Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 8/9/2015 4:00:15 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I remeber iran contra


Yes, but the left never listens........... smirks a tad.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 8/9/2015 4:13:57 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3672
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
There have been no laws passed regarding immigration since 2005. That's a failure of Congress. I think we all agree that the status quo isn't acceptable.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 8/9/2015 4:48:40 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

perhaps the point then is to look at the nature of the executive orders? I could be wrong, but I don't remember these conversations going on when carter, or Clinton were presidents.

have any of the republican presidents created executive orders that were in the eyes of some, unconstitutional?

its laughable to think if that were the case, despite how much liberals don't like the constitution really, that they wouldn't be calling republicans on that very thing.

at the moment, you don't have a "hypocrisy" case to make unless you answer the two points above.

I don't recall anybody debating whether or not any exec. orders were unconstitutional...until now. That's regardless of the nature of the order. Gee...I wonder why.

It is quite possible that they ALL are, seeing as how...they are not law. There might be a narrow bureaucratic allowance but I am sure it would take the courts a long time to sort through them all.

Plus, I've seen at least as much or in fact more disregard for the constitution from the right than from the left in this country.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 8/9/2015 4:52:27 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I remeber iran contra


Yes, but the left never listens........... smirks a tad.


Like I've written. When it comes to such venality, the dems are amateurs while the repubs are real pros.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 8/9/2015 8:11:07 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

There have been no laws passed regarding immigration since 2005. That's a failure of Congress. I think we all agree that the status quo isn't acceptable.


Why bother to pass new laws when we have a king who just ignores the laws we already have

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 8/10/2015 12:18:19 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

There have been no laws passed regarding immigration since 2005. That's a failure of Congress. I think we all agree that the status quo isn't acceptable.


Why bother to pass new laws when we have a king who just ignores the laws we already have

who has a phone and a pen and can change them at will

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 8/10/2015 2:51:50 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

perhaps the point then is to look at the nature of the executive orders? I could be wrong, but I don't remember these conversations going on when carter, or Clinton were presidents.

have any of the republican presidents created executive orders that were in the eyes of some, unconstitutional?

its laughable to think if that were the case, despite how much liberals don't like the constitution really, that they wouldn't be calling republicans on that very thing.

at the moment, you don't have a "hypocrisy" case to make unless you answer the two points above.

I don't recall anybody debating whether or not any exec. orders were unconstitutional...until now. That's regardless of the nature of the order. Gee...I wonder why.

It is quite possible that they ALL are, seeing as how...they are not law. There might be a narrow bureaucratic allowance but I am sure it would take the courts a long time to sort through them all.

Plus, I've seen at least as much or in fact more disregard for the constitution from the right than from the left in this country.


and your argument for the sudden revelation and charge of the unconstitutionality of some executive orders is what? am sorry to ask this but i don't see another option in the left's mind---that Obama's black?

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 8/10/2015 3:23:36 AM   
JVoV


Posts: 3672
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

There have been no laws passed regarding immigration since 2005. That's a failure of Congress. I think we all agree that the status quo isn't acceptable.


Why bother to pass new laws when we have a king who just ignores the laws we already have


Probably following Reagan's example, to patch a law until Congress can get it right. (See the immigration act of 1986).

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 8/10/2015 4:04:26 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Sanders admits that Obamas policy is open borders

Evidence of that abounds everywhere you look

A person would have to be eliberately obtuse to remain in denial about that

But still the faithful party propagandists persist...

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 8/10/2015 4:09:18 AM   
JVoV


Posts: 3672
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
I've only heard Sanders say the Koch brothers want open boarders. You have a link?

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 8/10/2015 4:20:07 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Your memory's really that short?

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4828472

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 8/10/2015 4:35:28 AM   
JVoV


Posts: 3672
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
My memory is fine. But apparently I can't read, because I see no place where Bernie mentions Obama or the current policy in regards to open boarders as you're saying.

Actually, Bernie seems to be onboard with Obama's policy.

quote:

So, to my mind is what do we do and how do we address the problem of 11 million undocumented people in this country today moving? We move aggressively toward a path toward citizenship. We move as fast as we can to legal status. We provide protection for those people. But to simply open the borders of America. Do you think there is any candidate for president who thinks that that makes sense? I don't think so.


A quote from Bernie, from your link in the OP of that thread.

