RE: Pearl Harbor Day (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BamaD -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 10:42:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

This opens endless debate on IF the US was responsible for ending WW2.

In our history textbooks, they were hailed as saviours and the very reason WW2 ended. Of course because they attack the Japanese who are the main transgressors in Asia.

But on the internet, and in Europe and even in the US itself, they believe, it would have made no difference whether US interfered or not.

Gawd knows, who is right.



Winston Churchill had his first good nights sleep in over two years on Dec 7 1941. Some people are fools. Noone should claim that the U S won the war and everyone else were just supporting cast. However it is equally foolish to say that it made no difference. Austrailia was pretty much on their own and needed help, Midway broke the back of the Imperial Navy. Any claim that American manpower and production made no difference doesn't understand the war at all.
Saying this is not intended in any way to lesson the sacrifices made by all of the other countries involved in the war, everyone did as much as they could.
BTW saying the U S interfered is a bit of a misnomer since the Japanese attacked us, not the other way around.



Technically speaking, regardless of what history claims, Midway did not "break the back of the Imperial Navy."

Japan lost 4 first line fleet carriers, they had 3 left, with two more ready to launch.

What Midway did was break the "myth of invincibility" held by many Japanese Admirals. Isoroku Yamamoto figured he could give the Japanese Empire six months to a year of victories after Pearl Harbor.

But Midway was the third in a series of events that broke the mindset of the Imperial Navy Command.

First there was the Doolittle raid, then Coral Sea (a draw more or less,) then Midway.

But then, Nagumo had other problems besides the American carriers. He had senior staff screaming for a second strike on Midway, while none of them knew where the American Carriers were.

He expected at most 2 carriers, believing Yorktown sunk at Coral Sea.

And his staff were sure that the American Fleet could not be anywhere near Midway when they hit the island with the first attack.

When operation K failed because of an American seaplane tender at French Frigate Shoals, Yamamoto's first inclination was to call off the strike on Midway, but there was a screen of Japanese I boats between Midway and Pearl Harbor, the problem is that they got on station after the carriers passed the line.

The Japanese still had a very effective fleet in the Pacific, as proved with the battles around the Solomons.

The problem was that the Navy pulled the Carriers Wasp from the Atlantic, which put the fleets on equal terms as far as carriers went.

Even then, when the Hornet was sunk, followed a couple of months later by the Wasp, the Japanese still could have mounted a major strike against the Pacific Fleet, but by then Yamamoto was dead, and no one on the Imperial staff had the balls to take the risk.



OK I will go with that, Midway broke the will of the Imperial Navy.
The key to the victory was, as you know, the much malined intelligence services.




BamaD -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 10:44:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

LOL........what a total cock-up *smile*...............it sounds like something that could only happen in one of those cheesy old british comedies( 'The Mouse That Roared' maybe ?) but the denoument was horrific.

Foriegn office could have avoided it by sending the message tothe embassy just a couple of hours earlier, instead the gave the US a powerful propaganda point.




BamaD -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 10:47:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

I think that well past December 6 Bama, there were still quite a few Americans who didn't want to get involved. They just kept their heads down, their mouths shut and their opinions to themselves maybe ? *smile*.
From what I have read, the younger citizens and the working joes didn't mind getting into the big stoush but some of the older generation had seen it all before and didn't want any part of it and a number of the big businesses were making too much money to want to be anything but neutral.
Don't get me wrong; American war material helped Britain and her allies stay afloat and any of them who isn't grateful for that deserves to be speaking german as their first language but I remember my dad saying "Much as I dislike americans, THANK GOD FOR THE YANKS" He reckoned that if you hadn't come in when you did, WW2 would have ended very differently and WW3 was just around the corner for America

Corporate America made a ton of fucking money off Hitler and WWII. HERE

Nazi German had the 'best telephone system in Europe." How ? AT&T !! Nazi war trucks had Ford engineering and motors.

Standard Oil of NJ sold hi-test 'ethyl' gas to the Luffwaffe, or the bombers don't get off the ground. ($20 million worth)

Henry Ford got a German medal as did James Mooney a senior exec. of GM and Ford was one of Hitler's heroes. (1938)

How did German pay WWI war reparations (that was to take until 1988) and build up its military ? Western bankers and investors.

