RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order

RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

dcnovice -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 8:28:04 AM)
quote: The constitution protects the free exercise thereof...that's it. The rights all people are to enjoy irrespective of their religious beliefs is equality before the law, that law also now allowing that equality to extend to gay marriages. It's worth adding that some of us--many Episcopalians, for example--celebrate gay marriages as part of our free exercise of religion. Are those free exercise rights less valid than Davis's?

Real0ne -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 8:31:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail atheism is not a religion since it does not meet the necessary and sufficient conditions of the definition of religion: the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods. a particular system of faith and worship. a pursuit or interest to which someone ascribes supreme importance. another dictionary : the belief in a god or in a group of gods : an organized system of beliefs, ceremonies, and rules used to worship a god or a group of gods : an interest, a belief, or an activity that is very important to a person or group As it seems to me, the elephant in the room is that none of those definitions are sufficiently definitive. Some schools of Buddhism would fail to meet either of the primary definitions, and in both cases the third allows for anything to be a "religion." K. In a previous thread I gave a definition that adequately covers the whole enchilada, not some 'this is the usage and how we are abusing word today' definition above. [image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/Religion/RELIGIONthesocialsystemjfrank1_1.jpg[/image] Its a bit more difficult to understand unfortunately because it requires some background exposure and knowledge of philosophical terms. we discussed this already. Once again RO, this 'religious belief system'...is a non-system. Here's a philosophical term...bullshit. As an alleged practicing catholic and after putting 4 daughters through private catholic schools, a close friend and businessman from back east, goes to church on Sundays, and on Monday, sells his neighbor an $8,000 job for $12,OOO, goes to church the next Sun. and on Monday, fucks his neighbor's wife, goes to church the next Sun. and on Monday, cheats on his taxes. OOOHH but brother...he 'believes.' Belief systems so-called, are a matter of convenience of conscience...it's that simple. Communists, fascists, monarchists, all...have belief systems. yes for some unscrupulous slime of the earth people giving religion lip service that is true. no doubt. But these people none the less have their religious rights protected by the constitution. That and unlike the majority of posters here, these constructs have a basis in an argued under the rules of 'reason and logic' at a much higher academic level. The people here just post what think or what they want it to be, or what they would like it to be, not what it really is. In fact I have only seen one other poster who seems to understand the scope of its meaning. Look man, you are beating a dead horse. The constitution protects the free exercise thereof...that's it. The rights all people are to enjoy irrespective of their religious beliefs is equality before the law, that law also now allowing that equality to extend to gay marriages. Now Davis can have a religious belief that would have her hate the very idea of gay marriage but those beliefs or her 'belief system' do not in her 'free exercise thereof' bestow upon her any right as a govt. agent duly bound, to deny the gay applicants their equality under the law...simple as that. If she still finds that just too much, she resigns...simple as that. BTW polygamy has been flat out prohibited by law denying Morman's their free exercise thereof and violating their belief system. Well the klien case is cut and dry, the state simply stomped on their religious rights. and like you said with the mormons, amish and virtually all religions have been stomped on by the state. That is no different than before the revolution, the king said this is the way its a gonna be and thats the way it was. What changed? Not a damn thing. So much for the glorious revolution. When it comes to davis if what you said were true then it has to apply across the board. Its does not. The state is not above the constitution which is what you are saying. At least not legitimately despite people worship the state like a god and place them above the constitution is a psychological issue not a legal one. The bottom line is that the state has no authority to do anything entangling itself in religion. Which is not to say there is no gray area there always is but this is not it This is cut and dry violation of davis rights to force her to sign certs for gay marriage. You and everyone else needs to understand that there is HUGE money in this as well as tracking info etc etc. Many years ago all it took was an affidavit from the parties in most cases filed for free. The same methods work today, but them the gubblemint does not make the money. Its all about money. The gub should get out of the marriage and religion business since they did not belong there in the first place

Real0ne -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 8:37:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dcnovice quote: The constitution protects the free exercise thereof...that's it. The rights all people are to enjoy irrespective of their religious beliefs is equality before the law, that law also now allowing that equality to extend to gay marriages. It's worth adding that some of us--many Episcopalians, for example--celebrate gay marriages as part of our free exercise of religion. Are those free exercise rights less valid than Davis's? Thank you! That is and was and always will be my point. They stomp one persons rights and then to correct it they turn right around and stomp on another persons rights. Why? Because rather than doing it the old way (affidavit) they create their fucking bureaucracy growing the government and extorting money from us. Just like the klien case. They come in through commerce laws with this discrimination crap and I agree if its commercial matter fine no discrimination, but commercial law is not above the constitution or someone rights to exercise their religion, so when it gets to religion then discrimination has to yield to rights.

Real0ne -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 8:54:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne well the bible proves that it is in fact a religious matter. when you go to court for a traffic ticket they do not dredge up and re-try everything you have ever done in your life. All other things she did is not the subject matter of the case. (in other words real courts especially federal court is not even in the same universe as judge judy made for tv) For divorced people she would have no way to know if they were divorce on its face. The only way should know is by researching the people before certification and that would remove her protection and drop the corporate veil making her liable to a personal suit. It's not on their face. It's on their application for the marriage license. quote: Application: Information needed (from both applicants) to complete the application includes: Name & address Date of birth & age Place of Birth (If in KY give county, in another state give state) Father’s name Mother’s first & maiden name Current status of bride & groom (Single, Divorced, Annulled, Widowed) Number of previous marriages of both applicants Occupations of both applicants Race of both applicants Whether applicants are related (First & second cousins are not permitted to marry in Kentucky) Date of marriage *** Previous Marriages: If previously married, applicant must provide documentation to prove a previous marriage has been dissolved either through death or divorce. Link for reference: http://www.usmarriagelaws.com/marriage-license/kentucky/clerk-recorder/county-requirements.shtml In other words, every person applying for a marriage license who has been married prior has to show the documentation for why the prior marriage is no longer valid. For the application to be processed, that means showing proof of divorce. I thought about that more and you have me by the short hairs on that one dont you :) Well not really. I am not fully thought through on that one yet. I do not recall if the divorce is condemned. I thought not but maybe someone can fill me in on that one. Ok anyway, this actually serves to prove a different point that I make with religion. That is the point that religion is personal to each individual and it changes with where the person is at in life. It makes sense the government stay out of either legislating religion as they are and get out of it completely once and for all. That said even though someone belongs to a given church faith religion whatever that does not mean they follow the precise teachings to the letter. This flies in the face of the statists who insist the only possible valid religion is one that is decided by some kind of church democratic process. It does not. religion is personal. You decide what you will accept as 'your' religion and use the church as a foundation to work from. and that said I would argue that her other sins are moot for this case because she is not invoking her rights on that premise. Now despite everyones rush to call her a hypocrite her other sins do not remove her right to demand justic for this case. That is why gubmint should stay out of religion unless there is an injury or damage and they should have had their filing procedures set to accommodate the public rather than themselves.

MrRodgers -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 9:02:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail atheism is not a religion since it does not meet the necessary and sufficient conditions of the definition of religion: the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods. a particular system of faith and worship. a pursuit or interest to which someone ascribes supreme importance. another dictionary : the belief in a god or in a group of gods : an organized system of beliefs, ceremonies, and rules used to worship a god or a group of gods : an interest, a belief, or an activity that is very important to a person or group As it seems to me, the elephant in the room is that none of those definitions are sufficiently definitive. Some schools of Buddhism would fail to meet either of the primary definitions, and in both cases the third allows for anything to be a "religion." K. In a previous thread I gave a definition that adequately covers the whole enchilada, not some 'this is the usage and how we are abusing word today' definition above. [image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/Religion/RELIGIONthesocialsystemjfrank1_1.jpg[/image] Its a bit more difficult to understand unfortunately because it requires some background exposure and knowledge of philosophical terms. we discussed this already. Once again RO, this 'religious belief system'...is a non-system. Here's a philosophical term...bullshit. As an alleged practicing catholic and after putting 4 daughters through private catholic schools, a close friend and businessman from back east, goes to church on Sundays, and on Monday, sells his neighbor an $8,000 job for $12,OOO, goes to church the next Sun. and on Monday, fucks his neighbor's wife, goes to church the next Sun. and on Monday, cheats on his taxes. OOOHH but brother...he 'believes.' Belief systems so-called, are a matter of convenience of conscience...it's that simple. Communists, fascists, monarchists, all...have belief systems. yes for some unscrupulous slime of the earth people giving religion lip service that is true. no doubt. But these people none the less have their religious rights protected by the constitution. That and unlike the majority of posters here, these constructs have a basis in an argued under the rules of 'reason and logic' at a much higher academic level. The people here just post what think or what they want it to be, or what they would like it to be, not what it really is. In fact I have only seen one other poster who seems to understand the scope of its meaning. Look man, you are beating a dead horse. The constitution protects the free exercise thereof...that's it. The rights all people are to enjoy irrespective of their religious beliefs is equality before the law, that law also now allowing that equality to extend to gay marriages. Now Davis can have a religious belief that would have her hate the very idea of gay marriage but those beliefs or her 'belief system' do not in her 'free exercise thereof' bestow upon her any right as a govt. agent duly bound, to deny the gay applicants their equality under the law...simple as that. If she still finds that just too much, she resigns...simple as that. BTW polygamy has been flat out prohibited by law denying Morman's their free exercise thereof and violating their belief system. Well the klien case is cut and dry, the state simply stomped on their religious rights. and like you said with the mormons, amish and virtually all religions have been stomped on by the state. That is no different than before the revolution, the king said this is the way its a gonna be and thats the way it was. What changed? Not a damn thing. So much for the glorious revolution. When it comes to davis if what you said were true then it has to apply across the board. Its does not. The state is not above the constitution which is what you are saying. At least not legitimately despite people worship the state like a god and place them above the constitution is a psychological issue not a legal one. The bottom line is that the state has no authority to do anything entangling itself in religion. Which is not to say there is no gray area there always is but this is not it This is cut and dry violation of davis rights to force her to sign certs for gay marriage. You and everyone else needs to understand that there is HUGE money in this as well as tracking info etc etc. Many years ago all it took was an affidavit from the parties in most cases filed for free. The same methods work today, but them the gubblemint does not make the money. Its all about money. The gub should get out of the marriage and religion business since they did not belong there in the first place Last comment. Ms. Davis upon taking the position in govt., thereby becomes duty bound to and must relinquish or subjugate her religious beliefs to, comply with the law. If she does not wish to do so, she can resign the position.

