RE: Second hand smoke (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


KatyLied -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 8:52:26 AM)

quote:

Could it just be that smokers are more interesting people..........? Could it just be that we smokers are the core of any social group and without us the non smokers cannot function? Does this mean that smoking really does make one chic, attractive and sophisticated?


I'm guessing it's because those who join you:
1) don't have asthma triggered by smoke
2) don't mind smelling like smoke





mistoferin -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 8:53:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen
In any case I'd really rather others didnt breathe my smoke - for goodness sake cigarettes cost a fortune; get your own!


Now THAT was funny [:D]




EnglishDomNW -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 8:59:37 AM)

Can we talk about something else, every time I read an anti-smokers complaints on here I light up a cigarette and blow smoke at their user names.

I blame them for aiding my addiction.




MistressLorelei -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 9:12:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EnglishDomNW

Can we talk about something else, every time I read an anti-smokers complaints on here I light up a cigarette and blow smoke at their user names.

I blame them for aiding my addiction.


lol.... you will learn when your screen is all stained wth yellow nicotine residue and you can no longer read our beloved comments.

Have fun.... glad we can  assist you in your addiction.  It's the least we can do as you try to kill us with your smoke.

<smiles>




MistressBG -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 9:54:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

What amuses me most as a smoker, is that when I show consideration for others (as I always do) and take my cigarette outside, I am inevitably joined by non smokers who want to talk to me! Same thing happens at work and in the pub; we smokers go outside to avoid harming others - and they come out to join us!

Why is this I wonder? Could it just be that smokers are more interesting people..........? Could it just be that we smokers are the core of any social group and without us the non smokers cannot function? Does this mean that smoking really does make one chic, attractive and sophisticated?

In any case I'd really rather others didnt breathe my smoke - for goodness sake cigarettes cost a fortune; get your own!

E

PS - Tongue in cheek folks, OK!?


I absolutely loved your post! lmao ... well, I must agree with you, when we go out for a smoke during our work day we always have a few non smokers hanging around us for conversation....and of course, every once in a while I get someone who will let me know the dangers of smoking...as I am trying to enjoy my cigarette, for goodness sake, this has got to be one of the most annoying things a person can do...please non-smokers, do not interrupt a smoker while they are enjoying a cigarrette or cigar to warn them of the dangers, everyone is fully aware of the dangers we do not need your warning! Let us be.




FelinePersuasion -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 9:57:28 AM)

*grinning cheekily* Pssst smoking is bad for you






Dtesmoac -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 11:29:03 AM)

Smokers - a question - I was running a training course and told the group they could have five minutes, one guy piped up he needed 10. After he explained why, I cut one of his cigerettes in half and told him he had 4 mins left........he seemed a bit put out.
How long does it take for one cig (fag) and how much do you / do you need to leave on the but / tip.  

Is there an Americans and a British meaning for the lst line...? lol 




marieToo -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 11:30:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressBG

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

What amuses me most as a smoker, is that when I show consideration for others (as I always do) and take my cigarette outside, I am inevitably joined by non smokers who want to talk to me! Same thing happens at work and in the pub; we smokers go outside to avoid harming others - and they come out to join us!

Why is this I wonder? Could it just be that smokers are more interesting people..........? Could it just be that we smokers are the core of any social group and without us the non smokers cannot function? Does this mean that smoking really does make one chic, attractive and sophisticated?

In any case I'd really rather others didnt breathe my smoke - for goodness sake cigarettes cost a fortune; get your own!

E

PS - Tongue in cheek folks, OK!?


I absolutely loved your post! lmao ... well, I must agree with you, when we go out for a smoke during our work day we always have a few non smokers hanging around us for conversation


Maybe they're just drawn to the color yellow.




happypervert -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 11:51:10 AM)

quote:

Could it just be that smokers are more interesting people..........?

