RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 3:05:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

I don't need to cite when I can just watch the absurd foolish twists and turns he takes, sound familiar?
It was good enough for you, it must be good enough for me.
You expect me to have memorized the site of every news story I have read in the last year.
I noticed that neither you or dear Ron denied that Obama said that she didn't mean to share classified information she just didn't protect it like she should have. Although Mnottertail tried to make the claim that not properly protecting classified information isn't a crime, you going to make that claim?

Distracting, wouldn't you admit that Mnottertail trying once again to denegrate my military service is a level of derailment that dwarfs anything I do? Or are you so enamored of him that he can do no wrong?.



So more wriggling, you made the claim, back it

I dont need to deny what obama said, but the way it was described by "posters" was opinion , not fact. But you DID make a lousy claim about the blackberries.
Instead of saying you were wrong, the whole page is you trying to say other people are to blame for your posts lack of intellectual honesty, when that is merely down to you.

I dont speak for ron, I only speak for myself, so why would I deny something I didnt say.
You cant admit when you are wrong, why would someone like Butch apologise for you?
Im expecting you to be honest. Im not apologizing for ron.

Once again after crying about being bullied, and wanting to shut down your attackers, you are back to making personal attacks on rons "drinking" mental capacity, his" brain damage", you even suggest that Im enamoured of ron. I dont agree with Rons terminology a lot of the time, however I DO agree with him when he uses facts.
Should there come a time you use facts in an argument,(outside of gun threads) I will agree with you too.





I have not said dear Ron was brain damaged.
Have have not said anything about him drinking since I got a straight answer from him long ago.
So why are you lying about me doing it?

He however has accused me of being an ex con just a few pages back.
I don't demand to shut down people who disagree with me, unlike you I don't want to push their mute button.
I made a claim about the blackberry misuse because I read it, not on a blog but on news sites.
The fact that neither you nor Mnottertail read that article is not my fault.
You should know that finding something you read on a network site months ago if virtually impossible.
Don't you think that since the investigators have found triple digit presence of classified documents on her unsecured server means anything?




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 3:09:42 PM)

I did not accuse you of being an ex con, you confirmed you were. In the same manner you spewed your disingenous lying asswipe and recharacterized without any glimmer of truth what I said.

You made the tacit premises, I just filled them out for you. Look at what you did and apologize, you proclaimed and accused me of something I did not say, nor imply, nor intend, nor could be deduced from my words, on a multitude of occasions, all with your typical and factless stupid asswipe.







BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 3:20:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I did not accuse you of being an ex con, you confirmed you were. In the same manner you spewed your disingenous lying asswipe and recharacterized without any glimmer of truth what I said.

You made the tacit premises, I just filled them out for you. Look at what you did and apologize, you proclaimed and accused me of something I did not say, nor imply, nor intend, nor could be deduced from my words, on a multitude of occasions, all with your typical and factless stupid asswipe.





When did I confirm that I was an ex con let me save you time in your search, it didn't happen, you are lying.

Even if this were true, what bearing would it have on Hillary's guilt.
Hint --------- NONE!!!!!!!!!




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 3:31:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Audie Murphy and I got it done in one tour, we did it the first time. You couldnt get it right in 18.
You said you got a disability discharge at 18 years as an E5. Sorry pal, thats a RIF. Dole. Welfare.

You spew lying propaganda out here.

I am aware that the FBI has never mentioned the number of emails or anything else in this ongoing investigation of any substance, other than that they are investigating the handling of confidential information on the server.

And the FBI themselves damn sure have not given a number. Everything was classified after the fact.

But another lie, and still no credible citations of your other numerous lies.



Another lie, I never said I got a disability discharge.
I said I took an early retirement.
If you new half what you think you do you would know that in the early 90's they were letting people do that.
That is not a RIF, but you just keep justiying that lie if it makes you feel good.
And you are by, no means, Audie Murphy.




thishereboi -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 5:42:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

You still cant prove one nutsucker slobber blog containing fact.

Quit the derail, show us facts. Not slobberblogging and nutsuckerism.


To paraphrase a dear freind of yours I see no need to post cites when I can just sit here and watch you make a fool of yourself.



over the 800+ posts in this thread, many dozens of facts have been shared, as well as bunches of legal opinion, updates on the process, conservative and libertarian thought on the matter, insider information and a handful of other aspects of the scandal.

that vile critter parts continues to assert "factless" is rather evidence of an inability to discern, to learn, or something even worse.

so heres the thing bama, given what I just said above, as far as he is concerned, it doesn't matter what gets posted because he is clearly impervious to the truth. subsequently his "show me the facts" challenge lacks the necessary depth to take it seriously.

on the off chance that he actually does read, as opposed to merely babble vulgarities, here's a good summary for his edification:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/how-clintons-email-scandal-took-root/2016/03/27/ee301168-e162-11e5-846c-10191d1fc4ec_story.html?tid=pm_pop_b



It's all good, If she doesn't make it as a politician, she can always try for a career in music.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQ-Y7tn7_3o

Then again, maybe not [8D]




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 6:00:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I did not accuse you of being an ex con, you confirmed you were. In the same manner you spewed your disingenous lying asswipe and recharacterized without any glimmer of truth what I said.

