Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Lesbian slave to make master


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> Lesbian slave to make master Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Lesbian slave to make master - 9/3/2015 1:19:17 PM   
Sojourner1983


Posts: 3
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
I am curious as to if there are any lesbians who have specifically sought out male masters. Maybe not sought out but accepted their role as a slave to a male master, been given to a male by a female master or forced to service males. Most lesbian profiles have a "no males" disclaimer somewhere which led me to wonder if there were lesbian slaves out there who either became the slave of a male or were required to service males.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/3/2015 1:29:46 PM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sojourner1983

I am curious as to if there are any lesbians who have specifically sought out male masters. Maybe not sought out but accepted their role as a slave to a male master, been given to a male by a female master or forced to service males. Most lesbian profiles have a "no males" disclaimer somewhere which led me to wonder if there were lesbian slaves out there who either became the slave of a male or were required to service males.

Absolutely. I know it for a fact.

_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to Sojourner1983)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/4/2015 2:23:41 AM   
HoneyBears


Posts: 337
Joined: 11/5/2013
From: Pennsylvania
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sojourner1983

I am curious as to if there are any lesbians who have specifically sought out male masters. Maybe not sought out but accepted their role as a slave to a male master, been given to a male by a female master or forced to service males. Most lesbian profiles have a "no males" disclaimer somewhere which led me to wonder if there were lesbian slaves out there who either became the slave of a male or were required to service males.

Absolutely. I know it for a fact.

This sounds like brutally harsh punishment to us.

(There is no point to saying cruel and unusual punishment, because many of you all get into that sort of stuff.)

It also sounds like male fantasist locker-room-talk (i.e. men's gossip) wank fodder in general. No offense to the OP for speculating, other than maybe get a life?

The real issue is not whether there are lesbians who would consent to being humiliated by an irresponsibly untrustworthy lesbian domme by being "forced" to service males in whatever capacity,
but whether there are submissives with such low self-esteem who are so conflicted that they would allow themselves to be degraded thusly or else violate their own limits without respect for setting deal-breaker boundaries.

Unfortunately, they do exist.
These are the kind of submissives that no self-respecting dominant would want to touch with a ten-foot pole.

-- Lisa & Cub

_____________________________

"The most precious possession that ever comes to a man in this world is a woman's heart."-- J.G. Holland

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/4/2015 8:49:52 AM   
Bhruic


Posts: 985
Joined: 4/11/2012
From: Toronto, Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: HoneyBears



The real issue is not whether there are lesbians who would consent to being humiliated by an irresponsibly untrustworthy lesbian domme by being "forced" to service males in whatever capacity,
but whether there are submissives with such low self-esteem who are so conflicted that they would allow themselves to be degraded thusly or else violate their own limits without respect for setting deal-breaker boundaries.



Some subs/slaves relish humiliation and degradation, without the necessity of low self esteem or conflicted feelings. Consequently, a Dominant who satisfies those urges for them is not untrustworthy, nor disrespecting of boundaries.

Your response suggests a belief that all lesbians are uniformly disgusted by the idea of any sexual contact with the opposite sex, which I suspect is an inaccurate characterization... and you go on to be somewhat insulting to subs/slaves who's kinks may tend toward humiliation and degradation. Your statements may well be true for you, but not for all.

_____________________________

pronounced "VROOick"

(in reply to HoneyBears)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/4/2015 7:29:45 PM   
dreamlady


Posts: 737
Joined: 9/13/2007
From: Western MD
Status: offline
Hmm-m, I think you should re-read the opening post. A lesbian is a lesbian, right? Unless she's bisexual. If she desires sexual contact with the opposite sex, then she has bisexual leanings. I don't believe OP had bisexual women in mind, but strictly same-sex oriented lesbians.

I don't have many lesbian friends, and not any younger aged ones if that makes a difference, so there may be less flexibility or fluidity in their more traditional-type lesbian partnerships. Mine are monogamous, not poly, and have felt betrayed upon learning that their partner either wants to or has expressed a desire to go outside of their relationship for some once-a-year (live) cock.
Perhaps the ones you know don't have a problem with that.

Btw, I didn't read into discussion points pertaining to ALL subs or even to ALL lesbian subs, whether they're into humiliation & degradation per se as a matter of judgment.
Do you believe that lesbian subs secretly want to be humiliated by serving and/or servicing males, instead of let's say. . . other females?

It's a common male fantasy that there is no such thing as a lesbian, that lesbians can be "turned" by the sexual prowess or attractiveness of the *right* man, or that they secretly DO want to be with a man.