Of course! That must be it! Smokers are the most fascinating people there are, or at least some psychologists think so according to this headline:

Mentally Ill Make Up Nearly Half Of U.S. Tobacco Market And Are Twice As Likely To Smoke As Non Mentally Ill Americans

Here's a link:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/11/001122144303.htm

Yup, I bet those chats when you're huddled outside with other smokers are REAL interesting!




ScooterTrash -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 5:43:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

Youre kidding me right?  Why do you think you "enjoy" it?   Would you still drink a can of ginger ale if the label said it contained arsenic, simply because you "enjoy" it?  I think you'd probably switch to lemonade, no? 

You enjoy smoking because it relieves your need for a fix.  It makes everything "right".  And you need a fix so badly that your willing to put up with the "enjoyment" of smelling, coughing, not being able to laugh without harking up lung meat, being yellow,  and living surrounded with butts and ashes.

If you want to analogize the enjoyment you get from a cigarette and the enjoyment you get from eating your favorite food, try going without your favorite food for a few days and see if it fucks you up.  Then go a couple days without the "enjoyment" of a cigarette and come back and argue that point.

Your agument about doing other things that may not be safe, does not change the fact that cigarette smoking is an addiction.  This is what really makes me shake my head.  There hasnt been a smoker yet on this board who can actually debate a statement about cigarette smoking without trying to justify their habit in their own minds by pulling in all kinds of other unsafe shit to compare it to.  If you want to argue the dangers of being flogged then argue that.  We are talking about cigarettes, not the danger in pesticide, not the danger in being flogged, not the danger in mountian climbing. 

Im not down on smokers ( I used to be one), Im down on the way you all work so hard to accept the addiction, that you wish you didnt have.


   Interesting how you try to come across as such an expert and you don't know me from adam. You don't have a clue what I want or don't want so don't try to say you do. Good for you that you quit, you apparently wanted to, that does not mean that the rest of the world shares your sentiments. You say you aren't down on smokers on one hand then seem to come across like some shrink who has everyone else figured out. Sorry to say missy, but you are so wrong. We are all adults and we really can make our own decisions..for better or for worse. I can tell you one thing though, it's people like you that make people like us keep smoking...at least we will have one less thing in common.
   As for the comparisons, I think what scares you is that it does make sense. Certainly we could say screw it,  we're going to smoke no matter what a portion of the populations says, but it lends more relevence to show example of how the entire anti-smoking crusade is nothing more than a witch hunt, in a large populus of witches (no offense to witches, just using that as an example). I don't have to justify what I do, I really don't care, smoking in public was accepted way before segregating the smokers from the non-smokers was. What I do care is that this, as well as any other form of personal expression is in peril because of the select groups that think everyone should be the same.




SirKenin -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 5:48:11 PM)

Scooter, I do not think that they think we all should be the same.  I think they view smokers as inferior, an easy target and finally that their rights supercede those of the smoker (which I do not want to make argument for or against).




MistressSassy66 -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 8:06:07 PM)

I would hope that all would agree that if it comes to someone having Asthma,COPD or
other breathing/health issues with second hand smoke they wouldnt smoke around them.

If you do know someone is apt to be ill and still smoke...welll then I would say your an Arsehole,yep thats right an Arsehole.If you think it should be your right to smoke in a restaurant where these people cant get away from it...yep your an Arsehole.If at an outdoor gathering you cant even blow your smoke in the other direction so its not in My face sending Me into a wheezing fit and in search of My inhaler...yep your an Arsehole.Even if its your house and your friend with COPD visits and you still smoke around them....you are most definitely an Arsehole.

I dont allow it in My house because My health is more important than their cancer stick.
My slave bishop is a smoker...she is not allowed to smoke in the house or cars.
I could command her to quit...but as a human being first she has the ability to make choices for herself.
While I dont make her quit...I do limit how many she gets.

I have told My friends if they want Me to visit they cant smoke while I am there and could you please open a window or two before I get there,anyone who is a true friend does it without hesitation.
And if they dont well guess they are not really a friend and I dont visit.




MistressLorelei -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 9:12:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ScooterTrash

  Interesting how you try to come across as such an expert and you don't know me from adam. You don't have a clue what I want or don't want so don't try to say you do. Good for you that you quit, you apparently wanted to, that does not mean that the rest of the world shares your sentiments. You say you aren't down on smokers on one hand then seem to come across like some shrink who has everyone else figured out. Sorry to say missy, but you are so wrong. We are all adults and we really can make our own decisions..for better or for worse. I can tell you one thing though, it's people like you that make people like us keep smoking...at least we will have one less thing in common.
   As for the comparisons, I think what scares you is that it does make sense. Certainly we could say screw it,  we're going to smoke no matter what a portion of the populations says, but it lends more relevence to show example of how the entire anti-smoking crusade is nothing more than a witch hunt, in a large populus of witches (no offense to witches, just using that as an example). I don't have to justify what I do, I really don't care, smoking in public was accepted way before segregating the smokers from the non-smokers was. What I do care is that this, as well as any other form of personal expression is in peril because of the select groups that think everyone should be the same.

It shouldn't have to be The Smokers vs. the Non-Smokers.  Why can't it be do as you please in your space, I will do as I please in my space,  and in the spaces we share as a society (that you choose to be a part of), we leave the conditions safe and free of harm so people can share public places.

No one has asked you to quit smoking.... just quit smoking in places that don't belong only to you.  You don't pee anywhere you feel like it, because it's not acceptable to those who share your world.

Smoking in public was commonplace once upon a time....  before people realized its harmful effects,  Should we release every disease, harmful chemical, drug, etc. back into society, because they were once deemed harmless before they were proven harmful?

I don't expect everyone to be the same... puff away,  But in society, there are rules we all must conform to as human beings when sharing mutual (public) space..

Those who don't want to be a part of the society they have chosen to live within should pick a different society, or stay home where they make their own rules.... rather than than have to abide by the societal rules which are necessary to keep the society civilized.

Is being civilized really so difficult?   





Chaingang -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/4/2006 9:45:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mistoferin
No actually none of them are on my ban list...you missed my point. I am not into banning things...or losing rights. I would prefer the government stay the hell out of my life. I stand on the side of adults being able to make their own choices. If I want to smoke a cigarette, I don't want there to be a law against it. If I want to eat a bloody red steak...I don't want there to be a law against it. If I want to eat my eggs sunny side up...I don't want there to be a law against it.


I found this interesting.

Who precisely is it that is arguing in favor of a ban on tobacco or cigarettes? I call straw man. It's easier by far for someone to attack the absurd notion that tobacco should be made illegal than for them to honestly address the ACTUAL finessed and well constructed argument that no one - not even a smoker - has absolute rights in a public space.

No one is calling for a ban on tobacco, raw eggs, steak, fatty foods, or any other such absurdity.

What has been challenged is that a smoker's rights take precedence in a public space. They don't. Everyone's rights in a public space are equal - and that means the right to be left alone from any kind of unwanted interference from another person. And yes, that can include smoking, or loud music, or any other such pollution to a settled environment. What I can assert is this: a minority individual's right to do a thing is always constrained by the will of the majority in a public space. Sure, all individual's have rights - but not rights that take precedence over the rights of others; they only have rights that can run concurrent to the rights of others. No one is allowed to cross the lines of another's rights.

In their own homes smokers can do as they please. And no one has said otherwise that I have noticed. No one is coming anywhere near the subject of making tobacco illegal. That subject is simply not under discussion here.

Nice try though.

P.S. Very well put, MistressLorelei. That's exactly the same idea I am trying to express above.





KatyLied -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/5/2006 2:15:13 AM)

quote:

Is being civilized really so difficult?   


Evidently.  The proof is in this thread.




ScooterTrash -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/5/2006 3:44:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressLorelei

Is being civilized really so difficult?   

