Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Hillary Probed


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed Page: <<   < prev  28 29 [30] 31 32   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/24/2016 7:30:40 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I've reported a few months ago about the huge donations to the clinton foundation that followed upon the sale of the uranium to the russians.


Its pretty obvious there was quid pro quo. But forgetting that - I'd just like Hillary to go on the record and explain why the sale of 50% of the US's uranium assets to the russians was a good thing.


Emmadelimma's post says it was 20% you say it is 50%...which is it? Why do you have a problem with it?

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 581
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/24/2016 7:36:50 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

Another Hillary lie.

Clinton testified (under oath) she started using the new email system March 18. However, Judicial Watch now has an email chain dated Feb 9, detailing that the NSA briefed her that her attempts to use a blackberry were insecure; her attempts to change the rules for her personal benefit would not happen etc.

Obviously, Clinton lied in an attempt to prevent the public from learning that she had been briefed in depth that it was illegal, improper, and insecure.

Drip.. Drip..

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/274230-lost-emails-discovered-from-clintons-server

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 582
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/24/2016 7:41:00 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I've reported a few months ago about the huge donations to the clinton foundation that followed upon the sale of the uranium to the russians.


Its pretty obvious there was quid pro quo. But forgetting that - I'd just like Hillary to go on the record and explain why the sale of 50% of the US's uranium assets to the russians was a good thing.


Emmadelimma's post says it was 20% you say it is 50%...which is it? Why do you have a problem with it?




Emma's source is probably only talking about uranium reserves. Mine was talking about refinement facilities etc.

Why do I have a problem with the Russians controlling the majority of US Uranium?

Well, for one - we have laws that we don't allow foreigners to control strategic assets.
For two, Russian firms are not known for their stellar project management or environmental concern. Nothing better than plutonium or polonium contamination.
For three: Since we use uranium for reactors and weapons - I don't see a reason this is a good thing for the US.

I mean, we have a law requiring the approval of the Secretary of State before these assets can be sold. Personally, I think its pretty obvious she was bribed, but I'd certainly like to hear her thinking on why this is a good deal for the US.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 583
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/24/2016 8:12:14 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


ORIGINAL: thompsonx

I've reported a few months ago about the huge donations to the clinton foundation that followed upon the sale of the uranium to the russians.


Its pretty obvious there was quid pro quo. But forgetting that - I'd just like Hillary to go on the record and explain why the sale of 50% of the US's uranium assets to the russians was a good thing.


Emmadelimma's post says it was 20% you say it is 50%...which is it? Why do you have a problem with it?




Emma's source is probably only talking about uranium reserves. Mine was talking about refinement facilities etc.

You have not posted a link.

Why do I have a problem with the Russians controlling the majority of US Uranium?

Neither 20% not 50% is a majority.

Well, for one - we have laws that we don't allow foreigners to control strategic assets.

Really???? perhaps you could link us to that law?


For two, Russian firms are not known for their stellar project management or environmental concern. Nothing better than plutonium or polonium contamination.

I am sure you have a cite for this also, and how it compares to other uranium mines?


For three: Since we use uranium for reactors and weapons - I don't see a reason this is a good thing for the US.

We sell them wheat. We sell them oil well drilling bits. Without which they would starve to death in the snow. They sell us titanium to make compressor blades for b52's so what is your point?

I mean, we have a law requiring the approval of the Secretary of State before these assets can be sold.

You know perfectly well the sec of state cannot do this unilaterally but you lie as if it were.


Personally, I think its pretty obvious she was bribed, but I'd certainly like to hear her thinking on why this is a good deal for the US.

We sold them shit we didn't need for a good price....sounds like capitalism to me.


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 584
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/24/2016 9:20:01 PM   
Marini


Posts: 3629
Joined: 2/14/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

The DOJ is corrupt. Republican or Democrat government, doesn't matter. It is completely corrupted.


Give the little lady a hand.
I'm hoping more people begin to wake up EVENTUALLY, and really really understand this.
Let's just keep repeating it.


_____________________________

As always, To EACH their Own.
"And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. "
Nelson Mandela
Life-long Democrat, not happy at all with Democratic Party.
NOT a Republican/Moderate and free agent

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 585
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/24/2016 11:20:47 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
I'm ignoring the troll.

New article out, on Reuters, details how Hillary Put a polical appointee in the state department IT staff. Which had never been done before. And he answered to no one in the IT department.. just Clinton's chief fixer - Patrick Kennedy. Who, or course, is the man that decides what is classified and what isn't at state. Until the FBI/CIA got tired of his bullshit and sought independent classifications... article follows..

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Soon after Hillary Clinton's arrival at the State Department in 2009, officials in the information technology office were baffled when told that a young technician would join them as a political appointee, newly disclosed emails show.

The technician, Bryan Pagliano, was running the off-grid email server that Clinton had him set up in her New York home for her work as secretary of state. But even as years passed, Pagliano's supervisors never learned of his most sensitive task, according to the department and one of his former colleagues.

Pagliano's immediate supervisors did not know the private server even existed until it was revealed in news reports last year, the colleague said, requesting anonymity because of a department ban on unauthorized interviews.

Clinton's decision to side-step the official state.gov email system has since shrouded her campaign for the U.S. presidency this year in controversy and legal uncertainty. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is conducting one of several inquiries into the arrangement, which saw classified information passing through her unsecured clintonemail.com account.

The newly disclosed emails show Patrick Kennedy, the department's under secretary for management, oversaw the hiring of Pagliano. But Clinton and the department continued to decline this week to say who, if anyone, in the government was aware of the email arrangement.

"There was no permission to be asked," Clinton said earlier this month. State Department spokesman John Kirby declined to say whether this was correct, citing the ongoing inquiries.

Before joining the department, Pagliano had worked on Clinton's unsuccessful presidential campaign the previous year, and Clinton paid him separately to maintain the server, her campaign staff have said.

Pagliano is cooperating with the FBI in exchange for a promise of a form of prosecutorial immunity, but it remains unclear whether even he knew Clinton was using the server for her work as the nation's most senior diplomat.

Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon declined to answer questions, but said in an email he was glad that Pagliano was speaking with the FBI because "there was nothing inappropriate about the IT services he provided."

COLLEAGUES SURPRISED

The department gave copies of the emails to the Senate's Republican-led Judiciary Committee, which is investigating the email arrangement, and they are cited in a five-page letter that the committee chairman, Senator Chuck Grassley, sent last week to Kennedy, who remains the department's most senior manager.

Kennedy shared Pagliano's résumé in 2009 with Susan Swart, then the head of the department's Bureau of Information Resource Management and chief adviser to the secretary on the department's information technology systems, and her deputy, Charlie Wisecarver.

"How did the conversation go and have you reached an arrangement?" he asked them, referring to Pagliano, in another email, according to the letter the committee shared with Reuters.

Wisecarver and Swart, who had worked in the department for decades, were soon swapping emails expressing confusion and surprise that a political appointee, a so-called Schedule C employee who is more commonly hired to work in the secretary of state's offices, should be joining the IT department's ranks.

Schedule C employees, who help presidential appointees and agency heads make policy, can only report to people appointed by the U.S. president or other senior executive officials. But no one like that worked in the IT office, so Kennedy ended up being Pagliano's designated supervisor.

The department told Reuters that Pagliano and Kennedy had little contact, and that Kennedy was unaware of the server or his subordinate's role in running it. Nor did Wisecarver, Pagliano's day-to-day boss, or Swart know, according to the former colleague, who said the IT office should have been informed.

People who worked with Pagliano did not respond to messages. Pagliano's lawyer declined to comment.

Grassley's letter also indicates that at least some department officials had learned of the server's existence by the end of the second year of Clinton's tenure. Pagliano received an IT security briefing in late 2010 or early 2011 "in connection with his work on the Secretary's non-government server," according to Grassley's letter.

Grassley's staff, who have been interviewing officials as part of their inquiry, declined to provide more details. The State Department declined to confirm whether the meeting happened.

(in reply to Marini)
Profile   Post #: 586
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 7:31:38 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
Would you believe that amerika has received more than 260 metric tons of uranium from russia?
Would you believe that it is stored in tenn.?




