tweakabelle
Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007 From: Sydney Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Cuckingcurious Czechoslovakia or Czecho-Slovakia[1] /ˌtʃɛkɵslɵˈvækiə/ or /-ˈvɑː-/[2][3] (Czech and Slovak: Československo, Česko-Slovensko)[4][5] was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918, when it declared its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire, until its peaceful dissolution into the Czech Republic and Slovakia on 1 January 1993. Now pay real good attention to this detail... Since history tends to repeat itself! With the collapse of the Habsburg monarchy at the end of World War I, the independent country of Czechoslovakia[1] (Czech, Slovak: Československo) was formed as a result of the critical intervention of U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, among others. The Czechs and Slovaks were not at the same level of economic and technological development, but the freedom and opportunity found in an independent Czechoslovakia enabled them to make strides toward overcoming these inequalities. However, the gap between cultures was never fully bridged, and this discrepancy played a disruptive role throughout the seventy-five years of the union. They split into their own two countries peacefully. Nothing was taken by force. The only real recent conflict was Kosovo and Bosnia which we all know what that was all about. Well some of us at least. The claim that was being disputed was your claim that: quote:
Cuckingcurious The [European] boundaries are set. I can't say that for the Muslim world. I pointed out that your claim was factually wrong, and offered the recent disappearance of two countries - Czechoslavakia and Yugoslavia - from the map of Europe to support my claim. Your latest post confirms the accuracy of my claim, and how incorrect your original claim was. So we agree that your claim was, as I pointed out in post 226, "just another fact-challenged self serving claim". Despite being caught out red handed in advancing either a downright lie or a factually incorrect claim, amazingly you seem to think that this puts you in a position where you can lecture those who have just corrected your lies/inaccuracies: ("Now pay real good attention to this detail .....). That's full marks for chutzpah but a big fat ZERO for credibility. I am still awaiting any evidence you may have to support your other claim that are "no go zones in Europe". Of course I am speaking rhetorically here as I don't expect you to produce any good evidence to support your claim because there aren't any no go zones in Europe, regardless of what Trump claims. But on the evidence to date we have established that you know little or nothing about the rest of the world. So perhaps you would be better off listening and learning instead of parading your ignorance and prejudice. That way you might actually learn a few facts about the subjects you feel able to pontificate about in such a fact-free manner. Who knows what might happen then? Perhaps, one day your posts might even cease being objects of derision, if that's not being too optimistic to be a realistic prospect.
_____________________________
|