|
joether -> RE: Deaf, Dumb, and Blind (8/4/2015 8:14:33 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
quote:
ORIGINAL: joether
Its like watching FOX 'news' during election coverage. They place the GOP in the best positive light and Democrats in the worst. They were the ones that said Romney would not only win, but win by a landslide in 2012....
comrade bird brain---I trust your memory about as well as I respect your critical thinking and intellectual honesty, which is to say not at all. a reference for both of your lame comments above would be good but im not holding my breath on that.
Bounty, you are a foolishly dimwitted fellow with nothing useful to contribute to soceity; EXCEPT, to serve as an example of what sort of concepts we Americans need to denounce.
Next time the Democrats win the Oval Office (sooner than later), watch FOX 'news'. Go on youtube and look up the 2012 election on FOX 'news'. It was amusing to watch the conservative become bullshit that their candidate not only didnt win, but win in a landslide as they pushed in their propaganda. Megan Kelley had to walk down to the 'egg heads' and consult with them over the issue. They stated without a small likelihood that Romney was going to win. Go ahead, look it up; I'm not afraid with what you'll find. But you are! Because that would blow holes in your sad, excuse for an argument.
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
and while we are waiting for that---analyses of candidate coverage during presidential elections show fox to be the most balanced when it comes to amount of time devoted to candidates, and the amount of positive/negative statements concerning them. you can either look that up, or continue to be a shameless partisan hack.
Yeah, like your not shamelessly a partisan hack? How did you respond to me? Was that an....INSULT.....? Yes it was. Or at least an attempt to insult. I've known sixth graders whom use more colorfully insults than you do. Did you ever past the 5th grade?
Why are you waiting? www.youtube.com and www.google.com. Search string "inauguration 2012 FOX news". Or if you want to go 'old school', try "inauguration 2008 FOX news". Or have you forgotten all those birthers, truthers and bigots in 2008? You can't look up either because your.....AFRAID....of being a total hypocrite.
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
as far as placing the gop in the best positive light and the democrats in the worst just in general, its pretty clear from that statement you actually don't watch fox news. they don't actually do that and there is plenty of praise, criticism and representation for both sides of the aisle.
Actually I do watch FOX 'news'. Most of their material is like the Drudge Report; fear.....Fear......FEARRRRR!!!!!! Because conservatives are motivated by fear for some strange and odd reason. How many read the ACA in the last five years its been law? About 0.0001% of the population. How many are scared about what it does? All of them! Including yourself! Or are you going to ignore all the threads in which I had to correct your baseless and ignorant attacks with the facts from the law? How about that Iran Treaty? Only 159 pages long. Very easy to read and understand. But its to complicated for you. Better for you to be ignorant and controlled by others, right?
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
lastly Einstein---when you say "fox news" and "they" concerning Romney winning by a landslide---fox news has hundreds of people working at it and many dozens of online news anchors, commentators/analysts, guests, etc, and they come from all political stripes (again if you actually watched fox you would know that), so who (since you still cant figure this out, please notice the proper use of "who" again) exactly is "they?" who is the one monolithic voice that speaks for fox? (see, its not "whom is the one...") or did all the tv personalities, not to mention all the behind the scenes people and executives, somehow magically find themselves in agreement on Romney's landslide victory? the point being, there isn't one, such that you could say what you did.
Actually if you objective look at US History as it pertains to US Elections, you'll find many people outside conservative circles that pegged President Obama to win. Nate Silverman predicted both the percentage of votes in each state and which state would go to which person. He placed it on his blog a few weeks before the election. He and others did the number crunching on about a few million possible outcomes. The grand majority point to Obama winning. The only times he didn't win? He was dead. That wasn't to promising for the Romney camp.
Watch the clips from cnn, fox, or even msnbc when states were being called. The GOP/TP got very positive when they took an initial lead over Obama. And it was short lived. I remember it like it was yesterday! The only people left completely in the dark over the final results were 'low information voters' whom coincidentally were conservative in their political viewpoints.
Go ahead, research it. The facts as they say, are the facts. And you have neither the facts nor the evidence on your side. Therefore you result in petty name calling.
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
itd be so nice if you could wise up and stop writing your leftist drivel.
After you silence yourself and all the other conservatives and libertarians first! Which you and others will not do, because wisdom is just not a trait we accuse conservatives having these days!
|
|
|
|