ifmaz -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 11:16:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne ... When it comes to davis if what you said were true then it has to apply across the board. Its does not. The state is not above the constitution which is what you are saying. At least not legitimately despite people worship the state like a god and place them above the constitution is a psychological issue not a legal one. The bottom line is that the state has no authority to do anything entangling itself in religion. Which is not to say there is no gray area there always is but this is not it This is cut and dry violation of davis rights to force her to sign certs for gay marriage. ... No one was "forcing" Ms. Davis to do anything and she was free to resign, as is every employee who decides they cannot, for whatever reason, perform the duties of their chosen job.

zombiegurlsos -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 11:52:11 AM)
Well maybe someone saw the xenophobic nature of allowing the jew to serve in uniform ( decades before the Sikhs) while wearing skull cap with the military hat and said, hey there is a man over there with a gun telling me I have to beware.... the only thing to beware is not treating everyone equal .... quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: KenDckey I think she may stand a chance but only because the Fed allowed those of the Sikh faith to wear beards and turbins in the military I do not believe you think at all.

thompsonx -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 1:40:48 PM)
ORIGINAL: Real0ne 5 is out since there is no such commandment, you made it up These are not commandments so they are out also[8\|] Leviticus 18:22 - Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it [is] abomination. 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 - Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, (Read More...) Romans 13:8-10 - Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. (Read More...) John 8:7-11 - So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. (Read More...) James 4:12 - There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another? Galatians 5:14 - For all the law is fulfilled in one word, [even] in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Isaiah 56:3-5 - Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the LORD, speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people: neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I [am] a dry tree. (Read More...) Galatians 3:28 - There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. Matthew 19:11-12 - But he said unto them, All [men] cannot receive this saying, save [they] to whom it is given. (Read More...) 1 Corinthians 7:7-9 - For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that. (Read More...) Matthew 7:12 - Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets. Romans 1:24-27 - Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: (Read More...) Matthew 22:39 - And the second [is] like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Mark 10:6-9 - But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. (Read More...) Leviticus 20:13 - If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood [shall be] upon them. 1 Timothy 5:8 - But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. 2 Samuel 1:26 - I am distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan: very pleasant hast thou been unto me: thy love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women. 1 Samuel 18:1-30 - And it came to pass, when he had made an end of speaking unto Saul, that the soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul. (Read More...) Genesis 2:24 - Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh. 1 Timothy 1:8-11 - But we know that the law [is] good, if a man use it lawfully; (Read More...) Romans 1:26-27 - For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: (Read More...) Furthermore she has judged no one, homosexuality is condemned in the bible not by her. So if someone has a fuck book that says you felch monkey shit that makes it so?[8\|] as an agent of the state and on behalf of the sate SHE most certainly is: Well there you have said it..."as an agent of the state" not her doing something on her own hook but as an agent of the state. [granting] Approve[al] of the act the gays performed the act of marriage which no clerk could do prior to scotus ruling accept [of their status] acknowledge [of their status] authorize [ing their status] confirm, [their status] confirm officially [their status] endorse [their status], entitle [their status] give consent, [to their status] give permission, [to their status] legalize [their status], license, [their status] make valid [their status], pronounce legal [their status], ratify [their status], sanction [ing their status], validate [ing their status], On behalf of the state which is why SHE signs HER NAME NOT signed by 'THE STATE OF! She said its ok with her if the states name were on it. I agree. Well you just said it"as an agent of the state" not an agent of kim dumbass. The paper says "the state of kentucky does so and so. The state is not human but composed of humans. What we have here is a punkassmotherfucker who wishes to impose her views on others.Wanna take a bet on how much more time she is going to do?

