Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 5:29:45 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

I merely brought up the point that, according to the 2nd Amendment, a "well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State" would surely require much more than just "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" - it would require organisation, proper military-style training, and so forth.

Ohferfucksake, Peon, you don't have a "point," and you've been in enough gun threads to know it. "The right of the People" denotes an individual right everywhere it appears in the Constitution, and the Constitutional militia is the People, armed. It is not and was never intended to be comprised of organized military units.

K.



< Message edited by Kirata -- 10/19/2015 5:36:38 AM >

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 7:30:10 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


Actually, I have answered your "challenges" with documented evidence,


All you have offered is your opinion and little more


the fact you choose (in typical british style I might add) to ignore any indication that your beloved empire actually unfairly treated the American colonists, or the people of any of its colonies speaks more for your own myopic point of view.


Unfair? Have you a clue what a colony is?

You speak of "individualism" on the part of "american gunsters," and ignore that fact that that same individualism has driven the people of the US to first kick the british out of our business,


The historical record shows it was the french and not amerikan gunsters who did that.

come back and tell the british to leave our ships and crews alone (war of 1812)

We lost every major battle durring that war. N.o was fought after the war was over.


and then build something, that even with its problems, is a damn site better than most of the former colonies of the British Empire.

Done at the point of a gun with slave labor


As far as starving masses over throwing a corrupt government, the Cubans following Castro werent skin and bones. Driven by oppression, yes, but not starving.

Do you get all of your history from the disney channel?


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 8:33:47 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
Can't get it to load as an image

https://scontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/11181866_954031777978496_7601202674310654278_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=6da3e0e23e495f3935b72db98fd66b3e&oe=56D139C0

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 8:58:45 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/michael-santiago-chicago-shooting_5623f13ae4b08589ef47d74e?utm_hp_ref=crime

Father Charged After Son, 6, Fatally Shoots 3-Year-Old Brother

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/zombicon-shooting-florida_5623afefe4b02f6a900ca3c9?utm_hp_ref=crime
1 Dead, 4 Injured In Shooting At Florida ZombiCon Event
The gunfire broke out just before midnight.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/gun-smuggling-nyc_56201a97e4b06462a13b6c57?utm_hp_ref=crime
NEW YORK (AP) — A gunrunner who smuggled more than 100 weapons from Atlanta and Pittsburgh into New York City on cheap interstate passenger buses bragged about it in a cellphone call to his ex-girlfriend while carrying a cache in a duffel bag on the streets of Manhattan, prosecutors said Wednesday

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/gun-store-discount-christians_561c22b8e4b0c5a1ce603766?utm_hp_ref=crime
Here's one store where it pays not to be an atheist.

In the aftermath of the recent mass shooting at Umpqua Community College in Oregon, a gun store owner in Kingston, Tennessee, is offering a 5 percent discount to anyone who purchases a new firearm -- with the apparent caveat that the buyer states his or her religion.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 9:49:03 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Ohferfucksake, Peon, you don't have a "point," and you've been in enough gun threads to know it. "The right of the People" denotes an individual right everywhere it appears in the Constitution, and the Constitutional militia is the People, armed. It is not and was never intended to be comprised of organized military units.



Wow, really? Just the 'People, armed'? Not working together, in any way at all? So lots of disparate armed individuals - that would work against Uncle Sam's military?

Bollocks.


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 9:54:52 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Ohferfucksake, Peon, you don't have a "point," and you've been in enough gun threads to know it. "The right of the People" denotes an individual right everywhere it appears in the Constitution, and the Constitutional militia is the People, armed. It is not and was never intended to be comprised of organized military units.

Wow, really? Just the 'People, armed'? Not working together, in any way at all? So lots of disparate armed individuals - that would work against Uncle Sam's military?

Bollocks.

The arrogance of some Brits approaches a level that in mythology is reserved for the gods.

K.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 9:58:46 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

The arrogance of some Brits approaches a level that in mythology is reserved for the gods.




