|
joether -> RE: statistical impossibility (9/11/2015 6:11:50 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
quote:
ORIGINAL: joether
quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53
Did you not fully understand what you read ?
To fully understand, would imply having read the full document. KenDckey did not read the full article, so therefore, does not fully understand the information given. We both know how he failed; an we haven't talked about this issue anywhere else before hand!
sorry comrade bird brain and misnamed in uk, its the two of you that not only misunderstood ken's "another mind wasted" comment, but you also failed to take note of his subsequent explanation. not to mention you have no way of knowing whether ken read the whole article or not. youre a pretentious twit and an absolute critical thinking embarrassment.
Comrade? What? Are you russian now? Got the hots and desire for some Putin-man love? You needed it up the ass from a real russian bear, don't you?
HHere is what you and KenDckey did not read from the article:
"And several prominent Egyptians have stepped forward with offers of funding for her further education."
The reason for taking the tests was to obtain funding to go to school. That you, in your desperate attempt to attack me, overlooked the article and the information with it. As such, come across as an ignorant moron!
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
is your self esteem and self worth so bad that you need to get your jollies off putting other people down without cause?
Pot Calling the Kettle Black!
You sir, are a hypocrite!
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
does it make you feel superior?
I do not feel superior, elite, or even even impressive when dealing with you and most of the conservatives/libertarians on this board. I feel pity. That for some unknown and unexplained set of reasons, you each have done one or more things to dumb yourselves down. All this good information on the Internet, and some how, most of you miss out on it in your posts. It doesn't take even five minutes of research to find find the correct information that shows one or more of your arguments is full of shit. To which I ask: Why didn't this person research their information better?
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
is progressivism/liberalism/communism/socialism (whatever form of leftie you are) show itself as being a better social-political worldview because of your incessant slamming of others?
Please define the following words: A ) Progressivism, B ) Liberalism, C ) Communism, D ) Socialism.
I once asked the conservatives on this forum to define 'liberal' and 'conservative'. Not a single one of them could define either word. How sad is that? You hate the words 'progressive, liberal, communism, and socialism. Yet, do you even know what the concepts imply?
While your at it, define the following words: E ) Conservative, F ) Libertarian, G ) Tyrannical, H ) Capitalism, I ) Corporatism, J ) Fascism, K ) The Republic, M ) Modern Era Feudalism. The last one should be easy to define if you had a pulse in the last ten years
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
an we haven't talked
oh, and its "AND" not "an"...maybe you would look better at busting on other people if you had all your own i's dotted and t's crossed?
You keep insulting me, I'll keep using 'An' in a manner that annoys you. Fortunately for the Internet Era, all my i's get dotted and t's crossed, automatically. You do understand that my handwriting is not Ariel or Times New Roman, right? While most people can read my handwriting, its not of a standardize printing style. I would expect you to have even a 1st grader's intellectual ability to understand this concept without stating it. Apparently, I'm wrong....
|
|
|
|
