RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 5:19:11 AM)

a voice intercept translator is not an intelligence analyst, nor a computer programmer, so the nutsuckers are speaking in felching tongues again.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 5:24:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I did not accuse you of being an ex con, you confirmed you were. In the same manner you spewed your disingenous lying asswipe and recharacterized without any glimmer of truth what I said.

You made the tacit premises, I just filled them out for you. Look at what you did and apologize, you proclaimed and accused me of something I did not say, nor imply, nor intend, nor could be deduced from my words, on a multitude of occasions, all with your typical and factless stupid asswipe.





When did I confirm that I was an ex con let me save you time in your search, it didn't happen, you are lying.

Even if this were true, what bearing would it have on Hillary's guilt.
Hint --------- NONE!!!!!!!!!


Uh, you confirmed it, I explained it to you and did at the time, do you have alzheimers, that you cant remember roughly your last page of posts, it was all the same lies with an occasional new one thrown in? or is it some medication you take that prevents it? Or PTSD disability from your service to your country as a cook? old knife wounds and the like, cant imagine you were any good at 18 year and E5.

You know, you might have had a valid point in that post at one time, bubba bama, but nobody much trusts the word of an ex-con, as you have confirmed you are now.

What delusion makes you think I confirmed being an ex con?
The fact that you keep repeating that lie?
I have never said anything that any reasonable person could interpret as confirming this slanderous lie.


You go search for your word confirmed there blubbering bama, and see how you confirmed it, you did so as I did according to you.
You have repeatedly said shit that any reasonable person could interpret as confirming this. Start with what you said I confirmed, and walk it thru from there, I just filled in the blanks for you. That ignorant logic, if good for the goose, is good for the gander.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 5:26:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

And I was a cook ( chef) and a damn good one.......................where is the wrong in that ? Not in the military but as a civilian and in the Merchant marine. Totally useless and meaningless insults Bama. If they don't apply to you mate, ignore them and the perpetrator


It is interesting that the poster you seem to have a problem with is the one being lied about. Yet I haven't seen one post suggesting that the other poster shouldn't be lying in the first place. Yes you admitted it was a stupid lie, but your answer seems to be to ignore it which in this case will only lead to more lies from the first poster. It makes me wonder how you would handle it if they lies were aimed at you.

I see you are not knowledgeable on the subject, but I cannot be lying, because the logic is bama lameos.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 5:35:11 AM)

To all you guys who are wondering what the fuck:

See post 792. Then follow till 804 (after that for the next few pages it is wholly repetitive). You could read them all, if you think I am disingenuous, but you really dont want to waste that much of your life.

By his own confirmation (see how he confirms) he is a convict (by ineptitude, you do time)

I am just filling in bubbas blanks, according to his own logic.

And further, it cannot be a lie, because he confirmed it, also according to his own logic.

So, if I have confirmed something, he has sworn on a stack of bibles.
But it is one of his multitude of lies.





bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 5:51:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

It's all good, If she doesn't make it as a politician, she can always try for a career in music.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQ-Y7tn7_3o

Then again, maybe not [8D]


I cant watch videos where im at so maybe I can hunt this up later. in the meantime, I don't doubt for a moment that its either comical, or cringeworthy.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 6:02:48 AM)

and back to the topic at hand, an interesting addition to the conversation:

"MUST READ insider info on Hillary’s E-mail Investigation"

quote:

Today my National Review piece, “The Clinton E-mail Case Transcends Hillary’s Presidential Campaign” has prompted a comment from someone named ZigZ who I would guess is a member (or former member) of the intelligence community. His comment sheds new light on the Clinton FBI/Justice Dept. investigation and is so significant that I am posting it here on RedState.

quote:

Most people think Hillary’s email is a criminal investigation. IT IS NOT. It is an Espionage investigation. Publicly released information highlights 4 TS-HCS (HUMINT) and 1 TS-SCI TK SI (SIGINT) documents that were stored on Hillary’s nonsecure server that she shared with 3 nonsecure companies. HCS and TK SI are the most classified of classified. When FBI submits letter of recommend to indict, it will go to National Security Section (NSS) of DOJ completely bypassing AG Lynch. Lynch lacks the clearance necessary to possess the documents and doing so would open herself up to prosecution. NSS will not review the evidence. NSS will convene a grand jury of jurors with sufficient clearance to review the evidence. NSS will hold jurors clearance until dismissed as per law, to maintain NTK to courtroom only. Almost everyone on the jury will be from Intelligence Community because IC deals with HUMINT and SIGINT. IC wants Hillary’s head on stick because she played loose with human assets.

