|
Greta75 -> RE: Refugee Camps (12/10/2015 3:04:22 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mnottertail
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/wrjp255a.html
I dont think it is muslims we should ban until we figure out what is going on. We know what is going on, and muslims ain't even slightly in the running, here.
This is the intelligence my country has gathered.
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/singapore-sees-islamist-militancy-clear-present-danger-asia-192819080.html
Ng said that in the past three years the numbers of Islamic State sympathizers had exceeded the number of supporters al Qaeda had in the 10 years in which it was influential.
"And the returned fighters have come back and pledged allegiance to ISIS and the mission to form an Islamic caliphate in our part of the world," Ng said.
"They have sympathizers; they have foreign fighters who have been trained, have the motivation and the means, and who have a common vision. And so we look at this threat very carefully."Ng said members of Jemaah Islamiyah (JI), an al Qaeda offshoot that planned bomb attacks in Singapore in the early 2000s, had pledged allegiance to ISIS, as well as the Abu Sayyaf group in the Philippines.
"So the danger is a link up formalising of these loose groups into a force that will threaten our security and well being."
Seriously, we haven't had a islamic terrorist attack in our home ground yet, because it was always foiled before it could happen. We have been heavily about prevention. There are announcement in our train stations constantly, many ads put up about how to identify suspicious people, or suspicious item. People are encouraged to report anything suspicious, whether they are unsure if it really is or not. And it will be investigated.
What Donald suggest is a unpolitical correct way of prevention, as you guys don't even have the freedom to arrest terrorist suspect base on flimsy data, better to be safe but sorry.
Seems to have alot of red tape to do their jobs.
We don't have to ban Muslims, because, we can simply arrest those and put them in indefinite detention IF there is even remotely any sign, like their internet search history, or face book, that suggest they are radicalized.
We also got the Muslim community to take responsibility and put out a plan of action of how are they going to actively make sure their community do not get radicalized, we make it their responsibility to ensure so. But I guess by allowing them a little piece of their Sharia courts and a little governing among themselves, sets them up to be responsible for their little community too, since they are enforcing some muslim laws among themselves.
What I realise is, Muslim in the west only want to complain about discrimination but not interested in being part of the solution to prevent their fellow muslim people from being radicalised.
Part of these problems are the enabling of the west, the political correctness that enables them to shirk responsibility. This is an issue that needs to stop being skirted around IF anybody is serious about prevention.
Why does the west have to wait for an attack to happen before action is taken? And then Obama lamely saying, it's difficult to identify self-radicalized Muslims. It's difficult because it would be politically incorrect to profile them.
|
|
|
|