Meanwhile, the Moscow Treaty, signed by the United States and Russia in 2002,
stipulates the withdrawal of thousands of operationally deployed strategic nuclear
warheads. Because all HEU is sent to Oak Ridge after the nuclear weapons are taken out
of service, this has the potential to significantly increase the dismantlement workload at
Oak Ridge.

The Oak Ridge National Security Complex:
Human Health and the Environment
as Casualties of Hot and Cold Wars
A Global Green USA Legacy Program Report
By Dr. Jasmine Aimaq

Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) Transparency
This program supports the Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) Purchase Agreement between the United States and the Russian Federation. The agreement currently calls for the United States to purchase 500 metric tons (MT) of HEU (as low-enriched uranium [LEU]) from dismantled nuclear weapons. These purchases span a 20-year period with the product being used to fuel light-water reactors in the United States. Through calendar year 2005, approximately 260 MT has been converted and shipped to the United States. The program participants are able to assure themselves that both sides are abiding by the terms of the agreement through on-site monitoring, data exchanges, and the use of continuous nonintrusive monitoring equipment, ensuring that the U.S. nonproliferation goals are met.


55.^ Jump up to: a b "Global Security & Nonproliferation Programs Mission Factsheet" (PDF). Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Retrieved January 23, 2013.


< Message edited by thompsonx -- 3/25/2016 7:32:45 AM >

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 587
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 7:41:24 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
So, how many are almost quitting and who is almost indicted today?



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 588
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 8:17:29 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So, how many are almost quitting and who is almost indicted today?


I got out my abacus with the purple scale on it and did the cipher. I had an accountant friend of mine check my addition and we have reached a conclusion.The answer is somewhere between 0 and -1.
I am sorry but that is as close as we could get to a sollid answer.


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 589
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 11:45:57 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Would you believe that amerika has received more than 260 metric tons of uranium from russia?
Would you believe that it is stored in tenn.?




Meanwhile, the Moscow Treaty, signed by the United States and Russia in 2002,
stipulates the withdrawal of thousands of operationally deployed strategic nuclear
warheads. Because all HEU is sent to Oak Ridge after the nuclear weapons are taken out
of service, this has the potential to significantly increase the dismantlement workload at
Oak Ridge.

The Oak Ridge National Security Complex:
Human Health and the Environment
as Casualties of Hot and Cold Wars
A Global Green USA Legacy Program Report
By Dr. Jasmine Aimaq

Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) Transparency
This program supports the Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) Purchase Agreement between the United States and the Russian Federation. The agreement currently calls for the United States to purchase 500 metric tons (MT) of HEU (as low-enriched uranium [LEU]) from dismantled nuclear weapons. These purchases span a 20-year period with the product being used to fuel light-water reactors in the United States. Through calendar year 2005, approximately 260 MT has been converted and shipped to the United States. The program participants are able to assure themselves that both sides are abiding by the terms of the agreement through on-site monitoring, data exchanges, and the use of continuous nonintrusive monitoring equipment, ensuring that the U.S. nonproliferation goals are met.


55.^ Jump up to: a b "Global Security & Nonproliferation Programs Mission Factsheet" (PDF). Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Retrieved January 23, 2013.



Duh. And?

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 590
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 11:48:16 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So, how many are almost quitting and who is almost indicted today?




The news today is that Huma Abedin is being called to testify. Of course this is a far bigger scandal than watergate. And of course democrat trolls are trying to minimize it, stop it, shut it down.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 591
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 11:57:14 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
OH - and then's there's this:

Bombshell: Clinton Foundation Donor’s Flight From Justice Aided by Hillary Allies
Clinton donor smeared a decorated DEA agent and helped crooked Venezuelan friends escape justice
By Ken Silverstein • 03/25/16 9:30am
Hillary Clinton speaks at a Clinton Foundation event.
Hillary Clinton speaks at a Clinton Foundation event.
(Photo Andrew Burton/Getty Images)
Recent news reports indicate that the FBI is investigating former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for granting favors to her family’s foundation donors and for its systematic accounting fraud. In January, the Sunday Times of London cited former Judge Andrew Napolitano, a conservative libertarian and frequent Fox News guest, as saying that the FBI was taking evidence “seriously” and that Hillary “could hear about that soon from the Department of Justice.”

It’s hard to believe that the Obama administration and its hideously politicized Justice Department would ever indict Ms. Clinton, given that President Barack Obama picked her for secretary of state and its clear favoritism toward her in the presidential race. But there is massive evidence that shows financial abuses—including money laundering—at the Clinton Foundation and overwhelming evidence that donors were helped by Ms. Clinton.

To take one of so many examples, there’s the case of Clinton Foundation donor Claudio Osorio—who is now housed at a federal prison serving 12 years for fraud—who in 2010, with Ms. Clinton’s (and Bill Clinton’s) help, won a $10 million loan from the Overseas Private Investment Corporation.

The loan was granted to an Osorio firm called InnoVida, which was supposed to build houses in earthquake-ravaged Haiti. Instead, Osorio pocketed the money and used it to underwrite his lavish lifestyle and to pay off politicians. For political muscle, Osorio—who also had close ties to Jeb Bush, who sat on the board of a bank he owned—paid a lobbyist and major Hillary fundraiser named Jonathan Mantz.

Claudio Osorio's mugshot.
Claudio Osorio’s mugshot.
(Wikimedia Commons)
And that leads me to another Clinton Foundation donor Ms. Clinton helped out who happened to use Mr. Mantz (who now runs Ms. Clinton’s presidential campaign Super PAC) and apparently with the same great effect: Gonzalo Tirado, a crooked Venezuelan financier.

Mr. Tirado was president of and ran Venezuelan operations for the famously corrupt Stanford Bank, which was headquartered in Antigua and was named for its American founder, Allen Stanford. He and Mr. Stanford came to be extremely close and “were like father and son,” one well-placed source told me.

Mr. Stanford’s name may ring a bell as he was sentenced to prison for 110 years for committing an $8 billion Ponzi scheme. In 2006, the Hugo Chavez government was asked to investigate Mr. Tirado by scandal-plagued, pro-Wall Street New York Congressman Gregory W. Meeks, a member of the House Committee on Financial Services and a major recipient of cash and perks from jailbird Allen Stanford. Mr. Tirado was charged with tax evasion and theft, The Hill newspaper reported.

As I’ll detail below—and I uncovered this story with help from the National Legal and Policy Center, a Virginia-based watchdog group—Tirado soon fled for Miami to avoid prosecution and petitioned the State Department, through Mr. Mantz, for political asylum. It’s not clear if he won asylum—and he doesn’t seem to merit it as he had no record of political opposition to the Chavez government—but it is clear that he was allowed to remain in the U.S. and live a life of luxury.

(Mr. Tirado, who did not reply to a request for comment, has kept a low profile as of late. His last reported sighting came in 2014, when he unsuccessfully tried to commit suicide, or at least claimed he intended to kill himself.)

Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) announces his endorsement of Hillary Clinton for president.
Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) announces his endorsement of Hillary Clinton for president.
(Photo Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Incredibly, the Obama administration not only failed to help the Chavez government investigate Mr. Tirado, but it also indicted a legendary former DEA agent named Tom Raffanello, a one-time head of the DEA’s Miami office and the agency’s chief of congressional affairs during Bill Clinton’s first term as president.

Mr. Raffanello’s subsequent prosecution, which ended in abysmal failure, almost surely was prompted and abetted by Mr. Tirado, a secret FBI informant. Unsurprisingly, the vindicated Mr. Raffanello had few kind words for Mr. Tirado or Ms. Clinton during a recent interview.

“Tirado believed in buying influence,” Mr. Raffanello said of the crooked financier. “He wouldn’t give away 10 cents that he didn’t think he’d get back a dollar on. That was his entire philosophy.”

As for Ms. Clinton, he said that during her years in the Obama administration the “prevailing wisdom in Miami at the time, among people in high profile civil and criminal defense circles, was that giving money to the Clinton Foundation was very helpful. She was secretary of state and a potential future president. I’m sure that’s the same thinking now.”

(Ms. Clinton’s presidential campaign did not reply to a request for comment.)

Up until 2006, life was cushy for pampered, wealthy, jet-setting Gonzalo Tirado, who was running the Stanford Bank’s Venezuela operations. Events took a turn for the worse when an internal Stanford Bank audit discovered that he had fleeced about $5 million from the company.