Just like it's not an uncommon male Dom fantasy that there is no such thing as a Dominant woman, and some deliberately seek out Dommes and female switches - preferring them to female subs who are "less" of a challenge - in order to "turn" or to "break" them into a "broken Domme."

(Or that there's no such thing as a switch -- they just haven't found the *right* Dominant to submit to! )

Personally, these misguided beliefs are what is insulting and what trivialize the chosen preferences and/or orientations of others.

OP is a married Dom whose wife Dommes female submissives.
Now do you see where these inquiries are going?

"if there are any lesbians who have specifically sought out male masters [or] accepted their role as a slave to a male master,"

Now, here's where I see this fishing expedition going (translated): Are there Dominants out there willing to share/lend/give away their CNC lesbian slaves with/to us for us to [co-]Dom/me?

"been given to a male by a female master or forced to service males."
"wonder if there were lesbian slaves out there who either became the slave of a male or were required to service males."

Not saying it doesn't happen, Bhruic, but this doesn't sound like wank fodder to you?

DreamLady


Edit - inserted word

< Message edited by dreamlady -- 9/4/2015 7:37:50 PM >

(in reply to Bhruic)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/5/2015 9:39:21 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
Regarding service by someone who is sexually incompatible.

I am a straight male but I have happily accepted service (nonsexual) from submissive males and sometimes I enjoy exercising my sadistic streak with one.
Why should it not happen with other permutations of the game?

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to dreamlady)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/5/2015 2:21:57 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
Non sexual service is different than being coerced into passively accepting being raped.

And that's what we're talking about here. A sub whose domme forces her, perhaps by threats of abandonment, into allowing herself to be raped.

There are a lot of sub males who want forced bi, but we all know that means they are conflicted about their own sexuality and really want to have a sexual encounter with a man, while not having to accept the personal responsibility of choosing to indulge this hidden part of themselves.

That's totally different than someone who is clear about not wanting any opposite sex involvement but is nonconsensually manipulated into not calling the cops after it's forced on her.

Rape play is one thing. The op is talking about the real thing, a deliberate act of violence against a woman.

The one good thing about this post, is that anyone who talks to him can read his forum posts and see how much he disregards informed consent.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/7/2015 1:50:26 PM   
DannyIsNotWelcom


Posts: 177
Joined: 8/7/2015
Status: offline
Rape is a strong word but yes, that's why I'm so fiercely protective of other subs, because we make ourselves vulnerable on purpose.
Some seem to do it because they're desperate - any kind of attention is better than none - but nobody can tell me that anything goes because the cops won't handle it.
I've been jerked around, fucked in the ass, made fun of, beaten, scared ... but when I had the impression that I wasn't treated like a human being I have always put a stop to it.
With great power comes great responsibility. Unfortunate that this adage is now associated with a teenager wearing a silly costume but it's true.

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/8/2015 7:40:05 AM   
Bhruic


Posts: 985
Joined: 4/11/2012
From: Toronto, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dreamlady

Hmm-m, I think you should re-read the opening post. A lesbian is a lesbian, right? Unless she's bisexual. If she desires sexual contact with the opposite sex, then she has bisexual leanings. I don't believe OP had bisexual women in mind, but strictly same-sex oriented lesbians.



I don't think it is necessary for me to re-read the post. I have many gay and lesbian friends who, while they would not identify as actively bisexual, have had sexual experiences with the opposite sex.

Realistically, while there are those who reside at the extremes of straight or gay, there are an awful lot of people that reside somewhere on the line between the two. I do not automatically read the terms Gay or Lesbian to mean someone who finds the idea of the opposite sex abhorrent.

Gay or Lesbian, someone who adopts the role of submissive or slave is, on some level and to some agreed degree, deciding to hand over control of themselves, and their sexual life, to the authority of another... so unless it had been negotiated a priori as a hard limit, one presumes that sexual contact with whomever the Dominant chooses is a possibility.

quote:


Btw, I didn't read into discussion points pertaining to ALL subs or even to ALL lesbian subs, whether they're into humiliation & degradation per se as a matter of judgment.
Do you believe that lesbian subs secretly want to be humiliated by serving and/or servicing males, instead of let's say. . . other females?


In general, no. I do not. Do I believe it possible that some may? Yes, I do.

Just as I believe that some professedly straight male subs may enjoy the humiliation of being forced by their Mistress to service men.

Or that in a loving, straight, monogamous couple, the husband might enjoy the humiliation of watching his wife being fucked by other men.

Neither would I be shocked if there were some gay male submissives that fantasized being humiliated at the hands of a Mistress.

