Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: John Boehner Leaves


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: John Boehner Leaves Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/26/2015 4:24:43 AM   
MrMarkSilver


Posts: 9
Joined: 5/27/2014
Status: offline
No fan of Boehner here, but his job with the current and recent past House's make up, was a bit like herding cats. His party has no discipline, Boehner has negotiated deals that were acceptable to his non Tea party members, Democrats and the President only to have the rug pulled out from under him by the more extreme members within his own caucus. Although he is a Conservative he thought the House was like the House of Tip O'Neil or even Gingrich where you could do the business of the people by negotiation and compromise maybe he finally realized just how wrong he was?

(in reply to captive4ever)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/26/2015 6:14:05 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: captive4ever

Cantor is no longer in congress, he lost his seat at the last election.

So not only does he not have the gravitas, he doesn't have the eligibility either.

Thank God

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Mc Carthy...
cantor hasnt got the....gravitas.



yeah that was kinda my point:) but the crazy can get crazier.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to captive4ever)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/26/2015 6:24:27 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
And it will, we will have repeal of Obamacare going into the three digits, defunding of planned parenthood about where the number is with Obamacare now, and other imbecilic shit being passed, and the dogshit will go up to the Senate, and even McConnell won't bring that dogshit to the floor, so they will make a stab at getting rid of him.


Oh, yeah, you can count the republican vote for office on one hand here pretty quick. Several times, each at the top or the bottom (depending on the vote) of the stroke.




_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/26/2015 11:08:29 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrMarkSilver

No fan of Boehner here, but his job with the current and recent past House's make up, was a bit like herding cats. His party has no discipline, Boehner has negotiated deals that were acceptable to his non Tea party members, Democrats and the President only to have the rug pulled out from under him by the more extreme members within his own caucus. Although he is a Conservative he thought the House was like the House of Tip O'Neil or even Gingrich where you could do the business of the people by negotiation and compromise maybe he finally realized just how wrong he was?


Just a hello Mr Mark:) Nice to see you around again:)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to MrMarkSilver)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/26/2015 11:20:01 AM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14442
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrMarkSilver

No fan of Boehner here, but his job with the current and recent past House's make up, was a bit like herding cats.


I think that's accurate. They complained that because they didn't have the majority, they couldn't get anything done. Now, they have the majority and still don't do anything.

I heard a Republican in an interview that said that many in government are more concerned about coming out with the winners than voting with what they actually think and ending up on the losing side.


My frustration is that there is no candidate for me. The Republicans are too far right and Democrats are too far left - there are no moderates any more.


_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to MrMarkSilver)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/26/2015 11:23:45 AM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Just a hello Mr Mark:) Nice to see you around again:)

I'll second that.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/26/2015 12:55:18 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
some of you are operating under this strange assumption that its congress's job to "do something"


Actually, it *IS* Congress's job to do something. Its in the US Constitution. Ever heard of that document Mr. Selective-Amnesia-Suffer?

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
a few things: for the most part, what mess we are in is due to government involvement in places where many, if not most people, believe it doesn't belong. I don't want congress (or the government in general) to "do something," I want them to do less.


They do, do less....

Does not adequately help the poor. Does not help the elderly, the ill, the injured, and all those would are tormented by the evils within our society. The nation right now is that 'Limited Government' you so desperately wanted. A heavy amount of debt created by YOUR POLITICAL PARTY keeps the nation from doing more good towards its citizens.

One day, you'll need the help of government to help you out in a jam. Hopefully those people will know your a closet asshole whose against good government. And they'll say "sorry, our limited funding prevents us from helping you....."

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
which is a nice segue into our social/political differences. when democrats and republicans are so philosophically at odds with each other---just what does "doing something" look like? it means finding those rare places where bi-partisan agreement exists (if any) and to me, it also means putting a halt on the liberal agenda. the last two congressional elections where democrats were voted out in droves should give you an idea of where most of the country stands on that latter point.


Lets take that up coming budget battle in which the nation will shut down as an 'example' of your party's bullshit....

