RE: Hillary Probed (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


lovmuffin -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 4:11:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you've never heard of "screwed the pooch" or "fucked the dog"?
REALLY


Of course I have, Ronnie does it every time he posts. I see you want to distract from the fact that he is a liar and an asshole. I only asked that because earlier when I told him that concerning what I did at NSA "I can tell you but I would have to kill you" he treated it like an actual death threat.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, (see if you can parse that part too) I guess welfare patients were not taught to read, especially the constitution.

You want to follow the constitution, but you havent read it, you want to tell me about the minds of the founding fathers, but havent read it.



I guess mental patients were not taught to read either, especially the Constitution. Why don't you parse that part for everyone. Would that be along the same line of crap as the joether school of the Second Amendment.??




lovmuffin -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 4:13:31 AM)

OOPs




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 9:05:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you've never heard of "screwed the pooch" or "fucked the dog"?
REALLY


Of course I have, Ronnie does it every time he posts. I see you want to distract from the fact that he is a liar and an asshole. I only asked that because earlier when I told him that concerning what I did at NSA "I can tell you but I would have to kill you" he treated it like an actual death threat.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, (see if you can parse that part too) I guess welfare patients were not taught to read, especially the constitution.

You want to follow the constitution, but you havent read it, you want to tell me about the minds of the founding fathers, but havent read it.



I guess mental patients were not taught to read either, especially the Constitution. Why don't you parse that part for everyone. Would that be along the same line of crap as the joether school of the Second Amendment.??

No, his line of crap is worse than Joether, the last time this came up he actually claimed that the 2nd was there to protect the the central government from the states, then he has the gall to claim I haven't read the Constitution.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 9:21:37 AM)

Well, it doesn't take much gall when you haven't read it by demonstration, and the second amendments right to bear arms was for the well regulated and trained militia, to protect the US from enemies FOREIGN and DOMESTIC, and to protect US interests between states. ALL OF WHICH WE HAVE DONE. A great deal of it in your pathetic lifetime.




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 9:26:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well, it doesn't take much gall when you haven't read it by demonstration, and the second amendments right to bear arms was for the well regulated and trained militia, to protect the US from enemies FOREIGN and DOMESTIC, and to protect US interests between states. ALL OF WHICH WE HAVE DONE.

You don't even understand that the Bill of Rights was to protect the people and the states from the central government. Otherwise it would be called the bill of powers. Only a devoted statist could see it the way you do.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 10:12:05 AM)

Only to someone who has not read the constitution, or the Convention notes. Only an untutored nutsucker could see it the way that you do.




verbatimguy -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 10:16:16 AM)

To much to read exeept to say that she done wrong and she needs to be apoligized for that and then move on.

She was stuiopd as fuck but many people in politics are as stupid as fuck so nothing is new.




verbatimguy -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 10:22:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well, it doesn't take much gall when you haven't read it by demonstration, and the second amendments right to bear arms was for the well regulated and trained militia, to protect the US from enemies FOREIGN and DOMESTIC, and to protect US interests between states. ALL OF WHICH WE HAVE DONE. A great deal of it in your pathetic lifetime.


What does a gun do?

It kills.
Sure it kiills squirrels but that is not what teh contistions is about killing squirrels.

So why did teh peop0-el who wrote teh constitution allos everyone to have a gun which menas thaty they can kill people any time they want to?

A gun does nothing else but kill people.
Why would the contsinttuion allow us to kill peole?

Guns kill people. Thats why they put the right into teh constitution.
So that people could kill people.

Or do you think that teh writers who wrote the consitition didn't realize that guns kill people?

Since we can establish that the writers of teh constitution knew that guns kill people and that is all that guns do for teh purpose of government we have to tehn wonder why.

NMany people have debated the term "militia" and it has been extremely well establsished beyond any shodow of any doubt that the framewrs of the contuition meant EVERYONE when they said militia (times change and words change and how we ORGANiZE ourselves change).

Let me repeat that since there is an idiot above how doesn't know that MILITIA has been established to mean everyone.
Now you can fight that battle which is a semantics battle but it has been faought many times already and the highest courts in teh land have exstablished that MILITA means EVERYONE.

Given that we can establish two things
1` The framewrs wanted us to have guns becasue guns kill people (thats all they do)
2. The framewors wanted ALL of us to be able to have guns (becdause the militia has been debated thousands of times and that is the result).

So the framwerks wanted ALL of us to be able to have GUNS so that we could KILL PEOPLE.

Now why do you think they wanted that?

The answer is easy (and it was already said above).




WhoreMods -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 10:27:08 AM)

So by extrapolation from that, using a gun to shoot anybody who isn't English, is unconstitutional?




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 11:00:58 AM)

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Anyone? Some of you nutsuckers who pretend to know the constitution?


Nutsuckers are as ignorant and unknowledgeable, untruthful and mendacious, regarding the constitution as they are of attacking Hillary, as demonstrated daily by their pants shitting felch.




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 2:15:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Anyone? Some of you nutsuckers who pretend to know the constitution?


