Real0ne
Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
|
Only Gays Matter!
Gay HairStylist Refuses to Service to Service AntiGay Governer.
Yep! Here we go folks!
Everyone is unequal under the present day bureaucratically created unconstitutional administrative 'law'.
Extra-constitutional regulation and judicial 'fiat' of today infringes upon everyone's rights by creating not only judicial roadblocks to remedy, but a pseudo-judicial dictatorship that does an end-run around DUE PROCESS in violation of constitutionally protected rights, and the average joe plumber people in the US are too unaware, too ignorant, or too busy just surviving and supporting their families to wrap their minds around it danger, and has created a thriving cancer in practice in which so called 'law' is nothing short of the 'inquisition' granting liberties to one special group while trespassing upon the liberties of another.
This rotten fruit and wormwood is produced by those who have went to war to chip away at the rightful and justly reserved liberties of "ALL" the people, by their legislators, judges, and the plethora of gubblemint agencies forcing their bureaucracy designed 'new religion' upon 'some' people while thumbing their noses at this countries design intent through regulatory commercial 'laws', created by the unelected, judged and enforced by their unelected inquisitors, all outside the knowledge of the general population in support of their special interest political agendas and ideology that are also outside the framework of constitutional intent, and promulgated under the guise of law that the people who have to live under said regulations have neither voted upon nor even knew existed.
Here you go, freedom, just like it was prior to the 1700's.
Several weeks ago Martinez was left sans-attendant for her shoulder length bob after stylist Antonio Darden declined to take her as a customer. Darden, an openly gay 46-year-old Santa Fe resident, told The Huffington Post that he had been persuaded to drop the governor as a client after he heard her speak favorably about Gov. Chris Christie's (R) decision to veto same-sex marriage legislation in New Jersey.
"It makes me think more, why don’t gay people, because of the service industry we provide, start doing the same thing and get our rights," Darden said. "We are not asking for something outrageous."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/27/governor-susana-martinez-hairstylist_n_1305009.html
Darden operates a hair salon in Santa Fe, where Republican Governor Susana Martinez has been a regular customer. Darden announced in 2013 that Martinez was no longer welcome in his shop because she didn’t support legal recognition of same-sex marriage. Nor would he share his secret hair coloring formula with the Governor, something he was willing to do for other clients.
In a collectivist society, “offenses” aren’t defined by behavior, but rather by identity. This is compellingly illustrated by cases of Antonio Darden and Elaine Huguenin, New Mexico residents and business owners who, acting in the service of their principles, exercised their property rights by refusing service to potential customers.
Predictably, the legal doctrines justifying the use of administrative law (both at the federal and state levels) were devised during wartime. In its ruling in the 1944 case Yakus v. United States, the US Supreme Court found nothing amiss in the exercise of legislative power by FDR regime’s Price Administrator. Despite the fact that Article One of the US Constitution specifies that “All legislative power herein granted” was to be exercised exclusively by Congress, the Court pretended that an executive branch agency or official could carry out legislative tasks provided that Congress “sufficiently marks the field within which [the official] is to act so that it may be known whether he has kept within it in compliance with the legislative will.”
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=51558
Court Rules Bakery Illegally Discriminated Against Gay Couple
A Colorado judge today determined that a Lakewood bakery unlawfully discriminated against a gay couple by refusing to sell them a wedding cake.
David Mullins and Charlie Craig visited Masterpiece Cakeshop last year, with Craig’s mother, to order a cake for their upcoming wedding reception. Mullins and Craig planned to marry in Massachusetts and then celebrate with family and friends back home in Colorado. Masterpiece owner Jack Phillips informed them that because of his religious beliefs the store’s policy was to deny service to customers who wished to order baked goods to celebrate a same-sex couple’s wedding.
“Being denied service by Masterpiece Cakeshop was offensive and dehumanizing especially in the midst of arranging what should be a joyful family celebration,” said Mullins. “No one should fear being turned away from a public business because of who they are. We are grateful to have the support of our community and our state, and we hope that today’s decision will help ensure that no one else will experience this kind of discrimination again in Colorado.”
http://aclu-co.org/court-rules-bakery-illegally-discriminated-against-gay-couple/
SocietyNews
State Silences Bakers Who Refused to Make Cake for Lesbian Couple, Fines Them $135K
Oregon Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian finalized a preliminary ruling today ordering Aaron and Melissa Klein, the bakers who refused to make a cake for a same-sex wedding, to pay $135,000 in emotional damages to the couple they denied service.
“This case is not about a wedding cake or a marriage,” Avakian wrote. “It is about a business’s refusal to serve someone because of their sexual orientation. Under Oregon law, that is illegal.”
In the ruling, Avakian placed an effective gag order on the Kleins, ordering them to “cease and desist” from speaking publicly about not wanting to bake cakes for same-sex weddings based on their Christian beliefs.
“This effectively strips us of all our First Amendment rights,” the Kleins, owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa, which has since closed, wrote on their Facebook page. “According to the state of Oregon we neither have freedom of religion or freedom of speech.”
http://dailysignal.com/2015/07/02/state-silences-bakers-who-refused-to-make-cake-for-lesbian-couple-fines-them-135k/
Christians thrown to the lions, while gays get off scotfree!
Welcome to the wild wild world of INjustice where gay religion trumps everyone elses and people are regulated, fined, penalized trespassed upon through unlected unconstitutional administrative incursion created through the bureaucracies under the department of commerce.
The last thing the gubblemint wants is a solution that serves the BEST interest of BOTH parties as there would be no further suits to be filed but since they have their captive market, now Christians and others who have had their religious beliefs stomped upon now have to file suit to acquire their rights.
Welcome back America to the inquisition! hua!
< Message edited by Real0ne -- 9/7/2015 2:04:34 PM >
_____________________________
"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile
Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?
Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!
"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session
|
Gay lives Matter and Matter and Matter! - 
Profile
(especially since your implications were glaringly obvious) LOL 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread