Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Business should be banned based upon


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Business should be banned based upon Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 10:16:02 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CarpeComa

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

OP???
Who is banning companies?
what company has been banned?



Explicitly?

Prostitution (most places)
Uber
Liquor stores (dry counties)

Anything that would compete with state-established monopolies, such as:
Mail service
Cable (in most places)
Utilities (in a lot of places)

Implicitly banned businesses are harder to identify. A lot of businesses exist at the whims of local boards and regulators. It's difficult to point to one specifically because if they are banned by regulators, they simply cease to exist (or never exist in the first place) and if banned by a local board, it’s usually done before being opened. These bannings tend to be very quiet as for most businesses a new location isn't worth a drag out fight with the local board. Wal-Mart and Chick-fil-a have been publicized targets for being prevented from opening local stores. Anything ‘adult’ oriented is another frequent target. Then there are issues where a business hasn’t been totally banned, but complying with the existing law is prohibitively complicated/expensive which effectively bans the business. Why can’t I get beer delivered with my pizza? Because it has been effectively banned by regulation.


Ive addressed this before. THis is NOT a discussion of adult and illegal activities, drugs, prostitution (which I hasten to add are regulated because of largely morals/obscenity).
And have been "banned" for decades, NOT suddenly. ANd certainly not because of what has been happening since gay marriage was announced.
We can discuss actually severely regulated businesses all day, I ran one for 11 years.
I can get beer delivered with my pizza, altho I dont drink. Yet, our liquor and beer stores are run by the govmnt.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to CarpeComa)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 10:18:29 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CarpeComa
Oh, and lets not forget strangulation techniques like Operation Choke Point, which will shut a business down by fiat without requiring any of those irritating things like following the law or due process.


I had forgotten about that:

quote:

Operation Choke Point
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Operation Choke Point is an initiative of the United States Department of Justice that was announced in 2013,[1] which is investigating banks in the United States and the business they do with payment processors, payday lenders, and other companies believed to be at higher risk for fraud and money laundering.

This operation, disclosed in August 2013 Wall Street Journal story [2] has been accused of bypassing due process.; the government is pressuring the financial industry to cut off the companies' access to banking services, without first having shown that the targeted companies are violating the law.[3][4][5][6] As reported by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, critics believe "it's a thinly veiled ideological attack on industries the Obama administration doesn't like, such as gun sellers and coal producers."[7]


I have a buddy, who owns a legal gunsmithing business. The banks shut down his ability to take credit cards because of that, though he was able to find a workaround. There is another banking business that was set up specifically in response to the Obama regimes' scheme that he was able to use





< Message edited by Sanity -- 8/30/2015 10:30:46 AM >


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to CarpeComa)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 10:38:01 AM   
CarpeComa


Posts: 194
Joined: 5/12/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Ive addressed this before. THis is NOT a discussion of adult and illegal activities, drugs, prostitution (which I hasten to add are regulated because of largely morals/obscenity).
And have been "banned" for decades, NOT suddenly. ANd certainly not because of what has been happening since gay marriage was announced.


You have said no such thing in this thread. The fights around gay marriage are primarily because of what people consider to be morals/obscenity, so other businesses banned under the same auspices seems quite relevant. You don't get to throw out all the examples just because you don't like that they exist.

Even considering your sudden restriction, Chick-Fil-A, Wal-Mart, and Uber all all valid examples. Bitcoin processing was recently chased out of New York. These haven't been banned because of being gay unfriendly (except for Chick-Fil-A), just for being unpopular with the powers that be.

quote:

I can get beer delivered with my pizza, altho I dont drink. Yet, our liquor and beer stores are run by the govmnt.


I can't get beer delivered with my pizza here in the DFW area. I looked into trying to start a business for that, but the regulatory environment was rather byzantine and was made worse with DFW being a mishmash of dry/wet zones.

