Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Hillary Probed


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed Page: <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/17/2016 4:02:52 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

And 30% of republican voters will not vote trump.

Big fuckin deal.

How many days till nutsucker bombshells, now?

Or are they going to shit their pants some more still?

You keep saying the Repubs are a minority party so 30% of Dems is more than 30% of Reps by your "logic" and is thus a bigger deal.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 541
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/17/2016 4:24:51 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

And 30% of republican voters will not vote trump.

Big fuckin deal.

How many days till nutsucker bombshells, now?

Or are they going to shit their pants some more still?

You keep saying the Repubs are a minority party so 30% of Dems is more than 30% of Reps by your "logic" and is thus a bigger deal.



The numbers are growing, its at 40%. Nevertheless:
47(%) (nutsucker count by nutsuckers) * .7 (-30%) = 32.9 (this is nutsuckers. There are not 33% of the population that are Republicans nor same conservatives, we can count those on the magnatude of possibly hundreds period.

53(%) * .7 = 37.1

Lets call that millions of voters, just for scalar.

The picture doesn't look a great deal different, just makes it harder to get into gerrymandered legislative districts, (and that is the true downside of losing those 30%ers.


I shall not be tutoring innumerate nutsucker math to nutsuckers. Thats the numbers.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 3/17/2016 4:25:28 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 542
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/18/2016 7:15:25 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

Ah Hillary, will you be able to surpress the truth long enough to get elected.. Its interesting to see you run that race.

News today, here: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/emails-show-nsa-rejected-hillary-clinton-request-for-secure-smartphone/

1. Hillary was notified of the risks of doing secure email on a blackberry.
2. The state department turned down her request to do so.
3. She did it anyway, by setting up her own server...

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 543
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/18/2016 7:35:19 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
How is a server like a blackberry? Let me count the ways.

So, another day and not one Ass Guzzler nor Felching slobberBlogging Imbecile has quit.

We are not yet around the corner, after 1 year.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 544
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/18/2016 8:15:43 AM   
hot4bondage


Posts: 403
Joined: 7/29/2009
Status: offline
Sounds like her insecure Blackberry was linked to her insecure server. Obama's phone, Obamaphone, potato, potahto?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 545
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/18/2016 8:20:48 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Since the state department wouldn't give her a secure blackberry, her IT guy setup and insecure server and linked her insecure blackberry to it.

(in reply to hot4bondage)
Profile   Post #: 546
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/18/2016 9:04:10 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Well, thank god she wasn't using the insecure government servers, because there would be a much much bigger bunch of hackers on it.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 547
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/18/2016 9:07:44 AM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


Ah Hillary, will you be able to surpress the truth long enough to get elected.. Its interesting to see you run that race.

News today, here: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/emails-show-nsa-rejected-hillary-clinton-request-for-secure-smartphone/

1. Hillary was notified of the risks of doing secure email on a blackberry.
2. The state department turned down her request to do so.
3. She did it anyway, by setting up her own server...



Which means she knew the rules.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 548
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/19/2016 5:45:24 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
So, is hillary collared today? Or doesn't the FBI work weekends?

Guess this is either all nutsucker asswipe, or the spending cuts are working.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 549
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/19/2016 6:31:26 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
i found this:

quote:

They say that people resort to mockery when they have no logical argument against something. Is that why most satirists are liberals?


that seems like a good answer for you.


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 550
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/19/2016 6:41:06 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I think that nutsuckers quoting nutsuckerism when they are without fact (always) makes a mockery of nutsuckers, and is noisome to us all.

I think that most satire is actually derision of cretinous nutsuckers and their clinging to their hallucinations in spite of fact.

I know I hold them in derision. They are beneath contempt.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 551
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/19/2016 11:47:03 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
No one pays attention to Mnotter. He brings nothing to the table and is therefore properly ignored.

As for Hillary...

Yep, two new stories out,
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/17/herridge-report-hillary-clinton-tried-change-rules-use-blackberry-secure-facility

and a video - where she acknowledges that she knew her blackberry is insecure. http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/18/andrea-tantaros-says-hillary-clinton-knew-risks-having-private-email

Things like patriotism, laws, don't really affect democrats - if they did they'd be republicans - but it might sway a few on the edges.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 552
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/19/2016 2:21:16 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
its interesting you say that---I was just earlier today thinking if he were student in a class presenting his "arguments" he'd fail.

if his job were to present arguments with some degree of cogency, he'd get fired.

and if he had these conversations in real life with anyone he'd get his lights punched out.

saw similar articles today---one on breitbart, one on fox nation, and one on the daily caller (oh no comrades x 3!)

