Votes For Women (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


respectmen -> Votes For Women (8/28/2015 1:45:59 PM)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_Ed2BIOHbQ

Feminist propaganda being exposed and the truth being told as it should be.




epiphiny43 -> RE: Votes For Women (8/28/2015 3:52:16 PM)

Remarkably disingenuous arguments, particularly those equating class discrimination of all, men and women, as proof women weren't particularly subject to not just voting but a host of legal exceptions compared to men. Only recently have women been other than chattel as far as inheritance goes, almost impossible to become property owners unless by action of the very privileged elite. A brief Google of Women's Property Rights time lines fully illuminates the Feminist narrative of Western history. In practice, things were almost always worse than the applicable statutes.




Lucylastic -> RE: Votes For Women (8/28/2015 4:40:37 PM)

Nick is that you?




respectmen -> RE: Votes For Women (8/28/2015 4:44:42 PM)

Oppression has never been a gender issue, it's always been a class issue. Feminists hate facts and would rather lie to us all and make out that all men had this evil conspiracy to oppress women. It's amazing how such ridiculous assumptions about men can be passed for political correctness.

quote:

Only recently have women been other than chattel as far as inheritance goes


Firstly, only recently? haha. Hyperbole galore. Secondly, no, women were not as a whole. Only old money families did arranged marriages. And guess what? The husband didn't have a choice neither. Feminists also leave that out of their literature about history of course. Feminists love only telling half of the story. The vast majority of women, like probably 98 percent of women, were not forced into arranged marriages. Feminists make out it was happening everywhere because they love using obnoxious hyperbole to make men look worse.





HoneyBears -> RE: Votes For Women (8/28/2015 4:50:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Nick is that you?


Yeah, 34-year-old "Dominant" in Australia, which is what he's been going by (Dom instead of sub) lately on these Boards since k2 closed shop the end of February and he lost his trolling soapbox.[sm=soapbox.gif]




Lucylastic -> RE: Votes For Women (8/28/2015 6:19:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HoneyBears


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Nick is that you?


Yeah, 34-year-old "Dominant" in Australia, which is what he's been going by (Dom instead of sub) lately on these Boards since k2 closed shop the end of February and he lost his trolling soapbox.[sm=soapbox.gif]

Well he has his chance now.
He really is his own worst enemy.




respectmen -> RE: Votes For Women (8/28/2015 6:41:01 PM)

quote:

He really is his own worst enemy.


Yes, how dare a man refuse to kowtow the feminazi line. He must be punished and be turned into an instant social outcast. Women first or else it's misogyny! I'm loving this male privilege "sniggers"




Wayward5oul -> RE: Votes For Women (8/28/2015 7:45:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

quote:

He really is his own worst enemy.


Yes, how dare a man refuse to kowtow the feminazi line. He must be punished and be turned into an instant social outcast. Women first or else it's misogyny! I'm loving this male privilege "sniggers"


Been awhile since you got laid, huh?




respectmen -> RE: Votes For Women (8/28/2015 8:13:30 PM)

The people who reply to my threads in this forum are usually the exact types of people Lauren Southern is talking about in this video.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5Oixo1eF18&feature=youtu.be




Spiritedsub2 -> RE: Votes For Women (8/28/2015 8:26:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

quote:

He really is his own worst enemy.


Yes, how dare a man refuse to kowtow the feminazi line. He must be punished and be turned into an instant social outcast. Women first or else it's misogyny! I'm loving this male privilege "sniggers"


Been awhile since you got laid, huh?


And gonna be a while longer, methinks.




Kirata -> RE: Votes For Women (8/28/2015 9:16:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: epiphiny43

Only recently have women been other than chattel as far as inheritance goes, almost impossible to become property owners unless by action of the very privileged elite.

Yeah, no.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_rights_of_women_in_history

K.




stef -> RE: Votes For Women (8/28/2015 11:06:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

Been awhile since you got laid, huh?

I think his last time was roughly the 13th of Never.

Poor Little Nicky.




dcnovice -> RE: Votes For Women (8/29/2015 12:09:58 AM)

NM: Technical Travails




dcnovice -> RE: Votes For Women (8/29/2015 12:17:13 AM)

NM x 2




respectmen -> RE: Votes For Women (8/29/2015 1:29:27 AM)

Couldn't open it, oh well lol.

I am guessing it was something to ridicule me. Something that you would never do to a feminist of course :D




Zonie63 -> RE: Votes For Women (8/29/2015 4:26:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

Oppression has never been a gender issue, it's always been a class issue.


There is a lot of truth to this, although not all feminists are of the bourgeois, corporate variety. There are a few who seemingly support a more proletarian style of feminism, although they don't seem to get as much limelight as the more obnoxious ones.

If this is Nick, then I do have to ask: Could you at least post a few lines of summary with these videos? It's just easier to cut to the chase and get to the main points that way.




DesFIP -> RE: Votes For Women (8/29/2015 11:17:46 AM)

This isn't about him getting laid. I imagine he wouldn't know how to do that if the chance ever appeared.

It's to do with his mommy laying down the rules in the house. We know you've got mommy issues out the window. Go deal with them.

Oh, and now that we all know your new nickname, expect everyone to block you like usual.




NorthernGent -> RE: Votes For Women (8/29/2015 12:21:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

There is a lot of truth to this...



Once upon a time, women were expected to not read certain books because their minds couldn't cope with them - the general consensus in that age.

It's certainly an example of the comprehensive subjugation of women.

Time has shown that oppression is certainly not the preserve of 'class'; oppression comes in all shapes and sizes.

It would only take a cursory glance at history to spot the second class status of women in many spheres, if not all in any arena where men and women are competing.

Not that I particularly care, I'm not militant about these things, just an observation which to me is as clear as day.

I don't think women help themselves at time because even today they continue to be led down a path by men. Put yourself forward as consumed by shoes, hair and the rest of it; then yeah you'll be seen as dolls lacking a decent set of brain cells.






NorthernGent -> RE: Votes For Women (8/29/2015 12:29:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_Ed2BIOHbQ

Feminist propaganda being exposed and the truth being told as it should be.



Haven't watched it, prefer an opinion as opposed to a link.

But, I think 'feminists', although I don't particularly have time for these terms and labels, are pretty much spot on with their opinions.

'The truth' is there in history for anyone to view.




PeonForHer -> RE: Votes For Women (8/29/2015 1:39:49 PM)

He's back! Yay!!!




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875