WickedsDesire
Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015 Status: offline
|
I was not being overly harsh eg DocStrange got it straightaway too, hence my reply was worded as it was and I should have charged Op for even that that’s despite my CFS and the impacts of 100s wasted clicks and reads on all sites. Wayward5oul My words are just fine. Many people understand them. I am sorry you do not. That particular sock is getting on my nerves lately. Philosophical debates can rage regarding whether a question is valid. I look at who is asking the question, in conjunction with the question they are asking. And yes ive been banned off that other sites forums, here and there, for stating the OP is a guy, pretending he is a women, house of cards 100s of friends, picture likes and comments…where they do nothing but allude to it being them and not one correction… now, how many genuine peoples time has he cost, suckered in? Do you think that is fair? But it’s been stated to me not my problem the question is valid. Whyso I have asked backed and usually get banned about there. Or your words are gibberish (aka too complex, subtle, allegorical, truisms and for I am (some) moderator who is a; liar cheat weasel, bad stereotype, do sod all about fakes and the genuine lives they ruin, ban thee. Wayward I have revisited my words regarding that particular OP and feel I have no need to change or correct them If there are any aspects of them you do not understand you can mail me privately Note 1 socks words were about origins Note 2 remnant of time has a plethora of meanings. Origin being its primary Note 3 Carl Sagan used we are star dust I use remnant of time which also translates too Supernova remnant Note 4 am glad you sided with Op and offered no correction apology. Note 5 When I am wrong, and that does happen I come back and publicly eat humble pie no matter the site I had a bit of time....and its Christmas day What I think should have happened The user deleted till he behaves most of the time...he may be honest and genuine I really do not know The thread deleted as its origins were not valid. Not well that user is king socky and it asks a valid question...now that's where the philosophical debate comes in..and it can easily be extrapolated to stolen picture brigade, pants on fire lot and so on..eg say I was married (omitted that fact everywhere) and started a thread whose sole purpose is me looking for attention, profile views mails.....how do I get my hole..would that thread be valid, or question? I am not here to write you a book or sit in judgement of the world or grey areas. I draw the line at people who think nothing at all of wasting genuine peoples time
|