< Message edited by JVoV -- 8/10/2015 4:40:29 AM >

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 8/10/2015 8:02:04 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Damn, you HAVE been taking troll lessons

Its in the OP

quote:

Bernie Sanders Against Open Borders: "That Would Substantially Lower Wages In This Country"


Unless you arguing that he is simply a delusional old man who is seeing an open borders policy that no one else can



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 9/3/2015 9:58:48 AM   
Thegunnysez


Posts: 741
Joined: 8/17/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Why bother to pass new laws when we have a king who just ignores the laws we already have


We have a king? When was the parade? Why wasn't I told?

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 9/3/2015 10:04:20 AM   
JVoV


Posts: 3672
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Damn, you HAVE been taking troll lessons

Its in the OP

quote:

Bernie Sanders Against Open Borders: "That Would Substantially Lower Wages In This Country"


Unless you arguing that he is simply a delusional old man who is seeing an open borders policy that no one else can




Bernie claims that it's the Koch brothers and similar that are pushing for open boarders. And your insults don't change that.

< Message edited by JVoV -- 9/3/2015 10:06:44 AM >

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 9/3/2015 10:09:58 AM   
Thegunnysez


Posts: 741
Joined: 8/17/2015
Status: offline
Being aware that insults only reflect on the doner does not seem to diminish the vitriol of some.

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 9/3/2015 10:35:18 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

There have been no laws passed regarding immigration since 2005. That's a failure of Congress. I think we all agree that the status quo isn't acceptable.


Why bother to pass new laws when we have a king who just ignores the laws we already have


His name was George W. Bush. We removed him from power in 2008!

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 9/3/2015 10:37:52 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

There have been no laws passed regarding immigration since 2005. That's a failure of Congress. I think we all agree that the status quo isn't acceptable.


Why bother to pass new laws when we have a king who just ignores the laws we already have

who has a phone and a pen and can change them at will


It's called 'Congress'. If Republicans REALLY wanted to do something about it; they would have passed laws preventing the concept by now. Maybe you should ask them why they have not pushed forward on this task? Maybe because they, and their Tea Party minions are 'OK' with the concept.


(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 9/3/2015 11:26:36 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

perhaps the point then is to look at the nature of the executive orders? I could be wrong, but I don't remember these conversations going on when carter, or Clinton were presidents.

have any of the republican presidents created executive orders that were in the eyes of some, unconstitutional?

its laughable to think if that were the case, despite how much liberals don't like the constitution really, that they wouldn't be calling republicans on that very thing.

at the moment, you don't have a "hypocrisy" case to make unless you answer the two points above.

I don't recall anybody debating whether or not any exec. orders were unconstitutional...until now. That's regardless of the nature of the order. Gee...I wonder why.

It is quite possible that they ALL are, seeing as how...they are not law. There might be a narrow bureaucratic allowance but I am sure it would take the courts a long time to sort through them all.

Plus, I've seen at least as much or in fact more disregard for the constitution from the right than from the left in this country.


and your argument for the sudden revelation and charge of the unconstitutionality of some executive orders is what? am sorry to ask this but i don't see another option in the left's mind---that Obama's black?



An set of executive orders to place 'prisoners' whom were 'accused of crime(s)' against the United States of America in a place called Guantanamo Bay, Cuba? (violations of the 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments). Executive orders allowing for 'Enhanced Interrogation Techniques on said prisoners'? (Violation of the 8th amendment). An whom allowed all of this? George W. Bush. Where were all the conservative and libertarian outrage to Mr. Bush doing all this? Or His admnistration? Or towards the GOP/TP for allowing it? Particularly that Repbulican-controlled Congresss whom gave a blind eye towards the whole state of affairs.

If a Democrat had done any of that, you and every other conservative and libertarian would be all over them for it. So why is it your totally silent when your party and ideology breaks constitutional laws?

The purpose of the US Constitution is two fold:

1 ) To define the rules by which the federal government exists and its level of power/control over all persons found within its domain.
2 ) The limits of those powers by the federal government over all persons found within its domain.

Did the federal government control the area that the prisoners were located? Yes. Therefore, the US Constitution applies. Which means if the government takes someone into custody as either a 'prisoner of war' or a 'suspect accused of a crime'; they are afforded a number of rights (humanitarian and constitutional).

Why did we not declare war on Iran? The feeble-minded 'yes men' of the Republican controlled Congress would have signed off on it. Its because if they took prisoners 'of interest' they would have to give them all the same rights as any POW due to all the international treaties.

