CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail
quote:
ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Thats right, cuz I know what a conservative is, and I have only seen one other on this board. The nutsuckers who put the (R- ) behind there name are neither republican nor conservative.
You might start, by telling me when 'conservatives' ----
con·ser·va·tive (kən-sûr′və-tĭv)
adj.
1. Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change.
2. Traditional or restrained in style: a conservative dark suit.
3. Moderate; cautious: a conservative estimate.
4.
a. Of or relating to the political philosophy of conservatism.
b. Belonging to a conservative party, group, or movement.
5. Conservative Of, designating, or characteristic of a political party founded on or associated with principles of social and political conservatism, especially in the United Kingdom or Canada.
(see the last clause of 5, they are remaking the word now)
anyway, when conservatives have traditionally been free market communists?
when conservatives have been traditionally fiscally irresponsible disasters?
when conservatives have been traditionally set against unions?
when conservatives have been traditionally against America for Americans, and for running corporate money and jobs out of the country?
Start there, then we will work on why I am a conservative, and nutsuckers are nutsuckers.
Tell you what...why don't you give us the name of some prominent conservatives you stand with? Those that would...by your own statements above...would align against not only Bush but Obama and Clinton. Then explain why you always seem to come down on their side.
For all your talk about how no one on these boards or in office is a true conservative except you, it should be easy.
Tell you what, having proven that you are a nutsucker, and not a conservative, why dont you tell me some of the nutsuckers that are your favorite felching material. since you are unable to speak about conservatism, knowing not one fucking thing about it.
But quit your masturbatory shit and answer the question
About the last prominent person who could be called conservative was Goldwater, and one pretty big area where he and I agreed was that the war powers act was unconstitutional.
It isn't so much that I come down on the side of Obama or Clinton, or anyone as I dont come down on side of nusuckerism, or felching of rightwing lies, particularily when they are talking dildos in neckties who are demonstrably ruining America, corporate catamites who spill our blood and treasure, fiscally inept and disasterous.......ad nauseam.
You've proven nothing asshole except what you seem to be conservative. Given the last prominent conservative you can name was relevant 50 years ago...and the one area the two of you agreed on being unconstitutional...would, if it was withdrawn, give Presidents much more power to start wars without Congressional interference. Given your railing against what you seem to be unnecessary U.S. involvement elsewhere, that seems a bit inconsistent. Or is it that, unlike Goldwater, you prefer the President being solely accountable...especially if he's Republican...rather than having the flexibility that Goldwater sought?
|
RE: more hard hitting analysis from Faux Nuze - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread