RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


thompsonx -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/4/2015 3:13:48 PM)

I am pretty sure that spain was a case of the unitarians getting a bit of help from the muslims against the trinitarians and ol rodric.




kdsub -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/4/2015 5:27:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent
you have a baseless opinion that muslim countries are the aggressors.


Where did I say that?

I have always been against the Iraq war... We did attack without direct provocation... I only disagree with you when it comes to the innocence of Islam. Women... other religious groups...gays...and governments have been attacked on all levels from individuals to government sanctioned aggression. Both is this era and past.... There are no innocents...that is my only contention with your statements.

Butch




DesideriScuri -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 3:39:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874
so let's get rid of those enemies permanently

The problem is that you'll only be permanently getting rid of the current crop of "those enemies," while also providing recruitment material for the next crop.
It may only be a similar comparison between what ISIS is doing and what Christians did during The Inquisition (Spain, et. al.). How were those terrible practices brought to an end? I don't know, but that might be worth something to look into for those in charge.
I think the only way to permanently rid ourselves of Violence in the name of Islam, is to prove that the violence isn't supported by the teachings of Islam. That will relegate the violence to rarities and isolated actions, like with the occasional "Christian" fuckstick.

Good question.
The Spanish Inquisition and assorted burning of catholics and protestants were/was brought to an end by two things:
Firstly, working your way through your own process of internal strife.
Secondly, the conclusion at the end of this process was that only tolerance and a democratic system of government could end such instinctive behaviour.
The really important thing here is that you have to go through your own process of struggle to arrive at a workable solution.
Outside forces attempting to impose it will only stir up a hornets nest.
In the event they want to burn each other then let them get on with it. Eventually they will realise it ain't a good idea.
On the other hand, keep getting involved in their business and they will focus on you rather than cleaning up their own house.
But then, of course the aim is to ensure they do not get their house in order.


Great response, Gent! The only role an outside force should have (if it has any at all), would be to prevent gross abuse of human rights. So, we make sure Assad's supporters and detractors don't use chemical weapons on the other, for instance. What we shouldn't do is what we did in Libya, when we ended up being part of the de facto air force for the rebels. It's one thing to create a no-fly zone, and another to be bombing targets on the ground that aren't challenging that no-fly zone (I know we weren't, technically, dropping the bombs, but we were part and party to them).

If the Shia what to wipe out the Sunni, let them, unless there are serious abuses, according to the "rules of warfare." Let them fight it out.




DesideriScuri -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 3:43:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

I think the only way to permanently rid ourselves of Violence in the name of Islam, is to prove that the violence isn't supported by the teachings of Islam

This will be extremely hard to prove since Islam was spread through violence by their Prophet.
I would just call them out on it, and demand that they stop following that specific Prophet! And find a more peaceful one to follow.
The interesting thing about Islam is, it's not like the bible. The Quran has Hadiths that will give real historical examples of what that verse exactly means. And it usually confirms what it means literally.
When I speak to moderate muslims about this, they denounce the hadiths. For them to modernise, they have to discount the hadiths so that they are free to re-interprete the Quran to their peaceful interpretation.


If Islam isn't a religion of violence, then there will be proof that it's not a violent religion. If there is proof that it is a violent religion, then we address it as such. I've heard it said that it is a religion of violence. I've heard that it is a religion of peace. I've heard that Islam calls for violence against non-Muslims. I've heard it doesn't.

I don't proclaim to know if it is or if it isn't. That's for religious scholars to figure out.




JVoV -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 5:52:54 AM)

The only religion that can be considered truly peaceful is Buddhism.

Judaism and Christianity are both drenched in blood, no different than Islam.

If we judge Islam by the works of terrorists, should we judge Christianity by the Inquisition? Or Judaism by Palestinian genocide?




Greta75 -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 6:14:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

The only religion that can be considered truly peaceful is Buddhism.

Judaism and Christianity are both drenched in blood, no different than Islam.

If we judge Islam by the works of terrorists, should we judge Christianity by the Inquisition? Or Judaism by Palestinian genocide?


No I judge Islam by the actions of their prophets.

Action speaks louder than words. I want to see what their action is.

Buddha definitely never transgress against anybody.

Jesus pretty much kinda try to stay out of violence.

But I can't say that about Muhammad. I look at their role models.

And then you see followers emulating what their role model did in the past.

That's bad news.




kdsub -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 6:57:43 AM)

Undeniable facts...most all religions have tried to force their beliefs on others by force. But should not each generation be directly responsible only for their acts outside of restitution?