Back to the aforementioned 5 documents. She faces 4 counts each on 5 violations of 18 USC 93, 793, 798 and 1924 at the least. If found guilty, that represents a 100 year minimum jail sentence. If by some strange and unexplainable reason Hillary escapes prosecution, she still faces a high probability of Impeachment which would eliminate her chance of holding future office. If you are voting for Hillary, you are actually voting for Vice President.



http://www.redstate.com/diary/6755mm/2016/04/25/must-read-insider-info-hillarys-e-mail-investigation/





mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 6:41:20 AM)

I am guessing that is the stupidest piece of nutsucker asswipe posted to date, and that is a fierce competition.

Good ol Ziggy Z.
18 USC 93............disclosing documents? LOLOLOL. not even going to bother more with that pants shitter.
Nutsucker felchings finest hour.




Phydeaux -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 7:59:38 AM)

Funny how every document is the stupidest piece of nutsucker.... you've used that line more than 211 times before I stopped counting.

Brush up on usage of superlatives.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 8:05:53 AM)

despite vile critter parts ineffectual (febrile? addled? juvenile? hallucinatory?) rantings:

Chapter 93 › § 1905 18 U.S. Code § 1905 - Disclosure of confidential information generally

Whoever, being an officer or employee of the United States or of any department or agency thereof… publishes, divulges, discloses, or makes known in any manner or to any extent not authorized by law any information coming to him in the course of his employment or official duties or by reason of any examination or investigation made by, or return, report or record made to or filed with, such department or agency or officer or employee thereof, which information concerns or relates to the trade secrets, processes, operations, style of work, or apparatus, or to the identity, confidential statistical data, amount or source of any income, profits, losses, or expenditures of any person, firm, partnership, corporation, or association; or permits any income return or copy thereof or any book containing any abstract or particulars thereof to be seen or examined by any person except as provided by law; shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and shall be removed from office or employment.

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

[this one’s long, so here’s some relevant sections]

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

(e) Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 798 - Disclosure of classified information

(a) Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information—

(3) concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government; or

(4) obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government, knowing the same to have been obtained by such processes—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

(c) In this section, the term “classified information of the United States” means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 8:51:41 AM)

here you go comrade---argue with a brigadier general who worked in the DOJ:

http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/21/eight-laws-hillary-clinton-could-be-indicted-for-breaking/

its from 7 months ago and it presages all the material from the redstate article.




WickedsDesire -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 9:02:50 AM)

45 pages and the usual are still at it




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 9:09:24 AM)

LOL. A brigadier general (ret. and most of his rank is from the reserve as a weekend warrior the rest for hanging out with Reagan, sort of a Haig sort of guy) is no more expert than the dailycaller nutsucker slobber bloggers.......oh, he is one.




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 9:47:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I did not accuse you of being an ex con, you confirmed you were. In the same manner you spewed your disingenous lying asswipe and recharacterized without any glimmer of truth what I said.

You made the tacit premises, I just filled them out for you. Look at what you did and apologize, you proclaimed and accused me of something I did not say, nor imply, nor intend, nor could be deduced from my words, on a multitude of occasions, all with your typical and factless stupid asswipe.





When did I confirm that I was an ex con let me save you time in your search, it didn't happen, you are lying.

Even if this were true, what bearing would it have on Hillary's guilt.
Hint --------- NONE!!!!!!!!!


Uh, you confirmed it, I explained it to you and did at the time, do you have alzheimers, that you cant remember roughly your last page of posts, it was all the same lies with an occasional new one thrown in? or is it some medication you take that prevents it? Or PTSD disability from your service to your country as a cook? old knife wounds and the like, cant imagine you were any good at 18 year and E5.

You know, you might have had a valid point in that post at one time, bubba bama, but nobody much trusts the word of an ex-con, as you have confirmed you are now.

What delusion makes you think I confirmed being an ex con?
The fact that you keep repeating that lie?
I have never said anything that any reasonable person could interpret as confirming this slanderous lie.


You go search for your word confirmed there blubbering bama, and see how you confirmed it, you did so as I did according to you.
You have repeatedly said shit that any reasonable person could interpret as confirming this. Start with what you said I confirmed, and walk it thru from there, I just filled in the blanks for you. That ignorant logic, if good for the goose, is good for the gander.

Lying again, I have confirmed this or any of your other lies. Repeat it as often as you like it will not make it true.




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 9:54:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

To all you guys who are wondering what the fuck:

See post 792. Then follow till 804 (after that for the next few pages it is wholly repetitive). You could read them all, if you think I am disingenuous, but you really dont want to waste that much of your life.

By his own confirmation (see how he confirms) he is a convict (by ineptitude, you do time)

I am just filling in bubbas blanks, according to his own logic.

And further, it cannot be a lie, because he confirmed it, also according to his own logic.