To be fair, it's not up there with the pompous hot air of some Americans with their inane victim mentality, though.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 11:38:22 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

The arrogance of some Brits approaches a level that in mythology is reserved for the gods.

To be fair, it's not up there with the pompous hot air of some Americans with their inane victim mentality, though.

Modesty has always been your best quality.

K.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 3:35:35 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Can't get it to load as an image

https://scontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/11181866_954031777978496_7601202674310654278_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=6da3e0e23e495f3935b72db98fd66b3e&oe=56D139C0


And yet they are successfully reintroducing wolves to sheep.

(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 3:45:17 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Kirata

Ohferfucksake, Peon, you don't have a "point," and you've been in enough gun threads to know it. "The right of the People" denotes an individual right everywhere it appears in the Constitution, and the Constitutional militia is the People, armed.


It is not and was never intended to be comprised of organized military units.

That is not true. The law required regular military drills. If the fed needed soldiers there would be a request/requesition for militia troops and the govorner would supply military units from the militia. This was done in the war of 1812 and the mexican american war. It was a total hoot for the militia because they got paid by the fed to rape pillage and plunder. Regular army guys like grant wrote about it in their diaries using words like 'disgusting and revolting disgrace to the uniform and the flag'.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 4:09:02 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

Can't get it to load as an image

https://scontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/11181866_954031777978496_7601202674310654278_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=6da3e0e23e495f3935b72db98fd66b3e&oe=56D139C0


And yet they are successfully reintroducing wolves to sheep.

Actually, the wolf recovery program has been successful OVERALL in the OPINION of wolf activists and 'original ecosystem' lovers. In the eyes of ranchers who've lost sheep and/or cattle to wolves that the ranchers are not allowed to kill, it has not been all that successful.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 4:13:46 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
Actually, the wolf recovery program has been successful OVERALL in the OPINION of wolf activists and 'original ecosystem' lovers. In the eyes of ranchers who've lost sheep and/or cattle to wolves that the ranchers are not allowed to kill, it has not been all that successful.

Why don't you give us some links? Show us what the increase in losses have been? But if you only have a couple of bumpkins whining over their brew with no facts don't waste our time...o.k.?


(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 7:09:59 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Kirata

Ohferfucksake, Peon, you don't have a "point," and you've been in enough gun threads to know it. "The right of the People" denotes an individual right everywhere it appears in the Constitution, and the Constitutional militia is the People, armed.


It is not and was never intended to be comprised of organized military units.

That is not true. The law required regular military drills. If the fed needed soldiers there would be a request/requesition for militia troops and the govorner would supply military units from the militia. This was done in the war of 1812 and the mexican american war. It was a total hoot for the militia because they got paid by the fed to rape pillage and plunder. Regular army guys like grant wrote about it in their diaries using words like 'disgusting and revolting disgrace to the uniform and the flag'.

There is nothing surprising about the fact that calling the militia into regular military service would require them to be trained, but that doesn't change the fact that the Constitutional militia is the People, armed. The National Guard serves the role of a trained and organized ready reserve.

K.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/19/2015 7:16:26 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
Actually, the wolf recovery program has been successful OVERALL in the OPINION of wolf activists and 'original ecosystem' lovers. In the eyes of ranchers who've lost sheep and/or cattle to wolves that the ranchers are not allowed to kill, it has not been all that successful.

Why don't you give us some links? Show us what the increase in losses have been? But if you only have a couple of bumpkins whining over their brew with no facts don't waste our time...o.k.?

For a man who states an awful lot of contrariness without cites, you certainly expect a lot of citing from others. Here's a suggestion...stop me if you've heard it before...how about you bring some cites backing up your contrariness (stated first) before expecting others to back up their contrary opinion to yours?

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/20/2015 7:29:32 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
Actually, the wolf recovery program has been successful OVERALL in the OPINION of wolf activists and 'original ecosystem' lovers. In the eyes of ranchers who've lost sheep and/or cattle to wolves that the ranchers are not allowed to kill, it has not been all that successful.