Nutsuckers are as ignorant and unknowledgeable, untruthful and mendacious, regarding the constitution as they are of attacking Hillary, as demonstrated daily by their pants shitting felch.


Madison clearly stated that the right to bear arms was to protect the people from the government, not the other way around. Your posts no longer suggest that you drink to much but rather are not unlike what a person using LSD, not that you are, but that your thought processes are on the same level.




lovmuffin -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 3:28:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you've never heard of "screwed the pooch" or "fucked the dog"?
REALLY


Of course I have, Ronnie does it every time he posts. I see you want to distract from the fact that he is a liar and an asshole. I only asked that because earlier when I told him that concerning what I did at NSA "I can tell you but I would have to kill you" he treated it like an actual death threat.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, (see if you can parse that part too) I guess welfare patients were not taught to read, especially the constitution.

You want to follow the constitution, but you havent read it, you want to tell me about the minds of the founding fathers, but havent read it.



I guess mental patients were not taught to read either, especially the Constitution. Why don't you parse that part for everyone. Would that be along the same line of crap as the joether school of the Second Amendment.??

No, his line of crap is worse than Joether, the last time this came up he actually claimed that the 2nd was there to protect the the central government from the states, then he has the gall to claim I haven't read the Constitution.


Well, according to post #1290 he's pretty much in line with the joether school of make believe. I really couldn't say for sure which one is more full of crap but you could be right.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 4:03:10 PM)

to the topic at hand:

"Judge Nap: Hillary's 'Grave Legal Troubles' Will Come to a Head Very Soon"

quote:

Judge Andrew Napolitano appeared on "Fox and Friends" this morning and disputed Hillary Clinton's latest defense for her private email server.

Clinton has claimed that she simply followed the practice of secretaries of state who came before her, such as Colin Powell.

Judge Napolitano pointed out that Powell only used personal email for State Department business several times, and at no point did those emails involve material that was confidential, secret or top secret.




"Mrs. Clinton diverted all 66,000 of her emails - 100 percent of them - from the government server to her private server," Judge Napolitano said. "When the government asked for them back, she only gave half back. Of the half she gave back, they found 2,200 that contained state secrets in them."

He added that Clinton's failure to secure those secrets is the crime, but her deception to cover up that crime is even worse, particularly since she's getting members of Congress to "lie for her."

"I think she's in grave legal trouble, and I think it's going to come to a head very soon," Judge Napolitano said. "The evidence of her guilt is overwhelming, just from the public record."


http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/05/31/judge-napolitano-rips-new-hillary-clinton-email-defense-says-shes-grave-legal-trouble

oh no comrades, fox news!




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 4:05:59 PM)

and amongst the relatively amoral (immoral?) bit of humanity we call liberals:

quote:

Among Democratic voters, 71% believe Clinton should keep running [if she is charged with a felony]...


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/05/31/terrific-democrat-voters-believe-hillary-should-keep-running-for-president-if-shes-charged-with-a-felony-n2171437




BamaD -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 4:06:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you've never heard of "screwed the pooch" or "fucked the dog"?
REALLY


Of course I have, Ronnie does it every time he posts. I see you want to distract from the fact that he is a liar and an asshole. I only asked that because earlier when I told him that concerning what I did at NSA "I can tell you but I would have to kill you" he treated it like an actual death threat.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, (see if you can parse that part too) I guess welfare patients were not taught to read, especially the constitution.

You want to follow the constitution, but you havent read it, you want to tell me about the minds of the founding fathers, but havent read it.



I guess mental patients were not taught to read either, especially the Constitution. Why don't you parse that part for everyone. Would that be along the same line of crap as the joether school of the Second Amendment.??

No, his line of crap is worse than Joether, the last time this came up he actually claimed that the 2nd was there to protect the the central government from the states, then he has the gall to claim I haven't read the Constitution.


Well, according to post #1290 he's pretty much in line with the joether school of make believe. I really couldn't say for sure which one is more full of crap but you could be right.


It seems that Joether at least admits that the 2nd allows the states to offset the Feds, he doesn't seem to be so irrational as to think we have a bill of powers to protect the Feds from the people and the states.

BTW I never thought I would be saying that we had a regular further out in la la land than Joether, but if anyone could do it, it would be Mnottertail.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 4:12:55 PM)

"New Hillary Camp Lie: If She'd Been Aware of an Email Problem, She'd Have Addressed It"

quote:

Another day, another set of lies from Hillary Clinton's campaign about her national security-compromising and ongoing email scandal -- previous dissembling and dishonesty about which was exposed in last week's bombshell Inspector General report. Because mendacious assertions in earlier nothing-to-see-here memos have been blown to bits by the facts, Hillary's campaign chairman has been forced to roll out a fresh round of spin. As John Podesta attempts to telegraph some degree of contrition, two points stick out. First, he claims that if Hillary had been aware of any concerns about her email scheme, she would have nipped them in the bud:

quote:

“Had Secretary Clinton known of any concerns about her email setup at the time, she would have taken steps to address them. She believed she was following the practices of other Secretaries and senior officials,”


...on the "if she'd known" portion of Podesta's distortion [the quote above], please direct your attention to this comprehensive Washington Post story chronicling the timeline of the scandal, which I summarized in a 12-point synopsis in late March. Clinton and her chief of staff were alerted to the security risks from the earliest days of her tenure at State, dating back to a February 17, 2009 meeting at which the issue "came to a head," according to the Post. The key passage:

quote:

After the meeting on Feb. 17 with Mills, security officials in the department crafted a memo about the risks. And among themselves, they expressed concern that other department employees would follow the “bad example” and seek to use insecure BlackBerrys themselves, emails show. As they worked on the memo, they were aware of a speech delivered by Joel F. Brenner, then chief of counterintelligence at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, on Feb. 24 at a hotel in Vienna, Va., a State Department document shows. Brenner urged his audience to consider what could have happened to them during a visit to the recent Beijing Olympics. “Your phone or BlackBerry could have been tagged, tracked, monitored and exploited between your disembarking the airplane and reaching the taxi stand at the airport,” Brenner said. “And when you emailed back home, some or all of the malware may have migrated to your home server. This is not hypothetical.” At the time, Clinton had just returned from an official trip that took her to China and elsewhere in Asia. She was embarking on another foray to the Middle East and Europe. She took her BlackBerry with her.

In early March, Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security Eric Boswell delivered a memo with the subject line “Use of Blackberries in Mahogany Row.” “Our review reaffirms our belief that the vulnerabilities and risks associated with the use of Blackberries in the Mahogany Row [redacted] considerably outweigh the convenience their use can add,” the memo said. He emphasized: “Any unclassified Blackberry is highly vulnerable in any setting to remotely and covertly monitoring conversations, retrieving e-mails, and exploiting calendars.” Nine days later, Clinton told Boswell that she had read his memo and “gets it,” according to an email sent by a senior diplomatic security official. “Her attention was drawn to the sentence that indicates (Diplomatic Security) have intelligence concerning this vulnerability during her recent trip to Asia,” the email said. But Clinton kept using her private BlackBerry — and the basement server.


She was made explicitly aware of "the concerns." She personally acknowledged those concerns. Then she proceeded to deliberately ignore them and continue her reckless conduct for the next three-plus years, as she trafficked thousands of classified emails -- including many dozens that contained secret, top secret and beyond top secret material -- through her unsecure server.


quite a bit more at: http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/05/31/new-hillary-camp-spin-if-shed-been-aware-of-an-email-problem-shed-have-addressed-it-n2171399




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 4:16:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

to the topic at hand:

"Judge Nap: Hillary's 'Grave Legal Troubles' Will Come to a Head Very Soon"

quote:

Judge Andrew Napolitano appeared on "Fox and Friends" this morning and disputed Hillary Clinton's latest defense for her private email server.

Clinton has claimed that she simply followed the practice of secretaries of state who came before her, such as Colin Powell.

Judge Napolitano pointed out that Powell only used personal email for State Department business several times, and at no point did those emails involve material that was confidential, secret or top secret.




"Mrs. Clinton diverted all 66,000 of her emails - 100 percent of them - from the government server to her private server," Judge Napolitano said. "When the government asked for them back, she only gave half back. Of the half she gave back, they found 2,200 that contained state secrets in them."

He added that Clinton's failure to secure those secrets is the crime, but her deception to cover up that crime is even worse, particularly since she's getting members of Congress to "lie for her."

"I think she's in grave legal trouble, and I think it's going to come to a head very soon," Judge Napolitano said. "The evidence of her guilt is overwhelming, just from the public record."


http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/05/31/judge-napolitano-rips-new-hillary-clinton-email-defense-says-shes-grave-legal-trouble

oh no comrades, fox news!



here vile critter parts, i'll help ya out:

nutsucker cockgargle nutsucker felch nutsucker slobberblog nutsucker asswipe nutsucker airport bathroom nutsucker pants shitting nutsucker hallucination nutsucker faux nuze nutsucker

there, now you are freed up to go frothing somewhere else.




lovmuffin -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 4:46:54 PM)

unfortunately you forgot toilet licking so he will be back.




bounty44 -> RE: Hillary Probed (5/31/2016 5:29:43 PM)

dang and I missed the edit time window too or I would have added that.




mnottertail -> RE: Hillary Probed (6/1/2016 5:11:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

and amongst the relatively amoral (immoral?) bit of humanity we call liberals:

quote:

Among Democratic voters, 71% believe Clinton should keep running [if she is charged with a felony]...


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/05/31/terrific-democrat-voters-believe-hillary-should-keep-running-for-president-if-shes-charged-with-a-felony-n2171437

And amongst the nutsuckers, there was Nixon, St. Wrinklemeat (at least twice violating the law in the various weapons deals), W who was a convict prior to, during, and after his presidency, Trump who will surely be convicted, I am thinking that the morals of the nutsucker are describable as common mattress-backed crack whores.





Page: <<   < prev  63 64 [65] 66 67   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625