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 553
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/21/2016 7:33:42 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
"EXCLUSIVE – Bolton: FBI Will ‘Explode’ If Hillary Not Indicted Over Email Scandal Due to Politics"

quote:

Speaking in a radio interview on Sunday, John Bolton, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, stated he believes the FBI will “explode” if Hillary Clinton ultimately is not indicted for her email infractions due to what he described as politics triumphing over the legal system...

“I think that the pressure is definitely building,” Bolton responded. “And just take the politics out of this for a second. What Hillary Clinton and her top aides did is not just make a few small violations of laws to protect classified information. They made wholesale violations and they did it for a sustained, indeed for a four-year period.”

He continued:

quote:

So this is a far more serious than what happened to General Petraeus. And it’s one reason why I think that both the FBI and I believe the people in the Justice Department, the prosecutors who would oversee the handling of the case, are moving more and more to the conclusion that serious indictments are warranted here.

Now it’s possible that in this administration that politics can triumph over the legalities. But I think if that does happen, there’s a real risk for Obama and for the Attorney General that the FBI will explode. And a lot of things that we don’t know about, that are not on the public record at the moment, will come on the public record.

It may not be the same thing as firing Archibald Cox (the discharged Special Prosecutor) in the Watergate investigation, but if this potential prosecution is tanked for political reasons, it will be a very loud explosion. And it will stain Obama’s legacy forever. It will damage Loretta Lynch’s professional reputation and I think it will have a profound impact on the presidential election, as well.




http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/20/bolton-fbi-will-explode-if-hillary-not-indicted-over-email-scandal-due-to-politics/

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 554
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/21/2016 7:54:59 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

No one pays attention to Mnotter. He brings nothing to the table and is therefore properly ignored.

You seem enjoy the spankings he administers to you on a regular bassis...you keep comming back for more.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 555
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/21/2016 7:56:58 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: bounty44

"EXCLUSIVE – Bolton: FBI Will ‘Explode’ If Hillary Not Indicted Over Email Scandal Due to Politics"

Bolton????the republicrat clone of james carville...oh my...roflmfao

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 556
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/21/2016 8:01:09 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

No one pays attention to Mnotter. He brings nothing to the table and is therefore properly ignored.

As for Hillary...

Yep, two new stories out,
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/17/herridge-report-hillary-clinton-tried-change-rules-use-blackberry-secure-facility

and a video - where she acknowledges that she knew her blackberry is insecure. http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/18/andrea-tantaros-says-hillary-clinton-knew-risks-having-private-email

Things like patriotism, laws, don't really affect democrats - if they did they'd be republicans - but it might sway a few on the edges.



Faux Nuze inside the felchline. Nutsuckers would not know if they affect republicans, having nothing whatsoever in common with them. But cockgargling continues nonetheless. Factless asswipe spewed by the toiletlickers, repeatedly and constantly as if someone will actually forget that they are morons and shiteaters.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 3/21/2016 8:06:01 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 557
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/24/2016 11:03:55 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
"ED KLEIN: HILLARY CLOSER TO INDICTMENT"

[considering the source and its nature, I trust this post will unfortunately generate some "nutsuckers" and "slobberwhatevers"]

quote:

Ed Klein, one of the best investigative journalist on Hillary’s trail, says that his sources tell him that the “Justice Department is close to empaneling a grand jury and deciding whether to grant statutory immunity to Huma Abedin, Hillary’s closest adviser.”

Klein, who rarely gets it wrong, notes that such a development would force Abedin to testify under oath, facing perjury charges if she lies. He also adds that he is “also told that Hillary herself will most likely be forced to testify.”

Klein has previously reported that the FBI has notified Hillary’s three closest aides, Abedin, Cheryl Mills, and Jake Sullivan, that they will be required to testify. Klein concludes that these developments indicate that FBI director James Comey is “moving inexorably” toward recommending an indictment of Hillary. Klein says that his sources say that Attorney General Loretta Lynch would likely duck the decision on indicting Hillary, punting it to a special counsel to give it at least the appearance of nonpartisan impartiality...

Klein, the author of two recent bestselling books that document the rift between the Obamas and the Clintons: Blood Feud and Unlikeable, has demonstrated that his sources run deep into the FBI and the Justice Department...


http://thehillarydaily.com/ed-klein-hillary-closer-to-indictment/

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 3/24/2016 11:05:31 AM >

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 558
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/24/2016 11:10:46 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Another article today says that the FBI is running into stonewalling at DOJ.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 559
RE: Hillary Probed - 3/24/2016 11:11:53 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: bounty44

Would you care to put a time line on this? How long do your "sources" think it will take to indict her?
Are you thinking a month, six months, a year, two years? If she is not initicted in two years will you shut up or will this go on longer?

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 560
Page:   <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Hillary Probed Page: <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125