So, if I have confirmed something, he has sworn on a stack of bibles.
But it is one of his multitude of lies.



So you are basing your stupid lie on the fact that I know that noy properly protecting classified information (regardless of reason) is a crime. You somehow think that this confirms that I have been to prison. That is so stupid that I am amazed that even you would think it makes sense. What you have confirmed is that you are a moron.




subrob1967 -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 10:04:13 AM)

FR

Bama, why are you arguing with Chumly the Pawn Star? It's beneath you.




lovmuffin -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 10:19:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

FR

Bama, why are you arguing with Chumly the Pawn Star? It's beneath you.



Why are you giving him such a nice complement ?




lovmuffin -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 10:23:24 AM)

Nevermind




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 10:28:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Nope, you got it wrong again. You proclaim and accuse. Show me actual facts TO DATE, from the nutsucker slobberblogs in these 40 pages. Credibly citable FACT. All the ones I quoted are readily available from public information, credibly and extensively cited. For instance, you don't know this, because it is a fact. Haliburton profits from Iraq, and number of shares Cheney held in 'blind trust', what their share value was and when? Public record, IRS and so on.
What do these nutsuckers slobberblogs have here in the way of signed transcripts and videos from the FBI? from DOJ?

Start with the 147 agents investigating, its more like 12 or so. So, we disagree there, come up with the fact. The fact.

Dick, thats what they got, and thats what you got in your hand.

It isn't a matter of agree or disagree, it is a matter of fact. Provable fact. Like your dick. In your hands.




Thank you for confirming my statement.
You believe the ones who agree with you, you don't believe the others.

NP


What I said is plain, and you mendaciously and ignorantly and ineptly (lets keep track of that word) made an impugnment by propaganda and nutsucker asswipe regarding something I DID NOT say. (you have done it repeatedly, and not just on this thread.) It is a lie.


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Im not sure how you got to that assumption, as he said he believes facts. Maybes, what ifs, probables, or might haves...are not facts by any standard of any imagination.

BubbaD
And we know that dear Ron is never wrong.
Her staff has admitted to discussing classified information over unsecured blackberries, that alone can send you to jail, it doesn't matter what else you have done.
Obama said she didn't expose classified info on purpose, it was unintentional, exposing it through ineptitude will get you almost as much time as doing on purpose.
No if's, maybes, or could bes.



You were asked repeatedly for a citation of the astounding claim that: "Her staff has admitted to discussing classified information over unsecured blackberries".
Here you proclaim and announce that ineptitude will get you time.

You are not only inept, but an imbicile.
You have just confirmed that you are a convict. In your own words.

quote:

ol puckerlips
I have no lies stacked up.
You claim that right wing blogs are liars. and leftwing blogs are purely factual.

cite please, should be easy to find. uh oh, another lie stacked up. I never made such a claim, oh oh, puckerlips is stacking up more lies.


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

No, I made my own statement from it, and your DK syndrome is really virulent, you are making a fool out of yourself each time you deflect from your completely idiotic statement that staffers admitted that they passed around national secrets on unsecured blackberries, and can't substantiate it.

Nutsucker slobberblogs have no fact, nutsuckers have no fact, nutsuckers are destroying America thru their catamiting to corporations and foreign powers.

Too bad you couldnt make it in the service and make full use of your cooking skills, but I imagine you didn't have any, since you have to order pizza and guard your porch.

You are the laughingstock, my mendacious friend.

So you are back to you dismiss anything you don't like as a nutsucker blog.
Truth to you is what you want to believe.
Facts to you is what you want to believe.
I was a Linguist
an intellegence analyst
and a computer programer

prima facie lies. you cant spell intelligence after '18 years of being in the biz' or recognize programming languages after '18 years of being in the biz' (and they dont let 18 year hitch e5s do that shit. not ever.)
and we stack that one in passing....

quote:

bubba the hutt
You are at least aware are you not that the FBI has discovered over 100 clasified emails on Hillary's serve.


Cite please? stack another lie.

quote:


When did I confirm that I was an ex con let me save you time in your search, it didn't happen, you are lying.


Right out in the garish light of day, top dead center, for your viewing pleasure. The fact you never said it confirms it. It is your premises, and you use them all the time.

There's more, but thats enough for now, convict.








mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 10:30:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

FR

Bama, why are you arguing with Chumly the Pawn Star? It's beneath you.



Chunky the Pawn Star is a nice complement ?




the three ring nutsucker felching circus comes to town again, scabby knees and all boys, I bet your ticket sales are shit. And the call of cockgarglers are heard once again in the land..........good to see you boys.





lovmuffin -> RE: Hillary Probed (4/27/2016 10:31:48 AM)

OOPs




Page: <<   < prev  42 43 [44] 45 46   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.152344E-02