Mr. Tirado’s actions did not sit well with Stanford, and the Venezuelan beat a hasty exit from his job. He soon opened a bank of his own and lured in a few local investors. His new enterprise went down the tubes, and the defrauded locals, who were very close to the Chavez government, looked to it for help, leading to an investigation of Mr. Tirado.

Former Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.
Former Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez.
(Photo Juan Mabromata/AFP/Getty Images)
At the same time, the Chavez government was investigating Mr. Tirado at the behest of Stanford, through his hand-picked emissary, Congressman Meeks. (See this Wikileaked cable for more on the topic and on Mr. Tirado’s feud with the Venezuelan government.) That led to the filing of criminal charges against Mr. Tirado, as noted above. (The Venezuelan embassy in Washington did not reply to a request for comment.)

Mr. Tirado, apparently a conscienceless paranoid who felt no remorse for his actions, became convinced that Stanford Bank was monitoring his activities and tapping his phone and was the source of all of his troubles. Perhaps sensing he was in deep trouble, he fled Venezuela for Miami.

Mr. Tirado began spending money like a drunken sailor. He purchased at least two luxury estates in the Miami area. He also became a major investor in several companies, including a security firm called Command Consulting Group for which he recruited as a front man W. Ralph Basham, a former senior official with the Department of Homeland Security under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

Command Consulting Group, “an international security and intelligence consulting firm that provides advisory services to governments, corporations, and high net worth individuals,” according to its website, and whose top officials include a number of other former senior government terror and security veterans, is currently run out of an office in Washington. (Mr. Basham did not reply to a request for comment.)

As 2009 dawned, life could hardly have been better for the pampered Mr. Tirado. There was just one small problem: He needed to stay in the U.S. to avoid being sent back back to Venezuela, where he was sure to face trial and imprisonment. To stay in the U.S., Mr. Tirado needed the continued indulgence of the U.S. State Department.

Fortunately for Mr. Tirado, the U.S. government had been hostile to Venezuela ever since the South American nation of 31 million moved to the left in 2002, when Chavez was elected to the first of his three terms.

(Note and disclosure: Chavez died in 2013, and the country is now led by his former vice president, Nicolás Maduro. Despite its flaws, the country’s socialist government has made remarkable strides in bettering the lives of Venezuela’s poor majority. In 2004, I met Chavez as a reporter for the Los Angeles Times, and I consider him to be the greatest force for democratic change in modern Latin American history with the possible exception of Che Guevera.)

The George W. Bush administration had regularly conspired with the rancid political opposition, which Chavez displaced from power, and had sought to destabilize and overthrow the Chavez government with the help of local Venezuelan surrogates. Incoming President Barack Obama and his secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, were rabid opponents of Chavez’s as well, but Mr. Tirado didn’t want to count on that alone.

Jonathan Mantz.
Jonathan Mantz.
(BGR Group)
Knowing how the corrupt U.S. political system works, he hired an American lobbyist, Jonathan Mantz, to game the asylum process for him while he took it easy and spent his loot in America.

Mantz then worked at BGR, the firm of Republican Haley Barbour, the famously overweight former Mississippi governor and one of the most prominent of all GOP lobby shops. He had previously worked as finance director for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and for the laughably corrupt New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine.

Mr. Mantz, who had no real qualifications to be a lobbyist other than his ability to raise money—and who did not reply to a request for comment—had drummed up cash for Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign. Currently Mr. Mantz chairs Hillary’s 2016 Super PAC, Priorities USA Action. Mr. Tirado paid BGR $350,000.

Now sufficiently motivated, Mantz went to work lobbying Hillary’s State Department to let Tirado stay in Miami. Meanwhile, the crooked Mr. Tirado donated between $5,000 and $10,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to its website. As is its custom, the foundation does not state when the donation was made and declined to answer questions about the money it took from Mr. Tirado.

Coincidentally or not, Mr. Tirado was one four of Mr. Mantz’ clients who donated to the Clinton Foundation during his brief 16-month career as a lobbyist.

Thomas Raffanealo.
Thomas Raffanello.
(LinkedIn Profile)
Now let’s discuss the story of former DEA agent Thomas Raffanello, at which point this story becomes even more outrageous.

