LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: respectmen A quicky for now. I am too tired to go in-depth with replies but I am interested in replying to LPs fallacies in the next couple of days. It's really this simple, when you consent to joining a site like this, you are consenting to being exposed to sexual content that is not socially acceptable in the everyday world. You are consenting to be exposed to anti social behaviour which is simply BDSM. It's heavily anti social because people get sacked from their jobs for this. A quick word on this. As you know, I've worked HR before, and here in the States, you can *find* a reason to fire almost anyone. Somebody had better be the best dang employee on the planet to be able to prove that the underlying reason was their sexuality. This is an entirely separate thread, of course, but I think you might have seen my comments on this before. quote:
It's a hypocritical standpoint to not like certain anti social behaviours from a website and make that the reason to not accept it and ridicule others for it because it's anti social and because it doesn't suit you while accepting other anti social types of behaviours when it suits you, your sexual turn ons. Sorry. It's crap. Every kinky person is going to like the kinks they like and dislike the ones they don't. The ones they don't, they don't have to view, participate in, and even choose to enjoy with some people while not with others. quote:
When I mean accept it, I don't mean take the offer. In a kink community, I thought we should all be openly accepting towards others even if they are not your cup of tea. I don't know why people promote this fairy tale. I don't see you saying anything about, oh, how female supremacy is terribly acceptable for you. Do you hang around (sorry, bad pun) when folks are doing anal hook suspensions or are engaged in creating crown of thorn pics? How do you feel about the pro ana/mia folks or the feeders? Might want to be careful about throwing that word "hypocrite" around. quote:
If a pro domme or fin domme is entitled to only want a man's money on this site, why isn't a man entitled to only want his kinks fulfilled without any real relationship or friendship? I am not saying that I only want women for my sexual needs, but if a woman isn't judged for only wanting to exploit a man for his money through kinks, how is that any better than a man only wanting a woman for kinks and nothing more? Did you miss the part where I said that if you found that situation, that would be great? Have at it. Just realize that most women don't find males who only want their kinks satisfied to be what they are looking for. It's just not a high demand area. If you want to compare the two, you have to look at the factor that there is a demand for one and not the other. Nobody said you can't want what you want. At the same time, nobody has to give it to you, either. Just like I can't make you give me anything you don't want to give. quote:
I am not saying pro dommes aren't entitled here. They are, even that many men feel annoyed by them. Wonderful! I look forward to seeing your support on the matter in the various prodomme and fin kink threads in the future.
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|