< Message edited by CarpeComa -- 8/30/2015 10:41:05 AM >

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 10:38:05 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: CarpeComa

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

OP???
Who is banning companies?
what company has been banned?



Explicitly?

Prostitution (most places)
Uber
Liquor stores (dry counties)

Anything that would compete with state-established monopolies, such as:
Mail service
Cable (in most places)
Utilities (in a lot of places)

Implicitly banned businesses are harder to identify. A lot of businesses exist at the whims of local boards and regulators. It's difficult to point to one specifically because if they are banned by regulators, they simply cease to exist (or never exist in the first place) and if banned by a local board, it’s usually done before being opened. These bannings tend to be very quiet as for most businesses a new location isn't worth a drag out fight with the local board. Wal-Mart and Chick-fil-a have been publicized targets for being prevented from opening local stores. Anything ‘adult’ oriented is another frequent target. Then there are issues where a business hasn’t been totally banned, but complying with the existing law is prohibitively complicated/expensive which effectively bans the business. Why can’t I get beer delivered with my pizza? Because it has been effectively banned by regulation.


Ive addressed this before. THis is NOT a discussion of adult and illegal activities, drugs, prostitution (which I hasten to add are regulated because of largely morals/obscenity).
And have been "banned" for decades, NOT suddenly. ANd certainly not because of what has been happening since gay marriage was announced.
We can discuss actually severely regulated businesses all day, I ran one for 11 years.
I can get beer delivered with my pizza, altho I dont drink. Yet, our liquor and beer stores are run by the govmnt.

But no answer for Denver City Council vs Chick-Fil-A?

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 10:50:15 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
The good thing about state run liquor stores (and I don't drink either, well not anymore and a hell of a lot less than before) is the State gets to keep the profits and the taxes. double whammy. Prices were compatable tho to privately owned ones.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 11:19:46 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: CarpeComa

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

OP???
Who is banning companies?
what company has been banned?



Explicitly?

Prostitution (most places)
Uber
Liquor stores (dry counties)

Anything that would compete with state-established monopolies, such as:
Mail service
Cable (in most places)
Utilities (in a lot of places)

Implicitly banned businesses are harder to identify. A lot of businesses exist at the whims of local boards and regulators. It's difficult to point to one specifically because if they are banned by regulators, they simply cease to exist (or never exist in the first place) and if banned by a local board, it’s usually done before being opened. These bannings tend to be very quiet as for most businesses a new location isn't worth a drag out fight with the local board. Wal-Mart and Chick-fil-a have been publicized targets for being prevented from opening local stores. Anything ‘adult’ oriented is another frequent target. Then there are issues where a business hasn’t been totally banned, but complying with the existing law is prohibitively complicated/expensive which effectively bans the business. Why can’t I get beer delivered with my pizza? Because it has been effectively banned by regulation.


Ive addressed this before. THis is NOT a discussion of adult and illegal activities, drugs, prostitution (which I hasten to add are regulated because of largely morals/obscenity).
And have been "banned" for decades, NOT suddenly. ANd certainly not because of what has been happening since gay marriage was announced.
We can discuss actually severely regulated businesses all day, I ran one for 11 years.
I can get beer delivered with my pizza, altho I dont drink. Yet, our liquor and beer stores are run by the govmnt.

But no answer for Denver City Council vs Chick-Fil-A?




What about texas vs planned parent hood?


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 11:47:54 AM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
trying to put planned parenthood out of business isn't good in my opinion, but removal of state funding is. My 2 cents.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/23/texas-planned-parenthood-_n_7645364.html

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 11:57:03 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

trying to put planned parenthood out of business isn't good in my opinion, but removal of state funding is. My 2 cents.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/23/texas-planned-parenthood-_n_7645364.html


Sort of like state funding for NPR / PBS despite their leftist political agenda

An issue, though a separate issue from this issue

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 11:59:43 AM   
Thegunnysez


Posts: 741
Joined: 8/17/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


What a conveniently short memory you have

Theres Chik-fil-A, who leftists tried to destroy. The mom n pop pizzeria whose religious beliefs interfered with catering gay weddings, who leftists shut down...