They want to shut the entire government down over 1% of the funding Planned Parenthood uses. that's 1% of PPH's budget....NOT...the US Government's.

If what you say is not....bullshit...here, then you would be against your own party's desire to shut the government down. Since we all know its the opposite, your FULL OF SHIT!

Bi-partisan means your 'side' might get 13% of what it wanted. Or 25%. or 62%. And to be happy with. Unfortunately the word 'compromise' is absent from the conservative dictionary. Now why is that? Maybe because you play ZERO SUM politics. One side had to totally win for the other side to totally lose. An even when your on the winning side, your a poor winner in attitude!

Zero Sum politics works in governments with one ruler, like a dictator or tyrant. In a Democratic Republic, it requires 'give and take' for things to operate. Going into the budget battle, if conservatives are not aware right now that Democrats will not cave on that 1% to PPH; WHY....push things for the government shutdown?

Its like yelling at the vending machine. You demand it drop its price of $1 for a bottle of water. At the end of your shouting 'phase', the cost for that bottle of water is....STILL....$1. Yet, your now more thirsty then when you started; so what have you gain that was beneficial?

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
liberals like to cry that republicans are obstructionists, or the "party of no"---how absurd, as if republicans in those instances are doing something other than holding true to their positions and representing the will of their constituents. did we ever hear liberals raising a fuss when harry reid refused to allow votes, which actually is obstructionist, on republican sponsored bills?


The Republican/Tea Party....*IS* the 'Party of No'! The true position of a GOP/TP is to bankrupt the nation. To undermine its security (You....REALLY...want Donald Trump as the Commander in Chief?). To remove protections that keep the nation operating well (your party got rid of regulations that allows the housing market to blow up in 2007).

Democrats refused on bills because of the riders attached at the last moment by the GOP/TP. How often did conservative media report on those riders? Not a single time.....

If the GOP/TP knows that adding a rider that states the removal of funding from PPH's budget is required. And they know Democrats will totally oppose it. Why push the bill through Congress? Isn't that a WASTE OF MONEY? Why are all the 'fiscal conservatives' completely silent when their own party WASTES MONEY!?!?!?!?!?

Not that I'm expecting you to have a clue how to answer that one....

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
its interesting how republicans get cast in the role of "shutting the government" down whenever liberals don't get their way, never minding the will of the people. also, "defaulting on the government debt" is not a part of the equation. for democrats and their sympathizers to continue to bring it up is either ignorant, or disingenuous.


When the Republicans and their Tea Party minions can present a bill like honest men; they'll get their bills passed. When they play childish and immature games when they should be RESPONSIBLE WITH POWER; The Democrats stop them cold.

Unlike the GOP/TP audience, bounty; the liberals understand how this nation will deal with its debt. We'll have to raise taxes. How does the GOP/TP plan to lower the nation's debt, bounty? By cutting taxes and anything that is not a GOP/TP 'sacred cow'.

History Lesson: They tried to do this before. It was called 'Staving the Beast'. Happened in 2000. They thought by lowering taxes, it would force Democrats to cut spending. The problem? Well, they cut taxes BEFORE the budget was handled to the new lower level. The other? The GOP/TP cut far more from the Demcorat's 'sacred cow' than then did of themselves. As expected, the Democrats said 'fuck off'. Hence, the deficit was created from a government surplus within six months! Every year former President George W. Bush was in office, that deficit....GREW. And it was all added on to the nation's debt.

The GOP/TP and its supporters have the most BONEHEADED way of handling the national debt: ignore it. That's YOUR POLITICAL PARTY!

Funny how you cant bitch at them once......

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
lastly---tea party nuts? ultra right wingers? it says something pretty bad about our country when people who advocate for lower taxes, fiscal responsibility (yeah, 19 trillion in debt is a good thing), and limited/constitutional government are viewed in such a light.