Being civilized and respecting everyone else is rather simple actually. Having a civil discussion without having two sides attack each other and not look for common ground appears to be the tough part. I regret that issues such as this always end up in finger pointing and name calling, rather than trying to uncover viable solutions so that everyone feels their own personal idiosycracies are being respected. Being right or wrong is not an issue when is comes to topics such as this, learning how to coexist without infringing on each others space is the hard part. There really is a grey area, it doesn't always have to be black and white.




EnglishDomNW -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/5/2006 5:55:51 AM)

1) I love smoking
2) Non-smokers prefer fresh air

Therefore, when I'm smoking in a public place, go outside and enjoy the fresh air you love so much and let me enjoy my habit in peace.  That way I don't have to put up with the noise pollution of your complaints whizzing around my ears.

Everyone's happy. [;)]




MistressLorelei -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/5/2006 6:13:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ScooterTrash

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressLorelei

Is being civilized really so difficult?   

Being civilized and respecting everyone else is rather simple actually. Having a civil discussion without having two sides attack each other and not look for common ground appears to be the tough part. I regret that issues such as this always end up in finger pointing and name calling, rather than trying to uncover viable solutions so that everyone feels their own personal idiosycracies are being respected. Being right or wrong is not an issue when is comes to topics such as this, learning how to coexist without infringing on each others space is the hard part. There really is a grey area, it doesn't always have to be black and white.


I agree it's a gray area.  Unfortunately, wars start over those same gray areas.  Sometimes compromise is all that society has to offer.  Sometimes compromise sucks... I know I like things my own way... but the alternative to compromise when the need arises, isn't often pretty.

One world, yet somehow all of us have to share it.  It looks more impossible to do so with each passing day.





mistoferin -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/5/2006 6:31:38 AM)

You can call straw man all you like Chaingang. You chose to take one paragraph out of the context of an entire conversation and you're wondering why it seems absurd to you? The "conversation" between MistressLorelei and myself went like this....and I think that she understood where I was coming from just fine. Also, just for the record here...I have not once voiced an opinion on second hand smoke in this thread....nor have I even mentioned if I am a smoker or not...I was simply pointing out a possible repercussion that I see as a result of the direction the anti-smoking movement is going.

You can certainly disagree with me if you like, it's not going to change my mind. Howard Weyers of Weyco Insurance is a man that has been a business associate of mine. His first target was smoking...and he has been successful in his campaign against it in the workplace. So now you may be fully qualified for a postion with all the proper degrees and experience but turned away based simply on the fact that you are a smoker. You may be a faithful, long term employee who has devoted many years to your employer...and now your job is at jeopardy based on your smoking status. As I said, I know the man personally and I can tell you that his real pet peeve is obesity. He challenged smoking first because he felt it would get more support. He fully intends on tackling weight next. So the examples I used aren't so far fetched.

quote:

  
There seem to be smokers, non smokers....and then there are anti smoking fanatics. The whole issue is getting ridiculous. Companies can now fire you for smoking...or refuse to hire you in the first place based upon your smoking status. People are losing custody of their children because they are smokers. There are towns that are trying to become smoke free...so it won't even be legal to smoke inside your own home.

To the fanatics that are behind and pushing these movements....I would suggest you use caution. Right now it's smoking. The next item on the agenda is obesity. (Gosh I sure hope none of you anti smoking fanatics are carrying a few extra pounds) Soon there could come a day when you could walk back into your job after lunch and be fired because you were seen eating at Burger King. Not given a position because you didn't match the numbers on the height/weight ratio scale.

If we keep allowing our rights to be stripped from us...it won't be long before we don't have any left to fight for.

Mistress Lorelei:
So don't strip away the right of smokers' to smoke indoors.... Instead, strip away the non-smokers' rights to breathe safe indoor air?  That's the right you want?  You smoke, I choke... and all is right in the world.

I don't want rights to be stripped away.  I often speak about rights for minorities, abortion rights, etc. I, however, don't think it's fanatical to  place more importance in the right to breathe clean air, than the right to take clean air away from others.

When eating Burger King for lunch is proven to infringe on the rights of non-Burger King eating co-workers, as the greasy fat grams are filtered into the air and adding pounds and high cholesterol to others who didn't want to share the poor eating habits of another... you bet people would be complaining!
 

