RE: Business should be banned based upon

RE: Business should be banned based upon (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Lucylastic -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 7:35:04 AM)
katie hopkins is NOT a liberal, she is a freaky nasty piece of work, she is conservative through and through.

kdsub -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 7:38:41 AM)
Business should serve all the general public equally within the laws that govern their operation ... or... don't start a public business that can't or won't. Butch

KenDckey -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 7:44:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic katie hopkins is NOT a liberal, she is a freaky nasty piece of work, she is conservative through and through. She probably is, I didn't comment on that. My assumption is based upon this quote found on IMDB. quote: On 17 April 2015, British tabloid The Sun printed an opinion-piece by her attacking immigrants who cross the Mediterranean to settle in Britain, in which she wrote: 'Make no mistake, these migrants are like cockroaches... they are built to survive a nuclear bomb'. This appeared on the same day that a fishing vessel carrying migrants sunk off the coast of Libya, claiming 800 lives. Her article was denounced by, amongst others, the United Nations commissioner for human rights. I don't think I have seen any of her work. However my concept of banning her suggested business stands.

Sanity -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 7:44:37 AM)
Who was that guy, one of his whores recorded him saying some bad things in private. He was forced to cough up his sports team Then the main thing leftists HATE about campaign finance, the Citizens United victory, is they dont have access to political donors lists Which means they cant tell who to target with their Alinskyite tactics for acting on their dissenting political thoughts

Sanity -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 7:48:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic katie hopkins is NOT a liberal, she is a freaky nasty piece of work, she is conservative through and through. Sure, another good example Anyone committing what leftists consider thought crimes shouldnt be allowed to write, or have air time on TV or radio, or speak at college campuses etc

Lucylastic -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 7:59:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic katie hopkins is NOT a liberal, she is a freaky nasty piece of work, she is conservative through and through. Sure, another good example Anyone committing what leftists consider thought crimes shouldnt be allowed to write, or have air time on TV or radio, or speak at college campuses etc quote: katie hopkins is NOT a liberal, she is a freaky nasty piece of work, she is conservative through and through. If me saying she is a nasty piece of work, is saying she should be banned, not have radio time or be allowed to speak? REALLY?? you are delusional. No wonder you now think #BLM is terrorism. you have completely lost the plot.

igor2003 -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 8:00:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Thegunnysez quote: ORIGINAL: KenDckey religious beliefs? moral beliefs? whatever else you can come up with? Which business, in the U.S. are banned for any of the above? Two businesses that are often banned in many cities are strip clubs and adult book stores. Another "new" type of establishment that is being banned in many cities in Oregon are marijuana dispensaries now that pot has been "legalized" there.

Lucylastic -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 8:02:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity What a conveniently short memory you have Theres Chik-fil-A, who leftists tried to destroy. The mom n pop pizzeria whose religious beliefs interfered with catering gay weddings, who leftists shut down... Thats without getting into the history of leftists in other places around the globe. Include that sort of thing and I would be here all day and still just barely scratch the surface boycott is now banning? they havent been banned, they are still going strong, the pizzeria is the same, the gay wedding chick hasnt been banned. you dont know the difference ?? Thats always your issue, conflating boycott, with banning. Idiot

Lucylastic -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 8:03:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: KenDckey quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic katie hopkins is NOT a liberal, she is a freaky nasty piece of work, she is conservative through and through. She probably is, I didn't comment on that. My assumption is based upon this quote found on IMDB. quote: On 17 April 2015, British tabloid The Sun printed an opinion-piece by her attacking immigrants who cross the Mediterranean to settle in Britain, in which she wrote: 'Make no mistake, these migrants are like cockroaches... they are built to survive a nuclear bomb'. This appeared on the same day that a fishing vessel carrying migrants sunk off the coast of Libya, claiming 800 lives. Her article was denounced by, amongst others, the United Nations commissioner for human rights. I don't think I have seen any of her work. However my concept of banning her suggested business stands. my point is she IS a conservative, and her plans, like most conservatives are often ugly and ignorant.