As members of this particular community, I would have thought it was obvious by now that if something can be done, someone is doing it. :)

< Message edited by Bhruic -- 9/8/2015 8:04:15 AM >


_____________________________

pronounced "VROOick"

(in reply to dreamlady)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/8/2015 10:25:16 AM   
Bhruic


Posts: 985
Joined: 4/11/2012
From: Toronto, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dreamlady

Not saying it doesn't happen, Bhruic, but this doesn't sound like wank fodder to you?




For some reason I couldn't add this to my other post...

It could be wank fodder, or it could be a legitimate question exploring possibilities relevant to the OP's situation. The former was not explicitly obvious, so I chose to respond to the latter, rather than make the pre judgement.

Most people's questions - I assume - pertain to their particular situation, or something they want to explore (shrug).

< Message edited by Bhruic -- 9/8/2015 10:26:36 AM >


_____________________________

pronounced "VROOick"

(in reply to dreamlady)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/8/2015 7:54:17 PM   
dreamlady


Posts: 737
Joined: 9/13/2007
From: Western MD
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

There are a lot of sub males who want forced bi, but we all know that means they are conflicted about their own sexuality and really want to have a sexual encounter with a man, while not having to accept the personal responsibility of choosing to indulge this hidden part of themselves.

That's totally different than someone who is clear about not wanting any opposite sex involvement but is nonconsensually manipulated into not calling the cops after it's forced on her.


My reply is directed to Bhruic, and thanks btw for taking the time to go into more detail. But, I have to quote DesFIP's insightful response.

"Straight" men wanting forced bi, or taking the passive cop-out approach, of Whatever the Domme Wants is ok by me, is not at all in the same ballpark as:

-- A lesbian wanting and/or consenting to be "forced" to perform heterosexual acts, or (referring back to Hillwilliam's point about non-sexual Domination) wanting to be dominated by a male Master.

The former has to do with suppressed bisexuality, or still hiding in the closet with latent homosexual urges, unless there are those who believe that any given lesbian submissive is suppressing her latent heterosexuality or bisexuality.

-- As a parallel, a gay man secretly (or not so secretly) wanting and/or consenting to be "forced" to perform sexual acts with a woman, or wanting to be dominated by a female Master instead of a male Dom, regardless of what sexual orientation this Master has;

-- If the gay man was so inclined, would you not agree that he was actually bisexual in his leanings? Otherwise, what would be the point of self-identifying one way or the other?

Certainly there is fluidity, and people can develop new and different tastes on their sexual menu of preferences. What I see as the forest for the trees, however, is the dangerous notion that homosexuality is a willful choice, an arbitrary preference that can be reversed at will, not an ordinarily static condition.

This type of mentality or attitude about gender-bending sexuality is a slippery slope I would advise against going down. Because once you (plural) reach the bottom of this cliff, there will be Pandora's Box awaiting you.

DreamLady

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/9/2015 12:11:18 AM   
Bhruic


Posts: 985
Joined: 4/11/2012
From: Toronto, Canada
Status: offline


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

There are a lot of sub males who want forced bi, but we all know that means they are conflicted about their own sexuality and really want to have a sexual encounter with a man, while not having to accept the personal responsibility of choosing to indulge this hidden part of themselves.



No, we don't all know that. If humiliation and degradation are not your kinks then you may never understand this, but some people are excited by fear, and/or by the prospect of being forced to do something they find legitimately distasteful.

quote:


That's totally different than someone who is clear about not wanting any opposite sex involvement but is nonconsensually manipulated into not calling the cops after it's forced on her.



Yes, you are right. It is totally different. But neither the OP nor my later replies implied that what was being talked about was people being forced beyond their negotiated limits. That is a presumption made by you and others based on your personal definitions of the term lesbian.


quote:

ORIGINAL: dreamlady

"Straight" men wanting forced bi, or taking the passive cop-out approach, of Whatever the Domme Wants is ok by me, is not at all in the same ballpark as:

-- A lesbian wanting and/or consenting to be "forced" to perform heterosexual acts, or (referring back to Hillwilliam's point about non-sexual Domination) wanting to be dominated by a male Master.

The former has to do with suppressed bisexuality, or still hiding in the closet with latent homosexual urges, unless there are those who believe that any given lesbian submissive is suppressing her latent heterosexuality or bisexuality.


Only the individuals involved can really say. I make no assumptions about what is, only about what is possible.

I think it is gross generalization to assume that all straight men wanting forced Bi are closet bisexuals. Just as gross a generalization as assuming that all lesbians wanting forced hetero are closet bisexuals... or, the more apparent assumption that no woman identifying as lesbian could possibly want such a thing. It requires the presumption of generally knowing the mind of those people... which is not possible.


quote:


-- As a parallel, a gay man secretly (or not so secretly) wanting and/or consenting to be "forced" to perform sexual acts with a woman, or wanting to be dominated by a female Master instead of a male Dom, regardless of what sexual orientation this Master has;

-- If the gay man was so inclined, would you not agree that he was actually bisexual in his leanings? Otherwise, what would be the point of self-identifying one way or the other?


