandling of classified material through gross negligence a criminal act. Although Director Comey’s original version of his statement acknowledged that Secretary Clinton had violated the statute prohibiting gross negligence in the handling of classified information, he nonetheless exonerated her in that early, May 2nd draft statement anyway, arguing that this part of the statute should not be enforced.

Apparently, as of May 2016, then-Director Comey and other FBI officials believed the facts fit that gross negligence standard until later edits were made on or about June 10, 2016, removing those two sentences and including the following sentence instead:

Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.[3]


Grassley is now seeking all documents and information about conversations surrounding edits of the statement. He also wants to see each version of the draft remarks.

Comey drafted Clinton's exoneration statement in May 2016, months before Clinton and a number of other key witnesses in the FBI criminal case were interviewed and long before agents were finished with their investigation.


www.mnottertrolllovestownhall.com

in case youre wondering where the "factless propaganda" comes from this time mnottertroll---its the senate judiciary committee.




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/6/2017 7:07:07 PM)

The mental patient has trouble with reality. Each of the voices in his head have trouble with reality.




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/6/2017 7:08:39 PM)

He and WD are kindred. What do you want to bet he has more socks?




MasterDrakk -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/7/2017 4:10:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

"Grassley: Early Drafts of Comey's Exoneration Statement Acknowledged Hillary Clinton Violated Federal Law"

quote:

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray late Monday afternoon demanding to know why early versions of former FBI Director James Comey's statement exonerating Hillary Clinton strongly indicated she had violated federal law by hosting and sharing top secret information on a personal email server. In Comey's final statement, which he delivered in July 2016, that language was changed.

“Although Director Comey’s original version of his statement acknowledged that Secretary Clinton had violated the statute prohibiting gross negligence in the handling of classified information, he nonetheless exonerated her in that early, May 2nd draft statement anyway, arguing that this part of the statute should not be enforced,” Grassley said.

From the letter, which details how the statement changed:

quote:

On November 3, 2017, the FBI provided documents in response to the Committee’s August 30, 2017, letter requesting records relating to then-Director Comey’s statement exonerating Secretary Clinton from criminal wrongdoing. Among those documents, the FBI provided what appears to be a May 2, 2016, draft of the exoneration statement, two months before Director Comey’s July 5, 2016 press conference. In that draft, the original language is shown to have included the following sentence:

There is evidence to support a conclusion that Secretary Clinton, and others, used the private email server in a manner that was grossly negligent with respect to the handling of classified material.[1]

That same draft also included the following sentence:

Similarly, the sheer volume of information that was properly classified as Secret at the time it was discussed on email (that is, excluding the “up classified” emails) supports an inference that the participants were grossly negligent in their handling of that information.[2]

As you are aware, 18 U.S.C. § 793(f) makes the mishandling of classified material through gross negligence a criminal act. Although Director Comey’s original version of his statement acknowledged that Secretary Clinton had violated the statute prohibiting gross negligence in the handling of classified information, he nonetheless exonerated her in that early, May 2nd draft statement anyway, arguing that this part of the statute should not be enforced.

Apparently, as of May 2016, then-Director Comey and other FBI officials believed the facts fit that gross negligence standard until later edits were made on or about June 10, 2016, removing those two sentences and including the following sentence instead:

Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.[3]


Grassley is now seeking all documents and information about conversations surrounding edits of the statement. He also wants to see each version of the draft remarks.

Comey drafted Clinton's exoneration statement in May 2016, months before Clinton and a number of other key witnesses in the FBI criminal case were interviewed and long before agents were finished with their investigation.


www.mnottertrolllovestownhall.com

in case youre wondering where the "factless propaganda" comes from this time mnottertroll---its the senate judiciary committee.

you may be, but obviously are not aware, that the statute deals with knowingly mishandling and gross negligence, since no one here, or in the intel committee, or in the entire republican congress, or the world, can prove that or satisfy that definition, you will come up empty.

Remember, it took forensic experts to retrieve information form the server, it was not hacked. And that will be a huge stumbling block to overcome when some form of due diligence is pointed out to the witch hunters down there.

But here again, the staunch republican Comey has been mind melded with Jedi Hillaryness and after a lifetime of goody-two-shoedness decides to risk his freedom to cover up some deep and evil crime, of which there is not even scant evidence, for his master, the ever brilliant Dr. Evil Hillary, who singlehandedly (and not in the chain of command) killed people in Benghazi. Hey, how about Niger! Niger! Niger! what was the response there? is she still at it even today?

you are beating a dead stinking republican horse, and you can run it through the 11 investigations that came up empty in Benghazi. It will remain the same old song.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM7v2aeDdT8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpq5AD-EAIY
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article150276387.html
https://eturbonews.com/5008/executive-talk-donald-trump-jr-bullish-russia-and-few-emerging-ma

Trump won, Hillary lost, get over it. Dont ignore the absolute lawlessness of these republicans in favor of some distraction and shiny sea shell.




MasterDrakk -> RE: Hillary Probed (11/7/2017 4:32:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

He and WD are kindred. What do you want to bet he has more socks?

Whose socks are you Nancy?




Page: <<   < prev  110 111 [112] 113 114   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625