Sanity -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 8:06:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity What a conveniently short memory you have Theres Chik-fil-A, who leftists tried to destroy. The mom n pop pizzeria whose religious beliefs interfered with catering gay weddings, who leftists shut down... Thats without getting into the history of leftists in other places around the globe. Include that sort of thing and I would be here all day and still just barely scratch the surface boycott is now banning? they havent been banned, they are still going strong, the pizzeria is the same, the gay wedding chick hasnt been banned. you dont know the difference ?? Thats always your issue, conflating boycott, with banning. Idiot City councils are trying to deny permits, but its more than the successful political attacks. Its also the mindset, leftists should not be allowed into positions of power anywhere Recall the gunman with the bag full of Chik-fil-A sandwiches who tried to shoot up the Christian organization. Leftists are fascists

Lucylastic -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 8:15:48 AM)
Again, you dont know your fascist from your marxism, or liberal to socialist....thank you for your misguided but always laughable opinion

Sanity -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 8:18:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Again, you dont know your fascist from your marxism, or liberal to socialist....thank you for your misguided but always laughable opinion Typical Alinsky bs Cant argue the facts so you resort to your trollish, childish name calling

Lucylastic -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 8:52:11 AM)
hahahahahahahhahahahahahaha you have proven yourself to be with a clue, you cannot name any business that has been banned for religious, moral reasons. There is no religious persecution theres lots of discrimination tho. But in business, discrimination is NOT allowed any more. It has nothing to do with banning ANYTHING. EXCEPT discrimination.

Real0ne -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 9:10:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: igor2003 quote: ORIGINAL: Thegunnysez quote: ORIGINAL: KenDckey religious beliefs? moral beliefs? whatever else you can come up with? Which business, in the U.S. are banned for any of the above? Two businesses that are often banned in many cities are strip clubs and adult book stores. Another "new" type of establishment that is being banned in many cities in Oregon are marijuana dispensaries now that pot has been "legalized" there. Not sure how I managed to over look the 'based upon' part of the title, brain fart. Yeh problem businesses. They get banned because the communities scream for banning. They are exercising their community religion through government and leaving the name religion off the title so its not 'established'. [8D]

CreativeDominant -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 9:39:26 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic LOL no we havent, we havent seen any company being banned for religion, or "moral" beliefs. Make your questions more succinct if you want to be taken seriously How would you describe the Denver City Council denying Chick-Fil-A's application to open at D.I.A.? *Denver City Council members are in a pickle after Chick-fil-A made a bid to renew a lease to build a Chick-fil-A restaurant inside the Denver International Airport (DIA). The issue? The company’s reputation as an opponent of same-sex marriage. According to the Denver Post, Councilman Paul Lopez called for opposition to the chain at DIA, stating that it’s: “Really, truly a moral issue on the city.” Robin Kniech, a Denver City Council Member, remarked during Tuesday’s meeting: “I think the airport also has a question about our reputation. It has been the corporate philosophy [of Chik-fil-A] to use the dollars they earn to fund discriminatory lawsuits and to fund discriminatory political rhetoric. So that’s of concern to the extent that they will be forming profits from operating in our airport.” In any event, out of the ten city council members to attend the meeting Tuesday, none defended the chain, whose president Dan Cathy stated three years ago that the “biblical definition of the family unit” did not include same-sex marriage.* So...the city council is banning them for the way they use their money. For the OWNER'S beliefs...their thoughts. Not for breaking discrimination laws, though... *Denver Chanel 7NEWS reached out to Chick-fi-A for a statement and received this response: “Chick-fil-A is a restaurant company focused on serving great food and providing remarkable service to every single customer. Chick-fil-A, Inc. and its franchised restaurant owners are equal opportunity employers, employing more than 75,000 individuals who represent many diverse viewpoints, opinions, backgrounds and beliefs.***** Not banning companies for their beliefs, eh?

