|
UllrsIshtar -> RE: To want or not to want (10/15/2015 11:12:23 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: notaBULL
I do not see the fact that I wish to see all Females, whether Sub, Fat, Short, or Domme as Goddesses very damaging to the Future of the Female.
if I met a submissive Lady in a coffee shop then tell her she is not a sub but a Goddess
You are Schrödinger’s Rapist.
And by telling women on this forum, or the hypothetical woman in the coffee shop, that you do not respect our right to define ourselves, but that you will impose your chosen definitions on us, against our will, wishes and desires, you are sending the clear message that you're the type of Schrödinger’s Rapist who is closer to the "yes he will" than the "no he won't" side of things.
Because you have already shown on multiple occasions that you do not deem female consent necessary. Instead consider yourself entitled to take from women, their self-image, and replace it with your own.
You are blatantly disrespecting the women you claim to adore by refusing to acknowledge THEIR right to define themselves. By saying that you will define a woman as a Goddess against her wishes you are telling her that her humanity, her right to consent and refuse consent, her self-image, and her personal sovereignty mean NOTHING to you. And that you view her as noting more than a 'prop' (in this case a sexual prop even, because you sexual your desire for women to be Goddesses) for you to do with as you wish.
Considering that you are telling the women you meet: "you are not a real person who has the right to identify herself as what she wishes, you are merely a sexual prop on which I can impose whatever fantasy I want." (and that IS what you're saying), are you really surprised that women are reacting negatively?
quote:
If you fail to respect what women say, you label yourself a problem.
There’s a man with whom I went out on a single date—afternoon coffee, for one hour by the clock—on July 25th. In the two days after the date, he sent me about fifteen e-mails, scolding me for non-responsiveness. I e-mailed him back, saying, “Look, this is a disproportionate response to a single date. You are making me uncomfortable. Do not contact me again.” It is now October 7th. Does he still e-mail?
Yeah. He does. About every two weeks.
This man scores higher on the threat level scale than Man with the Cockroach Tattoos. (Who, after all, is guilty of nothing more than terrifying bad taste.) You see, Mr. E-mail has made it clear that he ignores what I say when he wants something from me. Now, I don’t know if he is an actual rapist, and I sincerely hope he’s not. But he is certainly Schrödinger’s Rapist, and this particular Schrödinger’s Rapist has a probability ratio greater than one in sixty. Because a man who ignores a woman’s NO in a non-sexual setting is more likely to ignore NO in a sexual setting, as well.
http://kateharding.net/2009/10/08/guest-blogger-starling-schrodinger%E2%80%99s-rapist-or-a-guy%E2%80%99s-guide-to-approaching-strange-women-without-being-maced/
The sub girl in the coffee shop might not punch you in the face, but she WILL deem you a dangerous Schrödinger’s Rapist from then on, and will attempt to avoid you, and feel threatened enough by you to take special precautions to make sure that you and her are never alone and never in a situation she can't escape.
|
|
|
|
