CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dcnovice FR From the OP's link: When [Dr. Chris] Kaufman, [director of trauma at Forbes Regional Medical Center,] was asked what the scene could have been like if the weapon was a gun, he didn't shy away from painting a much more grisly scene. “The bullets would have gone through the patients and more people would have been injured and the bleeding would have been more severe," he said. That said, this situation was truly horrific. But I don't see how it lessens the horror of other massacres, whether by gun or bomb or pressure cooker. This line of "argument," which always seems to surface after any shooting tragedy, strikes me as akin to saying we shouldn't address AIDS because people might get herpes instead. Exactly. So, let's ignore the CRIMINAL element (AIDS) with guns, let's go after the law-abiding element (herpes) by adding more gun laws for them to follow. After all, the law-abiding (herpes) are so much easier to deal with than the CRIMINAL element (AIDS) and non-enforcement issues.
|