thompsonx -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 1:43:25 PM)
I thought about that more and you have me by the short hairs on that one dont you :) Not by the short hairs at all. You have simply been caught in a lie.

thompsonx -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 1:45:32 PM)
I do not recall if the divorce is condemned. I thought not but maybe someone can fill me in on that one. "What god has joined together let no man put asunder". For a jesus phreque you don't seem to know shit about christianity

Real0ne -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 3:23:50 PM)
thompsonx This felcher is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. perpetual spamming, frivolous juvenile arguments, incessant thread disruption. Congratulations this is the first time I was ever forced put anyone on iggy for top shelf stupidity. * IGNORED * - 11/7/2015 5:55:46 PM * IGNORED * - 11/8/2015 1:40:48 PM * IGNORED * - 11/8/2015 1:43:25 PM * IGNORED * - 11/8/2015 1:45:32 PM

Real0ne -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 3:27:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Last comment. Ms. Davis upon taking the position in govt., thereby becomes duty bound to and must relinquish or subjugate her religious beliefs to, comply with the law. If she does not wish to do so, she can resign the position. How about at least one more. Is that your opinion or do you have some citation, court case whatever to show me to justify that position? If its a corporate dispute over where to set the vase of flowers then yeh resign, however this is a rights matter, no one resigns on a rights matter, they sue.

Lucylastic -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 3:30:16 PM)
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — Kentucky County Clerk Kim Davis has lost another bid to delay issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Thursday denied her latest request for a reprieve. Davis stopped issuing marriage licenses after the U.S. Supreme Court effectively legalized gay marriage in June. Four couples sued her, and U.S. District Judge David Bunning then ordered her to issue the licenses. He later clarified his order to include all couples, not just the four who filed suit. Davis' attorneys have appealed that expanded order several times, arguing that the mandate to issue licenses should apply only to the four couples who filed suit. They received licenses during Davis' five-day stint in jail for defying the court's order. The appeals court again rejected Davis' request Thursday.

Real0ne -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 3:38:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ifmaz quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne ... When it comes to davis if what you said were true then it has to apply across the board. Its does not. The state is not above the constitution which is what you are saying. At least not legitimately despite people worship the state like a god and place them above the constitution is a psychological issue not a legal one. The bottom line is that the state has no authority to do anything entangling itself in religion. Which is not to say there is no gray area there always is but this is not it This is cut and dry violation of davis rights to force her to sign certs for gay marriage. ... No one was "forcing" Ms. Davis to do anything and she was free to resign, as is every employee who decides they cannot, for whatever reason, perform the duties of their chosen job. so you like the gubmint extortion racket and want to perpetuate it forever? All it takes for the gubmint to change to accomplish the same identical thing is sign an affidavit. You know both swear they are married to one another sign it notarize it send it into the court done. 50cent stamp buck for envelope and copies and done. But you prefer that the state has stuck their nose into the peoples religion and made a business and a nice racket out of it rather than some very simple legislation to correct it and accommodate davis. Is that it? No one has posted anything that shows that one must give up their rights to work for the gubmint? Do you have anything?

Real0ne -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 3:41:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — Kentucky County Clerk Kim Davis has lost another bid to delay issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Thursday denied her latest request for a reprieve. Davis stopped issuing marriage licenses after the U.S. Supreme Court effectively legalized gay marriage in June. Four couples sued her, and U.S. District Judge David Bunning then ordered her to issue the licenses. He later clarified his order to include all couples, not just the four who filed suit. Davis' attorneys have appealed that expanded order several times, arguing that the mandate to issue licenses should apply only to the four couples who filed suit. They received licenses during Davis' five-day stint in jail for defying the court's order. The appeals court again rejected Davis' request Thursday. yeh I told you she would get her ass handed to her. from the little I have seen of the those attorneys work on this case she does not stand a snowballs chance in hel of winning and at best will establish some shit precedence. Thats how its done in the big leagues btw.

