wannapleez
Posts: 358
Joined: 1/26/2009 Status: offline
|
This is an honest question. I truly am not trying to be a smartass or kinkier-than-thou. Putting this in "Ask A Mistress", as I'm primarily interested in Mistresses' views, but subs and slaves are welcome to chime in. I don't get the appeal of chastity devices (on a man). As best I can tell, they serve two purposes: 1) Growth Limitation If the guy is a grow-er and not a show-er, and the device is fitted to his smallest, any arousal would be uncomfortable (if not downright painful) and would remind him of his place and Mistress. I am a grow-er and not a show-er, and the one time that a chastity device was discussed with a Mistress, it was for this very purpose. She was into administering pain and that was the sole reason she was considering locking me up. She knew just the buttons to push to instantly arouse me -- even in just a chat or text message -- so it would have been very effective. But I also know of many guys who are in devices who are not grow-ers, so I'm not sure that that would be a factor. 2) Orgasm Denial This seems to be the device use that is most talked about, and this is the one that I really don't get. Now, let me start by saying that I am quite familiar with orgasm denial. Frustratingly so, at times. :) My first Mistress lived some distance from me, so we only were able to get together about every 3 weeks, but were at least able to make those times together last 24-48 hours. When we were together, the denial usually consisted of lots of edging (and sometimes LOTS of edging -- 100 times in a 24-hour period without a single orgasm). And when we were apart, there would be some edging in cam sessions, but mostly it was just a strict order not to cum. Any cumming that did happen without her permission was purely accidental when the edging pushed too hard. And then there was always punishment. (To be clear, it wasn't that I never came without her permission, but I considered myself lucky if it was more than once when we were together, and even once when we were apart.) While I do not compare subsequent Mistresses to her -- I learned this the hard way, but only needed one lesson -- much of my overall philosophy of the lifestyle can be attributed to my time with her. And so it's with this mindset that comes my confusion. If a Mistress does not want her slave to cum, shouldn't that be enough incentive for him not to cum? why is an artificial device required to ensure that? I know that my self-control isn't that strong. And besides which, the dynamic has always seemed to me to be very psychological. So obeying her orders (regardless of what they are) is very psychologically arousing. It just seems that cumming without permission is indicative of a sub-par relationship or something. Or did Mistress Robin just set the bar ridiculously high for me? :)
|