quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
it was in post 23.. I may have a more liberal view of certain things than you but i have conservative views on other things..
BUT I AM NOT FUCKING STUPID TO SUGGEST SOMETHING AS STUPID AS NO BAIL FOR ANYONE.. (there, I feel a little better now)..
Do you really think I would want someone charged with crimes such as Dahlmer, or Manson or psychopaths like that out on the street with no bail? really, DS.. ok then, I guess what you are saying is that I gave you too much credit for thinking you have at least half a brain..

You only questioned if it made sense to me to place bail on minor offenses. You did not make any statement about keeping the bail system intact for more serious crimes.

In fact, you still haven't answered the question as to what you think the bail system is for. When I posted that skipping bail for minor offenses is different from scrapping the whole system, you only responded with aspersions.

You don't want people to twist your words? Choose them more wisely, and be more specific.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
it was in post 23.. I may have a more liberal view of certain things than you but i have conservative views on other things..
BUT I AM NOT FUCKING STUPID TO SUGGEST SOMETHING AS STUPID AS NO BAIL FOR ANYONE.. (there, I feel a little better now)..
Do you really think I would want someone charged with crimes such as Dahlmer, or Manson or psychopaths like that out on the street with no bail? really, DS.. ok then, I guess what you are saying is that I gave you too much credit for thinking you have at least half a brain..

You only questioned if it made sense to me to place bail on minor offenses. You did not make any statement about keeping the bail system intact for more serious crimes.

In fact, you still haven't answered the question as to what you think the bail system is for. When I posted that skipping bail for minor offenses is different from scrapping the whole system, you only responded with aspersions.

You don't want people to twist your words? Choose them more wisely, and be more specific.

You are getting as ridiculous as that one from AL.. so you can go on hide along with him..

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
it was in post 23.. I may have a more liberal view of certain things than you but i have conservative views on other things..
BUT I AM NOT FUCKING STUPID TO SUGGEST SOMETHING AS STUPID AS NO BAIL FOR ANYONE.. (there, I feel a little better now)..
Do you really think I would want someone charged with crimes such as Dahlmer, or Manson or psychopaths like that out on the street with no bail? really, DS.. ok then, I guess what you are saying is that I gave you too much credit for thinking you have at least half a brain..

You only questioned if it made sense to me to place bail on minor offenses. You did not make any statement about keeping the bail system intact for more serious crimes.
In fact, you still haven't answered the question as to what you think the bail system is for. When I posted that skipping bail for minor offenses is different from scrapping the whole system, you only responded with aspersions.
You don't want people to twist your words? Choose them more wisely, and be more specific.

You are getting as ridiculous as that one from AL.. so you can go on hide along with him..

Yay!!!! she put me on hide.

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)