sloguy02246
Posts: 534
Joined: 11/5/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote:
ORIGINAL: KenDckey Is there a leggal limit on how long a judge can lock up someone for contempt of court? I see her doing a life sentence and owing the government more money than her and her great great great great grandchildren could ever pay. Principle can outweigh other consideratios at times. I think she is trying to martyr herself. I doubt she will get much of anything. I hope she loses her job. According to today's Chicago Tribune, Ms. Davis is paid $80,000/year as the county clerk. Also, since county clerk is an elected position, she cannot be summarily fired. She can only be removed as a result of impeachment by the state legislature, which is currently on summer vacation. The article also stated that rather than be given jail time, the judge should order her to forfeit her salary for whatever time period during which she has failed and continues to fail to perform the duties of her office. Finally, from an email received from a friend earlier this morning: "To issue a marriage license which conflicts with God’s definition of marriage, with my name affixed to the certificate, would violate my conscience." Which "God's definition" is she talking about? In Genesis, Abraham had a concubine. King Solomon had 700 wives. In western Europe before the Reformation, people could get married in secret without clergy present, and there was no divorce. In the Middle Ages one could not marry within four degrees of relation, which was changed to seven, and then back to four in 1215. Before the 13th century, priests could marry, then they couldn't. After the Reformation, both Protestants and Catholics required church weddings and began to more strictly regulate the institution. Catholics maintained that marriage was a sacrament, Protestants did not. Basically, what "God's definition" for marriage is has always been contentious, without any consensus whatsoever, even within particular religious denominations. Perhaps it's because marriage is actually an inherently social institution.
|