Lucylastic -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 3:48:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — Kentucky County Clerk Kim Davis has lost another bid to delay issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Thursday denied her latest request for a reprieve. Davis stopped issuing marriage licenses after the U.S. Supreme Court effectively legalized gay marriage in June. Four couples sued her, and U.S. District Judge David Bunning then ordered her to issue the licenses. He later clarified his order to include all couples, not just the four who filed suit. Davis' attorneys have appealed that expanded order several times, arguing that the mandate to issue licenses should apply only to the four couples who filed suit. They received licenses during Davis' five-day stint in jail for defying the court's order. The appeals court again rejected Davis' request Thursday. yeh I told you she would get her ass handed to her. from the little I have seen of the those attorneys work on this case she does not stand a snowballs chance in hel of winning and at best will establish some shit precedence. Thats how its done in the big leagues btw. the new bloke was just elected, bevin/bevan? said he was changing the rules, not to need her signature. its moot. her 15 minutes are over.

Real0ne -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 4:13:01 PM)
where did you find that? I cant put my finger on it. I just read where the supreme court rejected hearing the case and they are totally silent on it. This shit is a powder keg and they know it. I hear bad boys bad boys whatcha gonna do when the people come for you. LOL

thompsonx -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 4:36:44 PM)
ORIGINAL: Real0ne thompsonx This felcher is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. perpetual spamming, frivolous juvenile arguments, incessant thread disruption. Congratulations this is the first time I was ever forced put anyone on iggy for top shelf stupidity. * IGNORED * - 11/7/2015 5:55:46 PM * IGNORED * - 11/8/2015 1:40:48 PM * IGNORED * - 11/8/2015 1:43:25 PM * IGNORED * - 11/8/2015 1:45:32 PM Punkassmotherfuckers claim to have people on hide so they don't have to respond when found to be peddling barnyard comodity as fact.[8\|] You on the other hand just dont pack the intellectual gear to carry your side of a discussion so it is clearly in your best interest to avoid your intellectual betters in discussions that are outside you skill set.

thompsonx -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 4:51:22 PM)
But you prefer that the state has stuck their nose into the peoples religion and made a business and a nice racket out of it rather than some very simple legislation to correct it and accommodate davis. Is that it? Why should the bitch be accomodated? She has a job and if she does not like the job she has she could probably get a job at micky d's. Would it be against her religious belief to serve same sex couples a burger? No one has posted anything that shows that one must give up their rights to work for the gubmint? Do you have anything? The simple minded bitch and the simple minded punkassmotherfuckers who defend this moron have yet to show where the government has to accomodate the foolish and the mentally defective while they serve in public office. Hmmm let me see yes they did make an accomodation...they gave her free room and board for a few days. With any luck she will get some more free room and board. Now for the intellectually challanged and the termanly stupid what that means is that she gave up no right but instead was acting as if she were above the law. You seem to think that your imaginary friend and not the constitution are the law of the land in the usa...you and she are wrong.

Lucylastic -> RE: Kim Davis' lawyers file new appeal over same-sex marriage license order (11/8/2015 5:27:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne where did you find that? I cant put my finger on it. I just read where the supreme court rejected hearing the case and they are totally silent on it. This shit is a powder keg and they know it. I hear bad boys bad boys whatcha gonna do when the people come for you. LOL you are really poor with looking for things huh. http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/kentucky-governor-elect-matt-bevin-will-remove-clerk-names-marriage-licenses http://www.hngn.com/articles/148220/20151108/matt-bevin-clerks-names-will-removed-kentucky-marriage-licenses.htm http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/11/06/us-usa-gaymarriage-kentucky-idUSKCN0SV2FV20151106 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/matt-bevin-kentucky-marriage-licenses_563d2042e4b0411d30712569 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/07/us/kentucky-governor-elect-vows-to-remove-clerks-names-from-marriage-licenses.html?_r=0 http://www.ibtimes.com/amid-kim-davis-backlash-kentucky-gov-elect-matt-bevin-remove-clerks-names-state-2173662

Page: << < prev 5 6 [7] 8 9 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.699707E-02