The GOP is more sane than the Tea Party. Lower Taxes? We already enjoy low taxes. Perhaps the problem is not with the government or taxes. Ever consider that? Perhaps its people that do not know how to operate on a budget. If we were to ask 1000 people: How much did you pay in taxes from all sources in 2014? How many would say "I dont know"? How many would give a ball park figure? How many could give the correct total down to the penny? Businesses can often do it with a good CPA; why cant common Americans?

I tell others whom have budget problems to compute a budget for their hobbies and 'enjoyments of life'. Because most of that disposable income goes towards those two areas. You enjoy bdsm toys? Make a monthly budget and keep to it.

Once you have a budget and keep to it faithfully, you have no problems with taxes. Because you will have figured that out ahead of time! Yes, there will be unforeseen taxes. That is why you make a liberal estimate on the amount of taxes you will incur during the year. That way if your budget is over the total taxes, you can apply it towards the coming year, or place it back into 'disposable income' area.

Do you know what your Income Tax Rate is right now?

Fiscal responsibility is very important. Through efforts by Democrats and the President, they have lowered the national deficit to under $250 billion a year. From the nearly trillion amount when the President started; I think they are doing pretty good. Why are you not cheering on the Democrats and the President for this effort?

An then we have that 'limited government'. I once created a thread. Its sole purpose was to ask all the conservatives and libertarians to define in exact terms the concept 'limited government'. You know what I got? Bullshit. Nothing resembling the concept. Yes 'Big Government' is a sound bite for the news to give to you.

Yet, does the size of government determine if it is a good government to the people?

Haiti has a small government. It couldn't handled one earthquake. Even today, there are many places still demolished. Yet, the United States of America (with that 'big government') can handle three separate and large disasters at once. So with that small government, you want President Obama picking and choosing....WHO...he helps out in a disaster?

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
to the point of the thread---to aylee's point, john Boehner was viewed as an establishment type of republican who did not represent the more conservative aspect of the party. in that regard, he is more or less "democrat lite." his departure was cheered by many at recent speeches being given by some of the current presidential candidates. among other things, I heard there were ~30 congressional members seeking a "no confidence" vote.


The man's title and name is Speaker of the House of Representatives, John Boehner. Try to show some respect for our government. I may dislike his politics and who he calls 'friend' in politics; but I try to show respect for our government.

"...the more conservative aspect of the party."

That is code for "being as much a metaphorical 'nazi' as possible towards Americans. Yes, the behavior and philosophy of current conservatives is not conservative. It is as yet an undefined word. Since old school conservatives would never vote for the 'new age' Republicans. Those folks might vote for the Democrats. Or a party other than the GOP/TP. Old school conservatives were often well informed on bills and the 'goings on' in government. This new 'conservative' group doesn't even know what is going on in government. On another thread, I showed a source that stated 62% of Republican voters are basically uniformed.

For my supporting evidence to show this is true, I give you the ACA and the Iran Treaty. How many 'conservatives' (all of you 'conservatives' as well) have read both documents and understand them fully?

Answer: 0.0000%.

I read both documents. Because they seem important to understand given the fury of discussions. A populace that protects itself from tyrannical government is one that stays informed on what government does and does not. Even the founding fathers told future generations to do this. Why are you failing the founding fathers?

Must be that 'limited government' you want.....

...'limited thought process' too.....

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/26/2015 4:44:02 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
But then The party of no , has gone from the party of no, to the party of , "if you dont give me my way, im gonna shut the place down" fuck the world.

Yet, you give a pass to the President who says, "if you pass a bill that reduces spending, I will shut down government with my veto."
The party of no, was a party of "hey, we've been elected on campaign promises of opposing liberal agendas, so we're actually representing the majority of those who voted in our election." And, that's the way it should be (following up on the campaign promises and planks you were elected under), regardless of which political party you belong to. If the majority of those voting voted for your campaign that supported carbon credit trade, I would expect you to work towards that end. IF you don't work towards that end, you are not accurately representing your constituents.
See how that works?

they ran on a jobs platform, they havent produced anything.
except jobs for people hired to clean up after 57 repeals of obama care.
You think its ok to defund healthcare because like minded cunts make up bullshit about planned parenthood....name one bill they have passed that hasnt included cutting funding to the least able to take the hits.
Do you know what they HAVE Passed???
tax cuts for the top earners.
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
waiting for the trickle down.
getting shit on.


Yet, when they run on a "repeal Obamacare" platform, and they try to do that, they get criticized, even though they are attempting to follow up on their promises.

What jobs bills have the Democrats brought up?

I thinks it's okay to defund health care, regardless of what Planned Parenthood is alleged to have done (and I think they've done nothing illegal, btw). Is it okay to shut down government over PP funding? Not in my eyes.

If Congress passes a budget bill and sends it to the President, if he vetoes it, he'll be shutting down government. Since there is no way for the GOP to send a bill to the President without at least some Democrat votes, anything reaching his desk will be, technically, bipartisan. The job of the GOP is not to pass legislation they know the President will sign if it doesn't line up with party's agenda.

Sometimes, Lucy, you really need to go buy a fucking clue.

ETA: What bills has Congress sent to the President that cut taxes for the top earners?


< Message edited by DesideriScuri -- 9/26/2015 4:45:03 PM >


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/26/2015 4:55:24 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: captive4ever
Cantor is no longer in congress, he lost his seat at the last election.
So not only does he not have the gravitas, he doesn't have the eligibility either.
Thank God
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Mc Carthy...
cantor hasnt got the....gravitas.


That's not true.

http://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Speaker-of-the-House/
    quote:

    Regardless, the Speaker—who has always been (but is not required to be) a House Member and has the same duties to his or her local constituents like the other 434 Members—is at the levers of power.


The US Constitution states (Article I, Section 2, Clause 5):
    quote:

    The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers;...


So, unless there is another House of Representatives rule that states Speaker must be an elected member of the House (and one that whoever is in charge of their website doesn't know about, either), the Speaker doesn't have to be elected from the ranks.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to captive4ever)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/26/2015 6:12:27 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
The president never had to exercise his veto even if he wanted to. The senate voted it down. HERE

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/26/2015 7:41:40 PM   
MrMarkSilver


Posts: 9
Joined: 5/27/2014
Status: offline
Hello Lucy! Hello DC! and you also Ron even though you didn't greet me! (Scandinavians, no couth!)...

< Message edited by MrMarkSilver -- 9/26/2015 7:42:11 PM >

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/26/2015 9:16:11 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

From what I read, Boehner enjoyed and wanted to make deals, but he could never deliver the Republican votes necessary to get anything done. Apparently there are about 40-50 house members who say NO to EVERYTHING.

(in reply to MrMarkSilver)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/27/2015 3:25:24 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy
From what I read, Boehner enjoyed and wanted to make deals, but he could never deliver the Republican votes necessary to get anything done. Apparently there are about 40-50 house members who say NO to EVERYTHING.


If he wanted to make a deal, I'm sure he'd get enough Democrat support to make up for those 40-50 "always NO" Representatives. There are 435 (voting) members. Simple majority is needed to pass legislation, making it imperative that 218 votes are there. If we reduce that total to 385 (because of 50 "Always No" Rep's), the task is more difficult, but there are more than enough votes to pass legislation. Forget about those 50, and get to work with the other 384.

Or, would he have to move too far towards the left and lose more GOP support? If that's the case, then the problem is also those Representatives in the Democrat Party ("is also," meaning blame is on the GOP side, too). FFS, if the GOP would just bend knee to the Democrats and pass everything the Democrats wanted, they'd get all sort of D support, wouldn't they?

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/27/2015 7:03:11 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

That's what he did on a limited basis, but in the Climate of the Republican party, that kind of action (working with Democrats) is regarded as a betrayal. The big example of is Immigration Reform. It passed the Senate, but Boehner, who also wanted it, could not get the votes in the house. He could not stop the gov't shutdown. He can't stop the Planned Parenthood nonsense either.