It is not for me to declare what people's "proper" self identifying labels should be. People "identify" for a myriad of reasons. Some people self identify in order to feel close to their desired community of peers. Many people choose the label that seems "most" correct for them. There are many possible reasons.

And some people don't accept bisexuality at all, and would attempt to label a man who had had even a single encounter with another man as "Gay". I find little merit in forcing labels on others, or judging their choice of labels for themselves.

quote:


Certainly there is fluidity, and people can develop new and different tastes on their sexual menu of preferences. What I see as the forest for the trees, however, is the dangerous notion that homosexuality is a willful choice, an arbitrary preference that can be reversed at will, not an ordinarily static condition.


I agree that the idea of homosexuality as a choice is an abhorrent concept... but it is very difficult to take that stance if you accept that people - all people - are sexual beings, inhabiting a spectrum of sexual desire. Homophobes who make the "choice" argument generally, in my opinion anyway, view sexual orientation as a black and white matter, and are obsessed with the labels.

quote:


This type of mentality or attitude about gender-bending sexuality is a slippery slope I would advise against going down. Because once you (plural) reach the bottom of this cliff, there will be Pandora's Box awaiting you.

DreamLady[/color]


I totally agree... but I am not entirely sure which of us is walking the slope.

< Message edited by Bhruic -- 9/9/2015 12:13:39 AM >


_____________________________

pronounced "VROOick"

(in reply to dreamlady)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/9/2015 12:43:42 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
Dear OP,

I don't mean you any offense but I'm willing to bet the mortgage that it's not you.

In years past on these boards, we used to have some folks who were willing to serve those who didn't fit their sexual orientation. It's not the norm and it's not anything you should hang your star on. You'd better be the level of an actual published author, (not that e-book bullshit) a shibari master of several years, a national presenter with a recognizable "name" or the luckiest SOB on the planet.

I've got a better shot at bagging a bear than you do collecting a lesbian.



_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Bhruic)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/9/2015 5:55:22 AM   
dreamlady


Posts: 737
Joined: 9/13/2007
From: Western MD
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bhruic

I totally agree... but I am not entirely sure which of us is walking the slope.

I should clarify how I meant slippery slope, taking consensual humiliation & degradation out of the equation, because this tends to muddy the waters.

Your seeing nothing wrong with this yourself when others engage in these practices, is not the slippery slope.
You see yourself as being non-judgmental about the CHOICES people make, and I can't argue with that conceptually.

Your characterization that these do in fact constitute acts of humiliation & degradation by the Dominant upon the lesbian, is not the slippery slope.
(Nor a Dominant with a gay male submissive, or the various kinds of cuckolding that couples might choose to engage in, with or without the cuckolded party being physically present)
The OP was specific in covering various explicit examples of polarized scenarios, without introducing gray spectrum areas or middle ground for the rest of us to speculate upon.

The slippery slope is when an individual's sexual orientation is not being honored, when it becomes invalidated by whomever, either publicly or privately.
This can happen with straight couples, where a male Dom might play the "obedient slave" card in order to induce his female submissive to engage in bisexuality despite her protests that she is not turned on by other women.

What you may not be grasping is the difference in behavior and in motivation between a straight woman and a straight man for the most part.
When a straight female submissive does not want to be "forced" to have same-sex relations, it is not because she is playing mind games with herself about her hard-wired sexual orientation preferences, let's say close to 98% of the time.
It is often quite the opposite with a male submissive who seeks sexual humiliation. Of those who do want to be sexually humiliated, about roughly a solid 90-95% of the time, they seek out a Dominant woman to "force" them to commit acts and have acts committed upon them that they could never own up to on their own (bisexuality, feminization, whatever causes them sexual shame) or face within themselves. His Mistress acts as a mirror to give him the external permission he requires for himself, or even as the scapegoat of his secret desires.

The most common desire I hear coming out of the mouths of submissives (and bottom-leaning switches), and the most common complaint I hear from lifestyle Dommes (and Top-leaning switches) is that so many submissives WANT to be absolved of taking any personal responsibility for themselves by virtue of making a power exchange with their Dominant partner.
Notice I am not speaking about every submissive, or that all submissives don't own up to their own actions out of wanting to be relieved of being in charge of decisionmaking, or that all Dommes feel put-upon, or that this always involves sexual humiliation, etc.