Why don't you give us some links? Show us what the increase in losses have been? But if you only have a couple of bumpkins whining over their brew with no facts don't waste our time...o.k.?

For a man who states an awful lot of contrariness without cites, you certainly expect a lot of citing from others. Here's a suggestion...stop me if you've heard it before...how about you bring some cites backing up your contrariness (stated first) before expecting others to back up their contrary opinion to yours?

If you need a link validating gravity I can do that...but... You have already agreed with my premise by stating both that it has been done successfully and that some have complained. It is you who have failed to keep your end of the discussion afloat. Who has complained and what is thier stake in the issue?



(in reply to CreativeDominant)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/20/2015 7:32:33 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Kirata

There is nothing surprising about the fact that calling the militia into regular military service would require them to be trained, but that doesn't change the fact that the Constitutional militia is the People, armed.

The constitutional militia was done away with by the dick act as you well know.


The National Guard serves the role of a trained and organized ready reserve.

Which is it's role as per the dick act as you well know.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/20/2015 10:30:24 AM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
Actually, the wolf recovery program has been successful OVERALL in the OPINION of wolf activists and 'original ecosystem' lovers. In the eyes of ranchers who've lost sheep and/or cattle to wolves that the ranchers are not allowed to kill, it has not been all that successful.

Why don't you give us some links? Show us what the increase in losses have been? But if you only have a couple of bumpkins whining over their brew with no facts don't waste our time...o.k.?

For a man who states an awful lot of contrariness without cites, you certainly expect a lot of citing from others. Here's a suggestion...stop me if you've heard it before...how about you bring some cites backing up your contrariness (stated first) before expecting others to back up their contrary opinion to yours?

If you need a link validating gravity I can do that...but... You have already agreed with my premise by stating both that it has been done successfully and that some have complained. It is you who have failed to keep your end of the discussion afloat. Who has complained and what is thier stake in the issue?

Over the decades since wolves have been present in the region, there have been hundreds of confirmed incidents of livestock depredation, though such predation represents a minute proportion of a wolf’s diet on a per wolf basis. While the majority of wolves ignore livestock entirely, a few wolves or wolf packs will become chronic livestock hunters, and most of these have been killed to protect livestock. Since the year Defenders of Wildlife implemented their compensation fund, they have allocated over $1,400,000 to private owners for proven and probable livestock depredation by wolves...
The Idaho state government opposed the reintroduction of wolves into the state and many ranchers and hunters there feel as if the wolves were forced onto the state by the federal government. The state's wolf management plan is prefaced by the legislature's memorial declaring that the official position of the state is the removal of all wolves by any means necessary. Because of the state of Idaho's refusal to participate in wolf restoration, the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Nez Perce tribe initially managed the wolf population there since the reintroduction. During that time, the Idaho wolf population had made the most remarkable comeback in the region with its abundant federal lands and wilderness areas peaking at nearly 900 wolves (almost half of the regional wolf population) in 2009. However, the wolves have increasingly blamed for livestock and hunting opportunity losses. The US Fish and Wildlife Service attempted twice to delist wolves from federal protection and turn them over to state management but both of those attempts were found unlawful by the federal court in Missoula, Montana. In order to quell the political battle between the ranchers, hunters and conservationists, members of Congress removed Endangered Species Act protection from wolves in 2011 and gave wolf management to the states of Idaho and Montana under state wolf management plans.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_reintroduction

The federal government currently does not compensate ranchers for livestock killed by wolves. Defenders of Wildlife, a nonprofit wildlife organization, only provides compensation for confirmed wolf kills.

Overall documented losses of livestock to wolves are less than one percent, considerably less than losses to weather, disease, and other dangers. Wolf kills are difficult to confirm, and the losses a small ranch takes from unconfirmed, and thus uncompensated, wolf kills can be significant. Small ranches can easily lose tens of thousands of dollars to wolf depredation if located near a wolf den.