Butch




BamaD -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 8:28:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

I think the only way to permanently rid ourselves of Violence in the name of Islam, is to prove that the violence isn't supported by the teachings of Islam

This will be extremely hard to prove since Islam was spread through violence by their Prophet.
I would just call them out on it, and demand that they stop following that specific Prophet! And find a more peaceful one to follow.
The interesting thing about Islam is, it's not like the bible. The Quran has Hadiths that will give real historical examples of what that verse exactly means. And it usually confirms what it means literally.
When I speak to moderate muslims about this, they denounce the hadiths. For them to modernise, they have to discount the hadiths so that they are free to re-interprete the Quran to their peaceful interpretation.


If Islam isn't a religion of violence, then there will be proof that it's not a violent religion. If there is proof that it is a violent religion, then we address it as such. I've heard it said that it is a religion of violence. I've heard that it is a religion of peace. I've heard that Islam calls for violence against non-Muslims. I've heard it doesn't.

I don't proclaim to know if it is or if it isn't. That's for religious scholars to figure out.


Actions speak louder than words. Over 90% of the boots on the ground fighting ISIS are worn by Muslims trying to stop this evil heresy.




BamaD -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 8:31:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

The only religion that can be considered truly peaceful is Buddhism.

Judaism and Christianity are both drenched in blood, no different than Islam.

If we judge Islam by the works of terrorists, should we judge Christianity by the Inquisition? Or Judaism by Palestinian genocide?

Lets see, does something that happened in the 15th century have the same bearing on the state of a religion today that Paris has on the state of another religion today?




Hillwilliam -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 9:05:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I think you need to look back in history to the answers of your questions of conquest.



You clearly don't agree so go ahead and list these muslim invasions of Western nations.



Will you include European nations as "Western"?


Of course. I'm aware of Spain, Sicily, Siege of Vienna in the 1600s etc; but none of this would even register compared with Western nations setting up shop in their countries.


You forgot a little minor inconvenience known as the "Ottoman empire" invading Europe.
Muslims have instigated large scale invasions of the Western world and Westerners have invaded Muslim lands.

It's not nearly as one sided as you would have though it is it?




Musicmystery -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 11:25:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

The only religion that can be considered truly peaceful is Buddhism.



Google "Buddhist violence," and you'll get an education.




NorthernGent -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 11:38:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent
you have a baseless opinion that muslim countries are the aggressors.


Where did I say that?

I have always been against the Iraq war... We did attack without direct provocation... I only disagree with you when it comes to the innocence of Islam. Women... other religious groups...gays...and governments have been attacked on all levels from individuals to government sanctioned aggression. Both is this era and past.... There are no innocents...that is my only contention with your statements.

Butch


Read your own posts. You're asking me how far we should go back in history.

I said: go ahead, as far as you need, in your own time.





kdsub -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 1:25:37 PM)

No need..history is history...anyway we are closer in our views on the subject than apart.

Butch




LookieNoNookie -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 3:44:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

That brought it home because, good Christians can fight them with Jesus as the role model, and say, "Jesus wouldn't want this!"

So it was all the "good christians" who stoped the inquisition?
It was all the good christians who stopped the crusades?
It was all the good christians who stop those who would murder abortionist?
Christians are not a nickles worth different than any other religion. It is all about the benjamins and nothing more.



Don't be a moron. (Sorry....was that redundant?)

The Inquisition happened when an adult male had the education level of a 12 year old today.

The Crusades were BEGUN by Christians...your point? (Stupidity reigns in history).

The number of (morons) who have stalked Planned Parenthood clinics (and killed people)....were not a group of "licensed" religious fuck for brains...they were were isolationists who were (much like you).....morons.

Christians are different. They've learned (and they KNOW they were wrong) and....the education levels available today are vastly different than 1,000 years previous.

(Get a clue).





DesideriScuri -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 4:07:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
Trying to defend Islam and keep saying, oh it's peaceful, it's totally peaceful. It's not! How can anybody who reads their teachings even associate the word "peace" to it, that I cannot fathom.

We could interpret a book according to our own bias, or:
We could look at the evidence.
When was the last time a muslim country invaded England or the United States or France or a few more.
How many times have Western nations set up shop in muslim countries?
The fact, and I restate fact, not your interpretation of religious books; is that the aggressors are Western nations.
I don't speak as someone who has a problem with religion; nor do I care who is killing whom in the world - it's boring and nothing to do with me - but what I can't stand is people with big mouths who have a lot to say but none of it has any basis in fact.


When was the last time a "Christian" country attacked another country over religious reasons?






bounty44 -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 4:10:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

I think the only way to permanently rid ourselves of Violence in the name of Islam, is to prove that the violence isn't supported by the teachings of Islam

This will be extremely hard to prove since Islam was spread through violence by their Prophet.
I would just call them out on it, and demand that they stop following that specific Prophet! And find a more peaceful one to follow.
The interesting thing about Islam is, it's not like the bible. The Quran has Hadiths that will give real historical examples of what that verse exactly means. And it usually confirms what it means literally.
When I speak to moderate muslims about this, they denounce the hadiths. For them to modernise, they have to discount the hadiths so that they are free to re-interprete the Quran to their peaceful interpretation.