You made the tacit premises, I just filled them out for you. Look at what you did and apologize, you proclaimed and accused me of something I did not say, nor imply, nor intend, nor could be deduced from my words, on a multitude of occasions, all with your typical and factless stupid asswipe.





When did I confirm that I was an ex con let me save you time in your search, it didn't happen, you are lying.

Even if this were true, what bearing would it have on Hillary's guilt.
Hint --------- NONE!!!!!!!!!


Uh, you confirmed it, I explained it to you and did at the time, do you have alzheimers, that you cant remember roughly your last page of posts, it was all the same lies with an occasional new one thrown in? or is it some medication you take that prevents it? Or PTSD disability from your service to your country as a cook? old knife wounds and the like, cant imagine you were any good at 18 year and E5.

You know, you might have had a valid point in that post at one time, bubba bama, but nobody much trusts the word of an ex-con, as you have confirmed you are now.




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 8:24:30 PM)

Programmers are not overmanned never were and programmers were officers, warrant at the least.
Intelligence analysts (spelled correctly) are not private or sergeant jobs, you were an intelligence clerk at best, never overmanned.



While what you say may have been true in the army in your time in service, it was far from true in the Air Force.
I never worked with Army programmers so I don't know what their rank structure was but the vast majority of AF programers were enlisted, at least once computers were small enough to put more than one in a room.

As for intelligence analysts again most were enlisted, they cost a lot less than officers. For nearly a year I had a Marine e6 working for me, at yes I was an e4 at the time.

You insist on being wrong.




thompsonx -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 9:34:43 PM)


ORIGINAL: BamaD
For nearly a year I had a Marine e6 working for me, at yes I was an e4 at the time.

You called him "hey boy" too didn't you?
Did he fetch coffee for you also?[8|]




DaddySatyr -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 9:45:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Programmers are not overmanned never were and programmers were officers, warrant at the least.
Intelligence analysts (spelled correctly) are not private or sergeant jobs, you were an intelligence clerk at best, never overmanned.



While what you say may have been true in the army in your time in service, it was far from true in the Air Force.
I never worked with Army programmers so I don't know what their rank structure was but the vast majority of AF programers were enlisted, at least once computers were small enough to put more than one in a room.

As for intelligence analysts again most were enlisted, they cost a lot less than officers. For nearly a year I had a Marine e6 working for me, at yes I was an e4 at the time.

You insist on being wrong.


I was a Spc-4 with E-5's doing my "legwork" for me, when I was a Voice Intercept Translator. (1987-1990)



Michael




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 9:55:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Programmers are not overmanned never were and programmers were officers, warrant at the least.
Intelligence analysts (spelled correctly) are not private or sergeant jobs, you were an intelligence clerk at best, never overmanned.



While what you say may have been true in the army in your time in service, it was far from true in the Air Force.
I never worked with Army programmers so I don't know what their rank structure was but the vast majority of AF programers were enlisted, at least once computers were small enough to put more than one in a room.

As for intelligence analysts again most were enlisted, they cost a lot less than officers. For nearly a year I had a Marine e6 working for me, at yes I was an e4 at the time.

You insist on being wrong.


I was a Spc-4 with E-5's doing my "legwork" for me, when I was a Voice Intercept Translator. (1987-1990)



Michael


Thank you, both of them clearly have no idea how things work in the intelligence community (of course why should that be different), the e6 was a good man but completely unfamiliar with our "problem". For a change we were given plenty of time to train a man (when I showed up as a liguist they gave me 3 days training and put me in a analyst slot hard to get promoted when you work as an analyst and test as a liguist) so he spent that whole time writing down everything I said and, of course he followed my directions as you would expect a good marine to, to the letter.




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 10:22:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I did not accuse you of being an ex con, you confirmed you were. In the same manner you spewed your disingenous lying asswipe and recharacterized without any glimmer of truth what I said.

You made the tacit premises, I just filled them out for you. Look at what you did and apologize, you proclaimed and accused me of something I did not say, nor imply, nor intend, nor could be deduced from my words, on a multitude of occasions, all with your typical and factless stupid asswipe.





When did I confirm that I was an ex con let me save you time in your search, it didn't happen, you are lying.