But it has already been proven. A diet high in fat causes major health problems in the long term. Heart disease and colon cancer leading the way. These diseases lead to higher health insurance premiums. Those costs are passed on to everyone, your co-workers, your neighbors and strangers who you've never even met....including me.

Mistress Lorelei:
I agree.... But then... smoking should be banned, right?  We know about the detrimental effects smoking has on those who do it... and our, as you said 'higher health insurance premiums' because of it.  And seat belts should be mandatory, because fatal accidents from non-seat belt wearers hikes up our auto insurance premiums as well, etc. 

Which rights are we wanting to protect again?  Based on your comment about heart disease and cancer causing you higher health premiums, I'd think smoking would be on the top of your ban list.


No actually none of them are on my ban list...you missed my point. I am not into banning things...or losing rights. I would prefer the government stay the hell out of my life. I stand on the side of adults being able to make their own choices. If I want to smoke a cigarette, I don't want there to be a law against it. If I want to eat a bloody red steak...I don't want there to be a law against it. If I want to eat my eggs sunny side up...I don't want there to be a law against it.

Mistress Lorelei:
I agree with you to a point, and agree to disagree about the rest.

I want rights and choices for all too.  I don't want to smoke, but if others want to, they should be able to anywhere, except in  public places where others are harmed directly and physically as smokers enjoy their right to smoke... and their "right" to harm others simultaneously.








marieToo -> RE: Second hand smoke (8/5/2006 8:28:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ScooterTrash

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

Youre kidding me right?  Why do you think you "enjoy" it?   Would you still drink a can of ginger ale if the label said it contained arsenic, simply because you "enjoy" it?  I think you'd probably switch to lemonade, no? 

You enjoy smoking because it relieves your need for a fix.  It makes everything "right".  And you need a fix so badly that your willing to put up with the "enjoyment" of smelling, coughing, not being able to laugh without harking up lung meat, being yellow,  and living surrounded with butts and ashes.

If you want to analogize the enjoyment you get from a cigarette and the enjoyment you get from eating your favorite food, try going without your favorite food for a few days and see if it fucks you up.  Then go a couple days without the "enjoyment" of a cigarette and come back and argue that point.

Your agument about doing other things that may not be safe, does not change the fact that cigarette smoking is an addiction.  This is what really makes me shake my head.  There hasnt been a smoker yet on this board who can actually debate a statement about cigarette smoking without trying to justify their habit in their own minds by pulling in all kinds of other unsafe shit to compare it to.  If you want to argue the dangers of being flogged then argue that.  We are talking about cigarettes, not the danger in pesticide, not the danger in being flogged, not the danger in mountian climbing. 

Im not down on smokers ( I used to be one), Im down on the way you all work so hard to accept the addiction, that you wish you didnt have.


 Interesting how you try to come across as such an expert and you don't know me from adam. You don't have a clue what I want or don't want so don't try to say you do. Good for you that you quit, you apparently wanted to, that does not mean that the rest of the world shares your sentiments. You say you aren't down on smokers on one hand then seem to come across like some shrink who has everyone else figured out. Sorry to say missy, but you are so wrong. We are all adults and we really can make our own decisions..for better or for worse. I can tell you one thing though, it's people like you that make people like us keep smoking...at least we will have one less thing in common.
   As for the comparisons, I think what scares you is that it does make sense. Certainly we could say screw it,  we're going to smoke no matter what a portion of the populations says, but it lends more relevence to show example of how the entire anti-smoking crusade is nothing more than a witch hunt, in a large populus of witches (no offense to witches, just using that as an example). I don't have to justify what I do, I really don't care, smoking in public was accepted way before segregating the smokers from the non-smokers was. What I do care is that this, as well as any other form of personal expression is in peril because of the select groups that think everyone should be the same.


Dear Trash:

You missed my point by about a million miles.  But somehow that doesnt surprise me much.

"Missy"




Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.298828E-02