Sanity -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 9:40:15 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic katie hopkins is NOT a liberal, she is a freaky nasty piece of work, she is conservative through and through. Sure, another good example Anyone committing what leftists consider thought crimes shouldnt be allowed to write, or have air time on TV or radio, or speak at college campuses etc quote: katie hopkins is NOT a liberal, she is a freaky nasty piece of work, she is conservative through and through. If me saying she is a nasty piece of work, is saying she should be banned, not have radio time or be allowed to speak? REALLY?? you are delusional. No wonder you now think #BLM is terrorism. you have completely lost the plot. Not just Hopkins by any stretch Leftist fascists have been working for years to get Limbaugh banned, have Bush imprisoned... They riot if Coulter is scheduled to speak at a campus event as if it would cause the end of the world Etc etc etc Your own shrill attempts to make this conversation personal is a perfect example of how the fascist mind works btw, thank you for the illustration

Lucylastic -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 9:57:25 AM)
hahhahahahah and who have the religious right tried to shut down...hm lets have a look see. The RR have and are vowed/vowing to shut down PP in the government, not merely boycotting people like limbaugh, who is still in business, ANd Bush is stsill walking free Coulter is still running her ugly bitch self around and is not banned. Cmon you can do better than that....oh, yeah thats right, you cant.....

CarpeComa -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 9:59:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic OP??? Who is banning companies? what company has been banned? Explicitly? Prostitution (most places) Uber Liquor stores (dry counties) Anything that would compete with state-established monopolies, such as: Mail service Cable (in most places) Utilities (in a lot of places) Implicitly banned businesses are harder to identify. A lot of businesses exist at the whims of local boards and regulators. It's difficult to point to one specifically because if they are banned by regulators, they simply cease to exist (or never exist in the first place) and if banned by a local board, it’s usually done before being opened. These bannings tend to be very quiet as for most businesses a new location isn't worth a drag out fight with the local board. Wal-Mart and Chick-fil-a have been publicized targets for being prevented from opening local stores. Anything ‘adult’ oriented is another frequent target. Then there are issues where a business hasn’t been totally banned, but complying with the existing law is prohibitively complicated/expensive which effectively bans the business. Why can’t I get beer delivered with my pizza? Because it has been effectively banned by regulation.

Sanity -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 10:03:13 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic hahhahahahah and who have the religious right tried to shut down...hm lets have a look see. The RR have and are vowed/vowing to shut down PP in the government, not merely boycotting people like limbaugh, who is still in business, ANd Bush is stsill walking free Coulter is still running her ugly bitch self around and is not banned. Cmon you can do better than that....oh, yeah thats right, you cant..... Fortunately, your leftist friends do not yet have the power in this country that they seek, as they do and have had in other places (such as Venezuela, North Korea, the USSR, and so on) At this point they are just shrill, ugly little lemmings and thankfully their killings and political victories have as of yet somewhat limited in scope

CarpeComa -> RE: Business should be banned based upon (8/30/2015 10:08:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CarpeComa quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic OP??? Who is banning companies? what company has been banned? Explicitly? Prostitution (most places) Uber Liquor stores (dry counties) Anything that would compete with state-established monopolies, such as: Mail service Cable (in most places) Utilities (in a lot of places) Implicitly banned businesses are harder to identify. A lot of businesses exist at the whims of local boards and regulators. It's difficult to point to one specifically because if they are banned by regulators, they simply cease to exist (or never exist in the first place) and if banned by a local board, it’s usually done before being opened. These bannings tend to be very quiet as for most businesses a new location isn't worth a drag out fight with the local board. Wal-Mart and Chick-fil-a have been publicized targets for being prevented from opening local stores. Anything ‘adult’ oriented is another frequent target. Then there are issues where a business hasn’t been totally banned, but complying with the existing law is prohibitively complicated/expensive which effectively bans the business. Why can’t I get beer delivered with my pizza? Because it has been effectively banned by regulation. Oh, and lets not forget strangulation techniques like Operation Choke Point, which will shut a business down by fiat without requiring any of those irritating things like following the law or due process.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625