|
joether -> RE: The Nazi Leads the GOP Polls (12/6/2015 1:57:43 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thishereboi
Why would I put a bag over my head in shame. I am not in any way responsible for the actions of that ass any more than any other conservative is. Your problem is you see everything as us against them and seem to think everyone on the right thinks the same exact things and walks in lock step with each other. Occasionally you make a valid point but it get so lost in your walls of text that do nothing but prove what a pathetic little bigot you are.
Ironically, you have more 'Us verse Them' in many of your posts. I do it once and catch holy hell for it!
The majority of those asked sided with Mr. Trump over all the other possible candidates. The lower one's education, the more likely they were to vote for Mr. Trump. Meaning, the dumber and less schooled the individual, the more likely they were to ignorant to study Mr. Trump's language and thought processes to determine he is behaving more like a nazi than someone in favor of "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness".
The "...walls of text...." that you mention are to help you understand the thought process. That there is an argument and supporting information to that argument. Notice when most of the conservative on here attack me? Its like one sentence long. I'm allowed to assume pretty much anything I want, since they did not take the time or effort to clarify their viewpoint/position. Then they get all bitchy and call me names. Hey, they had all the time in the world to clarify position and viewpoint with supporting argument(s). They didn't; is that my fault?
If I was a bigot, I would be hating conservatives. I dont hate the majority of conservatives. Just the ones that behave like wannabe-tyrants and dictators. The majority of conservatives have managed to dumb themselves down. Its really be quite a mystery why they would allow that to happen. Old school conservatives are very intelligent and educated individuals. They too dislike the current 'crop' of GOP nomination candidates. But they are an ever shrinking minority against the tidal way of "Low Information Voters".
So why the "...wall of text..."? The hopes to some how inspire one or more to simply stop, look at things objectively, and decide if their argument really stacks up when the bullshit is removed. Yet, many non-old school conservatives plague this forum. They are not able to handle an in-depthc conversation on most topics. If the topic is not reduced to under 144 characters, they cant keep up. It is really sad to see so many conservatives (and even some liberals) whom desire a lack of information on a concept, rather than 'as much as possible', in order to arrive at a decision.
Study Mr. Trump's words and the tone of those words. Observe the actions of Mr. Trump up to this point in life. This is not an individual that gives me confidence based what I understand right now of them, in the position of President. It seems the more extreme the candidates must go to the right, the less confidence I have in their abilities. Mr. Huckbee, Mr. Cruz, and Mr. Jindal sat in on a lecture by a christian holy man stating that if we had a Republican candidate in office, we should kill millions of US Citizens because they are gay. The fact that none of these individuals spoke out to that sort of tyranny is very troubling. An there are plenty of individuals that would vote for any of these individuals, if that thought process were allowed to occupy the White House.
Yes, "Wall of Text" is intimidating to those not able to handle the concept. In one point of America's past, a length of words that could fill a small book were considered 'the norm', for a US President. They were required to show the nation what they would do, and exactly how that process would unfold. In 2015, Mr. Trump just has to say he has a 1900 character document for handling illegal immigrants. Yet anyone that read that 1900 character bullshit, understood it had many problems. All the conservatives on here didnt bother to read it; but took the man at his world. They were against the Iran Treaty; yet never read that document either. For 159 pages, its a pretty quick read. Rather interesting read as well. Then we get to 'The Big One' on this forum: The Affordable Care Act (i.e. Obamacare). I've had to correct their errors. Which really weren't errors. They listen to a one or two sentence line of bullshit from conservative media and thought it was factual. Came onto the form and got smacked down by myself. I not only showed and explain the law, I explained....WHY....it was there.
No doubtfully a few of them will attack me. They'll quote the whole thing and give a 'rebuttal' that is one to three sentences in length. A simple and easily defeated argument that has flimsy supporting information at best. Along with a pile load of insults and put downs. In other words, I'm being challenged by 40-70 year old (physically speaking) adults, whom have the mental and/or emotional level of a junior high school kid.
They do not understand nor like the President. He's something they are not: educated. Listening to the President can be quite interesting. I may not agree with his 'wall of text', but I often can understand how he arrived at the viewpoint. Conservatives can not understand the primary argument, nor the supporting. Its all just 'babble' and 'nonsense' to them. Ever watch a child as you explain the 2nd law of thermodynamics to them? Same idea. The difference is, the kid doesn't have the maturity to listen because of their physical age. Most conservatives hate Mr. Sanders and Mrs. Clinton because they are educated, mature, and reasonable. They want someone to talk to them like idiots rather than encouraging them to consider a choice with longs of good information at hand.
|
|
|
|