But Oh, that all changed we are told by 1939. Too late by then boys.

During a time when Time magazine naed Hitler man of the year and the world was busy pretending he wasn't a threat.




zombiegurlsos -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 11:41:05 AM)

it was all a US set up. The Japs were allowed to bomb Pearl Harbor




NorthernGent -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 1:38:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

This opens endless debate on IF the US was responsible for ending WW2.

In our history textbooks, they were hailed as saviours and the very reason WW2 ended. Of course because they attack the Japanese who are the main transgressors in Asia.

But on the internet, and in Europe and even in the US itself, they believe, it would have made no difference whether US interfered or not.

Gawd knows, who is right.



In many parts of Asia the Japanese were welcomed as liberators against Western Imperialism.

Also, in Europe?

In England, the intervention of the United States is not under-estimated.

They didn't lose 20 million people unlike the Russians, that's just a fact, but that doesn't at all mean that the US intervention made no difference.

It made a huge difference, as did the Americans and to a lesser extent the British supplying the Russians with food and armoured vehicles when the Russians were right in the shite without a pot to piss in around 1941/1942.




mnottertail -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 1:41:53 PM)

I will point out that MacArthur left most of the Japanese administrations in charge of conquered Asian territories, that didnt help, and that many Americans carried French or English weaponry during the war.


So, a mixed bag as always when you talk history.




Dvr22999874 -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 1:52:12 PM)

McArthur left them in charge because he had nobody of his own to put in their place and the Japanese had killed most of the civil administrators, so they wear the only option left at that time. It caused a lot of trouble and dissent with the locals.




mnottertail -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 1:55:42 PM)

Ja, they could have found somebody, hell, even trump would have been better than what occurred. But that is the only case.




jlf1961 -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 1:55:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

OK I will go with that, Midway broke the will of the Imperial Navy.
The key to the victory was, as you know, the much malined intelligence services.



Yup, the navy in Pearl were reading japanese intercepts and getting maybe one word in 10....

Midway was a guess, calculated and with good evidence, but a guess none the less.

The real cock up (to use the brit phrase) was Wake Island. After the first strikes, a relief force had been dispatched by the Pacific fleet consisting of the Enterprise, Lexington, and two transports with a total of three regiments of marines.

However, during a bombing raid, the radio shack took a direct hit and went off the air, so the relief force was recalled due to the belief that Wake had fallen.

Thus the question becomes:

If the relief force would have not been recalled and the reinforcements of men and aircraft would have been delivered, how would the first few months of the war gone?

The Japanese had no aircraft carriers at the Wake, depending on the bombers from their Marshal island bases for air cover.

The troops, the only troops that could be assigned to Wake was 2 battalions of Imperial Marines.

The Japanese also had no battle ships with the invasion fleet, just two heavy cruisers, which were outgunned by the four that had been dispatched from San Diego after the Pearl attack.

IF Wake had remained in American hands, it would have been perfect for the placement of the B17E's that were being ferried to Hickim by the Air Corps, thus the Marshals would have been untenable for the Japanese, they would not have had the forces for the Solomon campaign or the New Guinea operations, because of the existence of the forces at Wake.

Not getting the carriers at Pearl was one problem for the Japanese, even though it would have been temporary, Saratoga was nearing completion of refit in San Francisco, Wasp and two other carriers were in the Atlantic and via the Panama Canal arrived in Pearl a week after the attack.

This is not counting the fact that the Navy could have dispatched five Battleships from the Atlantic to the Pacific, after Nimitz arrived in Pearl, which he turned down. (why he never adaquately explained, since in essence, the Brits had the German navy bottled up with the exception of uboats.)

Then there were two new carriers that were launched within months of Pearl Harbor, those should have gone to the Pacific, but were held in the Atlantic, by order of FDR, who considered Germany the bigger threat.

Among other problems were the fact that FDR refused to allow the extra oilers and destroyers to return to the Pacific after Pearl Harbor keeping them instead for escort duty in the Atlantic.

Give you a few other Political points to consider:

1) for every DD or DE launched, one out of four went to the Pacific.
2) For every Gato class sub launched, 1 out of three was kept in the atlantic in the first year of the war.

Midway was considered the first "victory" of the Pacific war for the navy, however, by the time of midway, US subs had accounted for 3 cruisers, one small carrier, and over 95000 tons of Imperial shipping even with fucked up torpedoes that either did not explode or exploded early!

Now add to that the simple fact that except for very rare occasions, the Japanese never adopted the convoy system, American subs would patrol off the major ports of Japan and had a buffet of targets.

One more thing that you might want to look at.

Google Pappy Gunn.

That man took the manual for the B25 and used it for toilet paper. Did the same thing with the one for the A20.

He put so many fifty cal machine guns in the noses of those two types of bombers that when the pilot pressed the firing button, they threatened to stall the airplanes!!!

The concentrated fire would chew through the hulls of Japanese transports and destroyers like paper.

Then there were the real unsung heroes of the Pacific, the PT crews.

They were so feared by the Japanese destroyer crews in the Solomons that the PT crews were to be executed on sight if captured.

You see, I had one great uncle who flew in the Flying tigers, three in the marines and two in the navy in the Pacific and one on my dad's side that told me stories about how Patton's 7th armored crews stole bigger anti tank guns from the brits to put on Shermans (and one crew who tried unsuccessfully to mount a german 88 on one.)


The two navy uncles were at Pearl on the 7th. Assigned to the USS Nevada (which almost made it out of the harbor) and listening to them talk, the Nevada had she cleared the harbor would have blasted the entire Japanese navy to pieces.

Of the crew of the Arizona, there are three that were related to my grandmother, nephews.

There is not much about Pearl Harbor and the war in the Pacific that I have not heard first hand. I can point out every mistake in the movie Tora Tora Tora (if you watch really close, you can see three very modern Fletcher class destroyers complete with missiles.)





NorthernGent -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 1:56:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I will point out that MacArthur left most of the Japanese administrations in charge of conquered Asian territories, that didnt help, and that many Americans carried French or English weaponry during the war.


So, a mixed bag as always when you talk history.


Perhaps those are the small details.

I'm not so sure about WW2 but it's well documented that in 1916 the United States was not geared up to fight any sort of war in terms of the quality of its weapons and the size of its standing army, but it was American money, loaned not handed over granted, but then there's no such thing as something for nothing in this world; that enabled the British to borrow huge amounts from them to pass to the French and Italians to keep them fighting.

Certainly American resources played a significant role in the outcome of both wars.

And, we shouldn't forget that the Russians were being steam-rollered by the Germans. The two biggest encirclements of an army in history occurring outside Moscow and Kiev, and without American food and equipment to keep them going and the associated impact upon morale? Could have been the end.




thompsonx -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 4:08:32 PM)

It made a huge difference, as did the Americans and to a lesser extent the British supplying the Russians with food and armoured vehicles when the Russians were right in the shite without a pot to piss in around 1941/1942.

That is a little less than accurate mate. A little research could disabuse you of that notion. Lenningrad while under siege produced as much military hardware and the allies supplied to russia.




Dvr22999874 -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 4:17:34 PM)

Why were the Russians running convoys of food, arms and ammunition across Lake Ladoga when it was frozen then. Just to give the drivers something to do and stop them getting bored I guess. you've been reading selective propaganda again, haven't you Liberian ?




thompsonx -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 4:28:54 PM)

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Why were the Russians running convoys of food, arms and ammunition across Lake Ladoga when it was frozen then. Just to give the drivers something to do and stop them getting bored I guess. you've been reading selective propaganda again, haven't you Liberian ?

Food in arms out...not that hard to figgure out now is it...even for someone from idaho.





Tkman117 -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 4:58:47 PM)

FR

so given you guys are so up on the idea of remembering the bombing of a Navy installation I assume you'll also be in support of remembering the countless CIVILIANS who were nuked as "pay back" right?...[8|]




BamaD -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 5:48:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I will point out that MacArthur left most of the Japanese administrations in charge of conquered Asian territories, that didnt help, and that many Americans carried French or English weaponry during the war.


So, a mixed bag as always when you talk history.

The French weren't maling a lot of weapons at that time.
Initially we had lots of shortages. Why? Because though most of the thrities we thought that defence money was wasted money.




thompsonx -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 5:57:40 PM)

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Because though most of the thrities we thought that defence money was wasted money.


It still is wasted money.




kdsub -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 7:26:39 PM)

The British alone in 1941 supplied 30 percent of the total medium and heavy armor of the entire Russian army. This is not even counting the American contribution. The British also supplied aircraft making up 15 percent of the Russian air force. This is not even taking into account the raw materials supplied by the allies for Russian industry.The Soviet Union would have had a tough time surviving without this aid.

Butch




BamaD -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 8:05:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

OK I will go with that, Midway broke the will of the Imperial Navy.
The key to the victory was, as you know, the much malined intelligence services.



Yup, the navy in Pearl were reading japanese intercepts and getting maybe one word in 10....

Midway was a guess, calculated and with good evidence, but a guess none the less.

The real cock up (to use the brit phrase) was Wake Island. After the first strikes, a relief force had been dispatched by the Pacific fleet consisting of the Enterprise, Lexington, and two transports with a total of three regiments of marines.

However, during a bombing raid, the radio shack took a direct hit and went off the air, so the relief force was recalled due to the belief that Wake had fallen.

Thus the question becomes:

If the relief force would have not been recalled and the reinforcements of men and aircraft would have been delivered, how would the first few months of the war gone?

The Japanese had no aircraft carriers at the Wake, depending on the bombers from their Marshal island bases for air cover.

The troops, the only troops that could be assigned to Wake was 2 battalions of Imperial Marines.

The Japanese also had no battle ships with the invasion fleet, just two heavy cruisers, which were outgunned by the four that had been dispatched from San Diego after the Pearl attack.

IF Wake had remained in American hands, it would have been perfect for the placement of the B17E's that were being ferried to Hickim by the Air Corps, thus the Marshals would have been untenable for the Japanese, they would not have had the forces for the Solomon campaign or the New Guinea operations, because of the existence of the forces at Wake.

Not getting the carriers at Pearl was one problem for the Japanese, even though it would have been temporary, Saratoga was nearing completion of refit in San Francisco, Wasp and two other carriers were in the Atlantic and via the Panama Canal arrived in Pearl a week after the attack.

This is not counting the fact that the Navy could have dispatched five Battleships from the Atlantic to the Pacific, after Nimitz arrived in Pearl, which he turned down. (why he never adaquately explained, since in essence, the Brits had the German navy bottled up with the exception of uboats.)

Then there were two new carriers that were launched within months of Pearl Harbor, those should have gone to the Pacific, but were held in the Atlantic, by order of FDR, who considered Germany the bigger threat.

Among other problems were the fact that FDR refused to allow the extra oilers and destroyers to return to the Pacific after Pearl Harbor keeping them instead for escort duty in the Atlantic.

Give you a few other Political points to consider:

1) for every DD or DE launched, one out of four went to the Pacific.
2) For every Gato class sub launched, 1 out of three was kept in the atlantic in the first year of the war.

Midway was considered the first "victory" of the Pacific war for the navy, however, by the time of midway, US subs had accounted for 3 cruisers, one small carrier, and over 95000 tons of Imperial shipping even with fucked up torpedoes that either did not explode or exploded early!

Now add to that the simple fact that except for very rare occasions, the Japanese never adopted the convoy system, American subs would patrol off the major ports of Japan and had a buffet of targets.

One more thing that you might want to look at.

Google Pappy Gunn.

That man took the manual for the B25 and used it for toilet paper. Did the same thing with the one for the A20.

He put so many fifty cal machine guns in the noses of those two types of bombers that when the pilot pressed the firing button, they threatened to stall the airplanes!!!

The concentrated fire would chew through the hulls of Japanese transports and destroyers like paper.

Then there were the real unsung heroes of the Pacific, the PT crews.

They were so feared by the Japanese destroyer crews in the Solomons that the PT crews were to be executed on sight if captured.