Thats without getting into the history of leftists in other places around the globe. Include that sort of thing and I would be here all day and still just barely scratch the surface




What a conveniently short memory you have.
There are the Dixie Chicks who spoke their mind and there were those who sought to silence them. That is without getting into the history of fascists in other places around the globe. Include that sort of thing and I would be here all day and still just barely scratch the surface.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 12:02:31 PM   
Thegunnysez


Posts: 741
Joined: 8/17/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Who was that guy, one of his whores recorded him saying some bad things in private. He was forced to cough up his sports team


How much did he make on that transaction? Forced to sell a team for several times it's worth. Who couldn't use a whore like that?

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 12:11:15 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thegunnysez


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


What a conveniently short memory you have

Theres Chik-fil-A, who leftists tried to destroy. The mom n pop pizzeria whose religious beliefs interfered with catering gay weddings, who leftists shut down...

Thats without getting into the history of leftists in other places around the globe. Include that sort of thing and I would be here all day and still just barely scratch the surface




What a conveniently short memory you have.
There are the Dixie Chicks who spoke their mind and there were those who sought to silence them. That is without getting into the history of fascists in other places around the globe. Include that sort of thing and I would be here all day and still just barely scratch the surface.


Their fans quit buying their CDs because they're leftist loons

Not exactly the same thing there, Einstein

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Thegunnysez)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 12:16:39 PM   
Thegunnysez


Posts: 741
Joined: 8/17/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Their fans quit buying their CDs because they're leftist loons





Cite please.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 12:53:14 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Thegunnysez


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Their fans quit buying their CDs because they're leftist loons





Cite please.





_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Thegunnysez)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 1:17:23 PM   
Thegunnysez


Posts: 741
Joined: 8/17/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Thegunnysez




quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Their fans quit buying their CDs because they're leftist loons






Cite please.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 3:52:15 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: CarpeComa

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

OP???
Who is banning companies?
what company has been banned?



Explicitly?

Prostitution (most places)
Uber
Liquor stores (dry counties)

Anything that would compete with state-established monopolies, such as:
Mail service
Cable (in most places)
Utilities (in a lot of places)

Implicitly banned businesses are harder to identify. A lot of businesses exist at the whims of local boards and regulators. It's difficult to point to one specifically because if they are banned by regulators, they simply cease to exist (or never exist in the first place) and if banned by a local board, it’s usually done before being opened. These bannings tend to be very quiet as for most businesses a new location isn't worth a drag out fight with the local board. Wal-Mart and Chick-fil-a have been publicized targets for being prevented from opening local stores. Anything ‘adult’ oriented is another frequent target. Then there are issues where a business hasn’t been totally banned, but complying with the existing law is prohibitively complicated/expensive which effectively bans the business. Why can’t I get beer delivered with my pizza? Because it has been effectively banned by regulation.


Ive addressed this before. THis is NOT a discussion of adult and illegal activities, drugs, prostitution (which I hasten to add are regulated because of largely morals/obscenity).
And have been "banned" for decades, NOT suddenly. ANd certainly not because of what has been happening since gay marriage was announced.
We can discuss actually severely regulated businesses all day, I ran one for 11 years.
I can get beer delivered with my pizza, altho I dont drink. Yet, our liquor and beer stores are run by the govmnt.

But no answer for Denver City Council vs Chick-Fil-A?




What about texas vs planned parent hood?

Planned Parenthood: Not for profit, government funded, operates under differing regulations than other businesses. Refunded by Texas government...something the ones who run a state have the right to do.

Chick-Fil-A: Private business for profit. Pays property and other taxes. Funded only by their customers. Denied a business license because of religious beliefs, NOT discrimination.

See any difference there? Nice deflection there but I still see no acknowledgment that a business was banned because of religious beliefs.