Gender-bending in the sense I was using it in my previous post, has to do with acting or causing another to act CONTRARY to one's sexual orientation with respect to gender of preference. (Not crossdressing or taking on an androgynous outer appearance, if that's how anybody thought I meant this term)
It also refers to the WISHFUL THINKING on the part of the NON-PREFERRED gender, similar to the state of denial that so many men go into when they can't deal with perceived rejection by a woman. Any woman. Particularly lesbians. Some men get bent out of shape on this site when they see a lesbian profile which states NO MEN (as did OP apparently when he mentions coming across lesbian profiles which prohibit males from making contact).

The slippery slope out in the real world, is when you have homophobic people and groups of people who don't believe that homosexuality is a valid state of being.
That it can be bent back to "normal" from its "twisted" state. That there is no such thing as an authentic same-sex orientation. That homosexuals can be "reprogrammed" and rewired into becoming heterosexual.
Or even that bisexuality is not a valid condition -- that bisexuals are "confused" (like switches!). . .

My personal impression is that this general topic reeks of chauvinism, and that to me, is another slippery slope. Whether there are consensual chauvinists, consensual Male Supremacists, or what have you who just get into this sort of thing, is NOT THE (tangential) POINT.

DreamLady

(in reply to Bhruic)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/9/2015 7:32:51 AM   
Bhruic


Posts: 985
Joined: 4/11/2012
From: Toronto, Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dreamlady


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bhruic

I totally agree... but I am not entirely sure which of us is walking the slope.

I should clarify how I meant slippery slope, taking consensual humiliation & degradation out of the equation, because this tends to muddy the waters.


I don't think it muddy's the waters if that is what is actually being talked about. Perhaps the OP is not detailed enough to determine that.

quote:


Your seeing nothing wrong with this yourself when others engage in these practices, is not the slippery slope.
You see yourself as being non-judgmental about the CHOICES people make, and I can't argue with that conceptually.

Your characterization that these do in fact constitute acts of humiliation & degradation by the Dominant upon the lesbian, is not the slippery slope.
(Nor a Dominant with a gay male submissive, or the various kinds of cuckolding that couples might choose to engage in, with or without the cuckolded party being physically present)
The OP was specific in covering various explicit examples of polarized scenarios, without introducing gray spectrum areas or middle ground for the rest of us to speculate upon.


Again... perhaps the OP is not detailed enough for us to divine his secret intentions, if there are any. But I took this line...

"I am curious as to if there are any lesbians who have specifically sought out male masters."

... to be indicative of that grey spectrum you reference.

quote:


The slippery slope is when an individual's sexual orientation is not being honored, when it becomes invalidated by whomever, either publicly or privately.


It was not my impression that it was the OP's intention that negotiated limits would be dishonoured, and I don't think he specified anything to indicate that.

quote:


What you may not be grasping is the difference in behavior and in motivation between a straight woman and a straight man for the most part.
When a straight female submissive does not want to be "forced" to have same-sex relations, it is not because she is playing mind games with herself about her hard-wired sexual orientation preferences, let's say close to 98% of the time.
It is often quite the opposite with a male submissive who seeks sexual humiliation. Of those who do want to be sexually humiliated, about roughly a solid 90-95% of the time, they seek out a Dominant woman to "force" them to commit acts and have acts committed upon them that they could never own up to on their own (bisexuality, feminization, whatever causes them sexual shame) or face within themselves. His Mistress acts as a mirror to give him the external permission he requires for himself, or even as the scapegoat of his secret desires.


To me, this seems like a simple Female vs. Male gender bias about what men want vs. what women want. Is it personal anecdotal evidence that gives you these statistics, or some credible study? Either way, it is an assessment of a general population, where the OP inquired if it was possible there might be specific individuals who desire this and that.

quote:


Gender-bending in the sense I was using it in my previous post, has to do with acting or causing another to act CONTRARY to one's sexual orientation with respect to gender of preference. (Not crossdressing or taking on an androgynous outer appearance, if that's how anybody thought I meant this term)


My comments, at least, were all from the perspective of what the submissive who craves humiliation and degradation wants. Not what a dominant is enforcing in contravention of negotiated limits.

quote:


It also refers to the WISHFUL THINKING on the part of the NON-PREFERRED gender, similar to the state of denial that so many men go into when they can't deal with perceived rejection by a woman. Any woman. Particularly lesbians. Some men get bent out of shape on this site when they see a lesbian profile which states NO MEN (as did OP apparently when he mentions coming across lesbian profiles which prohibit males from making contact).