Many ranchers distrust the motivations of Defenders of Wildlife, and maintain that their methods are ineffective. The Colorado Wool Growers Organization, for example, released an official position statement on wolf reintroduction, which called the Defenders program a "publicity ploy."
http://www.jyi.org/issue/restoration-or-destruction-the-controversy-over-wolf-reintroduction/

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/20/2015 2:03:20 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/michael-santiago-chicago-shooting_5623f13ae4b08589ef47d74e?utm_hp_ref=crime

Father Charged After Son, 6, Fatally Shoots 3-Year-Old Brother

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/zombicon-shooting-florida_5623afefe4b02f6a900ca3c9?utm_hp_ref=crime
1 Dead, 4 Injured In Shooting At Florida ZombiCon Event
The gunfire broke out just before midnight.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/gun-smuggling-nyc_56201a97e4b06462a13b6c57?utm_hp_ref=crime
NEW YORK (AP) — A gunrunner who smuggled more than 100 weapons from Atlanta and Pittsburgh into New York City on cheap interstate passenger buses bragged about it in a cellphone call to his ex-girlfriend while carrying a cache in a duffel bag on the streets of Manhattan, prosecutors said Wednesday

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/gun-store-discount-christians_561c22b8e4b0c5a1ce603766?utm_hp_ref=crime
Here's one store where it pays not to be an atheist.

In the aftermath of the recent mass shooting at Umpqua Community College in Oregon, a gun store owner in Kingston, Tennessee, is offering a 5 percent discount to anyone who purchases a new firearm -- with the apparent caveat that the buyer states his or her religion.



So, since you added nothing to these cites, you are advocating the elimination of the right of the people to own firearms?

Or in the case of the child shooting a sibling, (which I agree that the father should be held criminally accountable, although I would push for first degree murder,) that because some gun owners fall under the heading of "terminally stupid" all gun owners should have their rights to gun ownership revoked?

Seriously, the gun control sector of the human population seem to imply that everyone that owns a gun is 1) too stupid to be allowed to walk the streets or go to the bathroom without supervision, or 2) waiting for the chance to either legally or illegally kill other humans.

Once more

The last year with accurate data published is 2013

neat tool to figure this out

33,636 deaths by firearms in the US.
21,175 were suicides
11,208 homicides
505 accidental deaths
467 Legal intervention
281 Undetermined intent

Now granted, homicides using anything else but a gun comes in at 4,913
19,974 committed suicide using other means than a firearm

At last estimate there were 310 million firearms in the US.

This means that 1.0850% of the firearms in the US were used to take another human life.

The gun control lobby in the US, and the "The US is a gun crazy blood thirsty need to do it our way" citizens of other countries love to throw numbers around.

Well there are the numbers. Now, by the way some of you carry on, the number of legally owned guns in the US is significant and directly responsible for the gun violence in the US.

Of the total number of homicides, assault weapons, or rifles of any type accounted for less than 1500 individuals. The rest were accomplished with hand guns, and still, in comparison to the total number of handguns in the hands of private, law abiding citizens, the number of legally owned hand guns used in the commission of a crime still falls to under 1.1%

To put it bluntly, looking at it from a purely Government expense (everyone says the government is spending way too much any way) the added cost to pass new laws, vs fixing the one major problem in making the present laws work, is not cost effective.

However, for the liberal gun control advocates in the US, taking into consideration the current Federal budgeting problems, where exactly would you like the money to cover this expense to come from?

Defense? Education? Welfare? School breakfast/lunch programs? Medicaid? Medicare? or how about the national endowment for the arts? NPR?

Come on, tell us just what you are willing to give up to get these new laws you want?

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/20/2015 2:13:54 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Or in the case of the child shooting a sibling, (which I agree that the father should be held criminally accountable, although I would push for first degree murder,)
..............................

so, in the case where it was a single mother and the father was out of the home, you would hold the father criminally accountable?