In truth part of the Republican party is held by anarachists and political terroriists. They'd like to destroy things, but instead of using bombs they use just about any political trick or maneuver they can find. So, no one can work with these guys.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/27/2015 10:34:10 AM   
MrMarkSilver


Posts: 9
Joined: 5/27/2014
Status: offline
After listening to Mr. Boehner this morning on Meet The Press, his frustration was with the Right Wing of his own party and their desire for symbolic victory(the continual Obamacare B.S.) as opposed to legislating. Without the pressure to maintain rank with his caucus, he spoke volumes in his comments. The Hastert Rule handcuffed the body as a whole and precluded so much legislation from ever seeing the body as a whole. His relief from frustration was evident in almost everything he said.

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/27/2015 11:02:28 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Gonna have to check that out Mark. Thanks.




Ps to DS. The estate tax .
Its you that needs the clue.
Planned parenthood defunding is their demand. Based on lies they have propogated with every lie and chance they can come up with. Fiorina proved that in the second debate, and that lying bitch wants to be president.

Pah


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to MrMarkSilver)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/27/2015 11:34:54 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Yet, when they run on a "repeal Obamacare" platform, and they try to do that, they get criticized, even though they are attempting to follow up on their promises.


The 'repeal the ACA' was a moved used a a few months before the state exchanges would open to all Americans. It was their last, best chance, to change what would become President Obama's crowning achievement in office. They shut down the government to force Democrats to remove a law on the books. When I asked conservatives on here if things were reversed; not a single one (yourself included) would go along with 'the deal' I was giving in a hypothetical question. So if it wasn't something conservatives would do; why try to get the liberals and moderates to do it?

It was a political stunt to gain points from their base. Cost the nation many billions of dollars and many more moderates would side with Democrats in future elections. In the end, conservatives lost out in the long run.

A intelligent and wise conservative (which most conservatives are not these days) would have understood that the ACA is around for as long as President Obama is in office. That one has to pick their battles, rather than mindlessly lashing out in fury. In fact the intelligent and wise conservative would have read through the ACA and determine what about the bill was actually good and what was not. Again, the grand majority of conservatives (yourself included here) did not perform this operation. So when lashing out in pathetic attempts to attack Democrats, the President or even liberals; you and others were rightly SMASHED with facts and evidence. You came out of the fight looking stupid and beaten.

Now, You, DS, have learned over time about the ACA. Unlike most conservatives on this board, you have gained insight about the concept of ACA. The question is, could you publicly state what is good about the ACA? Or, is 'conformity of stupid' more important as a conservative 'quality'?

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
What jobs bills have the Democrats brought up?


The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

This was that 'spending bill' (as conservatives labelled it). It basically created money to be spent at the state levels and some left over at the federal levels off set the problem of the recent recession: lack of demand. In each recession before it, past Presidents would spend money from the US Government to offset falling demand for products and thus, create a shorter length of time spent during a recession (or bear market). These are lessons learned from the Great Depression. Conservatives not surprisingly, never learned much about the Great Depression as it concern 'government' and 'spending'.

Even the conservative deity, Ronald Reagan spent US dollars keeping the economy from sinking into a recession.

Conservatives were against the act because they were automatically against President Obama. Completely mindless in there determination to make him a one term President. In their minds at that time (an observed by many non-conservatives) the belief was: The Ends Justify The Means. If they could do anything and everything to stop the President, including destroying the nation's economy, to get the White House; it was an 'OK' tactic. Curious that you talk about good standards of ethics (and I agree with you, as unbelievable as it sounds); yet you didn't hold your own party accountable or responsible with power.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
I thinks it's okay to defund health care, regardless of what Planned Parenthood is alleged to have done (and I think they've done nothing illegal, btw). Is it okay to shut down government over PP funding? Not in my eyes.


If you were informed you would know that Planned Parenthood did nothing it was accused of by the liars bring up the attacks. Since your not informed, we have the above statement. In fact, I even created a thread on the very topic. I showed how conservative media and political organizations were KNOWING lying about events. And that conservatives were either to stupid or corrupted (or both) to care, as 'The Ends Justify The Means'. It shows conservatives have...STILL...not learned that concept is wrong for the nation.