Mr. Raffanello worked for the DEA for more than three decades. He left in 2004 and went to work as the head of security for the Stanford Bank. “We set up cameras to prevent bank robberies and generally provided security at bank offices and functions,” Mr. Raffanello told me last weekend during the course of several lengthy phone interviews. “I was based in Miami but had offices in Caracas, Quito, Antigua and a few other places.”

Mr. Raffanello said Allen Stanford “couldn’t balance a checkbook” and described him as “a spoiled billionaire.” When I asked him why he went to work for Stanford in the first place he said, “I did due diligence. I called several associates, including the former head of DEA in Miami before me and several former assistant U.S. attorneys who worked for him. No one ever gave me a bad word; they said he was eccentric but a straight shooter. Madeleine Albright worked for him, and the former president of Switzerland was one of his board members.”

Stanford Bank collapsed and was put into receivership in 2010, at which point Mr. Raffanello left the company. But well before then Mr. Tirado—who, a source told me, had become an FBI informant—had become convinced that Mr. Raffanello was the source for all of his problems with the Chavez government and its investigation into him. Hence, he began a smear campaign against Mr. Raffanello in Venezuela and the United States.

As I mentioned above, it was Congressman Meeks—who currently supports Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and who took in more money from Stanford than any single member of Congress other than Charles Rangel and Pete Sessions of Texas—who prompted the Chavez government to look into Mr. Tirado.

But the paranoid Mr. Tirado, certain Mr. Raffanello was to blame, paid Venezuelan writers to place stories saying Mr. Raffanello worked for the CIA, Mr. Raffanello told me. That led to the Chavez government questioning Mr. Raffanello for alleged corruption involving the Stanford bank, though it determined the allegations were groundless and never charged him.

“Venezuela is like Casablanca,” Mr. Raffanello said. “If you tell a story twice it becomes the truth. It became impossible for me to go to Venezuela because I feared I’d get picked up by law enforcement.”

“I thought I was going to get Shanghaied, but you can’t make something out of nothing.” — Thomas Raffanello.

Meanwhile, Mr. Raffanello said, Mr. Tirado told the FBI and the Justice Department that he was trying to arrange Mr. Tirado’s kidnapping and was spying on him. “The guy knows how to play the game, and he played it at a high level because he had plenty of money,” Mr. Raffanello said.

About a year after Mr. Raffanello left Stanford Bank, he was indicted by the Obama Justice Department for allegedly shredding Stanford Bank documents. The case went to trial in Miami in 2010. On February 10 of that year, as the jury was deliberating, Judge Richard Goldberg interrupted its deliberations and unilaterally acquitted Raffanello (and another defendant), saying the evidence against him was “substantially lacking.”

It is highly unusual for a person to escape conviction after being indicted by a federal grand jury, let alone for the government to be humiliated in court as it was in the Raffanello case. Stunned federal prosecutors begged the judge to at least allow the jury to render a verdict because the acquittal would prevent them from appealing a verdict.

The judge dismissed their plea, and Mr. Raffanello’s ordeal was over. “I thought I was going to get Shanghaied, but you can’t make something out of nothing,” he said.

To sum up here, a corrupt Venezuelan banker hired a lobbyist close to Hillary Clinton, made a donation to her family’s foundation and has been allowed to live in the United States without fear of prosecution in his homeland. At a time that Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, the Obama Administration staged what can only be described as a political prosecution of an honest man and long-time government employee.

Mr. Raffanello has concluded this about Hillary Clinton’s campaign: “I learned a lot about her and her family when I was in the government, and how they are put together,” he said. “She is a person who will say and do anything in order to get elected president. I don’t think she’s going to win, but there’s nothing she won’t do while trying.”


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 592
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 11:59:22 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So, how many are almost quitting and who is almost indicted today?




The news today is that Huma Abedin is being called to testify. Of course this is a far bigger scandal than watergate. And of course democrat trolls are trying to minimize it, stop it, shut it down.



LOL, the nutsuckers are going deep for the felch. What nutsucker slobber blog is that from?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 593
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 12:51:38 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So, how many are almost quitting and who is almost indicted today?




The news today is that Huma Abedin is being called to testify. Of course this is a far bigger scandal than watergate. And of course democrat trolls are trying to minimize it, stop it, shut it down.



LOL, the nutsuckers are going deep for the felch. What nutsucker slobber blog is that from?


Google doesn't work for you?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 594
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 12:59:05 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


ORIGINAL: thompsonx

Would you believe that amerika has received more than 260 metric tons of uranium from russia?
Would you believe that it is stored in tenn.?




Meanwhile, the Moscow Treaty, signed by the United States and Russia in 2002,
stipulates the withdrawal of thousands of operationally deployed strategic nuclear
warheads. Because all HEU is sent to Oak Ridge after the nuclear weapons are taken out
of service, this has the potential to significantly increase the dismantlement workload at
Oak Ridge.

The Oak Ridge National Security Complex:
Human Health and the Environment
as Casualties of Hot and Cold Wars
A Global Green USA Legacy Program Report
By Dr. Jasmine Aimaq

Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) Transparency
This program supports the Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) Purchase Agreement between the United States and the Russian Federation. The agreement currently calls for the United States to purchase 500 metric tons (MT) of HEU (as low-enriched uranium [LEU]) from dismantled nuclear weapons. These purchases span a 20-year period with the product being used to fuel light-water reactors in the United States. Through calendar year 2005, approximately 260 MT has been converted and shipped to the United States. The program participants are able to assure themselves that both sides are abiding by the terms of the agreement through on-site monitoring, data exchanges, and the use of continuous nonintrusive monitoring equipment, ensuring that the U.S. nonproliferation goals are met.


55.^ Jump up to: a b "Global Security & Nonproliferation Programs Mission Factsheet" (PDF). Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Retrieved January 23, 2013.



Duh. And?


You were sniviling about how the russians bought more than half of amerika's supply of uranium. The article shows that russia has deposited 20 metric tons of uranium at oakridge tenn.
As usual half truths and whole lies. Please do not misunderstand me. I am not accusing republicrats or the right of pedling bullshit. It is you and you alone that is guilty of that.


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 595
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 1:03:58 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Selling uranium is immaterial to the question of control of an asset.

For the same reason the US doesn't need SoS approval to buy uranium, but you do need SOS approval to sell uranium enrichment assets. Troll.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 596
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 1:09:40 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Selling uranium is immaterial to the question of control of an asset.

For the same reason the US doesn't need SoS approval to buy uranium, but you do need SOS approval to sell uranium enrichment assets. Troll.


It seemed pretty important to you at the time.
Doesn't it hurt your mouth when you talk out of both sides at the same time?


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 597
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 1:16:36 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

So, how many are almost quitting and who is almost indicted today?




The news today is that Huma Abedin is being called to testify. Of course this is a far bigger scandal than watergate. And of course democrat trolls are trying to minimize it, stop it, shut it down.



LOL, the nutsuckers are going deep for the felch. What nutsucker slobber blog is that from?


Google doesn't work for you?




mine works fine. yours is set with nutsucker settings cuz its fucking propaganda.

The news today is that Huma Abedin is being called to testify.

No, she aint. Read for understanding, you might get something in May, and it wont be worth shit, she dont know servers and shit, they got Googley Eyed Robert for that shit, and that vanished into thin air.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 598
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 5:02:57 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
the news today is she's being called to testify.

That has no logical connection to when her testimony occurs.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 599
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/25/2016 5:08:11 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


ORIGINAL: thompsonx

I've reported a few months ago about the huge donations to the clinton foundation that followed upon the sale of the uranium to the russians.


Its pretty obvious there was quid pro quo. But forgetting that - I'd just like Hillary to go on the record and explain why the sale of 50% of the US's uranium assets to the russians was a good thing.
Why do I have a problem with the Russians controlling the majority of US Uranium?

Well, for one - we have laws that we don't allow foreigners to control strategic assets.

Really???? perhaps you could link us to that law?


d S. 1610, the Foreign
Investment and National Security Act (FINSA) of 2007

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 600
Page:   <<   < prev  28 29 [30] 31 32   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed Page: <<   < prev  28 29 [30] 31 32   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141