RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/26/2016 4:05:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

ROFLMAO so what? Nothing criminal or civil there. You act like you have never been in an audit by the IG.

Far from damning, far from guilty, far from illegal.




sorry there comrade, the IG report is more or less an admission/recognition that she skirted FOIA, which means--breaking the law.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/26/2016 4:14:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I can hear the furious fapping and impotence from here


i do realize he has a hard-on for Hillary but I think the mnottertail genitalia commentary and confessional thread is elsewhere on the forums.



WhoreMods -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/26/2016 5:03:12 AM)

A cute line, but it sounds a lot more like you people have a sexual fixation on Clinton than Lucy or Ron do, looking at this thread.
Is it jealousy because Clinton's other half had a big enough cock to play the field, rather than a tiny little thing like butthair boy?



bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/26/2016 5:04:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

cant remember if I posted this point a week ago or not (either way, its bound to lead to some vile critter parts frothing):

quote:

Judicial Watch Seeks Hillary Clinton Testimony

The question of whether Hillary Clinton can be questioned under oath by Judicial Watch attorneys now is squarely before a federal court judge.


http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/hillary-clinton-should-testify-under-oath/


You have posted something akin to this, or this very thing repeatedly Shiteater44. With your continuous felch and toiletlicking, I can see how you can lose track of your three or four useless and factless cites from the nutsucker slobber blogs.

Its no big deal, a deposition? Don't even know why they need a hearing for a court order, to subpoena duces tecum for deposition, its usually administrative, but its still meaningless, she is going to tell them to go back to their felching in the airport bathrooms, or answer their tired shit with her lawyer pretty much turning off the harrassment and begging the question shit, which is all they can do.

nutsucker lawyer: blah, blah blah.
Clinton lawyer: turned over to the state department.
nutsucker lawyer: blah, blah blah.
Clinton lawyer: asked and answered at the 7th congressional investigation in a query by nutsucker Gowdy.
nutsucker lawyer: blah, blah blah.
Clinton lawyer: asked and answered at the 5th congressional investigation in a query by nutsucker Gowdy.
nutsucker lawyer: blah, blah blah.
Clinton lawyer: asked and answered at the 11th congressional investigation in a query by nutsucker Gowdy.

Ad nauseam.


see highlighted part above---mission accomplished.



mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/26/2016 5:22:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

ROFLMAO so what? Nothing criminal or civil there. You act like you have never been in an audit by the IG.

Far from damning, far from guilty, far from illegal.




sorry there comrade, the IG report is more or less an admission/recognition that she skirted FOIA, which means--breaking the law.



Sorry my bolshevik friend, no such thing is true unless you are going to prosecute Albright, Powell, Rice, Kerry et al. And exactly for what?) And reading the actual IG report, the failure was systemic, and new policies have been put into place to fix the failures. It would appear the fault lies in the bureaucracy and oversight of the State department machinery, and not Secretaries of State.

If this was adjudged to be actionable it would have went to the FBI and not released to the public.

Transparency in government.



Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/26/2016 7:13:30 AM)

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/hillary-clinton-broke-email-rules-state-department-report-article-1.2649383?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%202016-05-26&utm_term=DailyNewsletter

Ah...the other's....statute of limitations.



mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/26/2016 7:26:54 AM)

Theres a statute of limitations for violating company policy? I was unaware that is a chargeable offense, in fact, I am almost certain it is not.



Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/26/2016 12:09:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I can hear the furious fapping and impotence from here


i do realize he has a hard-on for Hillary but I think the mnottertail genitalia commentary and confessional thread is elsewhere on the forums.

I hate to have to come back just to remind you that I was discussing you and the other cohorts of hillaries doom fapgroup
but I did cos I can.



Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/26/2016 12:25:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/hillary-clinton-broke-email-rules-state-department-report-article-1.2649383?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%202016-05-26&utm_term=DailyNewsletter

Ah...the other's....statute of limitations.

from your own link
While the report indicates Clinton violated the State Department's own policies she didn't violate the Federal Records Act, which would have been a more serious transgression. The report also makes clear that Clinton isn't the only secretary of State to have these problems. The State Department has a long track record of having some of worst document retention in the federal government.

please show statute of limitations with regards to this?




Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/27/2016 7:21:40 AM)

FR

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/king-clinton-caught-lying-year-email-scandal-article-1.2651043?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%202016-05-27&utm_term=DailyNewsletter

Otter tail, you knew this was all going to fall apart eventually didn't you?



mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/27/2016 8:35:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

FR

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/king-clinton-caught-lying-year-email-scandal-article-1.2651043?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%202016-05-27&utm_term=DailyNewsletter

Otter tail, you knew this was all going to fall apart eventually didn't you?

I have said since the inception that nutsuckers are falling apart. 19 trillion in debt, nutsuckers giving away our country, and nutsuckers are shitting their pants over minor policy shit.



mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/27/2016 8:37:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

cant remember if I posted this point a week ago or not (either way, its bound to lead to some vile critter parts frothing):

quote:

Judicial Watch Seeks Hillary Clinton Testimony

The question of whether Hillary Clinton can be questioned under oath by Judicial Watch attorneys now is squarely before a federal court judge.


http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/hillary-clinton-should-testify-under-oath/


You have posted something akin to this, or this very thing repeatedly Shiteater44. With your continuous felch and toiletlicking, I can see how you can lose track of your three or four useless and factless cites from the nutsucker slobber blogs.