You see, I had one great uncle who flew in the Flying tigers, three in the marines and two in the navy in the Pacific and one on my dad's side that told me stories about how Patton's 7th armored crews stole bigger anti tank guns from the brits to put on Shermans (and one crew who tried unsuccessfully to mount a german 88 on one.)


The two navy uncles were at Pearl on the 7th. Assigned to the USS Nevada (which almost made it out of the harbor) and listening to them talk, the Nevada had she cleared the harbor would have blasted the entire Japanese navy to pieces.

Of the crew of the Arizona, there are three that were related to my grandmother, nephews.

There is not much about Pearl Harbor and the war in the Pacific that I have not heard first hand. I can point out every mistake in the movie Tora Tora Tora (if you watch really close, you can see three very modern Fletcher class destroyers complete with missiles.)



They did however confirm with the water purification plant ploy.
As for breaking the will of the Japanese it should be noted that the four carriers lost at Midway were the cream of the crop. The Japanese considered them to be invicible.
From a technical asspect Midway was even worse.
The four engine Japanese scout plane at the begining was played by a C-130 and they frequently used clips of the wrong planes, notabley Wildcats were often played by Hellcats. And they used clips of diferent types of aircraft to protray the same aircraft in different parts of the same scene. The editors clearly did not know the difference between a Dauntless and a Devestator.
I agree with everything you said but earlier I was trying to be brief.




BamaD -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 8:08:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tkman117

FR

so given you guys are so up on the idea of remembering the bombing of a Navy installation I assume you'll also be in support of remembering the countless CIVILIANS who were nuked as "pay back" right?...[8|]

Don't start a fight unless you are willing to pay the price.
The moral of this is don't sucker punch a grizzley.




MrRodgers -> RE: Pearl Harbor Day (12/8/2015 10:20:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

I think that well past December 6 Bama, there were still quite a few Americans who didn't want to get involved. They just kept their heads down, their mouths shut and their opinions to themselves maybe ? *smile*.
From what I have read, the younger citizens and the working joes didn't mind getting into the big stoush but some of the older generation had seen it all before and didn't want any part of it and a number of the big businesses were making too much money to want to be anything but neutral.
Don't get me wrong; American war material helped Britain and her allies stay afloat and any of them who isn't grateful for that deserves to be speaking german as their first language but I remember my dad saying "Much as I dislike americans, THANK GOD FOR THE YANKS" He reckoned that if you hadn't come in when you did, WW2 would have ended very differently and WW3 was just around the corner for America

Corporate America made a ton of fucking money off Hitler and WWII. HERE

Nazi German had the 'best telephone system in Europe." How ? AT&T !! Nazi war trucks had Ford engineering and motors.

Standard Oil of NJ sold hi-test 'ethyl' gas to the Luffwaffe, or the bombers don't get off the ground. ($20 million worth)

Henry Ford got a German medal as did James Mooney a senior exec. of GM and Ford was one of Hitler's heroes. (1938)

How did German pay WWI war reparations (that was to take until 1988) and build up its military ? Western bankers and investors.

But Oh, that all changed we are told by 1939. Too late by then boys.

During a time when Time magazine naed Hitler man of the year and the world was busy pretending he wasn't a threat.

Irrelevant at best, propaganda at worst.

Rep. Louis McFadden would warn congress, that American’s were paying for Hitler’s rise to power. “After WWI, Germany fell into the hands of the German international bankers. Those bankers bought her and they now own her, lock, stock, and barrel. They have purchased her industries, they have mortgages on her soil, they control her productions, they control all her public utilities. The international German bankers have subsidized the present Government of Germany and they have also supplied every dollar of the money Adolph Hitler had used in his lavish campaign to build up a threat to the government of Bruening.

When Bruening fails to obey the orders of the German International Bankers, Hitler is brought forth to scare the Germans into submission. Through the Federal Reserve Board over 30 billions of American money has been pumped into Germany. You have all heard of the spending that has taken place in Germany, modernistic dwellings, her great planetariums, her gymnasiums, her swimming pools, her fine public highways, her perfect factories. All this was done on our money. All this was given to Germany through the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve has pumped so many billions into Germany that they dare not name the total.”


Time magazine and the media etc. were all part of the problem. That $30 billion, went to western industrialists and private bankers.

HERE




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875