Its not 'OK' to defund healthcare. One day, DesideriScuri, you will need the US government's help on things. Particularly healthcare. The pain and suffering you will endure will push you to get help from that US Government you have been trying to defund. Imagine if it was defunded for a moment. You would be....SCREWED! To 'enjoy your remaining years in misery and suffering'. Or, you'll accept the money, from the government, to get medication and help to alleviate the suffering; an be a total hypocrite. I wonder how strong your willpower is at resisting pain and suffering. Everyone has a breaking point DesideriScuri. As Clint Eastwood once said, "Man's got to know his limitations"....

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
If Congress passes a budget bill and sends it to the President, if he vetoes it, he'll be shutting down government. Since there is no way for the GOP to send a bill to the President without at least some Democrat votes, anything reaching his desk will be, technically, bipartisan. The job of the GOP is not to pass legislation they know the President will sign if it doesn't line up with party's agenda.


If Congress creates a budget they KNEW AHEAD OF TIME that the President would veto, its THEIR FAULT.

Does it cost much money to send some people on a fifteen minute walk to the White House and ask the President's people, "Hey here is what is in the bill, will the big boss sign off on it"? They've had a few months to do this.

They have...NO EXCUSE....for placing a rider into the budget bill they...KNOW...the President will not sign off on.

How would you like it if Democrats placed a law that would effectively kill the 2nd amendment? Would you and other conservatives sign off on the law?

Same tactic. Not a single conservative including the hypothetical conservative President would sign off on it. And it WOULD BE the Democrat's fault for shutting down the government.

If its...NOT 'OK"....for Democrats to do, then its....NOT 'OK'....for the Republican/Tea Party!

I don't really understand how or why you can be so ignorant and foolish on this issue. That conservatives didn't learn last time what happened, so maybe they'll have to learn...AGAIN! The shutdown takes places, Democrats not only get the White House but control of Congress. When conservatives in the nation and on this board bitch about it (like we all know they will); I'll point out to you and others about this discussion. Specifically pointing out this post. Then you will have...NO ONE TO BLAME BUT YOURSELVES...

We moderates and liberals already know how well you conservatives handle 'blame' and 'responsibility'....

...helping to keep liberal comedians in business for ANOTHER four years....

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Sometimes, Lucy, you really need to go buy a fucking clue.


How about you buy the fucking clue, DesideriScuri. Your party is corrupted to the core! Its 'values' have all been disproved as BULLSHIT. The people that make up the voters are uneducated, unintelligent, fools. You would rather the nation was destroyed....UTTERLY....rather than having to face up to the problems you have created! Don't you want RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT? No, you want that 'limited' shit you can not define (and yes, I did nail your ass on a thread about it too).

As I said, DesideriScuri, your an intelligent guy, but I'm at a lost for why you would still side with your political party given the situation at current. How 'dumb' of an idea is it for conservatives to shut down the government over something petty? Would be like the US Government giving Al Qaeda a few nuclear weapons and telling them to 'place nice with everyone'.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
ETA: What bills has Congress sent to the President that cut taxes for the top earners?


None, they got the last President to handled those bills. We as a nation are...STILL...paying for that mistake. Its one of the reasons our national debt is so fucking large. To bad your uninformed on that due to your political (and/of foolish) viewpoints.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/27/2015 11:36:27 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrMarkSilver
Hello Lucy! Hello DC! and you also Ron even though you didn't greet me! (Scandinavians, no couth!)...


Hello Mr. M. Silver. Nice to have you back!


(in reply to MrMarkSilver)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/27/2015 2:27:23 PM   
MrMarkSilver


Posts: 9
Joined: 5/27/2014
Status: offline
Thank you Joether! It has been a long time, good to see so mamy people still around.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: John Boehner Leaves - 9/27/2015 3:02:47 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

What did he have to say about the Hastert Rule?

(in reply to MrMarkSilver)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: John Boehner Leaves Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125