notaBULL -> RE: Definition of slavery (10/14/2015 4:46:00 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: J0K3ER quote:
ORIGINAL: notaBULL quote:
ORIGINAL: alpha499 you literally talk about the absolute slavery in its original form and meaning, that kind of slavery that does not exist anymore nowadays,occurred as a result to specific conditions that made the existence of slavery vital to ancient communities. the slave market was not more than a commercial activity, making money through selling slaves, putting them to labor for no wage, etc... were the main reasons that slavery existed, Ben Hur , was chained to his seat in a chip, Ganicus fought to death in the Arena, what pleasure could you derive from being a slave of this category, moreover you dont associate slavery with sex and if mistress asks you for sex you'd run in the other direction,. you cant run if you were asked by mistress to do some thing, you have no way around it,. BDSM as defined is an interpersonal dynamic with a wide range of practices, interests also vary and differ from one individual to another, here where self identificaion comes to handy, I may be allergic to leather but i definitely crave to lick a knee high boot. I am not trying to steer away from the course of the discussion, it is just you cannot discuss a matter in exclusion of other matters related to it. Huh ! Holy smoke ! you seen Goddess? lucky you however this should put me ahead of you in the list, I have never doubted in Goddess , you did, I have never challenged her, you did,and today you are telling me she is a beautiful Goddess, I know that thanx tho. Yes there is pleasure in absolute slavery, but you guys still did not answer how the Hegelian Dialectic fits into this Hi notaBULL and welcome back bro, to answer your question in a very honest way and not being sarcastic, it is been very very long time since I substituted the book FOR the steering wheel. but I may sneak a peak if time allows it. shoot ! this is confusing. do we say substitute X for Y or substitute X with Y Ok! Since no user seems to want to answer my question, here is how the Hegelian Dialectic fits into this thread. As I stated earlier, I do not understand kinksters who keep entertaining fantasies of slavery and then right before being collared, they lay down their list of limits with the most common one being: (no I will not give my money or tribute) Now we all understand here that slave owners are not idiots and real slave owners would not prevent slaves from being productive because the slaves are the ones bringing home the bacon. With that said, there is no need for limits if the main goal is the right goal (which is income earning.) Now if the owners are psychos, lost and blind and so much dipped into perversion that they even change the definition of slavery, then yes, Ok, you will need a list of limits like the following: (No I do not abuse children, I do not fuck animals, or whatever nonsense perverted souls may think of.) Ok, so how does the Hegelian Dialectic fit into this? Well, we should all know by now that up until The North and South war, slavery could be linked to the oldest civilizations, specifically the Sumerians. Well, the oldest is really ROMANIA Tartaria, but we will not go into that here. Hence we learn from ancient scriptures that the ruling class always depended on slavery to maintain their status, or in other words, to swim in wealth. There is no point debating this, the greatest minds in the world have studied this and laid it down. Marx, Lenin, Plato... And I am quite sure there is no Plato on here right now. Ok, so now we know that the ruling class needs slaves to party in high class settings. But as we have see throughout this thread, some people just do not want to be slaves. Oh! They love to role play, but when it comes to working 16 hours a day under ground for a Master, they will rebel. No Problem. The ruling class has seen it all. So they already know that there are individuals who are simply born to be slaves and those are in a sense, responsible for creating traffic to this site. Aristotle mentioned the NATURAL BORN SLAVES. So to make a long story short, The all seeing eye on the top of the pyramid which appears on the American Dollar means that everyone is watched (just like in the book 1984) and everyone is separated in categories. Those who want to be slaves are allowed to do so, then from the weakest to the most rebel, tactics are applied to break them. So when I stated earlier that General Douglas MacArthur probably thought he was Master of the world, he was in fact only a puppet of those who were using the Hegelian Dialectic against him, or in other words, using him as alpha to bring into submission those who still displayed signs of rebellion. So the point here is this: Whether you want to be slaves or not and whether you want to associate slavery to role play, it does not matter. There is someone at the top of the pyramid who will make sure you are a slave, Al Capone learned that lesson the hard way. And the person at the top of the pyramid wants cash to build pyramids, not someone on his knees who screams OINK OINK over and out.
|
|
|
|