joether
Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata Aside from the fact that I'm going to have this post bronzed and mounted on a plaque to present to you next time you call somebody else a "paranoid schizophrenic," I'd like to plumb the depths of your delusions a little further. In order for me to be paranoid, I would have to believe those Republicans are coming after me. Which they are not. Therefore, I am not paranoid. In order for me to be schizophrenic, I would have to believe in things that are not real and/or act/react as if they were real. The GOP is against the deal, because a Democratic President put it together. They have been, from day one, automatically opposed to any and all efforts of the President. They have not brought up the particulars of the treaty, because that might inform the very people they wish to keep in the dark on the situation: their voters. Their voters whom are ignorant and easily controllable with fear. This would not be schizophrenia, this would be observation of behaviors by people with less than honorable, decent, and scrupulous intentions. That your 'OK' with these sort of people, enough to defend them, states much about your being.... You should get a copy of the DSM v5. quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata Firstly: A third of Republicans support Iran nuclear deal ~Reuters Secondly: More Americans disapprove than approve of the Iran deal ~CBS News Does your post apply to them too? Maybe if you took the time to not just read but to....UNDERSTAND....the OP, you would be able to answer your own question. How many of each of these, have....READ....the treaty? Very few. A person whom defends/fights a law, but doesn't even know what is in the law, not written in the law, or how it behaves; is an idiot. Most Americans are idiots. They have not read the document, so therefore, are obtaining all their information from other sources. How trustworthy and honest are those sources? FOX 'news' is watched/listen to by a large percentage of Americans. How truthful, honest, and educating do you think FOX 'news' is with regards to this treaty? You have to say 'yes', in order for your two above statements to have any real merit. Go ahead, make sure you include the evidence with your bullshit.... quote:
ORIGINAL: Kirata And thirdly, how about these people who oppose the deal?Brad Sherman, D-Calif., a senior member of the U.S. House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee; Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., the committee’s senior Democrat; Ted Deutch, D-Fla., the senior Democrat on its Middle East subcommittee; Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., the senior Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee; Steve Israel, D-N.Y., who until last year chaired the House Democrats reelection campaign; Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Harry Reid's hand-picked successor for the Democratic party’s Senate leadership; and the all Democrat Citizens Advisory Board (Gary Ackerman, Evan Bayh, Mark Begich, Shelley Berkley, Peter Deutsch, and Mary Landrieu)? Thanks in advance. Why do they oppose? I'm fine if people read the treaty and decided "Yeah, this works" or "no, this does not work". Because often that is followed by sections from the treaty used in an argument to support their viewpoint. These people opposite not because they didn't read the treaty, but because they did. But your leaving out....WHY....they oppose it. You assume (foolishly) that since they oppose, their reasons are irrelevant. And that simply shows your level of intelligence and education on the subject matter. And intelligent and educated person, whom has read the treaty, would like to know why person 'A' likes the treaty and why person 'B' does not. I can understand the ACA being a bit....long...at 2409 pages. The Iran treaty is 159 pages. Its been around for a few weeks now. What is your excuse for not reading it? Since you have had plenty of time to read this thread and several others. And that brings us to the point here: you didn't read, so you are ignorant. You look for someone whom opposes this, because you oppose it. But you dont understand nor care to understand....WHY....they oppose it.
|