NorthernGent
Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent quote:
ORIGINAL: kdsub High horse was not appropriate and i removed it. I apologize. You see the problem , and the reason for the court rulings in my opinion, is that most of the time the arresting officer is within his mandated duty. If people thought that they knew the law better than the police there would be too much arguing and perhaps violence. There are many weird circumstances as we know in the world of law enforcement. Some laws are vague or can be interpreted in more than one way. The safest solution is to let a judge determine the validity if there is a disagreement...not a street lawyer... or people like in this thread playing like they know. If a citizen is unlawfully arrested and suffers some damage then they have the right to sue the arresting officer and department. This happens all the time and is a mitigating factor in the behavior of officers. Otherwise if officers are sued and damages are paid then the departments will change and so will the officers or be fired... Take the recent unrest for instance... this has changed procedures all over the country for the good. Butch No problem with the high horse thing. What I do agree with is that in practice it will be difficult to prove that a policeman was acting outside of his authority, as it is predicated on reasonable suspicion. But, I find it very hard to believe that it is unlawful to resist unlawful arrest in the United States. Effectively it is saying that the police have the authority to act like common criminals. I doubt it very much. I'll look it up, see what I can find. Well it seems it differs from state to state, and it really surprises me that it's unlawful to resist arrest in some places over there. It also seems that it was quite lawful to resist arrest across the United States once upon a time, so something has changed. In that case, contrary to your post above it is not the same in England. We have the right to resist unlawful arrest and with the application of reasonable force, not excessive force, and the right to claim for false imprisonment. We will not be charged for resisting arrest as a separate crime. Sounds like a police state to me: guilty until proven innocent. The police have no jurisdiction outside of their lawful duty here; they can't simply pull anyone off the street for anything with questions asked later. They're no longer acting as a police officer in the event they do that, and as such it's an assault and false imprisonment.
_____________________________
I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits. Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.
|