(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 4:34:45 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3672
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


What a conveniently short memory you have

Theres Chik-fil-A, who leftists tried to destroy. The mom n pop pizzeria whose religious beliefs interfered with catering gay weddings, who leftists shut down...

Thats without getting into the history of leftists in other places around the globe. Include that sort of thing and I would be here all day and still just barely scratch the surface



Conservative & religious groups have called for boycotts on JC Penney for hiring Ellen as a spokesperson, on Target for disallowing the Salvation Army to collect donations in front of their stores (that one worked, and now they have a strong partnership), Starbucks for supporting gay marriage, Lowe's caved in and pulled commercials for a TLC show about a moderate Muslim family after a boycott was started, and let's not forget the Southern Baptists boycotting Disney for damn near a decade, for promoting a 'gay agenda'.

Are conservatives the only ones allowed to use their money as speech? Or speech as speech?

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 4:45:19 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


What a conveniently short memory you have

Theres Chik-fil-A, who leftists tried to destroy. The mom n pop pizzeria whose religious beliefs interfered with catering gay weddings, who leftists shut down...

Thats without getting into the history of leftists in other places around the globe. Include that sort of thing and I would be here all day and still just barely scratch the surface



Conservative & religious groups have called for boycotts on JC Penney for hiring Ellen as a spokesperson, on Target for disallowing the Salvation Army to collect donations in front of their stores (that one worked, and now they have a strong partnership), Starbucks for supporting gay marriage, Lowe's caved in and pulled commercials for a TLC show about a moderate Muslim family after a boycott was started, and let's not forget the Southern Baptists boycotting Disney for damn near a decade, for promoting a 'gay agenda'.

Are conservatives the only ones allowed to use their money as speech? Or speech as speech?

isn't the denial of a business license much more than a boycott. Well they both do begin with a B. But one is to keep one from operation by govbernmental action. the other is a collection of people expressing their opinion by withholding their personal funds.

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 5:27:58 PM   
JVoV


Posts: 3672
Joined: 3/9/2015
Status: offline
Government has a right to avoid promoting businesses on their property that they feel are not conducive to local laws and policies.

A representative or attorney for the company could easily answer any questions the city has about company policies that would effect its employees, customers, and the community at large.

Of course, I said all of that in your other thread.

Let's point out that local politics is rarely what it's made out to be. This could be as simple as a city counselor's cousin wanting the space for a franchise of their own. Or another company promising a more lucrative deal for the airport.

(in reply to KenDckey)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 5:31:35 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

Government has a right to avoid promoting businesses on their property that they feel are not conducive to local laws and policies.

A representative or attorney for the company could easily answer any questions the city has about company policies that would effect its employees, customers, and the community at large.

Of course, I said all of that in your other thread.

Let's point out that local politics is rarely what it's made out to be. This could be as simple as a city counselor's cousin wanting the space for a franchise of their own. Or another company promising a more lucrative deal for the airport.


Would you feel the same if the city council were skin heads Islamists or whatever, pushing THEIR radical agenda at a big city airport

Kinda doubt it

But since its your pet extremist ideology you see nothing wrong with their heavy handed tactics

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Business should be banned based upon - 8/30/2015 5:34:29 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

Government has a right to avoid promoting businesses on their property that they feel are not conducive to local laws and policies.

A representative or attorney for the company could easily answer any questions the city has about company policies that would effect its employees, customers, and the community at large.

Of course, I said all of that in your other thread.

Let's point out that local politics is rarely what it's made out to be. This could be as simple as a city counselor's cousin wanting the space for a franchise of their own. Or another company promising a more lucrative deal for the airport.


As far as I can find (not claiming that I saw every possible instance) the company does not discriminate against anyone. It appears the only real anger is what one person believes not practices. I do like the idea that it could be nepotism tho. Only time will tell.

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Business should be banned based upon Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

1.079