MrRodgers
Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote:
ORIGINAL: kdsub Is this the case tried in the court of public opinion? If so there is only one acceptable outcome... guilty... Guilt before...during and after trial... It is not the officer on trial but the City of appeasement. He may be guilty... or innocent...it makes no difference... They will keep trying him and declaring miss trials until a guilty verdict comes back... the City cannot afford otherwise. Butch Since when has guilt or innocence ever made a difference ? Look at the literally dozens on death row that were innocent. How about all of those rape convictions later thrown out by DNA evidence ? Then maybe we should get rid of the police and the courts and just depend of mob "justice" .....or 'social media' Justice ? Rather we should rely upon what we have including all of the science that can be brought to bear upon guilt or innocence, and whether or not it's either prosecutorial misconduct, or social media, it'a all we've got and corruption is in the people involved...not some illusory sector of society like the court of public opinion, or what one can pick and choose to castigate. I mean one cannot have it both ways. If the court of 'public opinion' is at work here, why didn't that also corrupt the jury. I dare day that many more people were convicted of crimes for which they were innocent and because of the court of public opinion. And here was a jury that could no neither determine guilt or innocence, yet we are to believe has put the heat on prosecutors who are only now...victim to the court of public opinion. They only found out that the prosecutor was withholding information from the defense last week so yes they would only now be subjected to the court of public opinion. And there has been, to the best of my knowlege (of course I haven't been in contact with the judge) any attempt to find out what else they are withholding. The judge's public statement treated the part they got caught in as no big deal. Don't you think that prosecutorial misconduct is important even if the defendant is a cop? Yes but that has nothing to do with the 'court of public opinion.'
_____________________________
You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite. J K Galbraith
|