Why not treat them like anyone else the government takes into custody and accused of a crime? Because then they would have access to a lawyer, right to see the evidence against them, and be treated fairly under the law.

Nope, they were defined as 'Enemy Combatants'. What is an 'Enemy Combatant'? A person with no rights. Neither constitutional nor human. They have....NOTHING. So if they are tortured, 'oh well....'.

Many conservatives and libertarians at large and within this forum (like you) bitch constantly about the government doing evil things towards US Citizens. Of jailing them, torturing them, and other draconian measures that you feel are unconstitutional. Jade Helm 15 was/is a great example that the delusion still has not dissipated from reality for you guys. If its wrong for the US Government to perform these actions.....

.....WHY.....

Was it 'OK' for the George W. Bush administration, through a series of executive orders and privileges, to perform these actions? Your the ones that not only voted Republican then, but do so now! The reason is easy....

You feel you can bash the current administration for far less questionable actions as they relate to the US Constitution, and are pissed off angry when you learn that the rest of the nation does not see it that way. Your side has lost credibility and integrity in an irresponsible bid to claim power. Kinda of like what a tyrant does....

You justify in your mind that the 'Ends Justify the Means' with the actions Republican have taken, and are currently taken. That in the 'end', you'll be vindicated of all crimes and punishments.

You wont be. Because the liberals and moderates have long memories and consult history books quite often. You do not hold the people you desire in power to the same level of accountability and responsibility with power, as you slam Democrats and the President on the hour of every day! Until you, and all the other conservatives and libertarians do so; you'll NEVER get anything you want.

In ways you understand that. Hence why so many conservatives and libertarians have talked about taking the country by force. Planting a new 'constitution' that is pro-conserative in its ideology. Taking steps that are ever increasingly evil and vile towards other people (basically non-white males). Or I could just dumb down the 'tyrannical process' to just a word. Since conservatives and libertarians are not know for their 'in-depth' thinking processes. NAZIS!

Yes, that evil bunch whom used misdirection, lies, and propaganda in the media to spread the message that 'undesirables' cost their country greatly (not the evil people, but the good people). Kinda of like how modern day conservatives and libertarians view illegal immigrants. And that there should be two ways the US Constitution works. One for US Citizens and one for all others. Of course as time progresses even that is modified so only those preaching conservative ideology gets 'constitutional' rights and all other US Citizens are lumped in with the undesirables.

Kind of like what conservatives and libertarians do towards liberals and moderates....

Your side is 'OK' with hatred. Even trying to use religion, to justify why a group of people can not marry; even though when one removes the religion from the equation there is no arguments left to fall back upon. Your afraid of the illegal immigrants and what they might do. Unscrupulous people, like those in the higher end of the GOP/TP and corporations know this. And they know how to harness that fear. Turn it into more rage and hatred. Once your that level of anger; your MUCH EASIER to manipulate and control for evil purposes.

Kind of like what conservative media is doing right now.....

They have conditioned you so well to obedience while ignoring reality. Which is what happen to many whom joined the Nazis. When their nation was utterly destroyed, and saw the stuff they did not want to see nor listen to; did they realize their mistakes. They paid a very heavy price.

Why allow this to happened to the United States of America?

You can not form even an ounce of a decent reply. You do not hold the people you want in power (or are in power) to even a billionth of the level you attack Democrats and the President on issues. If you were ever to do such a thing.....

...We'd have awesome government overnight! You can't do that. Not enough education. Not enough thought processing. Not enough courage. That's why the liberals and moderates have to pull double-duty shifts to keep this nation going; because 30% of this nation has been compromised by those with evil intent masquerading around as 'your friends'. The founding fathers warned about tyranny. An in their times, things were much more simple. In 2015, everything is much more sophisticated. From firearms to ships. From roadways to medicine.

Should we not expect tyranny to become the same? More so, should we not guard against it?


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners - 9/7/2015 4:29:59 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

His name was George W. Bush. We removed him from power in 2008!


You may not be from around here (which may account for your ignorance) but that is not what happened at all. In my country the president is only allowed to serve/fuck the people for two terms. So your rhetorical use of the word "remove" does not carry the force of the meaning of the laws of presidential succession. My point is that your arguments would carry more force if you stopped your sanity like partisanship.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: GOP = Iranian Hardliners Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109