If Islam isn't a religion of violence, then there will be proof that it's not a violent religion. If there is proof that it is a violent religion, then we address it as such. I've heard it said that it is a religion of violence. I've heard that it is a religion of peace. I've heard that Islam calls for violence against non-Muslims. I've heard it doesn't.

I don't proclaim to know if it is or if it isn't. That's for religious scholars to figure out.


Actions speak louder than words. Over 90% of the boots on the ground fighting ISIS are worn by Muslims trying to stop this evil heresy.


bama, ive posted to this effect before and it bears revisiting. the justifications/admonitions for the violence we see are integral to their holy writings.

im not aware of anyone in the muslim world looking at the violence done by fellow muslims, and judging those people as heretics.

by contrast, the violent ones are looking at the others and effectively judging them as apostates.




DesideriScuri -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 4:12:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV
The only religion that can be considered truly peaceful is Buddhism.
Judaism and Christianity are both drenched in blood, no different than Islam.
If we judge Islam by the works of terrorists, should we judge Christianity by the Inquisition? Or Judaism by Palestinian genocide?


1. We shouldn't judge Islam by the works of terrorists, or the radical fringe.
2. No, Christianity, as a whole, shouldn't be judged by the Inquisition. Whichever religion sponsored the Inquisition should be judged by the Inquisition, and only so far as to what it was at that time. Christianity nowadays shouldn't be judged by actions from long ago that are no longer espoused, taken, or supported.




thompsonx -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 4:14:30 PM)

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

That brought it home because, good Christians can fight them with Jesus as the role model, and say, "Jesus wouldn't want this!"

So it was all the "good christians" who stoped the inquisition?
It was all the good christians who stopped the crusades?
It was all the good christians who stop those who would murder abortionist?
Christians are not a nickles worth different than any other religion. It is all about the benjamins and nothing more.





The Inquisition happened when an adult male had the education level of a 12 year old today.

Spanish inquisition 1478-1834. It would appear that you have less than the educational level of a 12 year old

The Crusades were BEGUN by Christians...your point? (Stupidity reigns in history).

So also in your posts

The number of (morons) who have stalked Planned Parenthood clinics (and killed people)....were not a group of "licensed" religious fuck for brains...they were were isolationists who were (much like you).....morons.

I am sure you would like to believe that but they do seem to have a relatively large and vocal posse...for which you seem to be a cheerleader.

Christians are different.They've learned (and they KNOW they were wrong)

So now they are fully cognizant of their stupidity...well that is comforting to some I would suppose.[8|]


and....the education levels available today are vastly different than 1,000 years previous.

Yours does not seem to have advanced much...considering the inquisition started a little over 500 years ago not 1000.[8|]




DesideriScuri -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 4:16:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

I think the only way to permanently rid ourselves of Violence in the name of Islam, is to prove that the violence isn't supported by the teachings of Islam

This will be extremely hard to prove since Islam was spread through violence by their Prophet.
I would just call them out on it, and demand that they stop following that specific Prophet! And find a more peaceful one to follow.
The interesting thing about Islam is, it's not like the bible. The Quran has Hadiths that will give real historical examples of what that verse exactly means. And it usually confirms what it means literally.
When I speak to moderate muslims about this, they denounce the hadiths. For them to modernise, they have to discount the hadiths so that they are free to re-interprete the Quran to their peaceful interpretation.

If Islam isn't a religion of violence, then there will be proof that it's not a violent religion. If there is proof that it is a violent religion, then we address it as such. I've heard it said that it is a religion of violence. I've heard that it is a religion of peace. I've heard that Islam calls for violence against non-Muslims. I've heard it doesn't.
I don't proclaim to know if it is or if it isn't. That's for religious scholars to figure out.

Actions speak louder than words. Over 90% of the boots on the ground fighting ISIS are worn by Muslims trying to stop this evil heresy.


I don't judge Muslims by actions taken by other Muslims. I will judge a Muslim his/her own actions.

Why are they fighting ISIS? Is it one sect fighting another sect over sectarian divisions (and I don't know the answer)? That'd hardly be supportive of Islam being a peaceful religion.




DesideriScuri -> RE: So . . . what do we do about Daesh? (12/5/2015 4:21:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
bama, ive posted to this effect before and it bears revisiting. the justifications/admonitions for the violence we see are integral to their holy writings.
im not aware of anyone in the muslim world looking at the violence done by fellow muslims, and judging those people as heretics.
by contrast, the violent ones are looking at the others and effectively judging them as apostates.


http://www.pri.org/stories/2015-11-18/muslim-condemn-isis-are-terrorists-apostates




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625