Even if this were true, what bearing would it have on Hillary's guilt.
Hint --------- NONE!!!!!!!!!


Uh, you confirmed it, I explained it to you and did at the time, do you have alzheimers, that you cant remember roughly your last page of posts, it was all the same lies with an occasional new one thrown in? or is it some medication you take that prevents it? Or PTSD disability from your service to your country as a cook? old knife wounds and the like, cant imagine you were any good at 18 year and E5.

You know, you might have had a valid point in that post at one time, bubba bama, but nobody much trusts the word of an ex-con, as you have confirmed you are now.

What delusion makes you think I confirmed being an ex con?
The fact that you keep repeating that lie?
I have never said anything that any reasonable person could interpret as confirming this slanderous lie.




Dvr22999874 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 10:26:47 PM)

What is wrong with being and EX_con. It says you have paid your debt and can begin again. I was and I did. Nothing to be ashamed of I think and the only difference between a con and a criminal is that the con got caught.................how many crims do you know ? I can name a few here who should be locked up and the key dropped in Teneriffe harbour.




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 10:34:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

What is wrong with being and EX_con. It says you have paid your debt and can begin again. I was and I did. Nothing to be ashamed of I think and the only difference between a con and a criminal is that the con got caught.................how many crims do you know ? I can name a few here who should be locked up and the key dropped in Teneriffe harbour.

What are you missing here? I am not an ex con, it is a lie, like his totally uneducated insistance that I was a cook in the military.




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 10:36:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

What is wrong with being and EX_con. It says you have paid your debt and can begin again. I was and I did. Nothing to be ashamed of I think and the only difference between a con and a criminal is that the con got caught.................how many crims do you know ? I can name a few here who should be locked up and the key dropped in Teneriffe harbour.

When the family business is law enforcement there is plenty wrong with it.




Dvr22999874 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 10:39:49 PM)

I am missing nothing. I am saying it's a stupid thing for anybody to accuse anybody else of. I apologise if you see a slur in my words. It was totally unintended.
I agree about the law enforcement bit..................check through "The Fitgerald Enquiry" in Queensland a few years back. The Minister for police and the police commissioner BOTH ended up in the slammer along with half the force *smile*. Those were the bad old days and they are on the way back.




Dvr22999874 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/26/2016 10:42:20 PM)

And I was a cook ( chef) and a damn good one.......................where is the wrong in that ? Not in the military but as a civilian and in the Merchant marine. Totally useless and meaningless insults Bama. If they don't apply to you mate, ignore them and the perpetrator




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 1:29:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

I am missing nothing. I am saying it's a stupid thing for anybody to accuse anybody else of. I apologise if you see a slur in my words. It was totally unintended.
I agree about the law enforcement bit..................check through "The Fitgerald Enquiry" in Queensland a few years back. The Minister for police and the police commissioner BOTH ended up in the slammer along with half the force *smile*. Those were the bad old days and they are on the way back.

That happens, and nobody hates bad cops more than good cops.
I didn't think you were sluring me, I just thought you were missing what upset me about his lies. I don't have a problem with you at all.




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 1:33:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

And I was a cook ( chef) and a damn good one.......................where is the wrong in that ? Not in the military but as a civilian and in the Merchant marine. Totally useless and meaningless insults Bama. If they don't apply to you mate, ignore them and the perpetrator

Ignoring his lies leads to him claiming that I have confirmed them.
And a good cook is an artist, even if they work at IHOP.
In the military it is too often assembly line production of barley palitable food.
There are exceptions, FT Meade, for example, had an excelent 24 hr chow hall.




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 2:01:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

I am missing nothing. I am saying it's a stupid thing for anybody to accuse anybody else of. I apologise if you see a slur in my words. It was totally unintended.
I agree about the law enforcement bit..................check through "The Fitgerald Enquiry" in Queensland a few years back. The Minister for police and the police commissioner BOTH ended up in the slammer along with half the force *smile*. Those were the bad old days and they are on the way back.

Yes, but most of his accusations are stupid




thishereboi -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 3:04:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

And I was a cook ( chef) and a damn good one.......................where is the wrong in that ? Not in the military but as a civilian and in the Merchant marine. Totally useless and meaningless insults Bama. If they don't apply to you mate, ignore them and the perpetrator


It is interesting that the poster you seem to have a problem with is the one being lied about. Yet I haven't seen one post suggesting that the other poster shouldn't be lying in the first place. Yes you admitted it was a stupid lie, but your answer seems to be to ignore it which in this case will only lead to more lies from the first poster. It makes me wonder how you would handle it if they lies were aimed at you.




Page: <<   < prev  41 42 [43] 44 45   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.298828E-02