Why do you guys keep making these preposterous strawmen?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. - 10/20/2015 2:14:49 PM   
KenDckey


Posts: 4121
Joined: 5/31/2006
Status: offline
quote:

A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY TO THINK ABOUT.......December 29, 2015 marks the 128nd Anniversary of the murder of 297 Sioux Indians at Wounded Knee Creek on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota. These 297 people, in their winter camp, were murdered by federal agents and members of the 7th Cavalry who had come to confiscate their firearms “for their own safety and protection”. The slaughter began after the majority of the Sioux had peacefully turned in their firearms. The Calvary began shooting, and managed to wipe out the entire camp. 200 of the 297 victims were women and children. About 40 members of the 7th Cavalry were killed, but over half of them were victims of fratricide from the Hotchkiss guns of their overzealous comrades-in-arms.

TWENTY members of the 7th Cavalry's death squad, were deemed “National Heroes” and were awarded the Medal of Honor for their acts of [cowardice] heroism.

We hear very little of Wounded Knee today. It is usually not mentioned in our history classes or books. What little that does exist about Wounded Knee is normally a sanitized “Official Government Explanation”. And there are several historically inaccurate depictions of the events leading up to the massacre, which appear in movie scripts and are not the least bit representative of the actual events that took place that day.

Wounded Knee was among the first federally backed gun confiscation attempts in United States history. It ended in the senseless murder of 297 people.

Before you jump on the emotionally charged bandwagon for gun-control, take a moment to reflect on the real purpose of the Second Amendment, the right of the people to take up arms in defense of themselves, their families, and property in the face of invading armies or an oppressive government. The argument that the Second Amendment only applies to hunting and target shooting is asinine. When the United States Constitution was drafted, “hunting” was an everyday chore carried out by men and women to put meat on the table each night, and “target shooting” was an unheard of concept. Musket balls were a precious commodity and were certainly not wasted on “target shooting”. The Second Amendment was written by people who fled oppressive and tyrannical regimes in Europe, and it refers to the right of American citizens to be armed for defensive purposes, should such tyranny arise in the United States.

As time goes forward, the average citizen in the United States continually loses little chunks of personal freedom or “liberty”. Far too many times, unjust gun control bills were passed and signed into law under the guise of “for your safety” or “for protection”. The Patriot Act signed into law by G.W. Bush, was expanded and continues under Barack Obama. It is just one of many examples of American citizens being stripped of their rights and privacy for “safety”. Now, the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is on the table, and will, most likely be attacked to facilitate the path for the removal of our firearms, all in the name of “our safety”.

Before any American citizen blindly accepts whatever new firearms legislation that is about to be doled out, they should stop and think about something for just one minute-
Evil does exist in our world. It always has and always will. Throughout history evil people have committed evil acts. In the Bible one of the first stories is that of Cain killing Abel. We can not legislate “evil” into extinction. Good people will abide by the law, and the criminal element will always find a way around it.

Evil exists all around us, but looking back at the historical record of the past 200 years, across the globe, where is “evil” and “malevolence” most often found? In the hands of those with the power, the governments. That greatest human tragedies on record and the largest loss of innocent human life can be attributed to governments. Who do the governments always target? “Scapegoats” and “enemies” within their own borders…but only after they have been disarmed to the point where they are no longer a threat. Ask any Native American, and they will tell you it was inferior technology and lack of arms that contributed to their demise. Ask any Armenian why it was so easy for the Turks to exterminate millions of them, and they will answer “We were disarmed before it happened”. Ask any Jew what Hitler’s first step prior to the mass murders of the Holocaust was- confiscation of firearms from the people.

Wounded Knee is the prime example of why the Second Amendment exists, and why we should vehemently resist any attempts to infringe on our Rights to Bear Arms. Without the Second Amendment we will be totally stripped of any ability to defend ourselves and our families.
— with Bill Callahan- Walkingman, Jeff Carlson and Andrew White
Dates edited by me to update to this year



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wounded_Knee_Massacre

Gun control at its finest

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: SCOTUS, Second Amendment and gun control laws. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094