This is reading an awful lot in to the intention and character of the OP, with no basis. And a somewhat insulting general characterisation of men, in my opinion.

quote:


The slippery slope out in the real world, is when you have homophobic people and groups of people who don't believe that homosexuality is a valid state of being.
That it can be bent back to "normal" from its "twisted" state. That there is no such thing as an authentic same-sex orientation. That homosexuals can be "reprogrammed" and rewired into becoming heterosexual.
Or even that bisexuality is not a valid condition -- that bisexuals are "confused" (like switches!). . .

My personal impression is that this general topic reeks of chauvinism, and that to me, is another slippery slope. Whether there are consensual chauvinists, consensual Male Supremacists, or what have you who just get into this sort of thing, is NOT THE (tangential) POINT.

DreamLady



I certainly agree with you that the notion that homosexuality is something that can be cured is distasteful, but I disagree with you that that is what the OP was discussing, or believes. That a man asked a question that you have read a personal issue in to seems to be the basis of your feeling that the topic reeks of chauvinism, and I think that is invalid. The gender of the OP and of the form of the question could just as easily be reversed.

The problem with any slippery slope is that the slippery slope is a logical fallacy, usually invoked to stifle open discourse. "Let gays marry each other? What next, we gonna let them marry animals???"

I agree with a lot of the issues you raise... I just disagree that it's what the OP is all about, and I disagree that it's dangerous to openly talk about it.

_____________________________

pronounced "VROOick"

(in reply to dreamlady)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/9/2015 9:49:09 AM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline
~FR~

One of my best friends at the moment is a lesbian girl in service to a Gorean man.
She was really truly fully a lesbian before she met him... not bisexual claiming lesbian.

When they met, he already owned a slave, whom he allowed to play with other girls whenever she wanted. He travels a lot for business, and so while he was away, his slave and my friend started to get closer and closer and fell in love with each other.

Because of this my friend started to spend more and more time at his house while he was home, and one day he decided -in Gorean style- that he wanted to own her, so he put a collar on her. She resisted him at first, and held back, but he gradually got her to trust him enough to blossom in his collar.
I don't know the specifics, but do know that getting to the point where she was comfortable having sex with him took a lot of effort and patience on his part.

A couple years ago the other slave -the one my friend fell for in the beginning- broke up with the Gorean, and left. My friend decided to stay, because she thought she'd have a better future with him than with her.
She's still faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar more girl focused than she is male focused, and fucks girls just about every chance she's got (he doesn't mind at all, so that helps). The mere mention of another man besides him touching her sexually freaks her out big time, and she's still not really a 100% comfortable with him fucking her. She only refers to it as him 'raping' her, which is in line with Gorean style phrasing, although I've never heard anybody use the term to consistent and exclusively. I don't think he would ever subject her to being expected to sexually serve other men.

So yeah... sometimes in an extremely rare set of circumstances you can end up with a lesbian owned by a straight man.

That doesn't mean lesbian slaves are looking for straight dudes though, or that you should try to land one.



_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to Bhruic)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/9/2015 4:31:44 PM   
dreamlady


Posts: 737
Joined: 9/13/2007
From: Western MD
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bhruic

I don't think it muddy's the waters if that is what is actually being talked about. Perhaps the OP is not detailed enough to determine that.


No, I did not get that OP's intent had anything to do with (consensual) humiliation & degradation, or what motivations the Dominants of lesbian submissives might have.
None of us knows at this juncture whether he even cares if this is done consensually -- all he wants to know is whether it is done or whether it does take place.

Your position came across, though as, if and when these event scenarios take place, we should assume that they are consensually entered into. We don't know that either, and I'll concede that this might not have been the intent of the message you wished to convey.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bhruic

Some subs/slaves relish humiliation and degradation, without the necessity of low self esteem or conflicted feelings. Consequently, a Dominant who satisfies those urges for them is not untrustworthy, nor disrespecting of boundaries.


Many subs enjoy acts of humiliation & degradation, to a certain extent. I think that you would agree (hopefully) that Dominants should be very careful where they tread in this area so as not to cause psychological damage to their subs.
Many of us are not out to break our toys. Many of us do not lend out our toys to others for them to break (intentionally or otherwise).
There are those, however, who are not concerned with adding value to their submissives' sense of worth and overall welfare, who irresponsibly do not respect their boundaries like they should, and who are not trustworthy as a result.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bhruic
But I took this line...

"I am curious as to if there are any lesbians who have specifically sought out male masters."

... to be indicative of that grey spectrum you reference.

. . . which is your prerogative, naturally, how you choose to interpret the word "specifically sought out."

But by grey spectrum, for the purposes of this topic, when an OP inquires about lesbians, I'm going to take him at his word. Lesbians, not bisexual submissive women.
Specifically seeking out. Not, stumbled into a cluster fuck situation where a lesbian slave finds herself servicing males and serving a male Master, that she did not specifically seek.

Not gray areas where there are lesbians who are open to disavowing their lesbian tendencies in order to act out an ostensibly straight male Dom's kinky D/s fantasies, in order to please her lesbian Owner.

Not gray areas where lesbians who want to be humiliated & degraded want to be humiliated & degraded in this fashion. If they did, then chances are, they are not doing this to get their urges satisfied, because there would have to be an urge present if what we are discussing is consensual in nature.

The general default, I would think, would be to assume that lesbians would not ordinarily have urges to serve and to service males instead of (or in addition to) females.

Sorry, Bhruic, but I don't see that there is this huge gray area with which to divine the secret intentions of lesbians and their lesbian Masters.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bhruic

To me, this seems like a simple Female vs. Male gender bias about what men want vs. what women want. Is it personal anecdotal evidence that gives you these statistics, or some credible study? Either way, it is an assessment of a general population, where the OP inquired if it was possible there might be specific individuals who desire this and that.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bhruic
quote:

ORIGINAL: dreamlady
It also refers to the WISHFUL THINKING on the part of the NON-PREFERRED gender, similar to the state of denial that so many men go into when they can't deal with perceived rejection by a woman. Any woman. Particularly lesbians. Some men get bent out of shape on this site when they see a lesbian profile which states NO MEN (as did OP apparently when he mentions coming across lesbian profiles which prohibit males from making contact).

This is reading an awful lot in to the intention and character of the OP, with no basis. And a somewhat insulting general characterisation of men, in my opinion.

Btw, it is by personal observation, as you have also shared with us, that I came up with my loosely defined percentages (which is why I prefaced them as 'close to' and 'about roughly'). I didn't go back through my correspondences or not take the cumulative experiences of other women at face value. Even if I ran across a *credible* study, just how credible would it be unless its results could be consistently replicated.

I did not make a general characterization of males, just those who possess the same mentality as the ones who can't handle perceived rejection very well.

Nevertheless, your objection is duly noted.

DreamLady

(in reply to Bhruic)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/9/2015 7:26:00 PM   
DannyIsNotWelcom


Posts: 177
Joined: 8/7/2015
Status: offline
[Master] Stop laughing! You're not useful like that!
[Me] Sorry Sir, I just had to imagine what they think a double blind study must be like.
[Master] Ahahaha, I will so punish you boy!

(in reply to dreamlady)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/10/2015 6:36:47 AM   
Bhruic


Posts: 985
Joined: 4/11/2012
From: Toronto, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dreamlady


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bhruic

I don't think it muddy's the waters if that is what is actually being talked about. Perhaps the OP is not detailed enough to determine that.


No, I did not get that OP's intent had anything to do with (consensual) humiliation & degradation, or what motivations the Dominants of lesbian submissives might have.
None of us knows at this juncture whether he even cares if this is done consensually -- all he wants to know is whether it is done or whether it does take place.

Your position came across, though as, if and when these event scenarios take place, we should assume that they are consensually entered into. We don't know that either, and I'll concede that this might not have been the intent of the message you wished to convey.


I don't know how you read that in to my position. Your position was an absolute that no lesbian would ever seek out or desire contact with the opposite sex, and my position was simply that for some, that may not be true.



quote:

ORIGINAL: Bhruic

Some subs/slaves relish humiliation and degradation, without the necessity of low self esteem or conflicted feelings. Consequently, a Dominant who satisfies those urges for them is not untrustworthy, nor disrespecting of boundaries.

quote:


Many subs enjoy acts of humiliation & degradation, to a certain extent. I think that you would agree (hopefully) that Dominants should be very careful where they tread in this area so as not to cause psychological damage to their subs.
Many of us are not out to break our toys. Many of us do not lend out our toys to others for them to break (intentionally or otherwise).
There are those, however, who are not concerned with adding value to their submissives' sense of worth and overall welfare, who irresponsibly do not respect their boundaries like they should, and who are not trustworthy as a result.



Yes, I agree... but I also believe that people have many different dynamics, some edgier than others. I trust that those people know what they are doing, and that it works for them... even though it might seem extreme or damaging to me - and I try not to be "holier than thou" about it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bhruic
But I took this line...

"I am curious as to if there are any lesbians who have specifically sought out male masters."

... to be indicative of that grey spectrum you reference.

. . . which is your prerogative, naturally, how you choose to interpret the word "specifically sought out."


How else can you possibly interpret "specifically sought out"??? If a Lesbian seeks out a male master, or male contact, I think it is safe to say that, for that lesbian at least, the term lesbian is not an absolute.


quote:


But by grey spectrum, for the purposes of this topic, when an OP inquires about lesbians, I'm going to take him at his word. Lesbians, not bisexual submissive women.


I would suggest that this is not taking him at his word, but putting words in his mouth.

quote:


Specifically seeking out. Not, stumbled into a cluster fuck situation where a lesbian slave finds herself servicing males and serving a male Master, that she did not specifically seek.

Not gray areas where there are lesbians who are open to disavowing their lesbian tendencies in order to act out an ostensibly straight male Dom's kinky D/s fantasies, in order to please her lesbian Owner.

Not gray areas where lesbians who want to be humiliated & degraded want to be humiliated & degraded in this fashion. If they did, then chances are, they are not doing this to get their urges satisfied, because there would have to be an urge present if what we are discussing is consensual in nature.

The general default, I would think, would be to assume that lesbians would not ordinarily have urges to serve and to service males instead of (or in addition to) females.

Sorry, Bhruic, but I don't see that there is this huge gray area with which to divine the secret intentions of lesbians and their lesbian Masters.



Well, you don't see a gray area, and for you lesbian is an absolute term... that's your prerogative. I have many lesbian friends, and they are definitely lesbian. Some of them, I know for a fact, have had sexual experiences with men. I am not about to tell them that they are now disqualified from being able to refer to themselves as lesbian, and that they are actually confused and really bisexual. But that's just me. I see people, not labels.

quote:

Btw, it is by personal observation, as you have also shared with us, that I came up with my loosely defined percentages (which is why I prefaced them as 'close to' and 'about roughly'). I didn't go back through my correspondences or not take the cumulative experiences of other women at face value. Even if I ran across a *credible* study, just how credible would it be unless its results could be consistently replicated.


True... we are both making personal observations. The difference is that your personal observation is in defense of an absolute idea that "lesbian" means one thing, and one thing only... and my personal observation is in defense of the idea that sexuality is not always so absolute, and that there are grey areas... ironically.

quote:


I did not make a general characterization of males, just those who possess the same mentality as the ones who can't handle perceived rejection very well.

Nevertheless, your objection is duly noted.

DreamLady



Fair enough... but you seemed to be lumping the OP in to that rather large category of "many men" for his simple musing on the phrase "no men", which did not seem fair to me. He expressed no ire or feelings of rejection in his post. Thus it came across as a general shot at men... but thanks for noting it.

It has been an interesting conversation. When you get right down to it though, the OP - whatever you imagine his motives and the nature of his character to be - is simply asking "Does this kink exist?" from the submissive's perspective. You seem to be arguing that it does not, and can not... and I am simply arguing that - though it may be rare - it does exist.

< Message edited by Bhruic -- 9/10/2015 6:44:56 AM >


_____________________________

pronounced "VROOick"

(in reply to dreamlady)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Lesbian slave to make master - 9/10/2015 12:36:20 PM   
dreamlady


Posts: 737
Joined: 9/13/2007
From: Western MD
Status: offline
I think it best we agree to disagree, given that neither of us are being helpful to the OP in getting his questions answered by beating a dead horse. Rather than expanding upon or augmenting one another's pov, you seem to be intent on refuting whatever it is I have to say. You are entitled to your opinions and to whatever anecdotal info you have to contribute, rather than the both of us speaking in generalities. There are always going to be exceptions to every rule, but the exception does not make the rule.

I found UllrsIshtar's post greatly insightful, since it was based on a specific example. Her lesbian friend was not "specifically" seeking out a male Master, but ended up with one given a rather unique set of circumstances.

What is the likelihood that any random Dom will bag himself a lesbian slave or fall into a situation where he gets serviced by one? All the different variables aside, probably not very high. As LadyPact succinctly pointed out, unless he is an expert Top, he will get plenty of opportunities for play with submissives of any and every inclination and orientation, but that doesn't mean he'll be accepted as an instant Master by anybody who isn't looking to become an instant slave.

Now, are you simply out to tell OP what he wants to hear (i.e. feed into his wishful thinking), or do you want to give him a reality check? This has nothing to do with any 'holier than thou' attitude. I tend to have an efficient nature, although admittedly I can get longwinded in my explanations. I look for results, not pie-in-the-sky ruminations.
You can run interference all you like, but I would prefer to converse with others within the framework of reality, not fantasy. I have never said that there is anything under the sun which does not exist, or spoken in terms of absolutes. Generalities, yes, as you have also done.
While this has been an interesting discourse, I shall let you have the last word if that makes you feel any better. (I'm such a giver in that way.)

DreamLady

(in reply to Bhruic)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> Lesbian slave to make master Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109