Its no big deal, a deposition? Don't even know why they need a hearing for a court order, to subpoena duces tecum for deposition, its usually administrative, but its still meaningless, she is going to tell them to go back to their felching in the airport bathrooms, or answer their tired shit with her lawyer pretty much turning off the harrassment and begging the question shit, which is all they can do.

nutsucker lawyer: blah, blah blah.
Clinton lawyer: turned over to the state department.
nutsucker lawyer: blah, blah blah.
Clinton lawyer: asked and answered at the 7th congressional investigation in a query by nutsucker Gowdy.
nutsucker lawyer: blah, blah blah.
Clinton lawyer: asked and answered at the 5th congressional investigation in a query by nutsucker Gowdy.
nutsucker lawyer: blah, blah blah.
Clinton lawyer: asked and answered at the 11th congressional investigation in a query by nutsucker Gowdy.

Ad nauseam.


see highlighted part above---mission accomplished.


Shiteater44 is felching, a continuous thing as he licks toilets and does his nutsucker duties in the airport bathrooms. As was known from the very first post Felchgobbler44 has made here.



BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/27/2016 2:10:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Theres a statute of limitations for violating company policy? I was unaware that is a chargeable offense, in fact, I am almost certain it is not.

That would be when it is a crime to violate company policy.



Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/28/2016 8:04:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/hillary-clinton-broke-email-rules-state-department-report-article-1.2649383?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%202016-05-26&utm_term=DailyNewsletter

Ah...the other's....statute of limitations.

from your own link
While the report indicates Clinton violated the State Department's own policies she didn't violate the Federal Records Act, which would have been a more serious transgression. The report also makes clear that Clinton isn't the only secretary of State to have these problems. The State Department has a long track record of having some of worst document retention in the federal government.

please show statute of limitations with regards to this?





Liberal reporter writing for a liberal paper discussing a liberal TV news show that was discussing an Obama appointee IG report...


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/king-clinton-quit-presidential-race-email-scandal-article-1.2652342?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%202016-05-28&utm_term=DailyNewsletter

2:43 - Mika Brzezinski to Andrea Mitchell, "The first interview we showed was the one you did with her and she says time and time and time and time and time and time again it was allowed. Was it allowed?" Andrea answers, "It was not allowed to not return those records before she left the State Department. She violated the Official Records Act, according to her own State Department IG (Investigator General) appointed by President Obama. What you have shown just now, Mika, completely undercuts the argument she has been making for more than a year, just as she trying to persuade voters that she is not untrustworthy. I think the most surprising, and in some ways shocking thing, is their reaction, claiming that this is the same as what former secretaries did."



Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/28/2016 8:08:49 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

FR

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/king-clinton-caught-lying-year-email-scandal-article-1.2651043?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%202016-05-27&utm_term=DailyNewsletter

Otter tail, you knew this was all going to fall apart eventually didn't you?

I have said since the inception that nutsuckers are falling apart. 19 trillion in debt, nutsuckers giving away our country, and nutsuckers are shitting their pants over minor policy shit.

Well, mostly correct. Hey, what about the $4.3 trillion that the Fed is holding in QE revenue. They're paying banks twice the interest rate to invest the funds than the banks can get on the market...sorta keeping old people pension funds doing nothing in favor of making profits for banks. Then of course when the next president fixes this smoke and mirrors the county will have to pay huge interest on the $4.3 trillion. It'll cost way more than any war GW started.



bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/28/2016 12:16:57 PM)

given that congress has been overwhelmingly democrat in the burgeoning years of debt, vile critter parts must be talking about his social/political "nutsucking" kin.



Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/28/2016 1:34:01 PM)

I thought they were toilet licking, fetching kin. You might be right though.



Nnanji -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/29/2016 7:08:25 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

im gutted,
so gutted
I may never recover from the humiliation and contempt, oh woe is me.



[sm=fingers.gif]


Interestingly enough, some time ago the Dalai Lama co-authored a book titled, "The Art of Happiness." In the book he states, "In Buddhism, the principal of causality is accepted as a natural law. In dealing with reality, you have to take that law into account...Now, for instance, hatred, jealousy, anger, and so on are harmful. We consider them negative states of mind because they destroy our mental happiness; once you harbor feelings of hatred or ill feelings towards someone, once you yourself are filled by hatred or negative emotions, then other people appear to you as hostile. So, as a result there is more fear, greater inhibition and hesitation, and sense of insecurity..."

Above, if you read what I wrote, you'll see that I didn't try to gut you. You saw something that wasn't there through the lense of your own insecurity, fear and hate. Above, you admit you've been harmonizing with that energy for years. Now, it limits you even if you believe it comforts and shields you.

I really do wish you the best.



Lucylastic -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/29/2016 7:44:04 AM)

wow took you nearly four days to come up with that?
"golf clap"
I am aware of my flaws, have been for a number of years...
Mind you, your opinion has little to do with fact, again.
PS dont try sarcasm, you might hurt yourself...



lovmuffin -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/29/2016 9:16:01 AM)

"Golf clap" ?? What does that mean ?



Page: <<   < prev  61 62 [63] 64 65   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.640625E-02